https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93687
Evgeniy changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xtemp09 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91440
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||malashkin.andrey at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105199
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=59782
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note this only matters if you preprocessing the file yourself; that is
-save-temps works correctly and errors out that there is a stray '#' in
program.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103892
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
Pavel M changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|C preprocessor: splicing|Translation phase 2:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103892
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3d41408c5d28105e7a3ea2eb2529431a70b96369
commit r12-8071-g3d41408c5d28105e7a3ea2eb2529431a70b96369
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
--- Comment #1 from Pavel M ---
The same behavior with:
xxx \
error
Expected:
xxx error
Actual:
xxx
error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105207
Bug ID: 105207
Summary: C preprocessor: splicing physical source lines to form
logical source lines may not work
Product: gcc
Version: 11.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103680
--- Comment #5 from Jan Hubicka ---
The cfgcleanup logic is consistent assuming that your profile was consistent on
the input (i.e. read from profile feedback). If you
1) read profile
2) do optimization and prove that given if conditional is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103819
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103378
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103818
--- Comment #4 from Jan Hubicka ---
We have access list:
Base 0: alias set 2
Ref 0: alias set 1
access: Parm 0 param offset:0 offset:-4611686018427387936 size:32
max_size:32
access: Parm 0 param offset:0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |minor
--- Comment #1 from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105206
Bug ID: 105206
Summary: mis-optimization with -ffast-math and __builtin_powf
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103376
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jan Hubicka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4943b75e9f06f0b64ed541430bb7fbccf55fc552
commit r12-8070-g4943b75e9f06f0b64ed541430bb7fbccf55fc552
Author: Jan Hubicka
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105205
Bug ID: 105205
Summary: Incorrect assignment of derived type with allocatable,
deferred-length character component
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105160
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #8 from Steve Kargl ---
On Sat, Apr 09, 2022 at 10:23:39AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #7 from Thomas Koenig ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #6)
> (In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> > There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
> > on comp.arch. The code has
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Thomas Koenig from comment #5)
> There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
> on comp.arch. The code has
>
> #ifdef HAVE_SQRTL
> {
> long double xl =
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #5 from Thomas Koenig ---
There is another, much worse, problem, reported and analyzed by "Michael S"
on comp.arch. The code has
#ifdef HAVE_SQRTL
{
long double xl = (long double) x;
if (xl <= LDBL_MAX && xl >= LDBL_MIN)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82261
--- Comment #4 from Peter Cordes ---
GCC will emit SHLD / SHRD as part of shifting an integer that's two registers
wide.
Hironori Bono proposed the following functions as a workaround for this missed
optimization
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105130
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105180
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
---
26 matches
Mail list logo
