https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100621
Bug ID: 100621
Summary: ranges::reverse_view fails to meet its complexity
requirements
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82134
David Blaikie changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dblaikie at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100598
--- Comment #3 from cqwrteur ---
I've seen the same issues.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290
--- Comment #16 from Andrew Pinski ---
I Have a new patch though I need to remove some code still.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100614
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100614
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|other |web
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski
Hey there,
I noticed that `liboffloadmic/configure' and
`liboffloadmic/plugin/configure' lack execute permissions (`644' instead of
`755'), and I was wondering if that was intended.
Thanks for your time and effort.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100620
Bug ID: 100620
Summary: ICE: in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2840
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619
Bug ID: 100619
Summary: ICE: in build_attr_access_from_parms, at
c-family/c-attribs.c:5038
Product: gcc
Version: tree-ssa
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Somehow I missed this when the report was originally filed. I'll take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100618
--- Comment #1 from Fangrui Song ---
Perhaps
-fsemantic-interposition=function,variable (default -fpic/-fPIC)
-fsemantic-interposition=variable (compatible with copy relocations but
enable function optimizations)
-fsemantic-interposition= (a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100618
Bug ID: 100618
Summary: Add a -fno-semantic-interposition variant which allows
variable interposition
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100616
--- Comment #1 from wang ivor ---
Seems like the same bug happens whenever you use a class template with a
non-type template argument in two modules with dependency. This seems to be a
pretty serious bug that renders non-type template argument b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100597
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100617
Bug ID: 100617
Summary: [modules] Exported namespace not visible from outside
when the module imports another module that declares
the same namespace
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100616
Bug ID: 100616
Summary: [modules] ICE when a class template taking a non-type
template argument is used both inside and outside the
defining module
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100615
Bug ID: 100615
Summary: analyzer failed to report leak in rxtxcpu's
parse_cpu_list
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan O'Connor
---
I was afraid you were going to say it's not a bug :-) That's why I reached out
to Nico, who was on the committee, and was one of the people who proposed
jthread.
My view, as a user, is that jthread sho
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100380
--- Comment #4 from Antoni ---
I just had a similar issue when developing a new feature for libgccjit and it
might be the same problem. If it is (I haven't checked in this case), here's
what's happening:
* The asm is replayed.
* The asm tries
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Are is the first argument in the pack,
Sorry, that was meant to say Arg0 not Are
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The standard could support this by saying that if the function object is a
pointer to member function then the requirement is
is_invocable_v, Arg0, stop_token, decay_t...> where Are
is the first argume
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100614
Bug ID: 100614
Summary: Missing mpfr 4 tarballs
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: other
Assignee
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't think this is valid.
The requirement for the constructor is is_invocable_v,
stop_token, decay_t...> which means the stop_token is passed to INVOKE
before the object, so it calls INVOKE(f, toke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100613
Bug ID: 100613
Summary: libgccjit should produce dylib on macOS
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: jit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
--- Comment #1 from Nils Gladitz ---
(In reply to Nils Gladitz from comment #0)
> Indicating that "Foo" is constructed more often than it gets destructed.
Sorry that of course was supposed to read:
Indicating that "Foo" is destructed more ofte
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan O'Connor
---
The std::jthread constructor does not support taking a pointer to a member
function that has, as a first argument, a std::stop_token.
In C++20, the new jthread class can accept a std::stop_token to aid
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100612
Bug ID: 100612
Summary: std::jthread can't be initialized with a pointer to a
member function taking a std::stop_token
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576
--- Comment #2 from Nils Gladitz ---
I opened bug 100611 for what I described above; assuming this is related but
distinct.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611
Bug ID: 100611
Summary: coroutines: destructor called too many times for
coroutine lambda stored object
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56457
Jan-Benedict Glaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jbg...@lug-owl.de
--- Comment #4 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100610
Bug ID: 100610
Summary: DWARF5, wrong include_directories[0] when building in
/
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100597
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ro at gcc dot gnu.org
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95833
Tony E Lewis changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||TonyELewis at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100597
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:af42043e6618e69187b47f37dac870763c01e20f
commit r12-809-gaf42043e6618e69187b47f37dac870763c01e20f
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: Sa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100342
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:425ad87dcfacbb326d8f448a0f2b4d6b53dcd98f
commit r12-808-g425ad87dcfacbb326d8f448a0f2b4d6b53dcd98f
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: S
38 matches
Mail list logo
