https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:031d42adff2c958cd5bc8457fd89cc5b6f8b8c7b
commit r9-9869-g031d42adff2c958cd5bc8457fd89cc5b6f8b8c7b
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103726
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103727
Bug ID: 103727
Summary: [aarch64] Too strict built-in decl check
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103728
Bug ID: 103728
Summary: Allow to run unittests before main()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102347
--- Comment #19 from Kewen Lin ---
Filed PR103727 for aarch64 issue tracking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101796
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f9fea41a767f6ad8cf3d521031048a2491f98b1
commit r12-5990-g8f9fea41a767f6ad8cf3d521031048a2491f98b1
Author: Haochen Jiang
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101796
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103662
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||clyon at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103729
Bug ID: 103729
Summary: ls64 tests fail on aarch64 with -mabi=ilp32 and
aarch64_be
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103577
--- Comment #6 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #3 from Iain Buclaw ---
>> FYI, with darwin, I've only been using the most recent commit i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a5b4ebc217afe6c31334e017d1fead4a6b8e53b2
commit r12-5991-ga5b4ebc217afe6c31334e017d1fead4a6b8e53b2
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103688
Joel Hutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103523
Joel Hutton changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103704
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0e34451ae582c901a2df08498b36f68ae401f0a
commit r12-5992-gc0e34451ae582c901a2df08498b36f68ae401f0a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86976
Bug 86976 depends on bug 71557, which changed state.
Bug 71557 Summary: time_get is case sensitive
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71557
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
commit r12-5993-g127c7178d5ec502d95862fd823537cbca1a0cb99
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e75a0a03588977c8c758091f9b50d456a5f67227
commit r12-5994-ge75a0a03588977c8c758091f9b50d456a5f67227
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
Bug ID: 103730
Summary: ubsan: store with insufficient space for an object of
type
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103711
Sebastian Redl changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sebastian.redl@getdesigned.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103731
Bug ID: 103731
Summary: 390: inefficient 64-bit constant generation
Product: gcc
Version: 8.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: tar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
--- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek ---
What do you find wrong about it?
((logger_msginfo *) & logger)->Fn
where logger is a pointer and logger_msginfo is a 2 * sizeof (void*) sized
struct does reference the pointer after the logger variable. It
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103704
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99217
huangpei at loongson dot cn changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||huangpei at loongson dot cn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99217
--- Comment #7 from huangpei at loongson dot cn
---
Created attachment 52006
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52006&action=edit
patch 0001
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
--- Comment #2 from Jan Smets ---
PEBKAC. Thanks for clarifying.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103730
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103563
--- Comment #4 from Samuel Hangouët ---
Ok. Thanks for the tip and sorry for the wrong report.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103729
--- Comment #1 from Przemyslaw Wirkus ---
Cheers! I will have a look.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102131
--- Comment #9 from Zhendong Su ---
Perhaps the following is due to the same root cause?
[558] % gcctk -O0 small.c; ./a.out
[559] % gcctk -O1 small.c; ./a.out
Aborted
[560] % cat small.c
int a;
int main() {
unsigned b = 0;
for (a = 2; a < 8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103408
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6bf5d9108ae2dcb6cb883442d7bd299fd8fc15e9
commit r12-5995-g6bf5d9108ae2dcb6cb883442d7bd299fd8fc15e9
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d5c965374cd688b0a8ad0334c85c971c1e9c3f44
commit r12-5996-gd5c965374cd688b0a8ad0334c85c971c1e9c3f44
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103350
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103731
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103619
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #9 from Martin Liška ---
Fi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103661
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |marxin at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86973
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96061
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103716
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Summary|[10/11/12 Regress
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103715
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101846
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
For bar, the problem is that while vpmovdw is AVX512F, we actually recognize it
only at combine time as vpermw (with selected exact permutation) combined with
low part extraction. And vpermw is only AVX512
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103721
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 regression] wrong code |[12 regression] wrong code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103666
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103723
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2021-12-15
Summary|Loop inva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103732
Bug ID: 103732
Summary: Incorrect constexpr evaluation of runtime expression
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103723
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Actually this is more complex, I had missed the original add too.
the full loop:
[local count: 958878296]:
_18 = (unsigned int) ivtmp.7_15;
len_test_12 = _18 + 1;
ivtmp.7_7 = ivtmp.7_15 + 1;
if (iv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103732
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
ICC and MSVC both accept it like GCC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
Bug ID: 103733
Summary: Missed optimization: defaulted op== for trivially
comparable types worse than memcmp
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57690
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Liska :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7527ddecef4721b3f4b00e8ad22d390b457c310b
commit r12-5997-g7527ddecef4721b3f4b00e8ad22d390b457c310b
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103713
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
Bug ID: 103734
Summary: IPA-CP opportunity for imagick in SPECCPU 2017
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98782
--- Comment #30 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Martin Jambor from comment #29)
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #23)
> > I wonder if we can get rid of the final magic parameter too, we run with
> > --param ipa-cp-unit-growth=80
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:73c3dacef9a30d7d66918606a97c496c71289f1b
commit r12-5998-g73c3dacef9a30d7d66918606a97c496c71289f1b
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26163
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103094
rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103194
--- Comment #22 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #15)
> > Is the behavior well defined for n >= 64? I got
> >
> > foo.c:11:19: warning: left shift count >= width of type
> > [-Wshift-count-overflow]
> >11 | lon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103734
--- Comment #1 from hubicka at kam dot mff.cuni.cz ---
I think ipa-cp heuristics still needs some work. It is nice that we got
it to do something, but I just checked and with LTO+PGO build of clang
it produces cca 30 clones that are not "for all
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
--- Comment #2 from Jan Engelhardt ---
== New input ==
$ cat x.cpp
struct S {
char b[16];
#if __cplusplus >= 202000L
bool operator==(const S &) const = default;
#else
inline bool operator==(const S &o) const { return __bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103733
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
That is still not equivalent, I bet you meant return !__builtin_memcmp.
Anyway, the reason we can optimize memcmp and can't optimize the loop that the
defaulted operator== emits is that there is no guarante
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102992
--- Comment #37 from Francois-Xavier Coudert ---
OS bug confirmed to be still present on macOS 12.1 (darwin 21.2.0), at least on
Intel. I don't have a non-patched compiler on ARM right now to confirm, but I
don't expect it to be arch-dependent.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103735
Bug ID: 103735
Summary: [12 Regression] Extra glibc "make check" failures
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98324
R. Diez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rdiezmail-gcc at yahoo dot de
--- Comment #7 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103736
Bug ID: 103736
Summary: snprintf bogus format-truncation, disregarding modulo
on argument
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Sebor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f
commit r12-6002-g639ece7abfa3688008cb791aec4c7a1a4f76e59f
Author: Martin Sebor
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail|8.0 |10.3.0, 11.2.0, 8.3.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81592
Bug 81592 depends on bug 78969, which changed state.
Bug 78969 Summary: bogus snprintf truncation warning due to missing range info
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78969
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98166
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
Give me money
MR CRABS
MOENTY
NOW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 91457, which changed state.
Bug 91457 Summary: FAIL: g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-4.C -std=gnu++98 (test for
warnings, line 25)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91457
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103736
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 85651, which changed state.
Bug 85651 Summary: Invalid -Warray-bounds warning with -O3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85651
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #3 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 52007
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52007&action=edit
Patch to ignore first format for builtins that have more than one
This patch for 10.3.0 instructs gcc to ignor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #4 from Tomas Kalibera ---
Created attachment 52008
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52008&action=edit
Example from comment 2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80532
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #8 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90906
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #3 from Martin Sebor -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130
--- Comment #5 from Tomas Kalibera ---
(In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1)
> See bug 92292. The extra attribute isn't ignored, it simply means the
> function has multiple format attributes, which is valid, but should
> probab
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54924
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92292
Tomas Kalibera changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tomas.kalibera at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103737
Bug ID: 103737
Summary: new test case decltype-bitfield1.C fails in r11-9363
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #16 from Martin Sebor ---
With the patch in comment #13 committed in
g:9695e1c23be5b5c55d572ced152897313ddb96ae GCC 12 prints the following for the
test case in comment #0:
pr40635.c: In function ‘server_init’:
pr40635.c:14:9: warnin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103737
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|bogus name and location in |[12 Regression] bogus name
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103604
--- Comment #21 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:fd43568cc54e17c8b4a845677872c6282bc6dbb7
commit r12-6003-gfd43568cc54e17c8b4a845677872c6282bc6dbb7
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=40635
--- Comment #19 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #18)
> The location is still present at g:45f4e2b01b82c72b3a11ff4ad184d7edcf0e63d4
> but is lost after:
>
> commit 9f55df63154a39d67ef5b24def7044bf87300831
> Author: A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
commit r11-9385-g689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103719
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
commit r11-9385-g689f8fed9b2a250e6cbeeec4fa882b8afd34eec8
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103717
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a5c50c3ad2a2f66f1232d25b0f0c15ee1bf449f
commit r11-9386-g1a5c50c3ad2a2f66f1232d25b0f0c15ee1bf449f
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103718
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
1 - 100 of 217 matches
Mail list logo