[Bug target/101296] Addition of x86 addsub SLP patterned slowed down 433.milc by 12% on znver2 with -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/102645] [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102645 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/102639] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3406-ga68412117fa47786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- we only have mask comparison for HFmode, ix86_expand_fp_movcc needed to be updated for it.

[Bug c++/102642] [12 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:2776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/102640] [11/12 Regression] omp declare target to on C++ block scope extern declarations since r11-3699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug target/102639] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3406-ga68412117fa47786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target||x86_64-*-* Known to work|11.2.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102622] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server by r12-3903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622 --- Comment #15 from Andrew Pinski --- here is the C testcase: static inline const unsigned *max1(const unsigned *t, const unsigned *t1) { return *t > *t1 ? t : t1; } int var_20 = 0; int var_22 = 0; short arr_32 [13]; char arr_45 [69]; void

[Bug middle-end/102464] Miss optimization for (_Float16) sqrtf ((float) f16)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102464 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:613196462a62a28de8414b9023ec2be9a29ac3dc commit r12-4242-g613196462a62a28de8414b9023ec2be9a29ac3dc Author: liuhongt Date: Fri Sep

[Bug tree-optimization/102494] Failure to optimize vector reduction properly especially when using OpenMP

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102494 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:77ca2cfcdcccee3c8e8aeaf1d03e9920893d2486 commit r12-4241-g77ca2cfcdcccee3c8e8aeaf1d03e9920893d2486 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Sep

[Bug tree-optimization/102645] [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102645 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE on valid code at -O3 on |[12 Regression] ICE on

[Bug tree-optimization/102645] New: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault

Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib gcc version 12.0.0 20211007 (experimental) [master r12-4238-gfba228e259d] (GCC) [619] % [619] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [620] % [620] % gcctk -O3 small.c during GIMPLE pass: unrolljam small.c: In function ‘main’: small.c:3:5: internal compiler error

[Bug tree-optimization/102622] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server by r12-3903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622 --- Comment #14 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #13) > VRP is rewriting: > _75 = _33 ? -1 : 0; > to: > _38 = () _33; > _75 = -_38; > > > Folding statement: _75 = _33 ? -1 : 0; > Applying pattern match.pd:39

[Bug tree-optimization/102622] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server by r12-3903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/102644] New: deduction failure when having default non-type template parameters that are lambdas

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102644 Bug ID: 102644 Summary: deduction failure when having default non-type template parameters that are lambdas Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 102638, which changed state. Bug 102638 Summary: Add warning for implicit save https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 What|Removed |Added ---

[Bug fortran/57360] Implement a warning for implied save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57360 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vivekrao4 at yahoo dot com --

[Bug fortran/102638] Add warning for implicit save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status

[Bug c++/67898] rejects-valid on overloaded function as non-type template argument of dependent type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67898 Bug 67898 depends on bug 61355, which changed state. Bug 61355 Summary: gcc doesn't normalize type in non-type template parameters https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/61355] gcc doesn't normalize type in non-type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/61355] gcc doesn't normalize type in non-type template parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61355 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fba228e259dd5112851527f2dbb62c5601100985 commit r12-4238-gfba228e259dd5112851527f2dbb62c5601100985 Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug rtl-optimization/102627] [11/12 Regression] wrong code with "-O1"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102627 --- Comment #4 from Vladimir Makarov --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3) > The assembly difference r11-8007 to r11-8008 is: > --- pr102627.s2021-10-06 06:32:46.0 -0400 > +++ pr102627.s2021-10-06 06:33:00.0

[Bug c++/102643] New: Segfault in alias template deduction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102643 Bug ID: 102643 Summary: Segfault in alias template deduction Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug ipa/102581] [12 Regression] ice in forced_merge, at ipa-modref-tree.h:352 with -fno-strict-aliasing and -O2 since r12-3202-gf5ff3a8ed4ca9173

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ian at airs dot com --- Comment #11

[Bug ipa/102474] [12 regression] Crash in ipa-modref compiling Go code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102474 Ian Lance Taylor changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|ASSIGNE

[Bug libstdc++/102377] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/cons/56012.cc with -std=gnu++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102377 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/102377] FAIL: 29_atomics/atomic_flag/cons/56012.cc with -std=gnu++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102377 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0e90799071ee78f712f3b58fca7000bc0a258ade commit r12-4234-g0e90799071ee78f712f3b58fca7000bc0a258ade Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug libstdc++/88466] [C++17] Support std::hardware_destructive_interference_size and std:: hardware_constructive_interference_size

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88466 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/102641] Bogus error for intent(out) dummy that is a polymorphic assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102641 --- Comment #2 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- I was thinking that for assumed-rank the front end should probably just emit a call to a library support function in the callee, instead of whatever it is doing now to try to deallocate/initialize

[Bug c++/102642] New: [12 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:2776

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102642 Bug ID: 102642 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in get, at cgraph.h:2776 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-invalid-code Severity: normal

[Bug c/93910] -Waddress-of-packed-member triggered without actual access to a member or the address of a member

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93910 joe.harvell at netscout dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||joe.harvell at netscout

[Bug fortran/102641] Bogus error for intent(out) dummy that is a polymorphic assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102641 Tobias Burnus changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug tree-optimization/102622] [12 Regression] Wrong code with -O3 for skylake-avx512 and icelake-server by r12-3903

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102622 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com,

[Bug ipa/102081] [12 regression] ICE building compiler starting with r12-3159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081 --- Comment #6 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #5) > I believe that this should be fixed. Is it still reproducing for you? (the > testcase in comment #2 compiles for me) Code in comment 2 compiles fine for me now

[Bug ipa/102310] [11/12 Regression] ICE in visit_ref_for_mod_analysis with OpenACC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102310 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mjambor at suse dot cz --- Comment #5 fro

[Bug ipa/102081] [12 regression] ICE building compiler starting with r12-3159

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102081 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |WAITING --- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka

[Bug tree-optimization/102505] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with 16 byte aligned field and virtual inheritance since r10-6321-g636e80eea24b780f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102505 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/102640] [11/12 Regression] omp declare target to on C++ block scope extern declarations since r11-3699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 51565 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51565&action=edit gcc12-pr102640.patch Untested fix.

[Bug target/101296] Addition of x86 addsub SLP patterned slowed down 433.milc by 12% on znver2 with -Ofast -flto

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101296 --- Comment #8 from Jan Hubicka --- so smarter merging in modref is now implemented ;)

[Bug middle-end/102566] [i386] GCC should emit LOCK BTS for simple bit-test-and-set operations with std::atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566 --- Comment #26 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #25) > Can you get some performance improvement data on real workloads? Will ask.

[Bug middle-end/102566] [i386] GCC should emit LOCK BTS for simple bit-test-and-set operations with std::atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #24) > (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23) > > I renamed the commit title. The new v3 is the v6 + fixes. > > Got it. Still no issues. Can you get some performance i

[Bug middle-end/102566] [i386] GCC should emit LOCK BTS for simple bit-test-and-set operations with std::atomic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102566 --- Comment #24 from Thiago Macieira --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #23) > I renamed the commit title. The new v3 is the v6 + fixes. Got it. Still no issues.

[Bug fortran/54753] assumed-rank dummies: Reject assumed-size actuals in in some cases (C535c; in F2018: C839)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54753 --- Comment #5 from sandra at gcc dot gnu.org --- Patch to add the diagnostic posted here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/fortran/2021-October/056656.html There's still a problem with the bogus diagnostic arising from deallocation/initialization

[Bug fortran/102641] New: Bogus error for intent(out) dummy that is a polymorphic assumed-rank array

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102641 Bug ID: 102641 Summary: Bogus error for intent(out) dummy that is a polymorphic assumed-rank array Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: nor

[Bug c++/102640] [11/12 Regression] omp declare target to on C++ block scope extern declarations since r11-3699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/102640] New: [11/12 Regression] omp declare target to on C++ block scope extern declarations since r11-3699

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102640 Bug ID: 102640 Summary: [11/12 Regression] omp declare target to on C++ block scope extern declarations since r11-3699 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/102557] [12 Regression] ICE: Segmentation fault signal terminated program cc1plus (indefinite recursion in modref_ref_node::insert_access) since r12-3202-gf5ff3a8ed4ca9173

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102557 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #4

[Bug ipa/102388] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4436 since r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102388 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug ipa/102388] [12 Regression] ICE in duplicate, at ipa-prop.c:4436 since r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c9d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102388 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0 commit r12-4230-g1a7d452c092be42a892d00c19561af10f42410b0 Author: Martin Jambor Date: T

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 99904, which changed state. Bug 99904 Summary: [concepts] ICE: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13056 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/99904] [concepts] ICE: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13056

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/99904] [concepts] ICE: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13056

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:052b2df6f0ecd1e5b55056911b16bca8b31ef7df commit r11-9088-g052b2df6f0ecd1e5b55056911b16bca8b31ef7df Author: Patrick Palka D

[Bug gcov-profile/98257] Replace Donald B. Johnson's cycle enumeration with iterative loop finding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98257 --- Comment #4 from Martin Liška --- Yes, please create a test-case I can possibly debug and fix.

[Bug target/102639] [12 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3406-ga68412117fa47786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Known to fail|

[Bug target/102639] New: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3406-ga68412117fa47786

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102639 Bug ID: 102639 Summary: ICE in extract_insn, at recog.c:2769 since r12-3406-ga68412117fa47786 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-v

[Bug c++/99904] ICE: in tsubst_pack_expansion, at cp/pt.c:13056

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99904 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e6e0d86a06389056d0e7fecc99c547420ad787a commit r12-4229-g2e6e0d86a06389056d0e7fecc99c547420ad787a Author: Patrick Palka Date: Th

[Bug ipa/102581] [12 Regression] ice in forced_merge, at ipa-modref-tree.h:352 with -fno-strict-aliasing and -O2 since r12-3202-gf5ff3a8ed4ca9173

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/102482] Winit-list-lifetime false positive for temporaries with std::initializer_list

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102482 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b239d05ffd5a17ede44abd55bc6622c6e279868 commit r12-4228-g9b239d05ffd5a17ede44abd55bc6622c6e279868 Author: Jonathan Wakely Date:

[Bug ipa/102581] [12 Regression] ice in forced_merge, at ipa-modref-tree.h:352 with -fno-strict-aliasing and -O2 since r12-3202-gf5ff3a8ed4ca9173

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102581 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:44b61586d8640b79e78cfdb6a555200ccee8df77 commit r12-4227-g44b61586d8640b79e78cfdb6a555200ccee8df77 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Thu O

[Bug c++/98940] Implement C++23 language features

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98940 Bug 98940 depends on bug 102615, which changed state. Bug 102615 Summary: [C++23] P2316R2 - Consistent character literal encoding https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615 What|Removed |Added -

[Bug c++/102615] [C++23] P2316R2 - Consistent character literal encoding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102615] [C++23] P2316R2 - Consistent character literal encoding

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102615 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:348b426be3fc99453b42e79a18331c7bf24ee0dc commit r12-4226-g348b426be3fc99453b42e79a18331c7bf24ee0dc Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug fortran/102638] Add warning for implicit save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 --- Comment #1 from Vivek Rao --- I meant to say that -Wimplicit-save would be part of -Wall *or* -Wextra.

[Bug fortran/102638] New: Add warning for implicit save

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102638 Bug ID: 102638 Summary: Add warning for implicit save Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: fortran

[Bug middle-end/24639] [meta-bug] bug to track all Wuninitialized issues

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24639 Bug 24639 depends on bug 102608, which changed state. Bug 102608 Summary: [12 regression] Recent change to VN causes bogus Wuninitialized warnings & kernel build failures https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608 What|Re

[Bug tree-optimization/102608] [12 regression] Recent change to VN causes bogus Wuninitialized warnings & kernel build failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/102608] [12 regression] Recent change to VN causes bogus Wuninitialized warnings & kernel build failures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102608 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1ebf2c14c60f5f37c00bea66aba46c25d4bcf473 commit r12-4225-g1ebf2c14c60f5f37c00bea66aba46c25d4bcf473 Author: Richard Biener Date:

[Bug target/85730] complex code for modifying lowest byte in a 4-byte vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85730 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- Created attachment 51564 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51564&action=edit Prototype patch Attached patch works around reload problem and creates: movl%edi, %eax movb

[Bug c++/102637] New: "Error: ‘reinterpret_cast’ is not a constant expression" when no reinterpret_cast is involved

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102637 Bug ID: 102637 Summary: "Error: ‘reinterpret_cast’ is not a constant expression" when no reinterpret_cast is involved Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/96339] [SVE] Optimise svlast[ab]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339 --- Comment #4 from prathamesh3492 at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Tejas Belagod from comment #3) > > Are you still working on this PR ? If not, can I assign it to myself ? > > Yes I am - its almost done - just been busy with a few higher pri

[Bug target/96339] [SVE] Optimise svlast[ab]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96339 --- Comment #3 from Tejas Belagod --- > Are you still working on this PR ? If not, can I assign it to myself ? Yes I am - its almost done - just been busy with a few higher priority things. I'll find some time to clean it up, test it and post it

[Bug target/102604] arm v7m_extra_costs for SFmode inaccurate?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102604 --- Comment #3 from Richard Earnshaw --- (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #2) > Right, using -Os makes these tests pass (but vsqrt.f32 and vsqrt.f64 would > fail), Ah, because sqrt() is expected to set errno? Would changing the code t

[Bug c++/102624] testcase lambda-uneval11.C causes cc1plus segment fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102624 --- Comment #2 from qingzhe huang --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > so it looks like some diagnostics affect current_function_decl, the key > is omitting -quiet from the command-line that's usually added by the driver. That is

[Bug fortran/56659] Segfault due to missing libcpp error handler for "gfortran -cpp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659 --- Comment #8 from Tobias Burnus --- (In reply to kapinos from comment #7) > The output of gfortran 10.2.0 was added previously, cf. > > f951: Warning: Include directory ‘./foo/bar’: Permission denied > > f951: internal compiler error: in cpp_

[Bug middle-end/100316] [11/12 Regression] __clear_cache() does not support NULL-pointer arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100316 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-10-07 Summary|Regressio

[Bug tree-optimization/102636] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102636 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||102131 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug tree-optimization/102636] [12 Regression] wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r12-3136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102636 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||guojiufu at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/102636] New: wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu

12.0.0 20211007 (experimental) [master r12-4219-g6496ae5c965] (GCC) [592] % [592] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out [593] % gcctk -Os small.c; ./a.out [594] % gcctk -O2 small.c; ./a.out [595] % gcctk -O3 small.c; ./a.out [596] % [596] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out Aborted [597] % [597] % cat small.c

[Bug middle-end/102633] [11/12 Regression] warning for self-initialization despite -Wno-init-self

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102633 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3

[Bug libgomp/102628] [12 regression] New test case libgomp.c-c++-common/alloc-9.c fails after its introduction in r12-4033

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102628 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/102631] -Wmaybe-uninitialized cannot see through a series of PHIs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102631 --- Comment #4 from Aldy Hernandez --- For the calls-aarch64.ii testcase, there's some additional information in the upstream thread. Quoted here for convenience: There's some missing context. The only way to get to BB101->BB102 is through:

[Bug fortran/56659] Segfault due to missing libcpp error handler for "gfortran -cpp"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56659 --- Comment #7 from kapinos at itc dot rwth-aachen.de --- Sorry, for not adding the reproducer again. It is very K.I.S.S.: - make (or reuse) an dir w/o read permissions - use it as include dir at *any* Fortran source including empty ones. The ou

[Bug c++/102635] Wrong rejection of function default argument value depending on argument name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102635 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill