[Bug driver/101546] Sporadic issue during compiling a code with a '--save-temps' option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101546 Stanislav Šimek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||stanislav.simek at siemens dot com -

[Bug c++/101572] New: Temporary object lifetime is not prolonged as required by the standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101572 Bug ID: 101572 Summary: Temporary object lifetime is not prolonged as required by the standard Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: norma

[Bug tree-optimization/101501] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/88496] Unnecessary stack adjustment with -mavx512f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88496 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- > > subq and addq aren't necessary. I can't reproduce this w/ GCC12/GCC11/GCC10, but it does existed in GCC9.

[Bug c/101573] New: uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in -O0 optimisation level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573 Bug ID: 101573 Summary: uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in -O0 optimisation level Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/101539] [C++20] Implement builtins for layout-compatibility and pointer-interconvertibility traits

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101539 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51186|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/101501] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501 --- Comment #5 from Richard Biener --- # of iterations (a_lsm.5_10 * 52) / 52, bounded by 63 is obviously wrong with a_lsm.5_10 being a 'char', that boils down to zero iterations when computed at runtime. The loop body looks like [loca

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |9.5 Summary|Different resul

[Bug tree-optimization/101501] [11/12 Regression] wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qrzhang at gatech dot edu --- Comment

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 --- Comment #25 from Marc Glisse --- Note that this also affects dynamic linking with -Wl,--as-needed (which some platforms use by default). #include int main(){ std::once_flag o; std::call_once(o, [](){}); } $ g++ b.cc -lpthread && ldd ./

[Bug tree-optimization/100499] [9/10/11/12 Regression] Different results with -fpeel-loops -ftree-loop-vectorize options

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499 --- Comment #32 from Richard Biener --- Testcase from PR101501 /* { dg-do run } */ unsigned char ag = 55; unsigned i; int main() { unsigned char c; unsigned char a = ag; d: c = a-- * 52; if (c) goto d; if (a != 255) __builtin

[Bug bootstrap/101574] New: gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 Bug ID: 101574 Summary: gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses] Product: gcc Version: 12.0

[Bug c++/100716] member function template parameter should never be printed in candidate list and "T = T" should never be shown in substitutions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100716 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Assignee|unassig

[Bug tree-optimization/101555] [12 Regression] Compile slowdown in tree PRE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101555 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug c++/100763] Diagnostics of type alias is missing scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100763 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mkretz at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/100763] Diagnostics of type alias is missing scope

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100763 Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/101562] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in insert, at wide-int.cc:682

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug rtl-optimization/101562] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in insert, at wide-int.cc:682

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Slightly modified testcase started to ICE with r5-424-g807e902eea17f3132488c256c963823976b2348c aka wide_int merge though: struct S { char c; }; void g (struct S a, struct S b); void f () { struct S x[1];

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 --- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely --- If you create a new thread of execution then you'll get a non-weak reference to pthread_create, which should cause libpthread.so to be linked even with -Wl,--as-needed (and for static linking it will work

[Bug libstdc++/101571] DestroyGuard used by the ranges::uninitialized family should use addressof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- It doesn't make sense indeed (FYI I don't see this in a native x86_64 bootstrap). Just ran one with patches ontop of g:a6291d88d5b6c17d41950e21d7d452f7f0f73020, I'm using plain ./configure w/o arguments her

[Bug tree-optimization/101555] [12 Regression] Compile slowdown in tree PRE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101555 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Btw, it behaves as "intended": > grep -i iteration Vara___024root__114.cpp.138t.pre RPO iteration over 1050 blocks visited 1050 blocks in total discovering 1050 executable blocks iterating 1.0 times, a bl

[Bug rtl-optimization/101562] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in insert, at wide-int.cc:682

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug debug/101575] New: [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 Bug ID: 101575 Summary: [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info Product: gcc Version: 11.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/101571] DestroyGuard used by the ranges::uninitialized family should use addressof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- We should also do this: --- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_iterators.h +++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_iterators.h @@ -175,10 +175,14 @@ namespace __gnu_test #if __cplusplus >= 20110

[Bug c++/101572] Temporary object lifetime is not prolonged as required by the standard

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101572 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/84360] unnecessary aka in error message

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|9.5 |---

[Bug target/101393] PowerPC32 inline assembly broken by commit 2d94f7dea9c73ef3c116a0ddc722724578a860fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393 --- Comment #12 from Franz Sirl --- The emitted .machine is easy to fix, what's not so easy to fix is the intention behind Segher's change that caused the wrong .machine. Consider this source compiled with -mcpu=7400: void ppcaltivecfunc (void

[Bug c++/101015] Poor diagnostic for deprecated alias-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug sanitizer/101576] New: -fsaniitize=undefined silences clear nullptr dereference warning at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101576 Bug ID: 101576 Summary: -fsaniitize=undefined silences clear nullptr dereference warning at compile time Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug sanitizer/101576] -fsaniitize=undefined silences clear nullptr dereference warning at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101576 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- The sanitizer implies -fno-delete-null-pointer-exceptions (e.g. so that the non-NULL runtime checks aren't optimized away), and the lack of that warning is a direct consequence of that. Don't rely on warnin

[Bug target/86681] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2304 on s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86681 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug sanitizer/101476] AddressSanitizer check failed, points out a (potentially) non-existing stack error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/101573] uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in -O0 optimisation level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org Com

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- Created attachment 51194 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51194&action=edit Valgrind log For both the non-working (offloading-disabled) and working (offloading-enabled) builds I'm usin

[Bug tree-optimization/101573] uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in -O0 optimisation level

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- Created attachment 51195 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51195&action=edit patch patch in testing

[Bug fortran/101577] New: [Interop] TYPE with BIND(C): Reject empty TYPE with zero components

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101577 Bug ID: 101577 Summary: [Interop] TYPE with BIND(C): Reject empty TYPE with zero components Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 > > --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge --- > Created attachment 51194 > --> htt

[Bug libstdc++/58909] C++11's condition variables fail with static linking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909 Marc Glisse changed: What|Removed |Added CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #27

[Bug driver/101546] Sporadic issue during compiling a code with a '--save-temps' option

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101546 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Stanislav Šimek from comment #2) > First Command > Command Line: mips_gcc_sde_elf_10.2.0/bin/mips-sde-elf-gcc-O0 -Wunused > -Wreturn-type -Wundef -fno-common -fno-merge-constants -g -UNDEB

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3) > You want to configure with --enable-valgrind-annotations (the > sparseset one is a false positive) Aha, thanks. Unfortunately: with that added, the probl

[Bug debug/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WONTFIX Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug debug/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1) > Not going to be fixed, Because ?

[Bug target/101560] [12 Regression] ICE building 526.blender_r with -Ofast -flto -march=znver2 since r12-1958-gedafb35bdad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug bootstrap/101574] gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses around assignment used as truth value [-Werror=parentheses]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 --- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574 > > --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge --- > (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from

[Bug target/101504] [12 Regression] ICE: in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1649 with -O2 -march=broadwell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch --- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu --- A patc

[Bug tree-optimization/101578] New: wrong code with "-O3 -fpack-struct"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101578 Bug ID: 101578 Summary: wrong code with "-O3 -fpack-struct" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimiz

[Bug target/101579] New: Suboptimal codegen for __builtin_shufflevector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101579 Bug ID: 101579 Summary: Suboptimal codegen for __builtin_shufflevector Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: t

[Bug tree-optimization/101496] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e58093276a6e319c2a6d9f02e343fbf8400dab60 commit r12-2464-ge58093276a6e319c2a6d9f02e343fbf8400dab60 Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/101497] [12 Regression] ice in type, at value-range.h:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea789238b2c24eedf70b56257235adf3d33c5a0a commit r12-2465-gea789238b2c24eedf70b56257235adf3d33c5a0a Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/101511] [12 Regression] ice in query_relation, at value-relation.cc:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3fa77472b78c5ddada03a1052b229bea11cb76f commit r12-2466-gd3fa77472b78c5ddada03a1052b229bea11cb76f Author: Andrew MacLeod Date:

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Component|debug |ada --- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou

[Bug tree-optimization/101511] [12 Regression] ice in query_relation, at value-relation.cc:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Last reconfi

[Bug tree-optimization/101511] [12 Regression] ice in query_relation, at value-relation.cc:879

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug tree-optimization/101512] [11/12 Regression] ICE in maybe_trim_constructor_store, at tree-ssa-dse.c:379

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug tree-optimization/101496] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: evrp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101497] [12 Regression] ice in type, at value-range.h:221

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101560] [12 Regression] ICE building 526.blender_r with -Ofast -flto -march=znver2 since r12-1958-gedafb35bdad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560 --- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2) > Please try > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575829.html I can confirm the patch avoids the ICE.

[Bug tree-optimization/101515] [11/12 Regression] ICE in pp_cxx_unqualified_id, at cp/cxx-pretty-print.c:128 since r11-6729-gadb520606ce3e1e1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11/12 Regression] ICE in

[Bug tree-optimization/101580] New: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580 Bug ID: 101580 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/101580] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/101560] [12 Regression] ICE building 526.blender_r with -Ofast -flto -march=znver2 since r12-1958-gedafb35bdad

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|WAITING

[Bug target/101504] [12 Regression] ICE: in lra_assign, at lra-assigns.c:1649 with -O2 -march=broadwell

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101504 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 Bernd Edlinger changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot de ---

[Bug libstdc++/100682] Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254e5d19a177af23a77b67fd51d0d1a25eaabfc7 commit r12-2467-g254e5d19a177af23a77b67fd51d0d1a25eaabfc7 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/100682] Outdated manual about the debug mode using

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug libstdc++/101571] DestroyGuard used by the ranges::uninitialized family should use addressof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aca7a0253d6e3116f846ad530b19d89644a64267 commit r12-2469-gaca7a0253d6e3116f846ad530b19d89644a64267 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/101571] DestroyGuard used by the ranges::uninitialized family should use addressof()

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org Targ

[Bug libstdc++/98518] std::array not bound checked with _GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98518 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.0 Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/94295] use __builtin_operator_new and __builtin_operator_delete when available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9ca352186226ae757688e160e7c6f394c9f26aa commit r12-2470-gc9ca352186226ae757688e160e7c6f394c9f26aa Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/94295] use __builtin_operator_new and __builtin_operator_delete when available

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug libstdc++/94345] std::chrono overflows due to c++14 non-compliance

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.3 Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/95702] ranges::transform missing vectorization opportunity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95702 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/96183] GCC accepts "convert '' from 'void' to 'int'" at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96183 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/98486] Variable template specialization doesn't account for primary's constraints

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug libstdc++/97570] avr-gcc: error: 'void* memalign' redeclared as different kind of entity

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug libgomp/101581] New: [OpenMP] omp_target_memcpy – support inter-device memcpy

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101581 Bug ID: 101581 Summary: [OpenMP] omp_target_memcpy – support inter-device memcpy Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Seve

[Bug c++/99625] GCC does not detect narrowing in aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99625 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22 Status|UNCONFIR

[Bug c++/99625] GCC does not detect narrowing in aggregate initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99625 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org As

[Bug target/100152] [10 Regression] used caller-saved register not preserved across a call.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152 --- Comment #58 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu --- Thanks. Brad

[Bug c++/101582] New: C++ FE doesn't accept attribute-declaration

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101582 Bug ID: 101582 Summary: C++ FE doesn't accept attribute-declaration Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug libstdc++/98842] optional's spaceship operations generates wrong code when operator== is not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a415b6a93765f29bffd0582a001bf03c4b93f3c commit r10-9996-g3a415b6a93765f29bffd0582a001bf03c4b93f3c Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug libstdc++/98842] optional's spaceship operations generates wrong code when operator== is not present

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 --- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4) > Hi, > > I think my commit e69ac020372 ("Add line debug info for virtual thunks") > has a mitigating effect on this test case: > due to such functions have DECL_

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 --- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3) > > Because ? > > No straightforward solution in DWARF < 5 and, therefore, not worth the > hassle. How about backporting the commit to gcc-11-branch? WDYT?

[Bug inline-asm/10153] [3.3/3.4 regression] selection of %dil or %sil on ia32 by valid C source

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10153 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8819419ba1d397c0444d89079ec16657a09914fb commit r12-2473-g8819419ba1d397c0444d89079ec16657a09914fb Author: Andrew Pinski Date: T

[Bug target/101393] PowerPC32 inline assembly broken by commit 2d94f7dea9c73ef3c116a0ddc722724578a860fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/101534] ICE in create_tailcall_accumulator, at tree-tailcall.c:1083

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101534 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/101578] wrong code with "-O3 -fpack-struct"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101578 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/101393] PowerPC32 inline assembly broken by commit 2d94f7dea9c73ef3c116a0ddc722724578a860fe

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393 --- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #12) > The emitted .machine is easy to fix, what's not so easy to fix is the > intention behind Segher's change that caused the wrong .machine. > > Consider this s

[Bug tree-optimization/87634] CSE for dynamic_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87634 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Component|c++

[Bug c++/63140] wrong code generation probably due to optimization problem

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140 --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski --- This might be fixed already just it was not marked as a regression.

[Bug ada/101575] [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes invalid line info

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575 --- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou --- (> More specifically, it's gone because we have: > ... > $ more defs.s > .file "defs.adb" > .text > .Ltext0: > .align 2 > .globl defs__struct1IP > .type defs__str

[Bug libstdc++/64735] std::future broken on armel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e commit r10-9997-gf2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e Author: Jonathan Wake

[Bug libstdc++/96657] [9/10 Regression] libsupc++.a missing required functions from src/c++98/atomicity.cc when atomic builtins are not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e commit r10-9997-gf2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e Author: Jonathan Wakel

[Bug libstdc++/96657] [9 Regression] libsupc++.a missing required functions from src/c++98/atomicity.cc when atomic builtins are not supported

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug libstdc++/101583] New: [12 Regression] error: use of deleted function when building gold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583 Bug ID: 101583 Summary: [12 Regression] error: use of deleted function when building gold Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug libstdc++/101583] [12 Regression] error: use of deleted function when building gold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583 --- Comment #1 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 51196 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51196&action=edit GCC 12 pre-processed source file

[Bug libstdc++/101583] [12 Regression] error: use of deleted function when building gold

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583 --- Comment #2 from Martin Liška --- Created attachment 51197 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51197&action=edit GCC 11 pre-processed source file

  1   2   3   >