https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101616
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98907
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-25
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101617
Bug ID: 101617
Summary: a ? -1 : 1 -> (-(type)a) | 1
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancement
Priorit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-25
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80588
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95906
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96695
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96694
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101616
Bug ID: 101616
Summary: Objective-C frontend should not emit vtable/fixup
messages (at least, not by default)
Product: gcc
Version: 10.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95489
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|switch expansion produces a |[9/10 Regression] switch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91425
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65968
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71836
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68123
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||compile-time-hog
Severity|mino
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52708
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56096
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target|armv5 |
Last reconfirmed|2013-03-05 00:00:00
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44275
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization,
|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31756
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Doesn't optimize the|-floop-interchange is not
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99930
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2021-04-06 00:00:00 |2021-7-24
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #5 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97137
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Last reconfirmed|2020
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94026
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Component|rtl-optim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83377
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
Last reconfirmed|2018-12-1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82237
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I think this has been fixed. I cannot reproduce it in 8.2 or the trunk. I
could see it in 7.3 though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81174
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78125
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21150
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67206
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57430
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|tree-optimization
--- Comment #5 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65678
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cas43 at cs dot stanford.edu
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58537
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46986
--- Comment #42 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
No, the go-macho package is irrelevant here.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #12 from Isuru Fernando ---
I patched libstdc++-v3/acinclude.m4 to add -nostdinc++ in GLIBCXX_INCLUDES and
it worked for me.
(My previous analysis was wrong. This issue is in canadian cross compilers
where GXX_FOR_TARGET includes its
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
--- Comment #8 from Matthew Krupcale ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> You misunderstood. Building a cross compiler and a canadian cross is so the
> new 4.8 compiler is NOT exposing to the bootstrap issue you mentioned.
Fair eno
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31889
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> jg .L2 # Shouldn't these two just
> jge .L6 # be one "je .L6"?
>
> Is fixed with:
> 2007-06-12 Richard Guenther
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
--- Comment #6 from Matthew Krupcale ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> Best way to support this really is to build a 4.8 cross compiler and then
> build a canandian cross GCC 4.8 and then bootstrap a 4.8.x using that newly
> build
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57130
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yahemore at gmail dot com
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71482
Fangrui Song changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #5 from F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50291
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101615
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-linux-gnu
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101615
--- Comment #1 from Qirun Zhang ---
My bisection points to g:6df6055d5c666e669890ff8
-optimization
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: qrzhang at gatech dot edu
Target Milestone: ---
It appears to be a recent regression.
$ gcc-trunk -v
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.0 20210724 (experimental) [master revision
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101614
Bug ID: 101614
Summary: [s390] vec_signed requires z15, docs say z13
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87858
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98616
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54452
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=77693
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |NEW
Last reconfirmed|2016-09-22 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83094
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83094
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Component|ipa
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
--- Comment #11 from Guillaume ---
Thanks! Wasn't happening with previous versions. Is there a workaround?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101598
--- Comment #7 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 51202
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51202&action=edit
Proposed patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87956
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86956
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83060
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
The ICE is gone in GCC 8+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81260
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Even clang does not error out.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79387
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71236
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Target Milestone|5.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79124
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |6.0
Component|c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85708
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69449
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-24
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57346
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tangyixuan at mail dot
dlut.edu.cn
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97200
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |7.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79754
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|error-recovery, |ice-on-valid-code
|ice
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||david.abdurachmanov at gmail
dot c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65486
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=69952
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kariya_mitsuru at hotmail dot
com
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63290
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|pointer-to-noexcept-functio |[C++11/14 only]
|n typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jeli
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65853
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80053
--- Comment #13 from Alexander Monakov ---
Yes, I'm talking only about labels which are potential branch targets, of
course after the jumps have been DCE'd it is not really observable where the
label points to. Unfortunately after four years I do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53932
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Last reconfirmed|2014-11-26 00:00:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61478
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101611
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92559
--- Comment #5 from Konstantin Kharlamov ---
(In reply to Konstantin Kharlamov from comment #4)
> By the way, FTR: I don't have the code anymore, but initially the problem
> came from a real-life algorithm involving lots of state, which looked ba
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46283
--- Comment #3 from Tor Myklebust ---
On Sat, Jul 24, 2021 at 6:45 AM pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
wrote:
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46283
>
> --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
> ((a *)0)->foo::x()
>
> ((T *)0)->foo::x()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101611
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-07-24
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80053
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92559
--- Comment #4 from Konstantin Kharlamov ---
By the way, FTR: I don't have the code anymore, but initially the problem came
from a real-life algorithm involving lots of state, which looked barely
readable when implemented in iterative way (i.e. a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80196
Isuru Fernando changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||isuruf at gmail dot com
--- Comment #10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101613
Bug ID: 101613
Summary: Preprocessor add a space between %##s_type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: prepr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78103
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
I actually think this should be doable with combiner splitters.
For the
unsigned int findLastSet3(unsigned long x) {
return x ? 8 * sizeof(unsigned long) - __builtin_clzl(x) : 0;
}
or
unsigned int findLastS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #13 from Eric Botcazou ---
> one minor remark, while working on a patch, I became aware,
> that probably the same will happen when using -gdwarf-5
> with old binutils, since we have this code in dwarf2out.c:
People should stick to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101575
--- Comment #12 from Bernd Edlinger ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #1)
> Not going to be fixed, just stick to the default setting (DWARF 5).
one minor remark, while working on a patch, I became aware,
that probably the same will ha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80053
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
1 - 100 of 127 matches
Mail list logo