https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104976
Bug ID: 104976
Summary: [avx512fp16] lowpart_subreg return NULL_RTX cause ICE
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104976
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target||x86_64-*-* i?86-*-*
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104976
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #1)
> The walkround in the backend is force_reg operand[1] before lowpart_subreg
> to avoid NULL_RTX.
It would be nice if we extend validate_subreg to avoid wired situati
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104963
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:16fe6e8c9787a3be47bee3dbf094d22a5691c190
commit r12-7697-g16fe6e8c9787a3be47bee3dbf094d22a5691c190
Author: Cui,Lili
Date: Thu Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104963
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:67e70a1a48ebf7db44710f3b022465ec38dfe5aa
commit r11-9667-g67e70a1a48ebf7db44710f3b022465ec38dfe5aa
Author: Cui,Lili
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104963
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104889
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #3 from PaX Team ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Can you attach what is inside cpugen.go?
i'm one of the original bug reproducers, this is what i get here:
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104911
--- Comment #6 from Iain Buclaw ---
Created attachment 52649
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52649&action=edit
fdump-tree-original
The corrupt is indeed coming from the front-end.
Attached tree dumps.
--- stage2/typesem.d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104911
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #27 from Jonathan Wakely ---
pst/algorithm_impl.h includes just because it needs std::not_fn.
We could move that to a separate header. Even without that, we could do:
--- a/libstdc++-v3/include/pstl/algorithm_impl.h
+++ b/libstdc++-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #28 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac73c944eac88f37db2767aa4acc7ff6f4983f21
commit r12-7699-gac73c944eac88f37db2767aa4acc7ff6f4983f21
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13071
--- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #11)
> I'll open an LWG issue to get clarification.
LWG agrees that it's ill-formed (no diagnostic required) to include standard
headers inside a linkage-specific
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #29 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Avoiding makes a big difference:
$ : | g++-11 -std=gnu++17 -P -E -x c++ - -include algorithm | wc -l
27018
$ : | g++-11 -std=gnu++17 -P -E -x c++ - -include algorithm | wc -l
25188
$ : | g++-12 -std=gnu+
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92546
--- Comment #30 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #29)
> Avoiding makes a big difference:
>
> $ : | g++-11 -std=gnu++17 -P -E -x c++ - -include algorithm | wc -l
> 27018
Doh, pasted the wrong line, the first nu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103528
--- Comment #14 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
"ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE" writes:
> --- Comment #11 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
>> --- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
>> Fixed?
>
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1f5c0e67393e8f67d66150eba8c64edfeb14e11b
commit r12-7700-g1f5c0e67393e8f67d66150eba8c64edfeb14e11b
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri Mar
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104974
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104977
Bug ID: 104977
Summary: [avx512fp16] wrong code for vfmaddcsh when
-masm=intel.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102980
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
Resol
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104565
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||davide.gadioli at polimi dot it
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104978
Bug ID: 104978
Summary: [avx512fp16] wrong code for _mm_mask_fcmadd_round_sch
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
--- Comment #7 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> I think the way to achieve this would be make sure to return true from the
> gfc_omp_privatize_by_reference hook.
What puzzles me is actually the reverse:
cl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
--- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek ---
So it means the firstprivate clause is added implicitly during gimplification
(with OMP_CLAUSE_FIRSTPRIVATE_IMPLICIT?) for it.
If we want to firstprivatize just the pointer and not what it points to,
perhaps
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104977
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Similar for _mm_fmadd_round_sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104978
--- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu ---
Similar for _mm_mask_fmadd_round_sch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103407
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
--- Comment #6 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #5)
> This patch fixes the ICE at openmp level:
> ...
> diff --git a/gcc/gimplify.cc b/gcc/gimplify.cc
> index 139a0de6100..19af384c634 100644
> --- a/gcc/gimplify.cc
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104978
--- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #0)
> #include
> __m128h
> foo (__m128h a, __m128h b, __m128h c, __mmask8 m)
> {
> return _mm_mask_fcmadd_round_sch (a, m, b, c, 8);
> }
>
>
> _Z3fooDv8_DF16_S_S_h:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104978
--- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #0)
> > #include
> > __m128h
> > foo (__m128h a, __m128h b, __m128h c, __mmask8 m)
> > {
> > return _mm_mask_fcmadd_round_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=54319
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59950
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aschepler at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104979
Bug ID: 104979
Summary: False positive from -Wanalyzer-malloc-leak with cast
within boxed pointer
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6393122d271a92d5d9d8656a57ea167e92498871
commit r12-7701-g6393122d271a92d5d9d8656a57ea167e92498871
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104980
Bug ID: 104980
Summary: Bad error on variable template instantiation failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104980
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-03-18
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104901
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104854
Martin Sebor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104952
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tom de Vries :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:093cdadbce30ce2d36846a05d979b8afc2eff618
commit r12-7702-g093cdadbce30ce2d36846a05d979b8afc2eff618
Author: Tom de Vries
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104952
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33053
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||msebor at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104981
Bug ID: 104981
Summary: [coroutines] Internal compiler error when promise
object's constructor takes a base class of the object
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104968
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102807
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
https://reviews.llvm.org/D119544 should fix this when it lands.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7a42b1fa1a090ead96cc0f94a8060a9650c810d5
commit r12-7708-g7a42b1fa1a090ead96cc0f94a8060a9650c810d5
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100557
--- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka ---
Reduced:
template _Tp declval();
struct print_tag_;
bool tag_invoke(print_tag_, auto);
bool tag_invoke(print_tag_, auto obj) requires requires { *obj; };
template
auto try_tag_invoke() noexcept(tag_inv
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tobias Burnus :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c133bdfa9e7d9225510d00dbb7270cc052e4e4ee
commit r12-7709-gc133bdfa9e7d9225510d00dbb7270cc052e4e4ee
Author: Tobias Burnus
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103039
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c7a6a32739d62deab03266e2b5449fce261b1ecb
commit r12-7710-gc7a6a32739d62deab03266e2b5449fce261b1ecb
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] New g++ |[11 Regression] New g++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104971
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52650
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52650&action=edit
gcc12-pr104971.patch
Here is untested patch with the optimization not to expand the pushf/pop at all
if we don
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104242
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104568
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a0c2c3f06227d46b5e9542dfdd4e0fd2d67d894
commit r12-7712-g0a0c2c3f06227d46b5e9542dfdd4e0fd2d67d894
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100680
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
commit r12-7713-g32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
--- Comment #36 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
commit r12-7713-g32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100834
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
commit r12-7713-g32ca611c42658948f1b8883994796f35e8b4e74d
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104568
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12 Regression] ICE |[10/11 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99578
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] gcc-11 |[11 Regression] gcc-11
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92918
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47da5198766256be658b4c321cecfd6039b0b91b
commit r12-7714-g47da5198766256be658b4c321cecfd6039b0b91b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:47da5198766256be658b4c321cecfd6039b0b91b
commit r12-7714-g47da5198766256be658b4c321cecfd6039b0b91b
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104476
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12 Regression] |[11 Regression] using-decl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101767
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104961
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Vladimir Makarov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0c016888ffd569c4b70722cf7df2efcc003f397b
commit r12-7716-g0c016888ffd569c4b70722cf7df2efcc003f397b
Author: Vladimir N. Makarov
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104973
--- Comment #4 from Ian Lance Taylor ---
The golang.org/x/sys/cpu.o is a different object file. That one uses
gcpugen.go, not cpugen.go. The original reporter is not reporting any problems
involving gcpugen.go. The cpugen.go (not gcpugen.go)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104208
--- Comment #14 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51a34fdff2af99e2bb096436d6872c8ea434d177
commit r11-9668-g51a34fdff2af99e2bb096436d6872c8ea434d177
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:51a34fdff2af99e2bb096436d6872c8ea434d177
commit r11-9668-g51a34fdff2af99e2bb096436d6872c8ea434d177
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87496
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063ef668c716ae0bf9c0f79ae62243e89075b475
commit r10-10504-g063ef668c716ae0bf9c0f79ae62243e89075b475
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104208
--- Comment #15 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:063ef668c716ae0bf9c0f79ae62243e89075b475
commit r10-10504-g063ef668c716ae0bf9c0f79ae62243e89075b475
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102740
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103299
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104208
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104008
--- Comment #12 from Marek Polacek ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #11)
> FWIW it seems the new test g++.dg/cpp0x/variadic-alias3.C crashes when using
> --param=hash-table-verification-limit=1000, similar to PR103769.
I cannot repro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70994
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98490
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||physiker at toast2 dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67817
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67804
--- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
*** Bug 67817 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=33056
Bug 33056 depends on bug 67817, which changed state.
Bug 67817 Summary: Missing compilation error for some wrong conversions in data
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67817
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84672
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104923
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Peter Bergner
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:114451a67febf2361b8ffa3f1ba6f33790791c09
commit r11-9669-g114451a67febf2361b8ffa3f1ba6f33790791c09
Author: Peter Bergner
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104923
Peter Bergner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104982
Bug ID: 104982
Summary: [12 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/bt-5.c by
r12-7687
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104943
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1c1daca1cdf7bc0156d57bb2b9083ee70c66b000
commit r12-7717-g1c1daca1cdf7bc0156d57bb2b9083ee70c66b000
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104943
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:faacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
commit r12-7718-gfaacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:faacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
commit r12-7718-gfaacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103533
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:faacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
commit r12-7718-gfaacafd2306ad7ece721a79dedbb6e44e0d65bdb
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104943
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104954
Bug 104954 depends on bug 104943, which changed state.
Bug 104943 Summary: Analyzer fails to purge state for local structs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104943
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104983
Bug ID: 104983
Summary: gcc ignore side effect inside CommaExpr and failed to
update value variable's value
Product: gcc
Version: 8.4.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104983
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||141242068 at smail dot
nju.edu.cn
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104984
Bug ID: 104984
Summary: Use hard-fp for libgcc single-floating-point routines
Product: gcc
Version: 9.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
93 matches
Mail list logo