[Bug target/105019] [nvptx] malias in libgomp results in "Internal error: reference to deleted section"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105019 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- Aliases in failing .exe: ... $ strings declare_target-1.exe | grep "\.alias" .alias gomp_ialias_GOMP_taskgroup_start,GOMP_taskgroup_start; .alias gomp_ialias_GOMP_taskgroup_end,GOMP_taskgroup_end; .alias gomp

[Bug target/105034] New: [10/11/12 regression]Suboptimal codegen for min/max with -Os

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105034 Bug ID: 105034 Summary: [10/11/12 regression]Suboptimal codegen for min/max with -Os Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105019] [nvptx] malias in libgomp results in "Internal error: reference to deleted section"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105019 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- Aliases in libgomp.a: ... $ grep "\.alias" build-gcc-offload-nvptx-none/nvptx-none/mgomp/libgomp/.libs/libgomp.a .alias gomp_ialias_GOMP_loop_runtime_next,GOMP_loop_runtime_next; .alias gomp_ialias_GOMP_loop_

[Bug target/105019] [nvptx] malias in libgomp results in "Internal error: reference to deleted section"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105019 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- To trigger: ... diff --git a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc index 87efc23bd96..8bf9ea90a77 100644 --- a/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc +++ b/gcc/config/nvptx/nvptx.cc @@ -245,6 +245,9 @@ def

[Bug tree-optimization/105030] store motion if-change flag causes if-conversion optimization can't be taken.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105030 HaoChen Gui changed: What|Removed |Added Host||powerpc-*-linux-gnu --- Comment #1 from H

[Bug tree-optimization/104970] [12 Regression] ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2133 since r12-6480-gea19c8f33a3a8d2b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104970 --- Comment #8 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- (In reply to Martin Sebor from comment #7) > The dollar sign in the internal attr_access string implies a VLA bound and > the attr_access::vla_bounds() function queries the VLA bounds. That should > ma

[Bug target/105033] New: Suboptimal for vec_concat lower halves of two vectors.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105033 Bug ID: 105033 Summary: Suboptimal for vec_concat lower halves of two vectors. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug middle-end/105032] Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC 6.4 used to ICE: : In function 'void* __sys_mmap(void*, size_t, int, int, int, off_t)': :39:1: error: unable to find a register to spill } ^ :39:1: error: this is the insn: (insn 21 20 37 2 (set (reg:S

[Bug c/105032] New: Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105032 Bug ID: 105032 Summary: Compiling inline ASM x86 causing GCC stuck in an endless loop with 100% CPU usage Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105031 Bug ID: 105031 Summary: wrong constexpr if statement in basic_stacktrace::operator=(basic_stacktrace&&) Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug target/104967] ICE: Segmentation fault (in find_instance)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104967 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-23 Assignee|unassigned at

[Bug tree-optimization/105030] New: store motion if-change flag causes if-conversion optimization can't be taken.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105030 Bug ID: 105030 Summary: store motion if-change flag causes if-conversion optimization can't be taken. Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/104894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -fno-plt -mcpu=power10 on PowerPC64 LE Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894 --- Comment #4 from Alan Modra --- Do check that the result is not a direct call. I think I was wrong to say the assert could be removed (or modified as you have done).

[Bug c++/53431] C++ preprocessor ignores #pragma GCC diagnostic

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||andre.schackier at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/105020] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmultichar" doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105020 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug bootstrap/95934] bootstrap fails in compiler assert in sanitizer_platform_limits_posix.cpp:1136

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95934 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eyalroz1 at gmx dot com --- Comment #2 f

[Bug sanitizer/105029] sanitizer_internal_defs.h:254:72: error: size of array ‘assertion_failed__1135’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105029 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug sanitizer/105029] sanitizer_internal_defs.h:254:72: error: size of array ‘assertion_failed__1135’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105029 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Host||x86_64-pc-linux-gnu Target

[Bug sanitizer/105029] New: sanitizer_internal_defs.h:254:72: error: size of array ‘assertion_failed__1135’ is negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105029 Bug ID: 105029 Summary: sanitizer_internal_defs.h:254:72: error: size of array ‘assertion_failed__1135’ is negative Product: gcc Version: 6.5.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105024] VLAs with C++ causes the gimplifier to produce __builtin_stack_save with the line# of the closing }

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Component|middle-end

[Bug middle-end/105024] VLAs with C++ causes the gimplifier to produce __builtin_stack_save with the line# of the closing }

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105024 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||wrong-debug Summary|g++ gene

[Bug target/105010] [12 regression] GCC 12 after 20220227 fails to build on powerpc64-freebsd with Error: invalid mfcr mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010 --- Comment #5 from Piotr Kubaj --- The command line output I pasted in the OP is actually from 12-20220320 (but 12-20220306 fails the same way). So I guess that fix did nothing for powerpc64-freebsd. Regarding .machine, I will check it tomorro

[Bug target/105010] [12 regression] GCC 12 after 20220227 fails to build on powerpc64-freebsd with Error: invalid mfcr mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010 --- Comment #4 from Segher Boessenkool --- Have you tried with something with commit 80fcc4b6afee72443bef551064826b3b4b6785e6 Author: Segher Boessenkool Date: Fri Mar 11 21:15:18 2022 + rs6000: Do not use rs6000_cpu for .machine ppc

[Bug middle-end/105028] [11/12 Regression] gcc.dg/long_branch.c compilation time increases by 10x on BE system after r11-5648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105028 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.3 Keywords|

[Bug other/105028] New: gcc.dg/long_branch.c compilation time increases by 10x on BE system after r11-5648

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105028 Bug ID: 105028 Summary: gcc.dg/long_branch.c compilation time increases by 10x on BE system after r11-5648 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug rtl-optimization/105023] new test case g++.dg/other/pr104989.C ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105023 --- Comment #2 from Segher Boessenkool --- @findex BLKmode @item BLKmode ``Block'' mode represents values that are aggregates to which none of the other modes apply. In RTL, only memory references can have this mode, and only if they appear in

[Bug c++/84964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 --- Comment #22 from Segher Boessenkool --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #21) > It did so even before my or Roger's patch. It was my first successful bootstrap in a few days, and I replied to this old PR without looking everywhere els

[Bug libstdc++/105027] New: Missing constraints on std::bit_cast

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105027 Bug ID: 105027 Summary: Missing constraints on std::bit_cast Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++

[Bug target/104894] [11/12 Regression] ICE with -fno-plt -mcpu=power10 on PowerPC64 LE Linux

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104894 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added CC||bergner at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #19 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #17) > Sounds related to PR92067, which requests that > __is_constructible(Incomplete) be a hard error. That request is far too simplistic and needs to be considere

[Bug c++/92067] __is_constructible(incomplete_type) should make the program ill-formed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92067 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- We need to be careful about this in SFINAE contexts. It can't be a hard error, because it's extremely common for constructors to be constrained with std::is_constructible, and for overload resolution to con

[Bug analyzer/105017] [12 Regression] gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc:631:21: warning: private field 'm_mem_space' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105017 Eric Gallager changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug libstdc++/105021] [11/12 Regression] Missing freestanding headers: bits/atomic_base.h:41:10: fatal error: bits/atomic_wait.h: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105021 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||10.3.1 Known to fail|

[Bug target/105010] [12 regression] GCC 12 after 20220227 fails to build on powerpc64-freebsd with Error: invalid mfcr mask

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105010 Piotr Kubaj changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at kernel dot crashing.org --- Co

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #18 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Jason Merrill from comment #14) > > Alternatively, when not following the standard strictly, why should it not > > be option (4.): Ignore the official restriction on determining (nothrow) > > c

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 --- Comment #15 from Marek Polacek --- Patch seems safe to backport to 11.

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 --- Comment #7 from Marek Polacek --- Patch seems safe to backport to 11.

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6 commit r12-7772-g4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tue

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6 commit r12-7772-g4b7d9f8f51bd96d290aac230c71e501fcb6b21a6 Author: Marek Polacek Date: Tu

[Bug c++/104996] [10/11/12 Regression] Overload resolution over rvalue/const lvalue array reference parameters for an init. list argument incorrectly picks the const lvalue ref. overload

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104996 --- Comment #5 from Ed Catmur --- Posted https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592154.html

[Bug c/105026] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check with __int128 and _Fract comparison

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105026 Bug ID: 105026 Summary: ICE: SIGSEGV in tree_class_check with __int128 and _Fract comparison Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: error-rec

[Bug middle-end/105025] New: ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:15863 with _Fract

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105025 Bug ID: 105025 Summary: ICE: in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.cc:15863 with _Fract Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/104999] [12 Regression] runtime error: pointer index expression with base 0x00000cf67720 overflowed to 0xffffffffea627728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104999 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:774ab2edcb5f3a24ed3a5cffd1143bd49a69f1ee commit r12-7771-g774ab2edcb5f3a24ed3a5cffd1143bd49a69f1ee Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug target/104984] Use hard-fp for libgcc single-floating-point routines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104984 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See libgcc/config/rs6000/t-e500v1-fp (which should have been removed along with associated configure logic when the powerpcspe port was removed, the cases using that file should no longer

[Bug c++/84964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #21

[Bug rtl-optimization/105023] new test case g++.dg/other/pr104989.C ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105023 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- There is already FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr84964.C -std=c++98 (internal compiler error: Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus) FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr84964.C -std=c++98 1 blank line(s) in output FAIL: g++.dg

[Bug c++/105024] New: g++ generates wrong line debug information

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105024 Bug ID: 105024 Summary: g++ generates wrong line debug information Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug analyzer/105017] [12 Regression] gcc/analyzer/sm-taint.cc:631:21: warning: private field 'm_mem_space' is not used [-Wunused-private-field]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105017 David Malcolm changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-03-22 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c/105013] Valgrind reports accessing uninitialized memory when -O2 option is used

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105013 --- Comment #2 from James Allwright --- Here is the valgrind output valgrind ./bug ==2490== Memcheck, a memory error detector ==2490== Copyright (C) 2002-2017, and GNU GPL'd, by Julian Seward et al. ==2490== Using Valgrind-3.15.0 and LibVEX; re

[Bug analyzer/103533] Enable "taint" state machine with -fanalyzer without requiring -fanalyzer-checker=taint

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103533 Avinash Sonawane changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rootkea at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c/84685] Designated initializers warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84685 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug c/82283] Wrong warning with -Wmissing-field-initializers

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82283 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug rtl-optimization/105023] New: new test case g++.dg/other/pr104989.C ICEs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105023 Bug ID: 105023 Summary: new test case g++.dg/other/pr104989.C ICEs Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: rtl-o

[Bug analyzer/105022] New: -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size doesn't warn for custom allocators marked with "malloc" attribute

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105022 Bug ID: 105022 Summary: -Wanalyzer-tainted-allocation-size doesn't warn for custom allocators marked with "malloc" attribute Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRM

[Bug libstdc++/105021] New: [11/12 Regression] Missing freestanding headers: bits/atomic_base.h:41:10: fatal error: bits/atomic_wait.h: No such file or directory

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105021 Bug ID: 105021 Summary: [11/12 Regression] Missing freestanding headers: bits/atomic_base.h:41:10: fatal error: bits/atomic_wait.h: No such file or directory Product: gcc

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/105020] #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmultichar" doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105020 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be a dup of this bug but basically the issue is the c++ does lexing up front and the pragma is handled in frontend after lexing.

[Bug c++/105020] New: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmultichar" doesn't work

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105020 Bug ID: 105020 Summary: #pragma GCC diagnostic ignored "-Wmultichar" doesn't work Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal P

[Bug middle-end/105009] [12 Regression] Fails to build with --target=xtensa-esp32-elf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105009 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/31178] VRP can infer a range for b in a >> b and a << b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Macleod --- Seems like it may expose a problem in gcc.target/i386/sse2-v1ti-shift-3.c as well: for (i=0; i<128; i++) { <...> if ((ti)rotr_v1ti(ut,i) != (ti)rotr_ti(x,i)) __builtin_abort(); if ((ti)rotl_v

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #17 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #16) > Same here: > > Program Headers: > Type Offset VirtAddr PhysAddr FileSiz MemSiz Flg Align > [...] > TLS0x00c3d

[Bug target/104781] [12 regression] SEGV in _Unwind_GetGR during i386 Ada bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104781 Bug 104781 depends on bug 104890, which changed state. Bug 104890 Summary: [11 Regression] doesn't work with __attribute__((target ("general-regs-only"))) and -march=i686 https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890 What|

[Bug target/104890] [11 Regression] doesn't work with __attribute__((target ("general-regs-only"))) and -march=i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|12.0

[Bug target/105000] __attribute__((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't disable AVX/SSE ISAs in ix86_isa_flags2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105000 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/105000] __attribute__((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't disable AVX/SSE ISAs in ix86_isa_flags2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105000 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f45603f39ba167dd0ea1b002c96ddccbfe2b4b2f commit r11-9686-gf45603f39ba167dd0ea1b002c96ddccbfe2b4b2f Author: H.J. Lu Date: Mon

[Bug target/104890] [11 Regression] doesn't work with __attribute__((target ("general-regs-only"))) and -march=i686

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104890 --- Comment #17 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f407033b7ca27a75cccef8310360e275cdb94d26 commit r11-9685-gf407033b7ca27a75cccef8310360e275cdb94d26 Author: H.J. Lu Date: Sun

[Bug target/105019] New: [nvptx] malias in libgomp results in "Internal error: reference to deleted section"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105019 Bug ID: 105019 Summary: [nvptx] malias in libgomp results in "Internal error: reference to deleted section" Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Seve

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #16 from Jason Merrill --- A more targeted possiblity would be for __is_constructible to error if the class has unparsed DMI.

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 --- Comment #15 from Jason Merrill --- Created attachment 52663 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52663&action=edit patch to make dependency on unparsed DMI a hard error This doesn't seem to break anything in the library, only

[Bug c++/84964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 --- Comment #20 from Segher Boessenkool --- FAIL: g++.dg/other/pr84964.C -std=c++14 (internal compiler error: Aborted signal terminated program cc1plus)

[Bug c++/84964] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE in expand_call, at calls.c:4540

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84964 Segher Boessenkool changed: What|Removed |Added CC||segher at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comme

[Bug c++/96917] decltype(auto) variable initialized with lambda by-reference capture has incorrect type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96917 Guillaume Racicot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gufideg at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/105014] [nvptx] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97459-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105014 --- Comment #3 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #2) > (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > > On a quadro k2000 with driver 470.103.01, I run into: > > So, sm_30. > > > ... > > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97459-1.c execut

[Bug target/102772] [12 regression] g++.dg/torture/pr80334.C FAILs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102772 --- Comment #16 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE --- > --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek --- > If the movaps that it fails on are: > movaps %xmm1, thr.1@ntpoff(%ebx) > movdqu 16(%eax), %xmm2 > movaps %xmm2, th

[Bug c++/105006] [12 Regression] ice: tree check: expected function_decl, have using_decl in maybe_push_used_methods, at cp/class.cc:1325

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105006 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/105014] [nvptx] FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97459-1.c execution test

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105014 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > On a quadro k2000 with driver 470.103.01, I run into: So, sm_30. > ... > FAIL: gcc.dg/pr97459-1.c execution test Reproduced on geforce gt710 (sm_35), with same

[Bug ipa/104303] [12 regression] gnatmake is miscompiled by IPA/modref

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104303 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2

[Bug target/104984] Use hard-fp for libgcc single-floating-point routines

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104984 --- Comment #1 from Den --- No one?.. Then, let's discourse. These are inside the file t-hardfp-sfdf : hardfp_float_modes := sf df hardfp_int_modes := si hardfp_extensions := sfdf hardfp_truncations := dfsf and these are inside the file t-soft

[Bug c++/103328] [11/12 Regression] ICE in remap_gimple_stmt with coroutines since r11-7419-g0f161cc8494cf728

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103328 --- Comment #22 from Avi Kivity --- Maintainers, please review the patch posted in [1]. [1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/591907.html

[Bug c++/102489] [12 Regression] coroutines: ICE in is_this_parameter, at cp/semantics.c:11273 since r12-3529-g70ee703c479081ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102489 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102489] [12 Regression] coroutines: ICE in is_this_parameter, at cp/semantics.c:11273 since r12-3529-g70ee703c479081ac

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102489 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6e33907ebe89361f8ddfb7481534cbf4a97f213 commit r12-7770-gb6e33907ebe89361f8ddfb7481534cbf4a97f213 Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: T

[Bug target/104882] [12 Regression] MVE: Wrong code at -O2 since r12-1434-g046a3beb1673bf4a61c131373b6a5e84158e92bf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104882 --- Comment #3 from Christophe Lyon --- Revert patch posted: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-March/592136.html

[Bug target/105018] [nvptx] Need better alias support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105018 --- Comment #2 from Tom de Vries --- As mentioned before by amonakov, a possibility is to add alias support to the nvptx-tools linker, and use that.

[Bug target/105018] [nvptx] Need better alias support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105018 --- Comment #1 from Tom de Vries --- (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #0) > Aliases to aliases are not supported (see libgomp.c-c++-common/pr96390.c). > This is currently not prohibited by the compiler, but with the driver link we > run in

[Bug tree-optimization/104969] Likely a false positive of -D_FORTIFY_SOURCE=3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104969 Siddhesh Poyarekar changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://sourceware.org/bugz

[Bug target/105018] New: [nvptx] Need better alias support

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105018 Bug ID: 105018 Summary: [nvptx] Need better alias support Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug target/105000] __attribute__((target("general-regs-only"))) doesn't disable AVX/SSE ISAs in ix86_isa_flags2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105000 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/31178] VRP can infer a range for b in a >> b and a << b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31178 Andrew Macleod changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amacleod at redhat dot com --- Comment

[Bug target/97106] [nvptx] Issues with weak aliases introduced by C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/102314] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1076 since r12-1319-gd4d38135b3137f1d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102314 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- Though, if we make those arrays incomplete, gfc_omp_finish_clause will need to figure out what size to use. This is in: if (OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (c) == NULL_TREE) OMP_CLAUSE_SIZE (c) = DECL_P (decl)

[Bug c++/96645] [9/10/11/12 Regression] [CWG2335] std::variant default constructor and unparsed DMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96645 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned a

[Bug target/97106] [nvptx] Issues with weak aliases introduced by C++

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97106 Bug 97106 depends on bug 97102, which changed state. Bug 97102 Summary: [nvptx] PTX JIT compilation failed when using aliases https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97102 What|Removed |Added --

[Bug target/97102] [nvptx] PTX JIT compilation failed when using aliases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97102 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/102314] [12 Regression] ICE in verify_ssa, at tree-ssa.c:1076 since r12-1319-gd4d38135b3137f1d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102314 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||burnus at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #

[Bug libgomp/98215] Coalescing memory in target region creates slower code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98215 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug target/104916] [nvptx] Handle Independent Thread Scheduling for sm_70+ with -muniform-simt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104916 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug target/104916] [nvptx] Handle Independent Thread Scheduling for sm_70+ with -muniform-simt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104916 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/104783] [nvptx, openmp] Hang/abort with atomic update in simd construct

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104783 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug target/104957] [nvptx] Use .alias directive (available starting ptx isa version 6.3)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104957 Tom de Vries changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0 Status|UNCONFIRMED

  1   2   >