[Bug target/101053] Incorrect code at -O1 on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101053 --- Comment #9 from Gilles Gouaillardet --- And here is the one-liner to fix this mess --- orig/OpenBLAS-0.3.15/kernel/arm64/dznrm2_thunderx2t99.c 2021-05-03 06:50:22.0 +0900 +++ OpenBLAS-0.3.15/kernel/arm64/dznrm2_thunderx2t99.c

[Bug libstdc++/101056] std::compare_partial_order_fallback missing the constraint of "F < E is well-formed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056 --- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 --- This is not a bug, it's just that LWG3465 has not been implemented yet.

[Bug tree-optimization/101031] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- Interestingly the bogus store removal happens in the strlen pass. > diff -u b/a-t3.c.190t.dom3 b/a-t3.c.191t.strlen1 --- b/a-t3.c.190t.dom3 2021-06-14 08:59:33.483709029 +0200 +++ b/a-t3.c.191t.strlen1

[Bug c++/101038] ice in vect_optimize_slp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c++/101040] [11/12 Regression] Internal compiler error: in get_or_insert_ctor_field, at cp/constexpr.c:3571 since r11-7980-gc3d3bb0f03dbd025

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101040 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW CC|

[Bug target/101053] Incorrect code at -O1 on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101053 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |MOVED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101043] ICE in check_noexcept_r for lambda conditional noexcept via requires expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101043 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug libstdc++/101056] std::compare_partial_order_fallback missing the constraint of "F < E is well-formed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Last

[Bug libstdc++/101055] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/101046] ICE: in gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR, at emit-rtl.c:6031 with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101046 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug target/101045] config/i386/subst.md: 76: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101045 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/101031] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08ce1f4c5091b80b680d15c53a17237544a3cca8 commit r12-1419-g08ce1f4c5091b80b680d15c53a17237544a3cca8 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug libstdc++/101049] std::variant: missed optimization in std::visit() on more than one variant

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101049 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I don't see how this can be done in the library though, so component=libstdc++ seems wrong. Probably a dup of PR 86912 See also PR 78113

[Bug target/101046] ICE: in gen_rtx_CONST_VECTOR, at emit-rtl.c:6031 with -mavx512vbmi -mavx512vl

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101046 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51005 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51005&action=edit gcc12-pr101046.patch Untested fix. For ops that have different mode of the arguments from the result mode, su

[Bug target/101058] New: [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 Bug ID: 101058 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Ke

[Bug target/101059] New: v4sf reduction not optimal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101059 Bug ID: 101059 Summary: v4sf reduction not optimal Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: target Assi

[Bug target/101045] config/i386/subst.md: 76: possible cut'n'paste error ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101045 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- subst.md is just fine, and it is unclear why Coverity thinks there is any copy and paste error, this is all generated code and matches what should be generated.

[Bug middle-end/100810] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-397-gda9e6e63d1ae22e530ec7baf59f6ed028bf05776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/101001] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needs-bisection | CC|

[Bug debug/100852] [11 Regression] -fcompare-debug failure (length) with -Og -fif-conversion -fno-tree-ccp -fno-tree-copy-prop

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100852 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] |-fco

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Summary|should use

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/101031] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libstdc++/101060] New: ‘fenv_t’ has not been declared in ‘::’ in 11.1, but is declared in 10.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101060 Bug ID: 101060 Summary: ‘fenv_t’ has not been declared in ‘::’ in 11.1, but is declared in 10.3 Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug tree-optimization/101061] New: tree-vrp misoptimization on skylake+ using union-based aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061 Bug ID: 101061 Summary: tree-vrp misoptimization on skylake+ using union-based aliasing Product: gcc Version: 8.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101061] tree-vrp misoptimization on skylake+ using union-based aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061 --- Comment #1 from Alexander Grund --- Created attachment 51006 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51006&action=edit compressed preprocessed source

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-14 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1) > You forgot to mention -msse2 which is also required to reproduce it. No, I don't need it for some reason: $ gcc --version gcc (GCC) 12.0.0

[Bug libstdc++/101060] ‘fenv_t’ has not been declared in ‘::’ in 11.1, but is declared in 10.3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101060 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:917efba2dd4ff34336d0d3aa55285ae22503e4aa commit r12-1420-g917efba2dd4ff34336d0d3aa55285ae22503e4aa Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- You have that -march=x86-64 in there which implies -msse2...

[Bug tree-optimization/101062] New: wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062 Bug ID: 101062 Summary: wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug middle-end/101063] New: #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON: wrong code generation: instructions leading to side effects may not be generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063 Bug ID: 101063 Summary: #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON: wrong code generation: instructions leading to side effects may not be generated Product: gcc Version: 11.1.

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-06-14 Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek --- I have tried: --- gcc/config/i386/mmx.md.jj 2021-06-11 11:32:35.813981393 +0200 +++ gcc/config/i386/mmx.md 2021-06-14 13:37:01.483325198 +0200 @@ -3370,7 +3370,9 @@ (match_operand:V2HI 2 "

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4f1bbed3d0184955d39adf0be287667891baf83 commit r11-8567-gc4f1bbed3d0184955d39adf0be287667891baf83 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5) We can split directly to sse2_pshuflw_1, avoiding mmx_pshufw_1. These two actually generate the same instruction (PSHUFLW) when XMM registers are involved.

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek --- Sure, your patch looks much better.

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, when this *punpckwd define_insn_and_split handles all possible constant permutations for V2HImode, shouldn't ix86_vectorize_vec_perm_const say so: case E_V2HImode: if (!TARGET_SSE2)

[Bug middle-end/101063] #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON: wrong code generation: instructions leading to side effects may not be generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063 --- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse --- > Note 1: Under -Wall gcc generates warning: > :5: warning: ignoring '#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS' [-Wunknown-pragmas] That seems like a huge hint, this is not implemented in gcc. You can find several existing P

[Bug c++/99910] [11/12 Regression] g++.dg/modules/xtreme-header-2_b.C ICE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910 Christophe Lyon changed: What|Removed |Added Target|cris-elf|cris-elf armeb CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8) > --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c > +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c > @@ -2379,12 +2379,15 @@ jump_thread_path_registry::duplicate_thread_path > (edge entry,

[Bug debug/101064] New: long compile time in var_tracking for Go package

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064 Bug ID: 101064 Summary: long compile time in var_tracking for Go package Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8) > Though, when this *punpckwd define_insn_and_split handles all possible > constant permutations for V2HImode, shouldn't ix86_vectorize_vec_perm_const > say so: >

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 --- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 > > --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment

[Bug libstdc++/101056] std::compare_partial_order_fallback missing the constraint of "F < E is well-formed"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b76a529c095f076c4780df0c913cf6d2391bcbc9 commit r12-1425-gb76a529c095f076c4780df0c913cf6d2391bcbc9 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/101065] New: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus" when compiling some malformed code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101065 Bug ID: 101065 Summary: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus" when compiling some malformed code Product: gcc Version:

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/101055] [11/12 Regression] should use __has_cpp_attribute() with __ prefixed/suffixed names

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||http://bugzilla.opensuse.or

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek --- And maybe for V2SImode too, though haven't verified that.

[Bug c/101066] New: Wrong code after fixup_cfg3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066 Bug ID: 101066 Summary: Wrong code after fixup_cfg3 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: wrong-code Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug libstdc++/101034] wrong constraint in std::any's constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14f26c75d255ef05b706a12d25b003da8a2f5b45 commit r12-1430-g14f26c75d255ef05b706a12d25b003da8a2f5b45 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:788bb7edb3975b80c4cb16323e7a5e55a2471e46 commit r12-1432-g788bb7edb3975b80c4cb16323e7a5e55a2471e46 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/100934] [9/10/11 Regression] wrong code at -O3 during unrolling since r9-6299

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail|12.0|11.1.0 Summary|[9/10/11/12

[Bug c/100913] cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12d13cf50fe68c898ee65d71d1ba9cdb3ea07996 commit r12-1433-g12d13cf50fe68c898ee65d71d1ba9cdb3ea07996 Author: Tobias Burnus Date: M

[Bug middle-end/100944] missing -Warray-bounds accessing a flexible array member of a nested struct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100944 --- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor --- The front end does complain but only with -Wpedantic.

[Bug c/100913] cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug other/89863] [meta-bug] Issues in gcc that other static analyzers (cppcheck, clang-static-analyzer, PVS-studio) find that gcc misses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863 Bug 89863 depends on bug 100913, which changed state. Bug 100913 Summary: cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ? https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/101067] New: SFINAE Out-of-line Function Definition not Matching Declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101067 Bug ID: 101067 Summary: SFINAE Out-of-line Function Definition not Matching Declaration Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/101034] wrong constraint in std::any's constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:028fd30231ea8a5ddea5525851ed93e0bc658a23 commit r11-8569-g028fd30231ea8a5ddea5525851ed93e0bc658a23 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wa

[Bug analyzer/101068] New: Analyzer does not purge constraints in loops (e.g. in explode-2.c)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101068 Bug ID: 101068 Summary: Analyzer does not purge constraints in loops (e.g. in explode-2.c) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- I was using pr87993.f90 from the testsuite... ;-) The fix is simple enough: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c index a37ad66..a9518e7 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Corrected patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056160.html

[Bug fortran/100683] Array initialization refuses valid

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683 --- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa --- Created attachment 51010 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51010&action=edit Patch and changelog

[Bug libstdc++/100940] views::take and views::drop should not define _S_has_simple_extra_args

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.2 --- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka

[Bug fortran/101069] New: ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069 Bug ID: 101069 Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Componen

[Bug c++/101070] New: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101070 Bug ID: 101070 Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/101071] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_constructor, at gimplify.c:5228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071 Bug ID: 101071 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_constructor, at gimplify.c:5228 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: n

[Bug c++/101072] New: [11/12 Regression] ICE in build_target_expr_with_type, at cp/tree.c:845

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101072 Bug ID: 101072 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in build_target_expr_with_type, at cp/tree.c:845 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93bfadf3a1db7d73e9ca4a4a3d40f7f81ea16d39 commit r12-1435-g93bfadf3a1db7d73e9ca4a4a3d40f7f81ea16d39 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug c++/101073] New: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6941

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073 Bug ID: 101073 Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6941 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug libstdc++/100894] The std::common_reference implementation seems to be wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Assignee|unassigned at gc

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug tree-optimization/101062] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/101052] Suggest stdlib.h when exit(1) is called

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052 --- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant --- Amazing 1-day turnaround, thank you Jonathan!

[Bug tree-optimization/101062] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Actually, with noinline,noclone,noipa it started already with r0-102336-g8f0fe813790d58066714c8f38f4916925c83517d

[Bug tree-optimization/101062] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- And union U { signed b : 5; }; int c; volatile union U d[7] = {{8}}; short e = 1; __attribute__((noipa, noinline, noclone)) void foo () { d[6].b = 0; d[6].b = 0; d[6].b = 0; d[6].b = 0; d[6].b = 0

[Bug libstdc++/101034] wrong constraint in std::any's constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d29239bd2e90b4d0af6608c01c1a1a40d617f3 commit r10-9914-gb0d29239bd2e90b4d0af6608c01c1a1a40d617f3 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/100982] wrong constraint in std::optional::operator=

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37864c5e6aa6befc17051f162c02d4f593a57e57 commit r10-9915-g37864c5e6aa6befc17051f162c02d4f593a57e57 Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/101034] wrong constraint in std::any's constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4986946f3b761dd4c3e0d79ca735c90e33f4bb83 commit r12-1436-g4986946f3b761dd4c3e0d79ca735c90e33f4bb83 Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Mon

[Bug tree-optimization/101062] [10/11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder -frename-registers"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug target/101058] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770 since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 Alejandro Colomar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug fortran/101069] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC

[Bug fortran/79524] [9/10/11/12 Regression] valgrind error for gcc/testsuite/gfortran.dg/fimplicit_none_2.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment

[Bug pch/64117] warning control #pragmas in precompiled headers are not obeyed for template code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117 --- Comment #7 from Alejandro Colomar --- Oops, sorry, I meant the previous comment for another bug. I don't know if it's solved or not in gcc-11

[Bug preprocessor/89808] An option to disable warning "#pragma once in main file"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808 Alejandro Colomar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com --- C

[Bug middle-end/101063] #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON: wrong code generation: instructions leading to side effects may not be generated

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c/29186] optimzation breaks floating point exception flag reading

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29186 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug fortran/101069] ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069 --- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz --- Oops, indeed.

[Bug libstdc++/100894] The std::common_reference implementation seems to be wrong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak

[Bug c++/101071] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_constructor, at gimplify.c:5228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5

[Bug c++/101071] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in gimplify_init_constructor, at gimplify.c:5228

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4 Summary|[9/10/11/12 Reg

  1   2   >