https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101546
Stanislav Šimek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stanislav.simek at siemens dot
com
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101572
Bug ID: 101572
Summary: Temporary object lifetime is not prolonged as required
by the standard
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88496
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
>
> subq and addq aren't necessary.
I can't reproduce this w/ GCC12/GCC11/GCC10, but it does existed in GCC9.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573
Bug ID: 101573
Summary: uninitialized warning could not appear correclty in
-O0 optimisation level
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101539
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #51186|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
# of iterations (a_lsm.5_10 * 52) / 52, bounded by 63
is obviously wrong with a_lsm.5_10 being a 'char', that boils down to zero
iterations when computed at runtime. The loop body looks like
[loca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Summary|Different resul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101501
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||qrzhang at gatech dot edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
--- Comment #25 from Marc Glisse ---
Note that this also affects dynamic linking with -Wl,--as-needed (which some
platforms use by default).
#include
int main(){
std::once_flag o;
std::call_once(o, [](){});
}
$ g++ b.cc -lpthread && ldd ./
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100499
--- Comment #32 from Richard Biener ---
Testcase from PR101501
/* { dg-do run } */
unsigned char ag = 55;
unsigned i;
int main()
{
unsigned char c;
unsigned char a = ag;
d:
c = a-- * 52;
if (c)
goto d;
if (a != 255)
__builtin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
Bug ID: 101574
Summary: gcc/sparseset.h:215:20: error: suggest parentheses
around assignment used as truth value
[-Werror=parentheses]
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100716
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101555
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100763
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mkretz at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100763
Matthias Kretz (Vir) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Slightly modified testcase started to ICE with
r5-424-g807e902eea17f3132488c256c963823976b2348c aka wide_int merge though:
struct S { char c; };
void g (struct S a, struct S b);
void f ()
{
struct S x[1];
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
--- Comment #26 from Jonathan Wakely ---
If you create a new thread of execution then you'll get a non-weak reference to
pthread_create, which should cause libpthread.so to be linked even with
-Wl,--as-needed (and for static linking it will work
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
It doesn't make sense indeed (FYI I don't see this in a native x86_64
bootstrap).
Just ran one with patches ontop of g:a6291d88d5b6c17d41950e21d7d452f7f0f73020,
I'm using plain ./configure w/o arguments her
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101555
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
Btw, it behaves as "intended":
> grep -i iteration Vara___024root__114.cpp.138t.pre
RPO iteration over 1050 blocks visited 1050 blocks in total discovering 1050
executable blocks iterating 1.0 times, a bl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101562
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
Bug ID: 101575
Summary: [gcc-11, -gdwarf-4] Missing .file directive causes
invalid line info
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
We should also do this:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_iterators.h
+++ b/libstdc++-v3/testsuite/util/testsuite_iterators.h
@@ -175,10 +175,14 @@ namespace __gnu_test
#if __cplusplus >= 20110
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101572
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84360
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|9.5 |---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #12 from Franz Sirl ---
The emitted .machine is easy to fix, what's not so easy to fix is the intention
behind Segher's change that caused the wrong .machine.
Consider this source compiled with -mcpu=7400:
void ppcaltivecfunc (void
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101015
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101576
Bug ID: 101576
Summary: -fsaniitize=undefined silences clear nullptr
dereference warning at compile time
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101576
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The sanitizer implies -fno-delete-null-pointer-exceptions (e.g. so that the
non-NULL runtime checks aren't optimized away), and the lack of that warning is
a direct consequence of that. Don't rely on warnin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86681
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101476
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
Created attachment 51194
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51194&action=edit
Valgrind log
For both the non-working (offloading-disabled) and working (offloading-enabled)
builds I'm usin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101573
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51195
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51195&action=edit
patch
patch in testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101577
Bug ID: 101577
Summary: [Interop] TYPE with BIND(C): Reject empty TYPE with
zero components
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #3 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
>
> --- Comment #2 from Thomas Schwinge ---
> Created attachment 51194
> --> htt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58909
Marc Glisse changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||glisse at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #27
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101546
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Stanislav Šimek from comment #2)
> First Command
> Command Line: mips_gcc_sde_elf_10.2.0/bin/mips-sde-elf-gcc-O0 -Wunused
> -Wreturn-type -Wundef -fno-common -fno-merge-constants -g -UNDEB
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
(In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #3)
> You want to configure with --enable-valgrind-annotations (the
> sparseset one is a false positive)
Aha, thanks. Unfortunately: with that added, the probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Not going to be fixed,
Because ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
--- Comment #5 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Thu, 22 Jul 2021, tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101574
>
> --- Comment #4 from Thomas Schwinge ---
> (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101504
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #1 from H.J. Lu ---
A patc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101578
Bug ID: 101578
Summary: wrong code with "-O3 -fpack-struct"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimiz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101579
Bug ID: 101579
Summary: Suboptimal codegen for __builtin_shufflevector
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e58093276a6e319c2a6d9f02e343fbf8400dab60
commit r12-2464-ge58093276a6e319c2a6d9f02e343fbf8400dab60
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ea789238b2c24eedf70b56257235adf3d33c5a0a
commit r12-2465-gea789238b2c24eedf70b56257235adf3d33c5a0a
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3fa77472b78c5ddada03a1052b229bea11cb76f
commit r12-2466-gd3fa77472b78c5ddada03a1052b229bea11cb76f
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|debug |ada
--- Comment #3 from Eric Botcazou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reconfi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101511
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101512
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101496
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101497
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #2)
> Please try
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-July/575829.html
I can confirm the patch avoids the ICE.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101515
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] ICE in |[11/12 Regression] ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580
Bug ID: 101580
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since
r12-2429-g62acc72a957b5614
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101580
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101560
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101504
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
Bernd Edlinger changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bernd.edlinger at hotmail dot
de
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:254e5d19a177af23a77b67fd51d0d1a25eaabfc7
commit r12-2467-g254e5d19a177af23a77b67fd51d0d1a25eaabfc7
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100682
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aca7a0253d6e3116f846ad530b19d89644a64267
commit r12-2469-gaca7a0253d6e3116f846ad530b19d89644a64267
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101571
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Targ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98518
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c9ca352186226ae757688e160e7c6f394c9f26aa
commit r12-2470-gc9ca352186226ae757688e160e7c6f394c9f26aa
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94295
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94345
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.3
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95702
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96183
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98486
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97570
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101581
Bug ID: 101581
Summary: [OpenMP] omp_target_memcpy – support inter-device
memcpy
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99625
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-22
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99625
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100152
--- Comment #58 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
Thanks. Brad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101582
Bug ID: 101582
Summary: C++ FE doesn't accept attribute-declaration
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a415b6a93765f29bffd0582a001bf03c4b93f3c
commit r10-9996-g3a415b6a93765f29bffd0582a001bf03c4b93f3c
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98842
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #5 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Bernd Edlinger from comment #4)
> Hi,
>
> I think my commit e69ac020372 ("Add line debug info for virtual thunks")
> has a mitigating effect on this test case:
> due to such functions have DECL_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #3)
> > Because ?
>
> No straightforward solution in DWARF < 5 and, therefore, not worth the
> hassle.
How about backporting the commit to gcc-11-branch? WDYT?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=10153
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8819419ba1d397c0444d89079ec16657a09914fb
commit r12-2473-g8819419ba1d397c0444d89079ec16657a09914fb
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |segher at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101534
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101393
--- Comment #14 from Segher Boessenkool ---
(In reply to Franz Sirl from comment #12)
> The emitted .machine is easy to fix, what's not so easy to fix is the
> intention behind Segher's change that caused the wrong .machine.
>
> Consider this s
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87634
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63140
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
This might be fixed already just it was not marked as a regression.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #7 from Eric Botcazou ---
(> More specifically, it's gone because we have:
> ...
> $ more defs.s
> .file "defs.adb"
> .text
> .Ltext0:
> .align 2
> .globl defs__struct1IP
> .type defs__str
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64735
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
commit r10-9997-gf2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
Author: Jonathan Wake
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
commit r10-9997-gf2074277aa3ce0848429e34d6149ba26ff3b708e
Author: Jonathan Wakel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96657
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
Bug ID: 101583
Summary: [12 Regression] error: use of deleted function when
building gold
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
--- Comment #1 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 51196
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51196&action=edit
GCC 12 pre-processed source file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101583
--- Comment #2 from Martin Liška ---
Created attachment 51197
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51197&action=edit
GCC 11 pre-processed source file
1 - 100 of 246 matches
Mail list logo