https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104963
Bug ID: 104963
Summary: GCC11/12 -march=sapphirerapids miss some isa.
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98845
Arseny Solokha changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11 Regression] ICE: |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104962
--- Comment #2 from James Murphy ---
Created attachment 52639
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52639&action=edit
client1.c
/*
* client1.c
*
*
* from Paul DuBois MySQL page 225
*
*
*
*/
#include
#include
#de
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104962
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104962
Bug ID: 104962
Summary: Compilier can not find files to link a simple MYSQL
app
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96983
--- Comment #40 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Michael Meissner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9baf563a176c4ea5a2a1606397ac09e16776d1ae
commit r11-9665-g9baf563a176c4ea5a2a1606397ac09e16776d1ae
Author: Michael Meis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98198
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4565a07a646949e6ce30a08c60484afe1fed0ac1
commit r12-7681-g4565a07a646949e6ce30a08c60484afe1fed0ac1
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101895
--- Comment #9 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Yea, no need to backport this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Julius Werner changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jwerner at chromium dot org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82235
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|NEW
Assignee|paolo.carlini at
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries ---
The OvO testsuite, when run at -O2 passes, because it inlines all .alias
instances.
But at -O0, it doesn't. With -foffload=-malias that's fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961
Bug ID: 104961
Summary: compilation never (?) finishes at -Og
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: compile-time-hog, memory-hog
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2f26b26721d5f8a6ac874fc23e18e1b03d207990
commit r12-7679-g2f26b26721d5f8a6ac874fc23e18e1b03d207990
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #31 from Martin Sebor ---
I suppose we could move this warning under level 2 until this is handled
better. -Warray-bounds already has two levels with level 2 being more noisy,
and it might be useful to add a level to -Wstringop-overr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #21 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #20)
> No, but "the first non-pure, non-inline virtual function in the class" is
> easy for the user to find.
Well, yes, granted, that would be a huge improvement.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #20 from Jonathan Wakely ---
No, but "the first non-pure, non-inline virtual function in the class" is easy
for the user to find.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100775
--- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
fixed in gcc11 too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100775
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9b1faeb5bfef258780e313aa8302a43f98f3b442
commit r11-9663-g9b1faeb5bfef258780e313aa8302a43f98f3b442
Author: Qing Zhao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=42540
--- Comment #19 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #17)
Ok, have read the wiki page.
> The linker could easily say that, with no changes from GCC.
Is the signature, or name, of the "key function" present in compil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Kees Cook changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kees at outflux dot net
--- Comment #30 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102943
--- Comment #47 from Andrew Macleod ---
Created attachment 52637
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52637&action=edit
new patch
I am working on a alternative cache for GCC 13, but along the way, I have
changes to the ranger_ca
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104960
Bug ID: 104960
Summary: [12 regression] several test cases fail after
r12-7670-gf6fb661ea8ac7e
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104955
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7fd6e36ea9aa8575841ff1da08b4aebc0298abe2
commit r12-7677-g7fd6e36ea9aa8575841ff1da08b4aebc0298abe2
Author: David Malcolm
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I tried this instead, but I think this still counts as "binding the same symbol
to different versions", and didn't work:
#if defined __sun__ && defined _GLIBCXX_HAVE_USELOCALE
#if defined(_GLIBCXX_SYMVER
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
--- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek ---
One can't take __has_cpp_attribute support for granted, so perhaps that needs
to be wrapped inside ifdef.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Oops, the second #if should be #elif
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
libstdc++ sources do this:
#if __has_cpp_attribute(clang::require_constant_initialization)
# define __constinit [[clang::require_constant_initialization]]
#endif
An alternative that doesn't use reserved
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
--- Comment #7 from Marc Mutz ---
Fantastic! Thanks for the tip!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86974
Marc Mutz changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.mutz at hotmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104959
Bug ID: 104959
Summary: nested lambda capture pack by ref will load from
nullptr
Product: gcc
Version: 10.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104492
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104958
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-16
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104958
Bug ID: 104958
Summary: missing -Wdangling-pointer leaking local address
through struct member
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries ---
So, what do we get after specifying -malias -mptx=6.3?
Alias attribute only for functions, not variables.
No support for weak alias (allowing this does compile, but we run into
execution fails in gcc.dg/glo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
--- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries ---
Created attachment 52636
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52636&action=edit
Tentative patch
Patch that I'm currently working on.
Adds -malias, off by default.
It's off by default becaus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104941
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:beb12c62eaec37ed0ee5a251ca0907d965d413b2
commit r12-7675-gbeb12c62eaec37ed0ee5a251ca0907d965d413b2
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Bug ID: 104957
Summary: [nvptx] Use .alias directive (available starting ptx
isa version 6.3)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104935
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
So in 554.roms_r I see cases (like for mod_grid.F90:allocate_grid) where
we now vectorize more V4DI stores from a CTOR of scalars which reduces code
size so jump-threading now goes wild (from DOM threading)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104956
Bug ID: 104956
Summary: ICE with -fmodules-ts unordered_set and map
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104882
Christophe Lyon changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |9.5
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104955
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
I suspect that this issue is due to building a feasible_graph per saved
diagnostic, thus leading to an O(N^2) where as the function gets bigger, each
individual diagnostic requires more work. Perhaps fixabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104955
--- Comment #1 from David Malcolm ---
Also takes a long time with -Wno-analyzer-double-free; perhaps we ought to
reject saved_diagnostics that will ultimately not be emitted.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||104955
--- Comment #5 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104955
Bug ID: 104955
Summary: Analyzer slowdown with many diagnostics
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: analyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
Also confirmed the issue still happens on trunk when we revert this match.pd
pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
Fixed for GCC 12 so far.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3117ffce4c1598a35e724138735b099262353358
commit r12-7673-g3117ffce4c1598a35e724138735b099262353358
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Sun Mar 13 0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94675
--- Comment #22 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Xavier from comment #21)
> The problem still happens with gcc 9.4.0 but it appears to be fixed with gcc
> 10.
I suppose that's with the original full testcase, I still see the diagnostic on
th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
--- Comment #4 from David Malcolm ---
Created attachment 52634
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52634&action=edit
Gzipped preprocessed source, unreduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|wrong-code with |[9/10/11 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
I'm also seeing states with dozens of bindings for touched regions for
__UNIQUE_ID_ddebugN for various N:
clusters within :: {, r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|incorrect alignas(void) |[9/10/11/12 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> The bug was made latent by g:51d464b608b38b9e2007948d10b1e0f1dcec142c which
> ensured that
>
> /* If the loop exits immediately, there is nothing to do. */
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104944
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-16
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Depends on||104943
--- Comment #2 from David Malcol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Yes, to be more precise:
&& produces an int (not a _Bool / bool) with value 0 or 1.
_Bool (a.k.a bool) is a distinct type, which might be larger or smaller than
int (the only actual requirement is "larg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
Does not enabling sanitizer improve things?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
Bug ID: 104954
Summary: Analyzer takes a very long time on Linux kernel
drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/calcs/dce_calcs.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68274
Bug 68274 depends on bug 102008, which changed state.
Bug 102008 Summary: [12 Regression] no cmov generated for loads next to each
other
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f6fb661ea8ac7e17c6924719de6219f002c4efef
commit r12-7670-gf6fb661ea8ac7e17c6924719de6219f002c4efef
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
--- Comment #11 from Andreas Schwab ---
The size of bool is target dependent (though only Darwin/ppc overrides it).
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Ok. Though, perhaps indeed trying to detect what phiopt optimizes and not
> sinking that case would be long term best, so that we don't do the ping pong.
Or,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104953
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104953
Bug ID: 104953
Summary: [12 regression] Several gdc and libphobos tests FAIL
on Solaris
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
--- Comment #9 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to dagelf from comment #8)
> Makes perfect sense now. && is "logical" in that it can only produce a bool,
> which in C is an int and anything except 0 or 1 is evaluated to false at
> compile time
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104931
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
The bug was made latent by g:51d464b608b38b9e2007948d10b1e0f1dcec142c which
ensured that
/* If the loop exits immediately, there is nothing to do. */
tree tem = fold_binary (code, boolean_type_node, i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96780
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e55c5e24b97ad8ddc44588da18e894c139e02c0a
commit r12-7668-ge55c5e24b97ad8ddc44588da18e894c139e02c0a
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104765
--- Comment #6 from Aaron Ballman ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #4)
> My preference: prohibit any use of ({}) in default arguments.
That's my preference as well assuming it doesn't break a significant amount of
code (which I have
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104952
Bug ID: 104952
Summary: [nvptx][OpenMP] wrong code with OR / AND reduction
('reduction(||:' and '&&') with SIMT
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
--- Comment #8 from dagelf ---
Makes perfect sense now. && is "logical" in that it can only produce a bool,
which in C is an int and anything except 0 or 1 is evaluated to false at
compile time.
There was a time when 'logical' and 'bitwise' we
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94675
--- Comment #21 from Xavier ---
The problem still happens with gcc 9.4.0 but it appears to be fixed with gcc
10.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104942
Siddhesh Poyarekar changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104942
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Siddhesh Poyarekar
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:818e305ea692ebc6578fb40881887d45382f876b
commit r12-7667-g818e305ea692ebc6578fb40881887d45382f876b
Author: Siddhesh Poyarekar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Ok. Though, perhaps indeed trying to detect what phiopt optimizes and not
sinking that case would be long term best, so that we don't do the ping pong.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
--- Comment #6 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Wouldn't at least now simply disabling the "optimization" in the last sink
> pass instance be safer?
I don't see how that's easily done. Not sinking any loads
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104910
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE: |[10/11 Regression] ICE:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104910
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:952155629ca1a4dfe7c7b26e53d118a9b853ed4a
commit r12-7666-g952155629ca1a4dfe7c7b26e53d118a9b853ed4a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102008
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104950
--- Comment #6 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #4)
> > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > > Ah, on aarch64 we get
> > >
> > > cmp w0, 0
> > >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104453
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104453
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:48fde80dea1fd59db34d0723427c41d0fb1ad951
commit r9-9985-g48fde80dea1fd59db34d0723427c41d0fb1ad951
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104734
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90388
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.0
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://github.com/scale-snu/ckks-gpu-core/issues/1
https://stackoverflow.com/questions/60824242/suddenly-getting-builtin-ia32-sqrtsd-round-is-undefined-with-nvcc-gcc
I think this is a bug in PaddlePaddle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103743
--- Comment #5 from Jiu Fu Guo ---
It would be also ok for the constant that only has 16bits in the middle:
e.g. 0x09876000ULL, we can rotate the constant to 0x9876.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102425
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||redi at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90370
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104951
Bug ID: 104951
Summary: avx512fintrin.h(9146): error: identifier
"__builtin_ia32_rndscaless_round" is undefined
Product: gcc
Version: 9.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90233
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104945
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-16
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104948
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Until you clear up your confusion, please stop leaving completely incorrect
comments all over bugzilla.
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo