[Bug target/99293] Built-in vec_splat generates sub-optimal code for -mcpu=power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99293 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/99293] Built-in vec_splat generates sub-optimal code for -mcpu=power10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99293 --- Comment #3 from Michael Meissner --- Created attachment 50947 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50947=edit Proposed patch

[Bug inline-asm/100921] Inline assembly use of struct not counted as use for store elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100921 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug inline-asm/100921] New: Inline assembly use of struct not counted as use for store elision

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100921 Bug ID: 100921 Summary: Inline assembly use of struct not counted as use for store elision Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #7 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #6) > And LWG 3403 was fixed by r12-1228. Hey, Jonathan, thank you for your contribution to gcc. Regarding the implementation of LWG 3403, the return type of __int128 is

[Bug tree-optimization/25290] PHI-OPT could be rewritten so that is uses match

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25290 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |

[Bug tree-optimization/58195] Missed optimization opportunity when returning a conditional

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58195 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- Note the loop based one is a little more complex due to the way GCC IR handles overflow being wrapping or undefined; I am just going to fix the case where overflow is defined as wrapping. The other case

[Bug tree-optimization/100864] (a&!b) | b is not opimized to a | b for comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100864 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > You can possibly merge it with the That is where I put it already, the ... was actually that part. Obviously this was not a patch just showing what was done.

[Bug c++/84476] [[nodiscard]] ignored on virtual functions accessed through pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84476 --- Comment #6 from Martin Sebor --- The same problem applies to attribute noreturn (but not deprecated). Clang, ICC, and Visual C++ behave as expected in both cases, suggesting GCC should change.

[Bug c/100920] New: bogus warn on -Wscalar-storage-order

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100920 Bug ID: 100920 Summary: bogus warn on -Wscalar-storage-order Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c++/100919] multiple -Wdeprecated-declarations on a call to a deprecated member function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100919 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.2.0, 11.1.0, 12.0,

[Bug c++/100919] New: multiple -Wdeprecated-declarations on a call to a deprecated member function pointer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100919 Bug ID: 100919 Summary: multiple -Wdeprecated-declarations on a call to a deprecated member function pointer Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/70057] duplicate integer overflow diagnostic in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70057 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|5.3.0, 6.3.0, 7.0 |10.2.0, 11.1.0, 12.0,

[Bug tree-optimization/58073] Suboptimal optimisation of ((x & 0x70) == 0x00 || (x & 0x70) == 0x10 || (x & 0x70) == 0x20)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58073 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) > > And maybe even one like this (which will solve the issue sooner): > > (bit_ior > (cmp (bit_and @0 INTEGER_CST@2) INTEGER_CST@3) > (cmp @0 INTEGER_CST@5)))

[Bug c/69972] duplicate integer overflow diagnostic in constant expressions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69972 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed|2016-02-29 00:00:00 |2021-6-4 Known to fail|

[Bug target/100912] powerpc64le: ieee128 long double incorrectly printed when using shared libstdc++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100912 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-04

[Bug tree-optimization/58073] Suboptimal optimisation of ((x & 0x70) == 0x00 || (x & 0x70) == 0x10 || (x & 0x70) == 0x20) on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58073 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- #define shift 4 return ((mask(d) == (0x0 << shift)) || (mask(d) == (0x1 << shift)) || (mask(d) == (0x2 << shift))); static inline unsigned mask(const struct dentry

[Bug tree-optimization/51781] Missed optimization for ==/!= comparison type-sinking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51781 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/68557] Missed x86 peephole optimization for multiplying by a bool

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68557 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug ipa/67014] builtin_tolower is inefficient.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67014 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |ipa CC|

[Bug c++/100102] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102 --- Comment #21 from Eduard Rozenberg --- @ppalka Huge thanks for this fix - it's working well for me. Very happy to see the patch applied with no problems to gcc 10.3.0, because it could take several years until the OS and Nvidia support gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/65412] sequence of ifs not turned into a switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65412 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- clang decides at 4 to change it to a switch statement while GCC takes a few extra ifs to change it. Again this is heuristics at work. #define B(y) void f##y(void); #define B10(y) B(y##0) B(y##1)

[Bug tree-optimization/65412] sequence of ifs not turned into a switch statement

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65412 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/95502] ICE in gfc_check_do_variable, at fortran/parse.c:4446

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100918] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Naming a destructor as a qualified template-id results in bogus access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100918 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||8.5.0 Known to fail|

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #6 from Jonathan Wakely --- And LWG 3403 was fixed by r12-1228. I plan to backport these three patches too. Thanks for all the bug reports like this!

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e5f2425f80aedd00f28235022a2755eb46f310d commit r12-1227-g3e5f2425f80aedd00f28235022a2755eb46f310d Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug c++/100918] Naming a destructor as a qualified template-id results in bogus access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100918 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100918] Naming a destructor as a qualified template-id results in bogus access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100918 --- Comment #1 from Patrick Palka --- We began rejecting this starting with r9-4879. If we replace the explicit specialization of Inner::~Inner with a generic definition struct Outer { public: template struct Inner { ~Inner(); }; };

[Bug middle-end/100905] [OpenMP] ICE in convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, at tree-nested.c:1514 with 'omp loop' in Fortran internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100905 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/100918] New: Naming a destructor as a qualified template-id results in bogus access error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100918 Bug ID: 100918 Summary: Naming a destructor as a qualified template-id results in bogus access error Product: gcc Version: 11.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/100809] PPC: __int128 divide/modulo does not use P10 instructions vdivsq/vdivuq

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100809 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |meissner at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug testsuite/100168] Test gcc.dg/pr56727-2.c fails on power10 code generation

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100168 Michael Meissner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/100917] Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50946 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50946=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100917] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double real

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100917 Bug ID: 100917 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double real Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100916] Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50944 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50944=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100916] New: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100916 Bug ID: 100916 Summary: Bind(c): CFI_type_other unimplemented. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug fortran/100915] Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50942 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50942=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100915] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100915 Bug ID: 100915 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_FUNPTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely --- Ah yes, the __member_data and __adl_data concepts aren't decaying the result types.

[Bug fortran/100914] Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50940 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50940=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100914] New: Bind(c): errors handling complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100914 Bug ID: 100914 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug c/100913] New: cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913 Bug ID: 100913 Summary: cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ? Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/100905] [OpenMP] ICE in convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, at tree-nested.c:1514 with 'omp loop' in Fortran internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100905 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7070b31e12c18905ed0a60aaedd7a071aab5c60 commit r12-1226-gc7070b31e12c18905ed0a60aaedd7a071aab5c60 Author: Tobias Burnus Date:

[Bug d/100882] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 Iain Buclaw changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug d/100882] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b81bb0a6025588ac752cd78cce74ecf0d9ab4494 commit r9-9569-gb81bb0a6025588ac752cd78cce74ecf0d9ab4494 Author: Iain Buclaw Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100912] New: powerpc64le: ieee128 long double incorrectly printed when using shared libstdc++

able-bootstrap CC=gcc-11 CXX=g++-11 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20210604 (experimental) (GCC) - Build and run simple test program with the new compiler and libstdc++ ~/build/gcc> cat ~/test-ieee128.cpp #include using namespace std; int ma

[Bug d/100882] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dcc5cf980af747941b32fd16c1d6a07177a1a404 commit r10-9891-gdcc5cf980af747941b32fd16c1d6a07177a1a404 Author: Iain Buclaw

[Bug d/100882] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83f932f23cae74344ec9e67c76faf2f014857992 commit r11-8512-g83f932f23cae74344ec9e67c76faf2f014857992 Author: Iain Buclaw

[Bug d/100882] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.c:2755

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100882 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df3fbd5957f12927a459a2686f4eee55f66ec2f4 commit r12-1225-gdf3fbd5957f12927a459a2686f4eee55f66ec2f4 Author: Iain Buclaw Date: Fri

[Bug fortran/100911] Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50938 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50938=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100911] New: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100911 Bug ID: 100911 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling C_PTR Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug target/100909] [12 Regression] powerpc64le: Regression causing unexpected error with IBM long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100909 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/100910] Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50936 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50936=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/100910] New: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100910 Bug ID: 100910 Summary: Bind(c): errors handling long double complex Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug middle-end/100908] asan clobberes register asm variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100908 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug fortran/99839] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in inline_matmul_assign, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/99839] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in inline_matmul_assign, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e912880888f9529eb44e3456c4753fc556c63812 commit r9-9568-ge912880888f9529eb44e3456c4753fc556c63812 Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug middle-end/100908] asan clobberes register asm variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100908 --- Comment #1 from Andreas Krebbel --- https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc/2021-June/236269.html

[Bug c/100909] New: powerpc64le: Regression causing unexpected error with IBM long double

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100909 Bug ID: 100909 Summary: powerpc64le: Regression causing unexpected error with IBM long double Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/100893] Template argument conversion fails for dependant constant function pointer template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100893 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||rejects-valid

[Bug c++/100893] Template argument conversion fails for dependant constant function pointer template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100893 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6f8c9691495ad5a307db98dc19c3296ee4e6de64 commit r12-1224-g6f8c9691495ad5a307db98dc19c3296ee4e6de64 Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug middle-end/100593] [ELF] -fno-pic: Use GOT to take address of an external default visibility function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100593 --- Comment #11 from Fangrui Song --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10) > Is there something wrong or undesirable with making this under -fno-plt (or > the noplt attribute as in your example)? > > (after all, it is a kind of

[Bug c/100618] Add a -fno-semantic-interposition variant which allows variable interposition

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100618 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/100908] New: asan clobberes register asm variables

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100908 Bug ID: 100908 Summary: asan clobberes register asm variables Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/99839] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in inline_matmul_assign, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df45c5b83447a06e6b15c729807a17409c39ddff commit r10-9890-gdf45c5b83447a06e6b15c729807a17409c39ddff Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100907] Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50932 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50932=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug c++/100102] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.c:15310

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100102 --- Comment #20 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5357ab75dedef403b0eebf9277d61d1cbeb5898f commit r12-1223-g5357ab75dedef403b0eebf9277d61d1cbeb5898f Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug fortran/100907] New: Bind(c): failure handling wide character

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100907 Bug ID: 100907 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling wide character Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/100906] Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 --- Comment #1 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 50930 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=50930=edit C code for bind(c)

[Bug fortran/99839] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in inline_matmul_assign, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fdca7cfda7d49f3b252e79acc5933d764e7b77d commit r11-8511-g2fdca7cfda7d49f3b252e79acc5933d764e7b77d Author: Harald Anlauf

[Bug fortran/100906] New: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100906 Bug ID: 100906 Summary: Bind(c): failure handling character with len/=1 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c/100783] [10/11 Regression] ICE on attribute nonnull and erroneous type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100783 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| Summary|[10/11/12

[Bug fortran/99839] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in inline_matmul_assign, at fortran/frontend-passes.c:4234

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99839 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bee8619ad0ac3bd27b7c8dc5819b83a5e8e147a0 commit r12-1222-gbee8619ad0ac3bd27b7c8dc5819b83a5e8e147a0 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug c/100783] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE on attribute nonnull and erroneous type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100783 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5328cad24f7460a39b2def12bb9b62be36c92a54 commit r12-1221-g5328cad24f7460a39b2def12bb9b62be36c92a54 Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 --- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to M Welinder from comment #2) > I think the current magic-pointer code could be improved with something like > > template>> > bool operator< (..., T) = delete; Or another constructor

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||headch at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/99778] Spurious -Wzero-as-null-pointer-constant on three-way comparisons

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99778 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 --- Comment #3 from Jonathan Wakely --- This is a dup of PR 99778

[Bug middle-end/100905] [OpenMP] ICE in convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, at tree-nested.c:1514 with 'omp loop' in Fortran internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100905 --- Comment #1 from Tobias Burnus --- Tendative patch: --- a/gcc/tree-nested.c +++ b/gcc/tree-nested.c @@ -1484,6 +1484,7 @@ convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses (tree *pclauses, struct walk_stmt_info *wi) case OMP_CLAUSE_AUTO: case

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 --- Another trivial issue is that LWG 3403 is not implemented and the ranges​::​data is missing the decay-copy part, making it unable to work with the following type. struct A { int*&& data(); };

[Bug tree-optimization/100732] [11 Regression] ICE on sprintf %s with integer argument

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE with |[11 Regression] ICE on

[Bug tree-optimization/100732] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -Wall: in ao_ref_init_from_ptr_and_range, at tree-ssa-alias.c:824 since r11-959-gb825a22890740f34

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9816f509db4966fcb90ed3baab72cc6cd901f06c commit r12-1219-g9816f509db4966fcb90ed3baab72cc6cd901f06c Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug middle-end/100905] New: [OpenMP] ICE in convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, at tree-nested.c:1514 with 'omp loop' in Fortran internal procedure

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100905 Bug ID: 100905 Summary: [OpenMP] ICE in convert_nonlocal_omp_clauses, at tree-nested.c:1514 with 'omp loop' in Fortran internal procedure Product: gcc Version:

[Bug c/100719] missing -Wvla-parameter on a mismatch in second parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100719 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0| --- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor ---

[Bug c/100719] missing -Wvla-parameter on a mismatch in second parameter

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100719 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c6503fa93b5565c922f76611a55b0a53cd940a5f commit r12-1218-gc6503fa93b5565c922f76611a55b0a53cd940a5f Author: Martin Sebor Date:

[Bug libgcc/100904] New: [9/10/11 Regression] Wrong line location #include error "No such file or directory" – line + 1 [traditional mode as used by gfortran]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100904 Bug ID: 100904 Summary: [9/10/11 Regression] Wrong line location #include error "No such file or directory" – line + 1 [traditional mode as used by gfortran] Product: gcc

[Bug tree-optimization/100778] [11/12 Regression] Get SIGFPE on simple test with -fpe-trap=invalid and SLP vectorization ON, with gfortran 11.1.0 on x86_64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100778 --- Comment #7 from Gabrielle Hugo --- Dear Richard, Thanks a lot for confirming the bug, and for posting similar issue bugfix. Will be interesting to understand why SLP vectorization is still too aggressive. Gabrielle

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 --- Comment #2 from M Welinder --- IMHO, nullptr_t would not be an improvement here. We would still have the combination of: (1) Correct usage causing a warning (2) The warning hinting at using the incorrect nullptr instead. (3) po>> bool

[Bug libstdc++/100889] Wrong param type for std::atomic_ref<_Tp*>::wait

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100889 Thomas Rodgers changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED

[Bug target/100637] [i386] Vectorize 4-byte vectors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100637 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d7dae0eb366a88a1baba1857ecc54c09e4a520e commit r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a1baba1857ecc54c09e4a520e Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Fri

[Bug libstdc++/100824] ranges::size should treat the subexpression as an lvalue

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100824 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ee9548b36a7f17e8a63585b58f340c93dcba95d8 commit r12-1214-gee9548b36a7f17e8a63585b58f340c93dcba95d8 Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug libstdc++/100903] Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/100757] [12 Regression] arm: ICE (unrecognizable insn) with MVE VPSELQ_S since r12-834-ga6eacbf10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100757 --- Comment #10 from Christophe Lyon --- The problem is in vec-common.md: (define_expand "vcond_mask_" [(set (match_operand:VDQWH 0 "s_register_operand") (if_then_else:VDQWH (match_operand: 3 "s_register_operand")

[Bug middle-end/100898] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -O2: in gimple_call_arg_ptr, at gimple.h:3264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/100898] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE with -O2: in gimple_call_arg_ptr, at gimple.h:3264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100898 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE with -O2: in|[9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE

[Bug libstdc++/100903] New: Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100903 Bug ID: 100903 Summary: Bogus "zero as null pointer constant" warning Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/100820] [12 regression] bootstrap hangs during stage2 on power 10

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100820 seurer at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/100902] pointer attachment issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100902 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org,

  1   2   >