[Bug ada/100559] New: Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 Bug ID: 100559 Summary: Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/100547] ICE with "-g -O1": stack overflow in expand with a very large vector_size attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100547 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Priority|P3

[Bug bootstrap/100552] [11/12 Regression] configure: 32208: Syntax error: Bad substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100552 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Keywords|

[Bug rtl-optimization/100554] [9/10/11/12 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure w/ -Os -fmodulo-sched -fno-tree-loop-optimize

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100554 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.4

[Bug c/100547] ICE with "-g -O1": stack overflow in expand with a very large vector_size attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100547 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 Petr Sumbera changed: What|Removed |Added Version|11.1.0 |unknown Target|sparc-solaris

[Bug tree-optimization/94589] Optimize (i<=>0)>0 to i>0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94589 --- Comment #21 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f5f1838435400b837c8677c53a611e2dc6d56442 commit r12-733-gf5f1838435400b837c8677c53a611e2dc6d56442 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug fortran/100555] [OPENMP] ICE in target parallel construct with if-clause

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100555 --- Comment #1 from xiao@compiler-dev.com --- Additionally, "implicit none" will lead errors if exists directive-name-modifier in if-clause. module m integer, save :: n = 4 end module program test use m use omp_lib implicit none

[Bug tree-optimization/100089] [11/12 Regression] 30% performance regression for denbench/mp2decoddata2 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089 --- Comment #3 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org --- Is this really a costing issue, or should we instead reject the BB fallback if it leaves any scalar COND_EXPRs around? This would be similar to the way that we reject IFN_MASK_LOAD/STORE call

[Bug tree-optimization/100089] [11/12 Regression] 30% performance regression for denbench/mp2decoddata2 with -O3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100089 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to rsand...@gcc.gnu.org from comment #3) > Is this really a costing issue, or should we instead reject the > BB fallback if it leaves any scalar COND_EXPRs around? This would > be similar to the

[Bug middle-end/100508] ICE with '-g -O3': in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.c:5618

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100508 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:19040050aa2c8ee890fc58dda48639fc91bf0af0 commit r12-736-g19040050aa2c8ee890fc58dda48639fc91bf0af0 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug bootstrap/100560] New: [13 regression] build/gengtype-state.o fails with clang 10.0.1: cannot specify -o when generating multiple output files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100560 Bug ID: 100560 Summary: [13 regression] build/gengtype-state.o fails with clang 10.0.1: cannot specify -o when generating multiple output files Product: gcc Vers

[Bug c/100547] ICE with "-g -O1": stack overflow in expand with a very large vector_size attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100547 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:229a6dbd9ef1680f1ca02d6ce63e8abdffaaeeba commit r12-737-g229a6dbd9ef1680f1ca02d6ce63e8abdffaaeeba Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug bootstrap/100560] [12 regression] build/gengtype-state.o fails with clang 10.0.1: cannot specify -o when generating multiple output files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100560 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd39327854de1d18110fada5f8a7a4630da6d144 commit r12-739-gdd39327854de1d18110fada5f8a7a4630da6d144 Author: Martin Liska Date: Wed

[Bug bootstrap/100560] [12 regression] build/gengtype-state.o fails with clang 10.0.1: cannot specify -o when generating multiple output files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100560 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/100561] New: Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 Bug ID: 100561 Summary: Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes) Product: gcc Version: og10 (devel/omp/gcc-10) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug debug/100515] [12 Regression] ICE in output_rnglists, at dwarf2out.c:12294 since r12-574-ge69ac0203725fb8d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100515 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Bernd Edlinger : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ecd1e6c894fbdbc10fdcfee419922b24e1115ee commit r12-740-g1ecd1e6c894fbdbc10fdcfee419922b24e1115ee Author: Bernd Edlinger Date:

[Bug middle-end/100562] New: ICE after commit a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100562 Bug ID: 100562 Summary: ICE after commit a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 --- Comment #1 from h0bb_88 at protonmail dot com --- Created attachment 50797 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50797&action=edit Source code

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 --- Comment #2 from h0bb_88 at protonmail dot com --- Created attachment 50798 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50798&action=edit Comparison between f90 result and bc computation

[Bug debug/100515] [12 Regression] ICE in output_rnglists, at dwarf2out.c:12294 since r12-574-ge69ac0203725fb8d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100515 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 --- Comment #3 from h0bb_88 at protonmail dot com --- System:Kernel: 5.8.0-53-generic x86_64 bits: 64 compiler: N/A Desktop: Cinnamon 4.8.6 wm: muffin dm: LightDM Distro: Linux Mint 20.1 Ulyssa base: Ubuntu 20.04 focal Machine:

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo --- breakpoint at tree-ssa.c:1013 error ("address taken, but ADDRESSABLE bit not set"); if ((VAR_P (base) || TREE_CODE (base) == PARM_DECL || TREE_CODE (base) == RESU

[Bug middle-end/100477] Bogus -Wstringop-overflow warning on memset

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100477 --- Comment #9 from andysem at mail dot ru --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #8) > > Submitting a bug for the LTO problem is only helpful if it comes with a test > case to reproduce it. I have heard about problems suppressing warnings

[Bug debug/100515] [12 Regression] ICE in output_rnglists, at dwarf2out.c:12294 since r12-574-ge69ac0203725fb8d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100515 --- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger --- Okay, while the ICE is fixed, there is something odd in the test case: foo._omp_fn.0: .LVL0: .LFB2: .cfi_startproc .file 1 "pr100515.c" .loc 1 10 5 view -0 ret .cfi_

[Bug target/100563] New: [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563 Bug ID: 100563 Summary: [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #6 from Jiu Fu Guo --- As Richard mentioned: one does mark the object addressable. Which is for 'label' (Gcc_backend::label_address). I'm wondering if all others invoking on build_fold_addr_expr_loc need to mark addressable?

[Bug c/100521] [12 Regression] ICE at -O2 and above: in verify_range, at value-range.cc:384 since r12-127-g694c956b6b877e48

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100521 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|ICE at -O2 and abov

[Bug ipa/100529] [11/12 Regression] ICE at -O3: in force_constant_size, at gimplify.c:733 since r11-4494-ga4223abb3deb24e8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100529 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/100530] [8/9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -g: in add_dwarf_attr with __seg_gs (Alternative address-space) global variable since r8-4385-ga297ccb52e0c894e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100530 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE with -g: in |[8/9/10/11/12 Regression]

[Bug c/100532] ICE: tree check: expected class ‘type’, have ‘exceptional’ (error_mark) in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.c:259

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100532 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- So you can try if the following fixes the bootstrap. diff --git a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc index 5d9dbb5d068..18673e54c96 100644 --- a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc +++ b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc @@ -1680,6 +1680,7

[Bug rtl-optimization/100539] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-dce" since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100539 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/100544] ICE: in default_conversion with destructor attribute at the top level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100544 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/100549] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault with __builtin_ia32_pcmpgtw128 since r12-110-gc54a9f7259fce1a2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100549 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/100550] [11/12 Regression] ICE: in fold_convert_loc with function call VLA argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100550 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug fortran/100551] [11/12 Regression] Passing return value of intrinsic to class(*) dummy argument can cause segfaults

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100551 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12 Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug middle-end/100556] ICE: in gimplify_expr with __transaction_atomic without -ftm

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100556 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug middle-end/100562] [12 Regression] ICE after commit a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100562 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Summary|ICE after commit

[Bug ada/100564] New: [12 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 Bug ID: 100564 Summary: [12 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] Broken Ada bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Priority|P3

[Bug target/100563] [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug middle-end/100562] [12 Regression] ICE after commit a076632e274abe344ca7648b7c7f299273d4cbe0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100562 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|NEW

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stefansf at linux dot ibm.com --- Comm

[Bug libstdc++/99327] ENOTSUP macro does not exist on djgpp crt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99327 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed in my fork: https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/93847c75473b3509c305e20b60ffe86b120b8e4b

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] valgrind complaints on gnat1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[12 Regression] Broken Ada |[12 Regression] valgrind

[Bug libstdc++/78113] std::variant and std::visit's current implementations do not get optimized out (compared to "recursive visitation")

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78113 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed in my fork (for visiting a single variant of up to 11 alternative types): https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/f5de3d9055e47b73cd1c4d35c235ebaa3f93a5e6

[Bug libstdc++/94418] Please make reverse_iterator nothrow constructible when possible

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94418 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- Specifically: https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/3e63e5a8f72caa3e700788dcbd959f7b738fb9d7

[Bug libstdc++/100153] Undefined behavior in stl_bvector.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100153 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- Fixed downstream (corrected URL): https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/9487ef2967f89f1cd25bcf4f922bd40ecf18e9ea

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] valgrind complaints on gnat1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 --- Comment #2 from Eric Botcazou --- Created attachment 50799 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50799&action=edit Tentative fix Please give it a try in your setup.

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- It looks like gfortran parses the constant in single-precision, which might be an issue with your fortran source.

[Bug libstdc++/90943] Visiting inherited variants no longer works in 9.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90943 --- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely --- Corrected URL for downstream fix: https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/486d89e403a18ef78f05f2efb1bc86bbd396899c

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96733] std::clamp for floats and doubles produces worse code than a combo of std::min / std::max

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96733 --- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely --- In my GCC fork I just switched clamp to use min and max unconditionally: https://gitlab.com/jonathan-wakely/gcc/-/commit/ec5ecc2e142fbb7fc532a5ef9527b61675bcbfc4

[Bug fortran/100561] Error while computing square of a real number (8 and 16 bytes)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100561 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- This is invalid because you wrote: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923 And not: 3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209749445923_16 The first is a real type

[Bug target/99988] aarch64: GCC generates excessive consecutive bti j instructions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99988 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Alex Coplan : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:419c243dfb9aba51aceb1370a241db082847eeb5 commit r10-9818-g419c243dfb9aba51aceb1370a241db082847eeb5 Author: Alex Coplan Date:

[Bug sanitizer/100439] stack overflow running ubsan

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100439 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- The test-case links to some static libraries: lib/libgmock_maind.a please provide full steps how to reproduce that?

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] valgrind complaints on gnat1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #2) > Created attachment 50799 [details] > Tentative fix > > Please give it a try in your setup. It helps! Thank you.

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-05-12 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] valgrind complaints on gnat1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Eric Botcazou : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac18ded230f1559f271f8d66121b2f16805f0b27 commit r12-744-gac18ded230f1559f271f8d66121b2f16805f0b27 Author: Bob Duff Date: Wed May

[Bug ada/100564] [12 Regression] valgrind complaints on gnat1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100564 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #3 from Petr Sumbera --- (cd /builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.1/components/gcc10/build/sparcv9 ; /usr/bin/env CONFIG_SHELL="/bin/sh" PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/usr/lib/sparcv9/pkgconfig" CC="/builds/psumbera/gcc10/bin/gcc" CXX="/builds/psumbe

[Bug c/100505] ICE: in record_in_finally_tree, at tree-eh.c:213

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100505 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Chengnian Sun from comment #2) > Should I avoid reporting test programs with __GIMPLE or __RTL? I think so, at least if you're just mass-generating them somehow. I think it's OK to report ICE

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou --- > (cd /builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.1/components/gcc10/build/sparcv9 ; > /usr/bin/env CONFIG_SHELL="/bin/sh" > PKG_CONFIG_PATH="/usr/lib/sparcv9/pkgconfig" > CC="/builds/psumbera/gcc10/bin/gcc" CXX="/buil

[Bug target/100563] [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rearnsha at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #5 from Petr Sumbera --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #4) > Thanks. What configure line do you use for the Intel build? (cd /builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.1/components/gcc10/build/amd64 ; /usr/bin/env CONFIG_SHELL="/bi

[Bug target/100563] [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563 --- Comment #2 from Richard Earnshaw --- Er, wow, I'm surprised this hasn't come up before. The problem is that the cstore_cc pattern in arm.md has no predicates on the operands and no constraints on the modes of those operands and yet it then

[Bug target/96005] Add possibility to use newer ptx isa

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96005 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- Created attachment 50800 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50800&action=edit Tentative patch

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > /builds/psumbera/userland-gcc-11.1/components/gcc10/gcc-11.1.0/configure > --prefix=/usr/gcc/11 --mandir=/usr/gcc/11/share/man --bindir=/usr/gcc/11/bin > --sbindir=/usr/gcc/11/sbin --libdir=/usr/gcc/11/lib

[Bug go/100537] Bootstrap-O3 and bootstrap-debug fail on 32-bit ARM after gcc-12-657-ga076632e274a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100537 --- Comment #9 from Jiu Fu Guo --- Yes, diff --git a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc index 5d9dbb5d068..32637a44af1 100644 --- a/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc +++ b/gcc/go/go-gcc.cc @@ -1680,6 +1680,7 @@ Gcc_backend::address_expression(Bexpression* bexp

[Bug tree-optimization/100519] ICE in insert_stmt_after, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100519 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd36bbb2281ada10b5e1df143ecf64b88cdb8119 commit r12-745-gcd36bbb2281ada10b5e1df143ecf64b88cdb8119 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100519] [11 Regression] ICE in insert_stmt_after, at tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1452

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100519 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 Priority|P3

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #7 from Petr Sumbera --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #6) > Have you made local modifications to the source code or is it pristine? No local changes. I wonder where i-cexten.ads is being modified...

[Bug target/100497] [OpenMP][nvptx] libgomp.c-c++-common/reduction-5.c - fails on some nvptx systems

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100497 --- Comment #12 from Tom de Vries --- After investigation by Tobias, this looks like an instance of PR96932.

[Bug target/96932] [nvptx] atomic_exchange missing barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96932 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug target/100563] [10/11/12 Regression] arm: ICE in arm_gen_dicompare_reg, at config/arm/arm.c:15976

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100563 Richard Earnshaw changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at g

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #8 from Eric Botcazou --- > No local changes. > > I wonder where i-cexten.ads is being modified... Unlikely I'd say. Could you go into the $(buildir]/gcc/ada directory and do: ls -l rts/i-cexten.ads ls -l rts_32/i-cexten.ads T

[Bug ipa/100539] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above with "-fno-dce -fno-inline-small-functions -fno-tree-dce" since r10-3311-gff6686d2e5f797d6

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100539 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|ipa Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/93385] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with u128 modulo at -O2 -fno-dce -fno-ipa-cp -fno-tree-dce

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93385 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||zhendong.su at inf dot ethz.ch --- Comme

[Bug target/99908] SIMD: negating logical + if_else has a suboptimal codegen.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8da3b309d8fb3ddec0b42218ca6762967b402dc3 commit r12-746-g8da3b309d8fb3ddec0b42218ca6762967b402dc3 Author: liuhongt Date: Wed Apr 7

[Bug target/99908] SIMD: negating logical + if_else has a suboptimal codegen.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908 --- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu --- Should be fixed in trunk.

[Bug target/99908] SIMD: negating logical + if_else has a suboptimal codegen.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908 --- Comment #7 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6) > Should be fixed in trunk. The original report was about arm. None of your changes are outside of the x86 backend, so no, this is not fixed for the original rep

[Bug target/99908] SIMD: negating logical + if_else has a suboptimal codegen.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99908 --- Comment #8 from Richard Earnshaw --- Never mind, the original reference to arm was not the 'arm cpu', my mistake.

[Bug target/96932] [nvptx] atomic_exchange missing barrier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96932 --- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #3) > Crossref: PR100497 - fails on Volta without > membar.sys; > before > atom.global.exch.b32 > > Unfortunately, compared to pre-Volta, it is very slow - membar.g

[Bug bootstrap/100552] [11/12 Regression] configure: 32208: Syntax error: Bad substitution

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100552 --- Comment #1 from Marius Hillenbrand --- Indeed, that line should not use the bash-specific pattern substitution and instead like this: diff --git a/gcc/configure.ac b/gcc/configure.ac index e9ba2af548a..4e788019d99 100644 --- a/gcc/configur

[Bug target/100565] New: [nvptx] Need configure options for misa default

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100565 Bug ID: 100565 Summary: [nvptx] Need configure options for misa default Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Compon

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] New: [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r11-2446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 Bug ID: 100566 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r11-2446 Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r11-2446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-code CC|

[Bug ada/100559] Solaris SPARC GCC 11.1 Ada build: i-cexten.ads:278:28: modulus exceeds limit (2 ** 64)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100559 --- Comment #9 from Petr Sumbera --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #8) > Unlikely I'd say. Could you go into the $(buildir]/gcc/ada directory and do: > ls -l rts/i-cexten.ads > ls -l rts_32/i-cexten.ads > They should not point to

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r11-2446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, on more reduced testcase from that it started already in r9-2635-g78ea9abc2018243af7f7ada6135144ac90c6ad27 (likewise at -O2): volatile int s, c; __attribute__((noipa)) void foo (void) { if (c++ >

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] [11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r9-2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.2|9.4 Summary|[11/12 Regressio

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r9-2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/100566] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Miscompilation of mausezahn since r9-2635

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100566 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- The r9-2635 change miscompiles it during PRE, [local count: 347387062]: j_7 ={v} s; if (j_7 == 0) goto ; [34.00%] else goto ; [66.00%] [local count: 291805133]: # i_8 = PHI <0(2), i_2(

[Bug target/98461] Suboptimal codegen for negating a movemask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461 --- Comment #15 from H.J. Lu --- Is this fixed now?

[Bug target/100336] file trunk/gcc/config/i386/i386-isa.def doesn't get installed ok ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100336 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug target/98461] Suboptimal codegen for negating a movemask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug other/98375] [meta bug] GCC 12 pending patches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98375 Bug 98375 depends on bug 98461, which changed state. Bug 98461 Summary: Suboptimal codegen for negating a movemask https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98461 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug preprocessor/100392] [11/12 Regression] compiling result of "g++ -E -fdirectives-only" causes "error: stray ‘#’ in program" if no newline at EOF

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100392 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6b664e2c4c127025e076d8b584abe0976694629 commit r12-748-gc6b664e2c4c127025e076d8b584abe0976694629 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: We

[Bug libstdc++/100567] New: views::take and views::drop should conditionally use _RangeAdaptor::operator()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100567 Bug ID: 100567 Summary: views::take and views::drop should conditionally use _RangeAdaptor::operator() Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

  1   2   >