https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100307
Bug ID: 100307
Summary: Wrong placement-new warning
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
--- Comment #3 from Alex Coplan ---
The above ICEs with just -O3 or -O2 -ftree-vectorize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100304
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100303
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||acoplan at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100306
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100299
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100306
Bug ID: 100306
Summary: aarch64: ICE (output_operand: invalid expression as
operand) during final
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100305
Bug ID: 100305
Summary: ICE in output_operand_lossage with -march=armv8.2-a
-O3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100292
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100289
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to rudi from comment #4)
> .x86_64-linux-gnu-bootstrap/x86_64-libreelec-linux-gnu/libgcc/config.log
> http://paste.ubuntu.com/p/Y6wFsSBdqv/
I wonder if you can attach this logfile in this bug ins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100284
--- Comment #7 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
Created attachment 50695
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50695&action=edit
preprocessed reproducer
$ ~/local/gcc-11.1.0/bin/gcc -march=armv8.2-a+sve -O3 -c bug.i
The bug has bee
ble-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-174-20210427141825-g37d2b98100c-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210427 (experimental) (GCC)
d=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld
--with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch
--prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r12-174-20210427141825-g37d2b98100c-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dushistov at mail dot ru
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100301
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100302
Bug ID: 100302
Summary: ICE in abs_hwi, at hwint.h:324
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100287
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
commit r12-178-gd91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
commit r12-178-gd91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100187
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
commit r12-178-gd91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100237
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
commit r12-178-gd91e7eab3a2c3957c2220ad71e62d9fc78cccb9b
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #5)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> > (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> > > when the type of __proj_val is an rvalue reference, we need to convert it
> > > to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94483
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100209
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100301
Bug ID: 100301
Summary: sum of __int128 - regression since 8.2
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100277
Eduard Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed.gcc at pobox dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #5 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> (In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> > when the type of __proj_val is an rvalue reference, we need to convert it to
> > rvalue for the next std::__invoke call: https://godb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102
Eduard Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed.gcc at pobox dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100300
Bug ID: 100300
Summary: compile-time infinite loop if using
execute_command_line
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100240
Eduard Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ed.gcc at pobox dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100299
Bug ID: 100299
Summary: cc1plus taking all RAM
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100298
Bug ID: 100298
Summary: noexcept is missing for thread::hardware_concurrency
clang refuses the code
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67762
--- Comment #7 from Evgeniy Dushistov ---
Here simple example extracted from Qt 6 git:
```
template
struct Prop {
void notify()
{
if constexpr (Signal != nullptr) {
}
}
};
class QObjectPrivate {
public:
s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571
--- Comment #11 from Mark J Olah ---
(In reply to Steve Kargl from comment #10)
> gfortran is mostly maintained by volunteers. I started fixing
> bugs 2 decades ago, because gfortran was the only Fortran compiler
> available for FreeBSD. I no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:21992a791aded6d818da39079546c067f3362e8b
commit r9-9469-g21992a791aded6d818da39079546c067f3362e8b
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571
--- Comment #10 from Steve Kargl ---
On Tue, Apr 27, 2021 at 06:03:16PM +, molah at ucar dot edu wrote:
> I would expect a compiler must do a reasonable job to compile correct Fortran
> code in a reasonable amount of time. The response for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e06c76270de946c56e9b38a7a87532d7eb72298a
commit r10-9773-ge06c76270de946c56e9b38a7a87532d7eb72298a
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100290
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6a94ee07e378632c4fcea2eead30a18ce15a6c3
commit r11-8310-gc6a94ee07e378632c4fcea2eead30a18ce15a6c3
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99683
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
commit r11-8309-g9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99200
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
commit r11-8309-g9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
commit r11-8309-g9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93383
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
commit r11-8309-g9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89565
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
commit r11-8309-g9532344edcf77c7c7b0fa5da31c1b9dd2850288e
Author: Patrick Palka
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100218
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5aee8c2a33ae0d3f375ed0ca6e03718b284d2574
commit r11-8308-g5aee8c2a33ae0d3f375ed0ca6e03718b284d2574
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100154
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3efd52599ae47e8084f9485cd4c84b17419273ba
commit r11-8307-g3efd52599ae47e8084f9485cd4c84b17419273ba
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot
gnu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100297
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100297
Bug ID: 100297
Summary: FAIL: gfortran.dg/allocatable_function_1.f90
gfortran.dg/reshape_8.f90
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98171
--- Comment #1 from David Edelsohn ---
gcc119 should be functioning again.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95549
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dje at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100274
--- Comment #2 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
The patch in comment#1 would turn the ICE into an accepts-invalid, since
we would only get a warning instead of an error. This happens because
the character length check in gfc_compare_actual_for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89096
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100293
--- Comment #3 from Brecht Sanders
---
My bad, yes I was using nvptx-tools (master from
https://github.com/MentorEmbedded/nvptx-tools).
my configure command for nvptx offload engine looks like this
./configure --prefix=/R/winlibs64_stage/inst_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92145
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37846c42f1f5ac4d9ba190d49c4373673c89c8b5
commit r12-175-g37846c42f1f5ac4d9ba190d49c4373673c89c8b5
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100296
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95942
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davem at devkitpro dot org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100246
Denis Excoffier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||g...@denis-excoffier.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100296
Bug ID: 100296
Summary: [10.x regression] offsetof with
non-constant-expression offset no longer accepted in
C++ mode
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100292
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100276
--- Comment #2 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Thomas Schwinge from comment #1)
> Yeah, sorry for that -- unfortunate difference in diagnostics for GCC build
> configuration without vs. with offloading enabled. [...] now resolved.
Namely by
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100293
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100276
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94177
David Edelsohn changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100293
--- Comment #1 from Brecht Sanders
---
Also tried with unpatched binutils 2.36.1, same outcome.
Building GCC targetting nvptx (--target=nvptx-none) also stops with the same
error. libatomic/config.log reports:
configure:3756: checking whether
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100295
Bug ID: 100295
Summary: Internal compiler error from generic lambda capturing
parameter pack and expanding it in if constexpr
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100279
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100294
Bug ID: 100294
Summary: need attribute takes_ownership
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88580
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37d2b98100cefcb9d312d379473c12aa6d61fc62
commit r12-174-g37d2b98100cefcb9d312d379473c12aa6d61fc62
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100290
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:85ef4b8d4eb3313a48b79c7e752891f9646bb246
commit r12-173-g85ef4b8d4eb3313a48b79c7e752891f9646bb246
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97571
--- Comment #9 from Mark J Olah ---
Thank you Karl and Jerry for the suggestions on transforming the code. It is
not my own code, and I cannot modify it. It is however correct Fortran code,
that currently builds fine with GCC 10.2.0, and all ot
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100293
Bug ID: 100293
Summary: MinGW-w64 of nvptx offload engine fails
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100284
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d0a57b030f1c7df33c6bc3c661d16c9cb79e96dd
commit r12-168-gd0a57b030f1c7df33c6bc3c661d16c9cb79e96dd
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100291
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Target Milestone|---
read model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 12.0.0 20210427 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100291
Bug ID: 100291
Summary: internal compiler error: trying to capture ‘this’ in
instantiation of generic lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100272
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2ae2a45c287d254c2890feff2cca46ed2ddb06ca
commit r12-167-g2ae2a45c287d254c2890feff2cca46ed2ddb06ca
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100161
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fb7c736c2f17ad054ee7815b688fa91135690f6d
commit r11-8306-gfb7c736c2f17ad054ee7815b688fa91135690f6d
Author: Marek Polacek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96380
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marek Polacek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af53e450e5c61e36bd01aa2db1251483a60be007
commit r11-8305-gaf53e450e5c61e36bd01aa2db1251483a60be007
Author: Marek Polacek
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94177
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Edelsohn :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a21b399708175f6fc0ac723a0cebc127da421c60
commit r12-165-ga21b399708175f6fc0ac723a0cebc127da421c60
Author: David Edelsohn
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97533
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
--- Comment #11 from Erik Schnetter ---
The number of active local variables is likely much larger than the number of
registers, and I expect there to be a lot of spilling. I hope that the compiler
is clever about changing the order in which expr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e89e883a450126d021874536ae102f60a1cacb78
commit r11-8303-ge89e883a450126d021874536ae102f60a1cacb78
Author: Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100200
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c0c371d0ea297af2e3180c64cd18f2bfce919b1
commit r12-164-g1c0c371d0ea297af2e3180c64cd18f2bfce919b1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100106
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100106
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Bernd Edlinger :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c33db31d9ad96f6414460315c12b4b505fad5dd7
commit r12-163-gc33db31d9ad96f6414460315c12b4b505fad5dd7
Author: Bernd Edlinger
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98952
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #4 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> when the type of __proj_val is an rvalue reference, we need to convert it to
> rvalue for the next std::__invoke call: https://godbolt.org/z/1G7aqxs3c.
So it seems the pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99277
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|12.0
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100249
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
(In reply to 康桓瑋 from comment #0)
> So I think it should be relatively safe to inline all std::__invoke calls.
I'm not sure we can inline these std::__invoke calls actually, because the
standard has strict
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100284
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
Ok, so Gilles: it would still be useful if you could attach a preprocessed
testcase and post the backtrace you're seeing with GCC 11.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90773
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3bb41228d76b3a3cbd9923d57388f0903f7683de
commit r12-162-g3bb41228d76b3a3cbd9923d57388f0903f7683de
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Mon Apr 26 15:3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|10.4
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100281
Andreas Krebbel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #50685|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99363
--- Comment #8 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
Shouldn't this be closed as fixed?
1 - 100 of 314 matches
Mail list logo
