https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83197
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89520
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 83197 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2018-09-27 00:00:00 |2021-8-8
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101817
Bug ID: 101817
Summary: g++ apply optimization irrespective of -O0 flag is set
Product: gcc
Version: 9.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84633
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems fixed in GCC 11+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87536
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101817
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use -fno-builtins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71174
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
This seems fixed in GCC 11+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101817
--- Comment #2 from Mohan ---
With -fno-builtins argument, it works good !!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 68429, which changed state.
Bug 68429 Summary: [concepts] ICE in in placeholder_extract_concept_and_args,
at cp/constraint.cc:1401
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68429
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82019
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 82019, which changed state.
Bug 82019 Summary: [concepts] ICE if concept is not satisfied
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82019
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92481
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.1.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92837
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92517
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||arthur.j.odwyer at gmail dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90841
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96545
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #8 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 91405, which changed state.
Bug 91405 Summary: [concepts] internal compiler error: in
synthesize_implicit_template_parm, at cp/parser.c:41206
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91405
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91277
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mr...@courier-mta.com
--- Comment #8 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91405
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tom at honermann dot net
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92541
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491
Bug 67491 depends on bug 92541, which changed state.
Bug 92541 Summary: ICE when concept requires contextual conversion to bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92541
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93664
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93741
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Seems to work in GCC 11+.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93785
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2020-02-18 00:00:00 |2021-8-8
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |8.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95124
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks like this is fixed, I cannot even reproduce it with GCC 10.1.0.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64924
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
--- Comment #3 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94333
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #1)
> Confirmed, started with r9-4045-g0c1e0d63fe0ceabb.
> Before that it was rejected with:
>
> pr94333.cc:7:45: error: lambda-expression in unevaluated context
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94333
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94128
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmusiienko at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Severity|normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95955
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96442
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 95955 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95455
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Clang gives:
:5:16: error: reference to local variable 'foo' declared in enclosing
function 'f'
[bar = foo] {};
^
:3:9: note: 'foo' declared here
int foo;
^
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101818
Bug ID: 101818
Summary: Error message for the wrong name in designated
initializers could be improved
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101537
Nikita Kniazev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nok.raven at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101818
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95085
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hewillk at gmail dot com
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28498
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101689
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Theodore.Papadopoulo@inria.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59507
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gs...@t-online.de
--- Comment #8 from An
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98101
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to scott snyder from comment #3)
> Here's another example that crashes in the same place, but which doesn't use
> -fvtable-verify. This example does use vectorization, and the ICE occurs
> only wit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=36791
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jfc at mit dot edu
--- Comment #7 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14839
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89062
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2006-03-02 12:57:12 |2021-8-8
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26602
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 26602 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25623
Bug 25623 depends on bug 26602, which changed state.
Bug 26602 Summary: cfg cleanup can mess up incoming frequencies
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26602
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=8093
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=23999
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33257
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33258
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target Milestone|-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
--- Comment #10 from Cameron ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> None of the testcases ICE in GCC 11+
I notice that if I change the repro to:
#include
struct S {
int a;
int* operator<=>(const S&) const = default;
};
bool b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101812
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101812
Uroš Bizjak changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101819
Bug ID: 101819
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in expand_expr_real_2, at
expr.c:9552 since
r12-2789-gf31da42e047e8018ca6ad9809273bc7efb6ffcaf
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=22599
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39442
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59299
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |5.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40207
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42200
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
GCC 8+ produces this for both:
cmpl$1, %edi
jbe .L1
testb $1, %dil
je .L4
.L1:
ret
.L4:
shrl%edi
jmp a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42543
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||4.6.4, 4.7.1
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43153
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80143
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #4)
> I think it was rather fixed in r8-7466-g3ec16e3610721403.
Yes that is more likely, I was trying to find that but I could not :).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94162
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work|11.1.0 |
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101820
Bug ID: 101820
Summary: fatal error: ISO_Fortran_binding.h: No such file or
directory
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21223
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24590
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
config/frv/frv.h:#define INVOKE__main
config/rs6000/eabi.h:#define INVOKE__main
I think the other ones that invokve __main is mingw/cygwin targets.
I wonder if there is a way to get rid of this really.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29864
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |4.4.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29253
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2008-02-04 14:27:46 |2021-8-8
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=46119
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-08-08
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101783
nick huang changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nickhuang99 at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40317
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|verify_flow_info ICE with |verify_flow_info ICE with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54068
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=60062
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vogu00 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47011
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34475
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51428
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Status|N
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Bug ID: 101821
Summary: Redundant xor eax eax
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #1 from Jeremy R. ---
This happens with __builtin_popcount as well, not just std::popcount. This
appears to have started in GCC 4.9.2. https://godbolt.org/z/4dGWvT5zr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50168
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gpiez at web dot de
--- Comment #24 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Jeremy R. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Redundant xor eax eax |Redundant xor eax eax
|re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |target
Summary|Redundant xor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is not unnecessary nor redundant, but fully intentional.
See e.g. PR62011.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101822
Bug ID: 101822
Summary: Codegen bug for popcount
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tree-optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #6 from Jeremy R. ---
Ah thank you @Andrew Pinski @Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101821
--- Comment #7 from Jeremy R. ---
Does the false dependency still apply to modern CPUs?
1 - 100 of 141 matches
Mail list logo