https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101053
--- Comment #9 from Gilles Gouaillardet
---
And here is the one-liner to fix this mess
--- orig/OpenBLAS-0.3.15/kernel/arm64/dznrm2_thunderx2t99.c 2021-05-03
06:50:22.0 +0900
+++ OpenBLAS-0.3.15/kernel/arm64/dznrm2_thunderx2t99.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
--- Comment #1 from 康桓瑋 ---
This is not a bug, it's just that LWG3465 has not been implemented yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Interestingly the bogus store removal happens in the strlen pass.
> diff -u b/a-t3.c.190t.dom3 b/a-t3.c.191t.strlen1
--- b/a-t3.c.190t.dom3 2021-06-14 08:59:33.483709029 +0200
+++ b/a-t3.c.191t.strlen1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101038
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101040
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101053
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101043
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101046
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101045
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:08ce1f4c5091b80b680d15c53a17237544a3cca8
commit r12-1419-g08ce1f4c5091b80b680d15c53a17237544a3cca8
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101049
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see how this can be done in the library though, so component=libstdc++
seems wrong.
Probably a dup of PR 86912
See also PR 78113
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101046
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 51005
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51005&action=edit
gcc12-pr101046.patch
Untested fix. For ops that have different mode of the arguments from the
result mode, su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
Bug ID: 101058
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2770
since r12-1215-g8d7dae0eb366a88a
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101059
Bug ID: 101059
Summary: v4sf reduction not optimal
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101045
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
subst.md is just fine, and it is unclear why Coverity thinks there is any copy
and paste error, this is all generated code and matches what should be
generated.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100810
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101001
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression]
|-fco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.0
Summary|should use
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101031
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101060
Bug ID: 101060
Summary: ‘fenv_t’ has not been declared in ‘::’ in 11.1, but is
declared in 10.3
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
Bug ID: 101061
Summary: tree-vrp misoptimization on skylake+ using union-based
aliasing
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
--- Comment #1 from Alexander Grund ---
Created attachment 51006
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51006&action=edit
compressed preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #1)
> You forgot to mention -msse2 which is also required to reproduce it.
No, I don't need it for some reason:
$ gcc --version
gcc (GCC) 12.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101060
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:917efba2dd4ff34336d0d3aa55285ae22503e4aa
commit r12-1420-g917efba2dd4ff34336d0d3aa55285ae22503e4aa
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
You have that -march=x86-64 in there which implies -msse2...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
Bug ID: 101062
Summary: wrong code with "-O2 -fno-toplevel-reorder
-frename-registers"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063
Bug ID: 101063
Summary: #pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS ON: wrong code generation:
instructions leading to side effects may not be
generated
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-14
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I have tried:
--- gcc/config/i386/mmx.md.jj 2021-06-11 11:32:35.813981393 +0200
+++ gcc/config/i386/mmx.md 2021-06-14 13:37:01.483325198 +0200
@@ -3370,7 +3370,9 @@
(match_operand:V2HI 2 "
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4f1bbed3d0184955d39adf0be287667891baf83
commit r11-8567-gc4f1bbed3d0184955d39adf0be287667891baf83
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #6 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
We can split directly to sse2_pshuflw_1, avoiding mmx_pshufw_1. These two
actually generate the same instruction (PSHUFLW) when XMM registers are
involved.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sure, your patch looks much better.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Though, when this *punpckwd define_insn_and_split handles all possible constant
permutations for V2HImode, shouldn't ix86_vectorize_vec_perm_const say so:
case E_V2HImode:
if (!TARGET_SSE2)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063
--- Comment #1 from Marc Glisse ---
> Note 1: Under -Wall gcc generates warning:
> :5: warning: ignoring '#pragma STDC FENV_ACCESS' [-Wunknown-pragmas]
That seems like a huge hint, this is not implemented in gcc. You can find
several existing P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|cris-elf|cris-elf armeb
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
> +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-threadupdate.c
> @@ -2379,12 +2379,15 @@ jump_thread_path_registry::duplicate_thread_path
> (edge entry,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101064
Bug ID: 101064
Summary: long compile time in var_tracking for Go package
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #9 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #8)
> Though, when this *punpckwd define_insn_and_split handles all possible
> constant permutations for V2HImode, shouldn't ix86_vectorize_vec_perm_const
> say so:
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #10 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Mon, 14 Jun 2021, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
>
> --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101056
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b76a529c095f076c4780df0c913cf6d2391bcbc9
commit r12-1425-gb76a529c095f076c4780df0c913cf6d2391bcbc9
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101065
Bug ID: 101065
Summary: "internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal
terminated program cc1plus" when compiling some
malformed code
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101055
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||http://bugzilla.opensuse.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And maybe for V2SImode too, though haven't verified that.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101066
Bug ID: 101066
Summary: Wrong code after fixup_cfg3
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:14f26c75d255ef05b706a12d25b003da8a2f5b45
commit r12-1430-g14f26c75d255ef05b706a12d25b003da8a2f5b45
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:788bb7edb3975b80c4cb16323e7a5e55a2471e46
commit r12-1432-g788bb7edb3975b80c4cb16323e7a5e55a2471e46
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|12.0|11.1.0
Summary|[9/10/11/12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12d13cf50fe68c898ee65d71d1ba9cdb3ea07996
commit r12-1433-g12d13cf50fe68c898ee65d71d1ba9cdb3ea07996
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100944
--- Comment #2 from Martin Sebor ---
The front end does complain but only with -Wpedantic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89863
Bug 89863 depends on bug 100913, which changed state.
Bug 100913 Summary: cppcheck: 2 * pointless new assignments in the parser ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100913
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101067
Bug ID: 101067
Summary: SFINAE Out-of-line Function Definition not Matching
Declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:028fd30231ea8a5ddea5525851ed93e0bc658a23
commit r11-8569-g028fd30231ea8a5ddea5525851ed93e0bc658a23
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101068
Bug ID: 101068
Summary: Analyzer does not purge constraints in loops (e.g. in
explode-2.c)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #7 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
I was using pr87993.f90 from the testsuite... ;-)
The fix is simple enough:
diff --git a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c b/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
index a37ad66..a9518e7 100644
--- a/gcc/fortran/resolve.c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #8 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Corrected patch posted:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056160.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #9 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa ---
Created attachment 51010
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51010&action=edit
Patch and changelog
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
--- Comment #6 from Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069
Bug ID: 101069
Summary: ICE in gfc_resolve_expr, at fortran/resolve.c:7087
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Componen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101070
Bug ID: 101070
Summary: ICE: Error reporting routines re-entered.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071
Bug ID: 101071
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
gimplify_init_constructor, at gimplify.c:5228
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101072
Bug ID: 101072
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in build_target_expr_with_type,
at cp/tree.c:845
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:93bfadf3a1db7d73e9ca4a4a3d40f7f81ea16d39
commit r12-1435-g93bfadf3a1db7d73e9ca4a4a3d40f7f81ea16d39
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101073
Bug ID: 101073
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in
cxx_eval_constant_expression, at cp/constexpr.c:6941
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Assignee|unassigned at gc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101052
--- Comment #5 from Jonny Grant ---
Amazing 1-day turnaround, thank you Jonathan!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Actually, with noinline,noclone,noipa it started already with
r0-102336-g8f0fe813790d58066714c8f38f4916925c83517d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
And
union U { signed b : 5; };
int c;
volatile union U d[7] = {{8}};
short e = 1;
__attribute__((noipa, noinline, noclone)) void
foo ()
{
d[6].b = 0;
d[6].b = 0;
d[6].b = 0;
d[6].b = 0;
d[6].b = 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b0d29239bd2e90b4d0af6608c01c1a1a40d617f3
commit r10-9914-gb0d29239bd2e90b4d0af6608c01c1a1a40d617f3
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100982
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37864c5e6aa6befc17051f162c02d4f593a57e57
commit r10-9915-g37864c5e6aa6befc17051f162c02d4f593a57e57
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101034
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4986946f3b761dd4c3e0d79ca735c90e33f4bb83
commit r12-1436-g4986946f3b761dd4c3e0d79ca735c90e33f4bb83
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101058
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79524
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64117
--- Comment #7 from Alejandro Colomar ---
Oops, sorry, I meant the previous comment for another bug. I don't know if
it's solved or not in gcc-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89808
Alejandro Colomar changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colomar.6.4.3 at gmail dot com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101063
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pavel.morozkin at gmail dot com
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101069
--- Comment #2 from G. Steinmetz ---
Oops, indeed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100894
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wak
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101071
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |10.4
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Reg
1 - 100 of 146 matches
Mail list logo