https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||doko at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102808
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #61 from Arnaud Charlet ---
(In reply to Eric Botcazou from comment #60)
> > And yes, the previous PR was more of a special case while this PR is in the
> > middle of the bootstrap path (triggers as part of compiling a-except.adb).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59675
Jay Feldblum changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||yfeldblum at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102788
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51621
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51621=edit
patch I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #60 from Eric Botcazou ---
> And yes, the previous PR was more of a special case while this PR is in the
> middle of the bootstrap path (triggers as part of compiling a-except.adb).
Right. As a last resort, I'm OK to try
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92482
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101635
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101309
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101308
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92621
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92189
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102086
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
commit r12-4467-g64f9623765da3306b0ab6a47997dc5d62c2ea261
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102798
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] |[9/10/11 Regression] wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102798
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5b1b2a186d94b31a522395e9d02c9cec1b928cb
commit r12-4466-ga5b1b2a186d94b31a522395e9d02c9cec1b928cb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |linkw at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
The next different is multiarch .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102784
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE in |ICE in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #59 from Arnaud Charlet ---
Right, PR ada/80590.
And yes, the previous PR was more of a special case while this PR is in the
middle of the bootstrap path (triggers as part of compiling a-except.adb).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #58 from Eric Botcazou ---
So we have the dreaded mix of 11.x Ada exception code and 10.x unwind code:
#0 0x773bb68b in msvcrt!abort () from C:\WINDOWS\SysWOW64\msvcrt.dll
#1 0x02074f7d in uw_init_context_1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
--- Comment #6 from Carlos Galvez ---
Hmm I don't see that in the x86 version of Ubuntu GCC:
Configured with: ../src/configure -v --with-pkgversion='Ubuntu
7.5.0-3ubuntu1~18.04' --with-bugurl=file:///usr/share/doc/gcc-7/README.Bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
--- Comment #57 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Thanks for the log, exception propagation crept in again in the bootstrap
> causing the same kind of issues as last time, investigating how to get rid
> of exception propagation when compiling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102745
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:017665f63047ce47b087b0b283548a60e5abf3d2
commit r12-4464-g017665f63047ce47b087b0b283548a60e5abf3d2
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102808
Bug ID: 102808
Summary: [12 regression] sve/mask_gather_load_1.c fails since
g:9b2ad21ab3ebc21a3408108327fa1a7cbedaf217
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org |unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102796
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
--- Comment #4 from Carlos Galvez ---
Thanks a lot for the detailed answer! That's very interesting, so it can
actually have to do with how the Ubuntu version has been built. I'll definitely
give it a try building locally.
Your output looks
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102807
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
This could be a bug in clang considering it uses concepts and all.
clang does not say why this concept evulates to false even:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100486
Arnaud Charlet changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |charlet at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102798
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is that the vectorizer should only duplicate pointer-info to SSA
names it created itself, not to _any_ existing ones.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102807
Bug ID: 102807
Summary: Simple code using ranges::views::keys does not compile
with clang
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102806
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
Yes, on the GIMPLE / Frontend level __builtin_shufflevector is implemented
mostly on the functional level and I don't remember doing any additional
specific optimizations (though it worked surprisingly
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102804
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102803
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |11.2.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> I wonder why tail-merging doesn't do it's job here. It does (on
> x86_64-linux):
Oh I missed that.
> but what's missing is possibly some if-combine?
Yes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102767
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #6)
> (In reply to Richard Earnshaw from comment #5)
> > We have the type
> > > type > size
> > unit-size
> > and movmisalign pattern is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102798
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102793
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||aarch64
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102789
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102788
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102783
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Even out-of-line does not help if there are visible CSE/association
opportunities across such call. A workaround is to make the out-of-line
function __attribute__((returns_twice)) which should insert
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102781
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-18
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-10-18
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102806
Bug ID: 102806
Summary: [x86] Suboptimal codegen for v4hi vector concat under
-mavx512bw and -mavx512vl
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
101 - 146 of 146 matches
Mail list logo