https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101080
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 101080 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101080
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> But it's a nice testcase.
The other PR has basically the same testcase even already and about the same
size.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
Alexander Grund changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|8.4.0 |8.5.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101083
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4e56b1347687a33efa47d13d357ae3b7ab759c99
commit r12-1493-g4e56b1347687a33efa47d13d357ae3b7ab759c99
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|FIXED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101014
--- Comment #8 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 51027
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51027&action=edit
Another test-case
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101083
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101086
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46235
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3155d51bfd1de8b6c4645dcb2292248a8d7cc3c9
commit r12-1525-g3155d51bfd1de8b6c4645dcb2292248a8d7cc3c9
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed Ju
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #7 from Jim Walker ---
Thanks for the fast work on this issue. How does it work for gcc bugs in terms
of getting into a release? Would there be a 10.x release that includes this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101087
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
It's only fixed on trunk so far, which will become the 12.1 release in 10-11
months.
It's a regression, so either the compiler fix should get backported to the
release branches (including the gcc-10 branc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101089
Bug ID: 101089
Summary: [OpenMP] Diagnostic difference with clang
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
--- Comment #11 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, alexander.gr...@tu-dresden.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
>
> --- Comment #9 from Alexander Grund ---
> > Note that when the union type is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
--- Comment #12 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, alexander.gr...@tu-dresden.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
>
> Alexander Grund changed:
>
>What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Grund ---
> But what you can see is that the resulting pointer is used for the
> initialization and not the placement address as literally written in source.
So I assume it was supposed to be "Y::Y (D_6557, 1);"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986
commit r12-1526-g43fc4234ad3d9302d3460385b6fdb5e3f59b6986
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||101025
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101025
Bug 101025 depends on bug 101088, which changed state.
Bug 101088 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in sm_seq_valid_bb, at
tree-ssa-loop-im.c:2383
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101088
What|Removed |A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4b50bf2864e09f028a39a3f460222632c4d7348
commit r12-1527-gb4b50bf2864e09f028a39a3f460222632c4d7348
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
Bug ID: 101090
Summary: incorrect -Wunused-value warning on remquo with
constant values
Product: gcc
Version: 9.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101091
Bug ID: 101091
Summary: std::views::take and std::views::drop are
overconstrained
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101092
Bug ID: 101092
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101092
--- Comment #1 from Heinrich Heinzer ---
Created attachment 51029
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51029&action=edit
source file that triggers the bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101091
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Gałecki ---
Consider the following example: https://godbolt.org/z/YYzqWaM9G
#include
#include
#include
void copy_drop_n1(const std::vector& src, std::vector& dest,
std::size_t n) { // size_t - na
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101093
Bug ID: 101093
Summary: C++20 Module ICE cannot define 'enum class
std::align_val_t' in different module
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
--- Comment #14 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 16 Jun 2021, alexander.gr...@tu-dresden.de wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101061
>
> --- Comment #13 from Alexander Grund ---
> > But what you can see is that th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101092
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||heinrich.heinzer at gmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7deee423f993bee8ee440f6fe0c9126c316c64b
commit r12-1529-gd7deee423f993bee8ee440f6fe0c9126c316c64b
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100453
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101094
Bug ID: 101094
Summary: [11 regression] 'Enum_Rep returns a unsigned value for
the negative representation in gcc-11
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101095
Bug ID: 101095
Summary: Bogus "error: conflicting global module declaration"
for abbreviate function template using placeholder
type in noexcept
Product: gcc
Ver
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101089
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94048
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101094
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Summary|[11 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101090
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfd841cacd6f0a641413912cea39a4561c73f0cb
commit r11-8578-gbfd841cacd6f0a641413912cea39a4561c73f0cb
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c90437109c30a0b6d2cf861c6f0cee8b69965ef
commit r11-8579-g8c90437109c30a0b6d2cf861c6f0cee8b69965ef
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68d2dbf845d8589c2a227a3097cbcff9429244b0
commit r11-8580-g68d2dbf845d8589c2a227a3097cbcff9429244b0
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101009
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:83758b7b67629ef4492a51e5a255f0070c07574a
commit r11-8581-g83758b7b67629ef4492a51e5a255f0070c07574a
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100981
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494
--- Comment #11 from J.M. Eubank ---
Confirmed that building with a larger default stack size on Windows works to
bootstrap GCC and binutils and dependencies - I chose -Wl,--stack=10485760 (10
MiB) but probably 2-4 MiB would be sufficient.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
Serdar Sanli changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mserdarsanli at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101091
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100558
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||j.galecki11 at gmail dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100494
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Macleod ---
My understanding from a quick check around is we usually expect 8-10 MB of
stack space. I have an idea how to flatten the call stack a bit, so leave this
open for that purpose if nothing else.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89021
--- Comment #57 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dd835ec24be9b1a89c6b0c78673de88c81a23966
commit r12-1537-gdd835ec24be9b1a89c6b0c78673de88c81a23966
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Wed J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100492
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cedce283c319103e039ae2659d0d7473dd8efeca
commit r10-9920-gcedce283c319103e039ae2659d0d7473dd8efeca
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100509
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cd712310edc2ffeec8982ba5f9aeaa0b14e93cf1
commit r10-9921-gcd712310edc2ffeec8982ba5f9aeaa0b14e93cf1
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
--- Comment #27 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37d845ac59b26e0beb97e7d0d138cb9995d6ada2
commit r10-9922-g37d845ac59b26e0beb97e7d0d138cb9995d6ada2
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:be85daaecc3ae2da8707e22dc1ef19c21c3e503f
commit r10-9923-gbe85daaecc3ae2da8707e22dc1ef19c21c3e503f
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100934
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b7878d4e179c72ad69cdd103fbbfe16bc38010db
commit r10-9924-gb7878d4e179c72ad69cdd103fbbfe16bc38010db
Author: Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100492
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Known to fail|10.3.1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100513
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100791
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||10.3.1
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101096
Bug ID: 101096
Summary: AVX512 VPMOV instruction should be used to downconvert
vectors
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101097
Bug ID: 101097
Summary: Vectorizer is too eager to use vec_unpack
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101095
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e64426dae129cca5b62355ef6c5a3bd6137e830
commit r12-1538-g9e64426dae129cca5b62355ef6c5a3bd6137e830
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
--- Comment #25 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e64426dae129cca5b62355ef6c5a3bd6137e830
commit r12-1538-g9e64426dae129cca5b62355ef6c5a3bd6137e830
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90404
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
See
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54202
--- Comment #10 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to Serdar Sanli from comment #9)
> A simpler example not involving any globals, causing Wfree-nonheap-object
> warning since GCC11
This is actually a bug in the example: it's invalid to decrement a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
Bug ID: 101098
Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in instantiate_body, at
cp/pt.c:25858
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Bug ID: 101099
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in type_unification_real,
at cp/pt.c:22173
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Bug ID: 101100
Summary: [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in trans_caf_token_assign,
at fortran/trans-expr.c:9433
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101101
Bug ID: 101101
Summary: ICE in gfc_build_array_type, at
fortran/trans-types.c:1391
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101102
Bug ID: 101102
Summary: ICE in propagate_necessity, at tree-ssa-dce.c:980
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
--- Comment #5 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
This and several other FAILs have re-appeared on master for cris-elf.
I think my autotester log entry is to the point:
... 2021-06-15-15:17:36 1de31913d20a (f: 88, p: 46598)
*** regress-11 (f: 99, p: 46
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|9.5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101103
Bug ID: 101103
Summary: -fsanitise=undef gives better help than
-fsanitize=undef
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101103
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101103
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
-fsanitize*= doesn't take an enum but comma separated list of enums though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d92613ec5529cecd66ef0c21b894c7f70ace7f87
commit r11-8582-gd92613ec5529cecd66ef0c21b894c7f70ace7f87
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100796
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2e908638758097e261bca1a4825d171a18af9c
commit r11-8583-gbb2e908638758097e261bca1a4825d171a18af9c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96391
--- Comment #26 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bb2e908638758097e261bca1a4825d171a18af9c
commit r11-8583-gbb2e908638758097e261bca1a4825d171a18af9c
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100806
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Rodgers ---
I have confirmed that this is new issue, not related to PR100334.
When there are waiting threads and the semaphore attempts to release one of
the waiting threads, the FUTEX_WAKE syscall's return indicates
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e3d92178b44a3722519ec68e72e307443bda70
commit r12-1540-g72e3d92178b44a3722519ec68e72e307443bda70
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:72e3d92178b44a3722519ec68e72e307443bda70
commit r12-1540-g72e3d92178b44a3722519ec68e72e307443bda70
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95501
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe0a2ec26867b290eb84af00317e60f8b67455c
commit r12-1542-gcfe0a2ec26867b290eb84af00317e60f8b67455c
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95502
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cfe0a2ec26867b290eb84af00317e60f8b67455c
commit r12-1542-gcfe0a2ec26867b290eb84af00317e60f8b67455c
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99910
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91706
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18
commit r12-1543-g6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18
commit r12-1543-g6816a44dfe1b5fa9414490a18a4aa723b6f38f18
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:84171488f5eed37020f0ecf8ef9b7a466e501da0
commit r11-8584-g84171488f5eed37020f0ecf8ef9b7a466e501da0
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression]|[9/10 Regression] Rejected
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101078
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P1 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101104
Bug ID: 101104
Summary: test case g++.dg/tsan/pthread_cond_clockwait.C fails
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100485
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor ---
(In reply to fiesh from comment #7)
> On a random related note, the man page says -Wmismatched-new-delete is
> enabled by default, but playing around with it, it seems it's only turned on
> by -Wall: https://
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff4deb4b1d0c5947669ddc76fde4db83e28009d8
commit r12-1548-gff4deb4b1d0c5947669ddc76fde4db83e28009d8
Author: Jason Merrill
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da25516718cb150cc938f5947650c9ab486505c6
commit r11-8586-gda25516718cb150cc938f5947650c9ab486505c6
Author: Jason Merrill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101029
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b98b55e0e8b4051f4e3b0afc76b506b01f0889f
commit r10-9926-g4b98b55e0e8b4051f4e3b0afc76b506b01f0889f
Author: Jason Merrill
-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210616 (experimental) [master revision
041f7417707:a530c589490:3155d51bfd1de8b6c4645dcb2292248a8d7cc3c9] (GCC)
$ gcc-trunk abc.c ; ./a.out
2
$ gcc-trunk -O3 abc.c ; ./a.out
Segmentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101105
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:f75211822f8d84bb706421
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100762
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang
--- Comment
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo