[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug middle-end/103163] [12 Regression] stack_limit_rtx is created too early

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|stack_limit_rtx is created |[12 Regression] |too

[Bug middle-end/101157] [12 regression] ICE compiling gcc.target/powerpc/stack-limit.c after r12-1702

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101157 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/103163] stack_limit_rtx is created too early

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103163 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug ipa/103171] [12 Regression] ICE Segmentation fault since r12-2523-g13586172d0b70c9d

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103171 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |critical

[Bug target/103275] [11/12 Regression] don't generate kmov with IE model relocations

2021-11-16 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103275 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek --- Just those particular TLS UNSPECs. And, e.g. UNSPEC_NTPOFF should be fine in any insn that takes memory operands...

[Bug ipa/101941] [12 Regression] Linux kernel build failure due to retaining fnsplit fragment with __attribute__((__error__))

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101941 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug c++/103273] [9/10/11/12 Regression] internal compiler error: in cp_parser_type_id_1, at cp/parser.c:24010

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103273 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |minor Known to work|10.3.1

[Bug libgomp/103276] [openacc] Trying to map already mapped data

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103276 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yuri Gribov from comment #0) > Here hostaddrs[1] points to a spurious variable in current stack frame. > > Gimple code seems to be correct > voidD.27 copyin_simple (struct simple & restrict v

[Bug ipa/103277] [12 Regression] ICE in branch_prob with -O1 -fbranch-probabilities -fno-ipa-pure-const

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug ipa/103277] [12 Regression] ICE in branch_prob, at profile.c:1208

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103277 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug tree-optimization/98956] Failure to optimize out boolean left shift

2021-11-16 Thread navidrahimi at microsoft dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98956 Navid Rahimi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||navidrahimi at microsoft dot com --- Com

[Bug tree-optimization/86136] Modular multiplication optimization

2021-11-16 Thread navidrahimi at microsoft dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86136 Navid Rahimi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||navidrahimi at microsoft dot com --- Com

[Bug c++/103297] New: GCC cannot detect out of bounds in constexpr context.

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103297 Bug ID: 103297 Summary: GCC cannot detect out of bounds in constexpr context. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug ipa/101941] [12 Regression] Linux kernel build failure due to retaining fnsplit fragment with __attribute__((__error__))

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101941 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #51805|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug target/103275] [11/12 Regression] don't generate kmov with IE model relocations

2021-11-16 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103275 --- Comment #8 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7) > vmovd have same issue, for simplify should we disable 32bit load for > sse/mask register when memory_operand has PIC address. Please disable specific UNSPEC operands wi

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

2021-11-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 103026, which changed state. Bug 103026 Summary: Implement warning for Unicode bidi override characters [CVE-2021-42574] https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103026 What|Removed

[Bug preprocessor/103026] Implement warning for Unicode bidi override characters [CVE-2021-42574]

2021-11-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103026 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug preprocessor/103026] Implement warning for Unicode bidi override characters [CVE-2021-42574]

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103026 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51c500269bf53749b107807d84271385fad35628 commit r12-5331-g51c500269bf53749b107807d84271385fad35628 Author: Marek Polacek Date: We

[Bug target/103275] [11/12 Regression] don't generate kmov with IE model relocations

2021-11-16 Thread crazylht at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103275 --- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu --- vmovd have same issue, for simplify should we disable 32bit load for sse/mask register when memory_operand has PIC address.

[Bug rtl-optimization/103296] Select satisfied register for deleting noop move instruction.

2021-11-16 Thread rjiejie at me dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103296 --- Comment #1 from jojo --- My patch here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-November/584589.html

[Bug rtl-optimization/103296] New: Select satisfied register for deleting noop move instruction.

2021-11-16 Thread rjiejie at me dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103296 Bug ID: 103296 Summary: Select satisfied register for deleting noop move instruction. Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug analyzer/102695] missing -Wanalyzer-write-to-const for writing to string, function, label, or const member

2021-11-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102695 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/102779] gcc.dg/analyzer/capacity-1.c etc.FAIL

2021-11-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102779 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|WAITING --- Comment #3 from David Malco

[Bug analyzer/102695] missing -Wanalyzer-write-to-const for writing to string, function, label, or const member

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102695 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:111fd515f2894d7cddf62f80c69765c43ae18577 commit r12-5330-g111fd515f2894d7cddf62f80c69765c43ae18577 Author: David Malcolm Date: T

[Bug analyzer/102779] gcc.dg/analyzer/capacity-1.c etc.FAIL

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102779 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a80d4e098b10d5cd161f55e4fce64a6be9683ed3 commit r12-5329-ga80d4e098b10d5cd161f55e4fce64a6be9683ed3 Author: David Malcolm Date: M

[Bug testsuite/103270] [12 regression] gcc.dg/vect/pr96698.c inner loop turned from hot to cold after r12-4526

2021-11-16 Thread luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103270 --- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > So you say this is a problem with loop header copying, that would mean the > issue is really latent and general, no? Header copying uses > gimple_du

[Bug c/103292] [12 regression] xorg-server-1.20.13 -Werror=array-bounds false positive on unions

2021-11-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103292 Martin Sebor changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Last reconfirmed|

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 --- Comment #5 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This could be an unimplemented feature in clang with respect to C++23 by the > way. The problem is that it has a silent undefined behavior in the code, the string do

[Bug ipa/101941] [12 Regression] Linux kernel build failure due to retaining fnsplit fragment with __attribute__((__error__))

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101941 --- Comment #22 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #21) > Jakub: I see it is about error attributed call in the split out part of > function. Then we really want to prevent the split. Keeping track of those > should be

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 --- Comment #4 from cqwrteur --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > This could be an unimplemented feature in clang with respect to C++23 by the > way. Same code works with clang --target=x86_64-windows-msvc. D:\hg\fast_io\tests\000

[Bug tree-optimization/102929] [missed optimization] two ways to rounddown-to-next-multiple

2021-11-16 Thread navidrahimi at microsoft dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102929 Navid Rahimi changed: What|Removed |Added CC||navidrahimi at microsoft dot com --- Co

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- This could be an unimplemented feature in clang with respect to C++23 by the way.

[Bug libstdc++/103294] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
^ > In file included from > /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-2026/include/c++/12.0.0/string:53, > from :2: > /opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-trunk-2026/include/c++/12.0.0/bits/ > basic_string.h:535:7: note: 'std::__cxx11::basic_string<_Cha

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 --- Comment #2 from cqwrteur --- *** Bug 103294 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/103294] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103294 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/103294] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
sic_string(const _CharT*, const _Alloc&) [with = std::allocator; _CharT = char; _Traits = std::char_traits; _Alloc = std::allocator]' 7 | std::string str2{"abcwe"}; | ^ In file included from /opt/compiler-explor

[Bug ipa/103246] [12 Regression] 416.gamess miscompare with -O2 -g -flto=auto since r12-5223-gecdf414bd89e6ba251f6b3f494407139b4dbae0e

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c693978dd64b16637577ebf50c760053d7d2165 commit r12-5328-g8c693978dd64b16637577ebf50c760053d7d2165 Author: Jan Hubicka Date: Wed

[Bug c/101702] [12 Regression] ICE: in handle_argspec_attribute, at c-family/c-attribs.c:3623

2021-11-16 Thread msebor at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101702 --- Comment #5 from Martin Sebor --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > Martin clearly prefers some other fix, so I'll let him fix it himself. I think I just misread your change. It doesn't cause the problem I was concerned about.

[Bug middle-end/103248] [12 Regression] ICE in operation_could_trap_helper_p, at tree-eh.c:2479

2021-11-16 Thread joseph at codesourcery dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103248 --- Comment #11 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- Division by zero is undefined behavior for fixed-point types the same way as it is for integer types (but not floating point, at least when infinities and NaN are supported). Treating it

[Bug libstdc++/103295] constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 cqwrteur changed: What|Removed |Added CC||unlvsur at live dot com --- Comment #1 from

[Bug libstdc++/103295] New: constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103295 Bug ID: 103295 Summary: constexpr std::string does not work for clang Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug libstdc++/103294] New: constexpr std::string does not work for clang

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103294 Bug ID: 103294 Summary: constexpr std::string does not work for clang Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: li

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 51819 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51819&action=edit Patch which is in testing Patch is now in full testing.

[Bug target/103275] [11/12 Regression] don't generate kmov with IE model relocations

2021-11-16 Thread jason at zx2c4 dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103275 --- Comment #6 from Jason A. Donenfeld --- Working around this now downstream via https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=876602ee223c6c4225371b428a346f0b2d7f2020 which we'll revert whenever an upstream fix is available.

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > I still need to test it a little bit. I get no failures in tree-ssa.exp. Running a full bootstrap/test.

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/103278] [12 Regression] Recent change to cddce inhibits switch optimization

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization Target Milestone|

[Bug tree-optimization/103278] [12 Regression] Recent change to cddce inhibits switch optimization

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103278 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug other/103293] [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-3.c fails after r12-5301

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103293 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug analyzer/103032] false positive diagnostic from -fanalyzer about double-free

2021-11-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103032 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- I haven't yet reproduced the precise symptoms you reported, but FWIW I'm seeing this in got_gsd, which looks like a true warning for this code: | 1903 | psects[psectid] = strdup(name)

[Bug other/103293] New: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-3.c fails after r12-5301

2021-11-16 Thread seurer at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103293 Bug ID: 103293 Summary: [12 regression] gcc.dg/tree-ssa/if-to-switch-3.c fails after r12-5301 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Before phiopt, we have: > if (func_14_uli_8.0_1 != 0) > goto ; [50.00%] > else > goto ; [50.00%] > >[local count: 805306369]: > _11 = pretmp_1

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/103292] New: [12 regression] xorg-server-1.20.13 -Werror=array-bounds false positive on unions

2021-11-16 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103292 Bug ID: 103292 Summary: [12 regression] xorg-server-1.20.13 -Werror=array-bounds false positive on unions Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severi

[Bug ipa/103246] [12 Regression] 416.gamess miscompare with -O2 -g -flto=auto since r12-5223-gecdf414bd89e6ba251f6b3f494407139b4dbae0e

2021-11-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246 --- Comment #11 from Jan Hubicka --- Thanks for reducing the testcase. I found the reason for build difference. There is misplaced code clearing to_info_lto. hubicka@lomikamen-jh:/aux/hubicka/trunk-git/build4/gcc$ cat ~/fix diff --git a/gcc/i

[Bug c++/101405] [12 Regression] internal compiler error: in reshape_init_class, at cp/decl.c:6483

2021-11-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101405 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org P

[Bug c++/103291] [11/12 Regression] #pragma gcc visibility is lost for external decls declared inside a function

2021-11-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/102740] [10/11/12 Regression] Data member not found in struct inside an unnamed union

2021-11-16 Thread mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/103291] [11/12 Regression] #pragma gcc visibility is lost for external decls declared inside a function

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11/12 Regression] #pragma

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- For me it was working at r12-5290-g074ee8d9a91d7 .

[Bug c++/103291] [11/12 Regression] visibility is lost for external decls declared inside a function

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/103291] [11/12 Regression] visibility is lost for external decls declared inside a function

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.0 Summary|gcc 11 regres

[Bug testsuite/103282] New test case gcc.dg/tree-ssa/modref-dse-5.c in r12-5292 fails

2021-11-16 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103282 Jan Hubicka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/103291] New: gcc 11 regression with #pragma GCC visibility vs extern inside C++ functions

2021-11-16 Thread roland at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103291 Bug ID: 103291 Summary: gcc 11 regression with #pragma GCC visibility vs extern inside C++ functions Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/102740] [10/11/12 Regression] Data member not found in struct inside an unnamed union

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roland at gnu dot org --- Comment #4 fr

[Bug c++/103290] gcc 11 regression with C++ designated initializers, unions, anonymous struct

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103290 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Sorry it is a dup of bug 102740. Both are similar issues. *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 102740 ***

[Bug c++/101767] [10/11/12 Regression] Aggregate initialization fails for struct that has both unnamed struct and union fields

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roland at gnu dot org --- Comment #2 fr

[Bug c++/103290] gcc 11 regression with C++ designated initializers, unions, anonymous struct

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103290 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRME

[Bug c++/103290] New: gcc 11 regression with C++ designated initializers, unions, anonymous struct

2021-11-16 Thread roland at gnu dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103290 Bug ID: 103290 Summary: gcc 11 regression with C++ designated initializers, unions, anonymous struct Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/103118] [modules] ICE tree check in get_merge_kind at cp/module.cc

2021-11-16 Thread johelegp at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103118 --- Comment #4 from Johel Ernesto Guerrero Peña --- With the setup in Comment 3, now I can also include `` in the GMF of a module. I don't think this worked last week. Though all I'm doing in the module is specializing a my-library type trait on

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > Most likely caused by r12-5300-gf98f373dd822b35c . Strange. That git commit doesn't seem to be in the range of git hashes I specified. The one commit that do

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code seems to be int ui_5; long func_14_uli_8; void func_14() { ui_5 &= (func_14_uli_8 ? 60 : ui_5) ? 5 : 0; }

[Bug tree-optimization/103288] [12 Regression] ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ice during GIMPLE pass: |[12 Regression] ice during

[Bug fortran/103289] New: OpenMP: Private Allocatable arrays not allowed inside 'parallel' with default(none)

2021-11-16 Thread vzborovsky at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103289 Bug ID: 103289 Summary: OpenMP: Private Allocatable arrays not allowed inside 'parallel' with default(none) Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Se

[Bug c/103288] New: ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt

2021-11-16 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103288 Bug ID: 103288 Summary: ice during GIMPLE pass: phiopt Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assig

[Bug c++/101715] [11/12 Regression] ICE with noexcept and canonical types differ for identical types

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101715 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug c++/103279] [12 regression] ICE on llvm-compiler-rt-13: internal compiler error: canonical types differ for identical types

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103279 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

2021-11-16 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigne

[Bug analyzer/102695] missing -Wanalyzer-write-to-const for writing to string, function, label, or const member

2021-11-16 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102695 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/103281] [9/10/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > The only thing which PHIOPT does is change: > if (c_15 == 0) > goto ; [INV] > else > goto ; [INV] > >: > >: > # iftmp.1_10 = PHI <0(4), c

[Bug libstdc++/100017] [11/12 regression] error: 'fenv_t' has not been declared in '::' -- canadian compilation fails

2021-11-16 Thread unlvsur at live dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100017 --- Comment #42 from cqwrteur --- Created attachment 51816 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=51816&action=edit patch after today's update to configure add a patch for today's update

[Bug tree-optimization/103281] [9/10/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection --- Comment #3 from And

[Bug ipa/103246] [12 Regression] 416.gamess miscompare with -O2 -g -flto=auto since r12-5223-gecdf414bd89e6ba251f6b3f494407139b4dbae0e

2021-11-16 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103246 --- Comment #10 from Martin Liška --- I isolated small reproducer: $ cat 1.f SUBROUTINE DENDD1(B,L2) IF(CITYPIPSI.EQ.1) CALL VADD(A1DB1DA,1,L2) END $ cat 2.f LOGICAL BSFDD L2 = 2 CALL DENDD1(X0X0,L2) I

[Bug tree-optimization/103281] [9/10/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[9/12 Regression] Dead Code |[9/10/12 Regression] Dead

[Bug tree-optimization/103281] [9/12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103281 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Keywords|

[Bug fortran/97896] [11/12 Regression] ICE in gfc_trans_assignment_1, at fortran/trans-expr.c:11156

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97896 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:92e549683e1f46ba419e40b12928dc8afe5dc967 commit r11-9243-g92e549683e1f46ba419e40b12928dc8afe5dc967 Author: Mikael Morin Da

[Bug fortran/103263] ICE in gfc_check_reshape, at fortran/check.c:4830

2021-11-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103263 --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Likely a duplicate / variant of the old constructor bug for [array]. We have tons of these.

[Bug fortran/103286] ICE in resolve_select, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

2021-11-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103286 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug tree-optimization/102981] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102981 --- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez --- *** Bug 103280 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug tree-optimization/103280] [12 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O3 (trunk vs 11.2.0)

2021-11-16 Thread aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103280 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240

2021-11-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug fortran/103286] ICE in resolve_select, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

2021-11-16 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103286 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3b3c9932338650c9a402cf1bfbdf7dfc03e185e7 commit r12-5322-g3b3c9932338650c9a402cf1bfbdf7dfc03e185e7 Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug fortran/103287] [12 Regression] ICE in argument_rank_mismatch, at fortran/interface.c:2240

2021-11-16 Thread kargl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103287 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2021-11-16 Ever confirmed

[Bug fortran/103286] ICE in resolve_select, at fortran/resolve.c:8848

2021-11-16 Thread anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103286 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

  1   2   3   >