https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105253
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||crazylht at gmail dot com
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105282
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Proposed the fix as
https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg283031.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105283
Bug ID: 105283
Summary: Ternary operator and precedence warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105284
Bug ID: 105284
Summary: missing syncstream and spanstream forward decl. in
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285
Bug ID: 105285
Summary: False positive with -Wanalyzer-null-dereference in
git.git's reftable/reader.c
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285
--- Comment #1 from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ---
Created attachment 52814
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52814&action=edit
A patch to git.git that works around the -fanalyzer false positive
A fix to git.git to work around t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285
--- Comment #2 from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ---
This code also errors under -Werror=analyzer-too-complex, including in some
adjacent code, so perhaps the analyzer gave up?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105264
--- Comment #9 from Ævar Arnfjörð Bjarmason ---
Thanks a lot, I can confirm that this fixes the issue in builtin/merge-file.c
in git.git.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
Mikael Pettersson changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikpelinux at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104271
--- Comment #9 from cuilili ---
Really appreciate for your reply, I debugged SRA pass with the small testcase
and found that SRA dose not handle this situation.
SRA cannot split callee's first parameter for "Do not decompose non-BLKmode
paramet
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105286
Bug ID: 105286
Summary: Struct initializers do not work with function pointers
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
Bug ID: 105287
Summary: [12 Regression] ICE in get_region_for_local, at
analyzer/region.cc:874
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
--- Comment #5 from Esger Abbink ---
Cherry picking
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/commit/cde87638bf5cf6aafffb590986b6a890da0ba06c
on top of releases-9.4.0 allowed me to apply the patch to get a patched gcc9.4
supporting -fprofile-prefix-map
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105281
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Those changes in have been present since GCC 4.6, so they predate the
C++23 changes by *many* years. Nobody has yet verified how closely it conforms
to the new C++23 spec.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105284
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105101
--- Comment #9 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #4)
> If you want quick fix for immediate shipment then you can take that:
>
> #include
> #include
>
> __float128 quick_and_dirty_sqrtq(__float128 x)
> {
> if (isnanq(x)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
--- Comment #6 from Esger Abbink ---
After patching ccache 4.5.1 to understand -fprofile-prefix-map it does cache .o
and .gcno:
$ ccache -z -C
$ cd /home/esger/src/application/coverage_test/dir1/source/ && CCACHE_DEBUG=
CCACHE_BASEDIR=/home/es
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102651
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102651
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105285
--- Comment #3 from David Malcolm ---
Thanks for filing this bug; I can reproduce it with the initial attachment;
it's unclear to me yet what's going on.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105287
--- Comment #2 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> Confirmed; it's an assertion failing in
> ana::frame_region::get_region_for_local, due to a variable having NULL for
> its DECL_CONTEXT:
>
> (gdb) list
> 869
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105268
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ccae4443c8322d9d82a19a1e7c689413a122a478
commit r12-8176-gccae4443c8322d9d82a19a1e7c689413a122a478
Author: Marek Polacek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105268
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101500
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[9/10/11/12 Regression] gcc |[C++17] [DR2311] gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105279
--- Comment #1 from Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen ---
The internal compiler error also seems to go away if I remove the pointer
subtraction around line 1833 in reproducer.c. Maybe this is the real problem
because I am not subtracting pointers the way
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104853
--- Comment #15 from rvalue ---
Hi, Kito:
I've tried these patches and found that it doesn't work with isa-spec
20190608/20191213.
Release 11.2.0 with following patches applied: 9871d39f752b, f41871dfdbd9,
f049717d8d50, 330aff0a9f7b, fa21fcfb6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104858
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e76cef873342a66408c126abceaf7dbddd3f477
commit r12-8178-g7e76cef873342a66408c126abceaf7dbddd3f477
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104858
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |10.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103083
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100545
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105288
Bug ID: 105288
Summary: AVX/AVX512 casts should the "v" constraint
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105238
--- Comment #7 from Esger Abbink ---
Building a real project with the patched gcc9.4 and ccache 4.5.1 (replacing
-fprofile-dir with -fprofile-prefix-map=${CMAKE_SOURCE_DIR}=.) it looks ok at
first sight:
- 100% cache hits for the second compila
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105289
Bug ID: 105289
Summary: ICE on partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 11.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105288
--- Comment #1 from Hongyu Wang ---
I think should be these 2?
(define_insn_and_split "avx512f__"
[(set (match_operand:AVX512MODE2P 0 "nonimmediate_operand" "=x,m")
(vec_concat:AVX512MODE2P
(vec_concat:
(match_op
ltilib --without-ppl --without-cloog-ppl
--enable-checking=release --disable-nls --enable-lto
LDFLAGS=-Wl,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib64,-rpath,/opt/wandbox/gcc-head/lib32
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 12.0.1 20220415 (experimental) (GCC)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105290
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is another bug related to how array types are messed up when it comes to
parsing. I suspect this is a dup of that one.
37 matches
Mail list logo
