https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102043
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
So to clarify the ARRAY_REF constraints - there is currently no way to
construct a valid ARRAY_REF where an index does an access to memory before the
supplied
base object. TREE_OPERAND (array_ref, 0) need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103165
--- Comment #3 from Tobias Burnus ---
Patch: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584035.html
* * *
Note the remark in
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584042.html regarding
preserving spacing with th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103181
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is rather
if (!TREE_CONSTANT (divisor) || integer_zerop (divisor))
return true;
return false;
for division handling where here we have { 3, 0 } for the divisor.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
Bug ID: 103183
Summary: ind[arr] produces an lvalue when arr is an array
xvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: accepts-invalid, rej
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
Bug ID: 103184
Summary: ICE caused by r12-5102
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103185
Bug ID: 103185
Summary: ind[arr] is rejected when arr is an array prvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 10.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: rejects-valid
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Small testcase reprodce it.
#include
int
tbit0 (_Atomic int* a)
{
#define BIT (0x01 << 3)
return atomic_fetch_or(a, BIT) & BIT;
#undef BIT
}
aarch64-linux-gnu-gcc test.c -O2 -S
test.c: In function ‘tbit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102376
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Prathamesh Kulkarni
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:145be5efaf5674a7d25c723dc5684392a6276834
commit r12-5147-g145be5efaf5674a7d25c723dc5684392a6276834
Author: Prathamesh Kulkarn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103168
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-11
Summary|Value nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103173
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
&MEM [(void *)&data] should have been folded to &data btw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101378
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10db7573014008ff867098206f51012d501ab57b
commit r12-5148-g10db7573014008ff867098206f51012d501ab57b
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103179
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103181
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
Priority|P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103181
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5fed4063f428a14f5b91533d5954b9bf4e3e7db
commit r12-5149-ga5fed4063f428a14f5b91533d5954b9bf4e3e7db
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There has to be C++ defect report about this. Because clang has the behavior
you are requesting but ICC, MSVC all act the same as GCC.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
When mask is integer_cst, it not safe to replace_uses_by (use_lhs, lhs); since
integer_cst has type signed int, but lhs has type unsigned int, and will issue
ICE for type mismatch
_7 = _1 & 8;
_1 is signed in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Found it PR 79832.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103183
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Found it PR 79832.
Well DR 1213, http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_defects.html#1213
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> When mask is integer_cst, it not safe to replace_uses_by (use_lhs, lhs);
Similar ICE for variable mask.
int
tbit0 (_Atomic int* a, int n)
{
#define BIT (0x01 << n)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
Bug ID: 103186
Summary: redefinition of template symbol error with strange
error diagnostic
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #1 from dennis luehring ---
Created attachment 51765
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51765&action=edit
ii-file
output of "gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++17 test.cpp -DTEST=1 -save-temps"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #2 from dennis luehring ---
Created attachment 51766
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51766&action=edit
s-file
output of "gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++17 test.cpp -DTEST=1 -save-temps"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103169
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tnfchris at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
>gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++17 test.cpp -DTEST=2
This is wrong, you should use g++ to link as you need to link against libstdc++
which gcc does not do which is why you are not seeing it on gcc.godbolt.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #4 from dennis luehring ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> >gcc -Wall -Wextra -std=c++17 test.cpp -DTEST=2
>
>
> This is wrong, you should use g++ to link as you need to link against
> libstdc++ which gcc does not do
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #5 from dennis luehring ---
-DTEST=1 compiles under Ubuntu 21.04 with g++ 10.3.0
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=g++
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/10/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=nvptx-none:amdgcn-amdhsa:hs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Reduced testcase for the first issue (note it is a different error but the
problem is the same):
using Callback = void();
template
struct GetSetHelper
{
static void set( Callback callback_ = []() {} ){
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|link-failure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103187
Bug ID: 103187
Summary: std::counting_semaphore::try_acquire_for does not
unblock during wait duration
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103184
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-11
Status|UNCONFIRM
ib
gcc version 12.0.0 2021 (experimental) [master r12-5143-ga97fdde627e] (GCC)
[637] %
[637] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
[638] %
[638] % gcctk -O2 small.c
gcctk: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault signal terminated program
cc1
Please submit a full bug report,
with preprocessed sou
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103187
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.2.1
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103187
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
The relevant commit seems to be g:aeaea265cea3a2b2e772af7825351a4ceef29aac but
that *should* only be an optimization to use futexes when available. The fact
it times out without that change suggests the no
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103042
--- Comment #9 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
>> gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/complex/fast-math-bb-slp-complex-add-pattern-double.c
>
> This one running is odd, it's guarded by vect_double whi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103042
--- Comment #10 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
[...]
> testsuite: change vect_long to vect_long_long in complex tests.
>
> These tests are still failing on SPARC and it looks like this
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102880
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
So interestingly as a band-aid fix I bootstrapped and tested
diff --git a/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c b/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
index a016ee47a02..c2a0555dd78 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-cfgcleanup.c
+++ b/gcc/tree-cfgc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|unknown |12.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
Bug ID: 103189
Summary: [12 regression] g++.dg/tree-ssa/pta-delete-1.C etc.
FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21823
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bkorb at gnu dot org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
Created attachment 51767
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51767&action=edit
patch I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103042
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103186
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Priority|P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103189
--- Comment #1 from Jan Hubicka ---
I wonder if you can attach .optimized dumps of valid revision and broken one.
It may be related to modref/PTA changes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26163
--- Comment #5 from Martin Liška
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
And reproduces with: gcc gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/guality/pr89892.c -Os
-ftree-vectorize
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103190
Bug ID: 103190
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in insert_stmt_after, at
tree-ssa-reassoc.c:1452 since
r12-431-ga310bb73edc9548e
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103190
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-11-11
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
Thomas Schwinge changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83336
Bug 83336 depends on bug 79872, which changed state.
Bug 79872 Summary: document placeholder %K in gcc-internal-format
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79872
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8865133614f09caadf48c0b7d05f0331959b3bc1
commit r12-5155-g8865133614f09caadf48c0b7d05f0331959b3bc1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code at -O2|[12 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26163
Bug 26163 depends on bug 103188, which changed state.
Bug 103188 Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O2 and -O3 on
x86_64-linux-gnu: Segmentation fault
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103191
Bug ID: 103191
Summary: vector doesn't have any checks enabled by
_GLIBCXX_ASSERTIONS
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103176
--- Comment #3 from Josiah VanderZee
---
Created attachment 51768
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51768&action=edit
Test case to reproduce strange -Wstringop-overflow warning
I'm worried this test case is too large to conv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95982
--- Comment #6 from Bence Kodaj ---
For what it's worth, the bug is no longer present in gcc 11.1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103192
Bug ID: 103192
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE on libgomp
target-in-reduction-2.{C,c}
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103182
--- Comment #4 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
And just to be clear, Andrew's c#1 is correct. It's 45967-2.c.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103188
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103174
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103190
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fac4c4bdab1735bd8a87e37c519f0260e4769f2a
commit r12-5158-gfac4c4bdab1735bd8a87e37c519f0260e4769f2a
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103190
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103193
Bug ID: 103193
Summary: gcc for x86_64: wrong code generation: ucomiss instead
of comiss
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103044
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Segher Boessenkool :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8d71d3a317236ab4a69f441cf867a43aeb448150
commit r12-5160-g8d71d3a317236ab4a69f441cf867a43aeb448150
Author: Raphael Moreira Zin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103192
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103004
--- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Bah, I typoed the PR id:
commit 8d71d3a317236ab4a69f441cf867a43aeb448150
Author: Raphael Moreira Zinsly
Date: Thu Nov 11 11:40:10 2021 -0300
libgcc: Fix backtrace fallback on PowerPC Big-endian
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83520
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55610
--- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #9)
> Is this still an issue now that dragonegg isn't really a thing anymore? Last
> update to it was years ago...
oddly, the changes to support PIE might well squash t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95177
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=17898
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90843
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90843
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #0)
> > I thought there was a bug about this but I can't find it so let me open this
> > one for reference...
>
> bug 5307
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103043
Thomas Koenig changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103051
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
All right, so something like this should work, right?
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s112.c
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/tsvc/vect-tsvc-s112.c
index 3c6ae49f212..851b54e68b1 100644
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96092
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194
Bug ID: 103194
Summary: ice in optimize_atomic_bit_test_and, at
tree-ssa-ccp.c:3626
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21823
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
New patch, for both PR 80047 and this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=21823
--- Comment #8 from Xi Ruoyao ---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #7)
> New patch, for both PR 80047 and this one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584164.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80047
--- Comment #7 from Xi Ruoyao ---
New patch for PR 21823 and this one:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584164.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103004
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103129
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:abdff441a07f55d16e3d0e5ced3123c83d210a0a
commit r12-5176-gabdff441a07f55d16e3d0e5ced3123c83d210a0a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103129
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ice in |[12 Regression] ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103192
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103193
--- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com ---
See bug 52451 and bug 91323 for previous cases of unordered comparisons
being wrongly used on x86.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103175
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Also this one which fails but doesn't ICE
g:d70ef65692fced7ab72e0aceeff7407e5a34d96d, r12-5113
make -k check-gcc-fortran
RUNTESTFLAGS="dg.exp=gfortran.dg/inline_matmul_17.f90"
FAIL: gfortran.dg/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103195
Bug ID: 103195
Summary: tfft2 text grows by 70% with -Ofast between
g:52fa771758635d9c53cddb9116e5a66fae592230...a97fdde62
7e64202940112009d45d17f85e4cc61
Product: gcc
1 - 100 of 195 matches
Mail list logo
