https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> > > So it there any canonical rtx for vec_merge?
> > > (vec_merge (A B const_int 10) should abviously equal to (vec_merge
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101117
Bug ID: 101117
Summary: Does not diagnose invalid constant initializers with
-std=c11 -pedantic -pedantic-errors
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71983
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||7.5.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> > So it there any canonical rtx for vec_merge?
> > (vec_merge (A B const_int 10) should abviously equal to (vec_merge B A
> > const_int 5)
>
> A and B here are 4-el
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
> So it there any canonical rtx for vec_merge?
> (vec_merge (A B const_int 10) should abviously equal to (vec_merge B A
> const_int 5)
A and B here are 4-element vector.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
With open-code
successfully optimize
__m128d f1(__m128d x, __m128d y, __m128d z){
__m128d tem = _mm_mul_pd (x,y);
__m128d tem2 = tem + z;
__m128d tem3 = tem - z;
return __builtin_shuffle (tem2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu ---
> (define_mode_attr addsub_cst [(V4DF "5") (V2DF "1")
> (V4SF "5") (V8SF "85")])
> (define_insn "*fma_fmaddsub_"
> [(set (match_operand:VF_128_256 0 "register_operand" "=v,v,v,x
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101116
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101116
Bug ID: 101116
Summary: missed peephole optimization not of bitwise and
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101115
--- Comment #2 from Chris Packham ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Try adding --enable-initfini-array to gcc config
>
> Most likely GCC config is not detecting .init_array/.fini_array support
> which is now always turned on the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101115
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Try adding --enable-initfini-array to gcc config
Most likely GCC config is not detecting .init_array/.fini_array support which
is now always turned on the trunk for *linux-* targets.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100777
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e10782370391ed48d2a690a4205594f6b7d2fbe
commit r10-9931-g9e10782370391ed48d2a690a4205594f6b7d2fbe
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99842
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:206d49a23735168769065716c4b211328dbf1b76
commit r10-9929-g206d49a23735168769065716c4b211328dbf1b76
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101115
Bug ID: 101115
Summary: ld.bfd: warning: .init_array section has zero size
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0d8d001d94166242be4387ca72fe0fc483860f1
commit r11-8613-gf0d8d001d94166242be4387ca72fe0fc483860f1
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bc7a522548c37daf612c2ba4c44e9ea93548ed45
commit r11-8612-gbc7a522548c37daf612c2ba4c44e9ea93548ed45
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> The complication is that the define_insn looks like
>
> (define_insn "*fma_fmaddsub_"
> [(set (match_operand:VF_128_256 0 "register_operand" "=v,v,v,x,x")
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
--- Comment #6 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org ---
For V4SI, it is also better to use vector splat and vector rotate operations.
revb:
.LFB0:
.cfi_startproc
vspltish %v1,8
vspltisw %v0,-16
vrlh %v2,%v2,%v1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
I'll take a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101114
Bug ID: 101114
Summary: new test case
libgomp.c/../libgomp.c-c++-common/struct-elem-5.c
fails after its introduction in r12-1565
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
What target is this on?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
--- Comment #1 from Mosè Giordano ---
To add more information, the real problem seems to be that xgcc can't generate
weak symbols:
sandbox:${WORKSPACE}/srcdir/gcc_build # x86_64-apple-darwin14-nm
x86_64-apple-darwin14/libsanitizer/lsan/.libs/l
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100777
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04a6793eec7f3482f3fb1273a725b3001865a685
commit r11-8610-g04a6793eec7f3482f3fb1273a725b3001865a685
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99842
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aaa8419bcf2ec491c0fd41a526f5817da0cf3ed4
commit r11-8608-gaaa8419bcf2ec491c0fd41a526f5817da0cf3ed4
Author: Peter Bergner
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-17
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91488
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b376b1ef38971b84975ad1540bf5d2ae0b924e76
commit r12-1603-gb376b1ef38971b84975ad1540bf5d2ae0b924e76
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:331e20a69be0d9e7d448580945945d4c7a1e3c0a
commit r12-1602-g331e20a69be0d9e7d448580945945d4c7a1e3c0a
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98571
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100719
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|11.2|12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
José Rui Faustino de Sousa changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51010|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100683
--- Comment #10 from José Rui Faustino de Sousa
---
Second and hopefully last update...
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-June/056170.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100406
Bug 100406 depends on bug 100876, which changed state.
Bug 100876 Summary: [11 Regression] -Wmismatched-new-delete should understand
placement new when it's not inlined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876
What|Rem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100783
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95507
Bug 95507 depends on bug 100684, which changed state.
Bug 100684 Summary: [11 Regression] spurious -Wnonnull with -O1 on a C++ lambda
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88443
Bug 88443 depends on bug 100574, which changed state.
Bug 100574 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE: in size_remaining, at builtins.c:413
with -O3 -ftracer -fno-tree-dominator-opts -fno-tree-fre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100399
Bug 100399 depends on bug 100307, which changed state.
Bug 100307 Summary: [11 Regression] spurious -Wplacement-new with negative
pointer offset
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100307
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100307
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639
Bug 24639 depends on bug 100250, which changed state.
Bug 100250 Summary: [11 Regression] ICE related to -Wmaybe-uninitialized
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00bf3e4d12944e659b3a3706ca720f1d6346e610
commit r11-8607-g00bf3e4d12944e659b3a3706ca720f1d6346e610
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100876
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fbafba7114939b279e860198d009d7641f3ce49c
commit r11-8606-gfbafba7114939b279e860198d009d7641f3ce49c
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100783
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3863203bf306a730482861e974ff779e0d1db02f
commit r11-8605-g3863203bf306a730482861e974ff779e0d1db02f
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100732
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9edb8fb8202dc6907f69094a8b2a621840174e1
commit r11-8604-gb9edb8fb8202dc6907f69094a8b2a621840174e1
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100684
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca0bc927103f5408f4812a3ad65d2d02a37840b2
commit r11-8603-gca0bc927103f5408f4812a3ad65d2d02a37840b2
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100619
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:933885db3872cc58dc36498aa1b8e8f15484e008
commit r11-8602-g933885db3872cc58dc36498aa1b8e8f15484e008
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100574
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:11133f8f113e4591a2a5c9e61d810b9e5931043e
commit r11-8601-g11133f8f113e4591a2a5c9e61d810b9e5931043e
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100307
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c2791cd4e62731ccde165c0e62b83f8e7ee38118
commit r11-8600-gc2791cd4e62731ccde165c0e62b83f8e7ee38118
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100250
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Martin Sebor
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a52b2f4cae38abecda2a7ad72a47c4e38236870a
commit r11-8599-ga52b2f4cae38abecda2a7ad72a47c4e38236870a
Author: Martin Sebor
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101113
Bug ID: 101113
Summary: g++ thinks constructor suppressed by a requires clause
is actually a bad copy constructor
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101112
Bug ID: 101112
Summary: [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.dg/pr86179.c after
r12-1551
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10
Bug ID: 10
Summary: Undefined reference to ___lsan_default_suppressions
when compiling GCC 11.1 for x86_64 macOS
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100884
m farazma changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100884
--- Comment #1 from m farazma ---
The development team has mentioned this is correct behaviour, according to PPC
ABI the returning function needs to sign or zero extend the result when
necessary:
https://refspecs.linuxfoundation.org/ELF/ppc64/PP
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80223
--- Comment #9 from Nick Desaulniers ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #8)
> I am thinking of __attribute__((no_profile)).
>
> In Clang,
> -fprofile-generate(-fcs-profile-generate)/-fprofile-instr-generate/-fprofile-
> arcs are all diff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101110
Bug ID: 101110
Summary: [12 regression] gcc.c-torture/execute/950704-1.c fails
after r12-1546
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67300
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch to document -foffload=
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-June/573081.html
Still undocumented:
-foffload-abi=[lp64|ilp32]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210617 (experimental) [master revision
:7d4a310d9:9a61dfdb5ecb58bc4caea1c11e017d93bdd1d9a5] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
__attribute__((section(".vtable_map_vars"))) f3() {}
$ gcc-trunk mutant.c
mutant.c:1:46: warning: return type defaul
: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210617 (experimental) [master revision
:7d4a310d9:9a61dfdb5ecb58bc4caea1c11e017d93bdd1d9a5] (GCC)
$ cat mutant.c
#include
test_ptr(void *p) {
atomic_int j;
j += *p;
}
$ gcc-trunk mutant.c
mutant.c:2:1: warning: return type defaults to ‘int’ [-Wimplicit-int]
2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b87f3318cf6334a3a42dcf27f2fdec0fce04665
commit r12-1567-g2b87f3318cf6334a3a42dcf27f2fdec0fce04665
Author: Patrick Palka
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100940
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0f4a2fb44dad6c9c140226fc19ed16109b85e6f4
commit r12-1566-g0f4a2fb44dad6c9c140226fc19ed16109b85e6f4
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100704
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:967b46530234b4e6ad3983057705aea6c20a03c4
commit r12-1564-g967b46530234b4e6ad3983057705aea6c20a03c4
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Fri May 21 11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97194
--- Comment #24 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:20a2c8ace0ab56c147fd995432abd5e7cf89b0e3
commit r12-1563-g20a2c8ace0ab56c147fd995432abd5e7cf89b0e3
Author: Uros Bizjak
Date: Thu J
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101107
Bug ID: 101107
Summary: Misleading error message in aggregate initialization
in CRTP base class
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100823
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-06-17
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.2
Summary|[11 regression
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101106
Bug ID: 101106
Summary: [11 regression] =delete on second declaration of the
same function produces a note with no error
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100790
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100790
--- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez ---
fixed in trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100790
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Aldy Hernandez :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f1555d4013ed3cae2589270436387063d1c2f1a3
commit r12-1562-gf1555d4013ed3cae2589270436387063d1c2f1a3
Author: Aldy Hernandez
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101100
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101099
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101098
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100871
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Marius Hillenbrand
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:de0fcacd568bbd86726df7a5416edd08a525c93a
commit r9-9587-gde0fcacd568bbd86726df7a5416edd08a525c93a
Author: Marius Hille
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100871
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Marius Hillenbrand
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:66d838e249814dbe731ee8d983d63dedfa4ecffa
commit r10-9927-g66d838e249814dbe731ee8d983d63dedfa4ecffa
Author: Marius Hil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100871
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Marius Hillenbrand
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e86ad5ad011573121291bccb88d3a6fdb933469c
commit r11-8597-ge86ad5ad011573121291bccb88d3a6fdb933469c
Author: Marius Hil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100871
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Marius Hillenbrand :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a4fc63e0c3c6c7b895225c883137d152743be7fc
commit r12-1559-ga4fc63e0c3c6c7b895225c883137d152743be7fc
Author: Marius Hillenbrand
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #15 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Eric, any idea what's going on? Shall I readd if (TREE_CODE (t) ==
> QUAL_UNION_TYPE) return; at the start function and thus ignore
> QUAL_UNION_TYPE and handle only UNION_TYPEs, or should the bitfield
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Sorry for bad paste, on QUAL_UNION_TYPE
atree__atree_private_part__node_record___is_extension___XVN
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101062
--- Comment #13 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I have tried to backport this patch to the 11 branch, but unlike the trunk, it
doesn't build there, with
atree.ads:3844:34: size for "Node_Record" too small
make[3]: *** [../../gcc/ada/gcc-interface/Make-la
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 54400, which changed state.
Bug 54400 Summary: recognize vector reductions
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100898
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE|[9/10 Regression] ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100852
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54400
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3dfa4fe9f1a089b2b3906c83e22a1b39c49d937c
commit r12-1551-g3dfa4fe9f1a089b2b3906c83e22a1b39c49d937c
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101103
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101097
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Uroš Bizjak from comment #8)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #6)
> >
> > I just to want to classify the test is used to test another optimization
> > which rely on either loop vectori
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101097
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
> As said - a lot of work, sth that might be easier when we got rid of the
> SLP vs. non-SLP duality.
Understand.
I guess we will encounter more redundant packs and unpacks, considering that we
have supporte
1 - 100 of 108 matches
Mail list logo
