https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Summary|Missed loop body
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-05-17
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105615
--- Comment #2 from Pilar Latiesa ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #1)
> Constraint subsumption is specified in terms of the normal form. When the
> concept C is made independent of the template parameter, the normal forms of
> C and
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #5 from Chris Packham ---
Upstream issue raised https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/issues/55499 I still
think there's some work on the GCC side required as even without this specific
issue things have diverged.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #9 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #8)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> > Hmm, we have specific code to add scalar->vector(vmovq) cost to vector
> > construct, but it seems not to work here, gu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
--- Comment #5 from Rui Ueyama ---
Cool! We'll add a `.llvm_addrsig` support to binutils and get back to you guys.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #8 from Hongtao.liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #7)
> Hmm, we have specific code to add scalar->vector(vmovq) cost to vector
> construct, but it seems not to work here, guess it's because &r0,and thought
> it was load n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Rui Ueyama from comment #3)
> I think we can implement the `.addrsig` support to the assembler, but I
> wonder if GCC will support it once the GNU assembler gains the feature?
Yes I think it wi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
--- Comment #3 from Rui Ueyama ---
I think we can implement the `.addrsig` support to the assembler, but I wonder
if GCC will support it once the GNU assembler gains the feature?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |SUSPENDED
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I see most of it was implemented in the assembler. So you might want to report
the support for .addrsig directive there too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105625
Bug ID: 105625
Summary: Support .llvm_addrsig section
Product: gcc
Version: 11.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #7 from Hongtao.liu ---
Hmm, we have specific code to add scalar->vector(vmovq) cost to vector
construct, but it seems not to work here, guess it's because &r0,and thought it
was load not scalar？
r0.1_21 1 times scalar_store costs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105624
Bug ID: 105624
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in final_scan_insn_1, at
final.cc:2861 (error: could not split insn)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073
Bug 105073 depends on bug 105033, which changed state.
Bug 105033 Summary: Suboptimal for vec_concat lower halves of two vectors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105033
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105033
Hongtao.liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105033
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:105c56a8cfde6015b989ab22c20c915c1b4e69ec
commit r13-518-g105c56a8cfde6015b989ab22c20c915c1b4e69ec
Author: liuhongt
Date: Fri May 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105591
--- Comment #14 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC13.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105591
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1fba0608d12a209a5d76d65bcb1dec1c07bc33e9
commit r13-517-g1fba0608d12a209a5d76d65bcb1dec1c07bc33e9
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon May
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105615
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073
Bug 105073 depends on bug 102583, which changed state.
Bug 102583 Summary: [x86] Failure to optimize 32-byte integer vector conversion
to 16-byte float vector properly when converting upper part with -mavx2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
--- Comment #3 from David Stone ---
Simplified reproduction:
```
auto g(auto fn) {
return fn();
}
template
struct base {
static auto value() {
return 0;
}
};
struct S : base {
static auto f() ->
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 10:16:51PM +, sgk at troutmask dot
apl.washington.edu wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
> On Mon, May 16, 2022 a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #5 from Steve Kargl ---
On Mon, May 16, 2022 at 08:27:24PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
>
> --- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
> (In reply to kargl from
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pc at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102583
--- Comment #7 from Gabriel Ravier ---
Can confirm it is indeed fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
--- Comment #2 from Marek Polacek ---
// PR c++/105623
auto g(auto) {}
template struct ct_string {
static auto name() {}
};
struct S : ct_string<> {
auto f() { g(name); }
};
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105492
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105623
Bug ID: 105623
Summary: [12/13 regression][rejects valid] invalid use of auto
when deducing return type of base class template
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105492
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed12749a3c9d9569a2c23df2e0db2136dcd3512d
commit r13-515-ged12749a3c9d9569a2c23df2e0db2136dcd3512d
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105553
--- Comment #3 from Glen Joseph Fernandes ---
I would have expected this to only take effect in C++20 standards mode, leaving
C++03 through C++17 modes with no change in behavior.
Given the following intention in your commit message:
> This ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473
--- Comment #17 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz ---
On comparing that with ifort's result I think that the only remaining bug
is that if decimal='comma' then '.' is neither a decimal symbol nor a
separator (see f2018 13.6).
On Mon, 16 May 20
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to anlauf from comment #3)
> F2018 has:
>
> C850 An entity with the PARAMETER attribute shall not be a variable, a
> coarray, or a procedure.
Or we see here an disagreement between C85
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32834
Bug 32834 depends on bug 47359, which changed state.
Bug 47359 Summary: Recursive functions of intrinsic names generates invalid
assembler
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rofirrim at gmail dot com
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47359
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105243
--- Comment #3 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to kargl from comment #2)
> This fixes the problem. Someone that regularly use git will need to commit
> it.
Are you sure this is the right solution?
Consider:
program p
type t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a9717558340352c832413343cef71f588eaf
commit r9-10188-ga9717558340352c832413343cef71f588eaf
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104849
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b8cd1fb402163e16d2a139f4bee346ff0c8f234
commit r9-10187-g6b8cd1fb402163e16d2a139f4bee346ff0c8f234
Author: Harald Anlauf
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #17 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f43db17894744827d93ddcea7952d4ecf1f83f30
commit r9-10186-gf43db17894744827d93ddcea7952d4ecf1f83f30
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105103
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bbcff39a4c1004ef55c6a6330408a9fe8c258d01
commit r10-10748-gbbcff39a4c1004ef55c6a6330408a9fe8c258d01
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104849
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9fed680237d2c4242d3273ab8f64c82231d5eeb7
commit r10-10747-g9fed680237d2c4242d3273ab8f64c82231d5eeb7
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105138
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d31975be113562448520f4c94fc75b9cbb09715e
commit r10-10746-gd31975be113562448520f4c94fc75b9cbb09715e
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105103
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2402dc6b982c4dacac2360830f0edc123c588110
commit r13-514-g2402dc6b982c4dacac2360830f0edc123c588110
Author: David Malcolm
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105230
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:34c60e5e776d29ae6eb9e2e94af1c67666ec1caa
commit r11-10007-g34c60e5e776d29ae6eb9e2e94af1c67666ec1caa
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104849
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:50c73234630d51e7d66986710afd1af23851002b
commit r11-10006-g50c73234630d51e7d66986710afd1af23851002b
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||13.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105622
Bug ID: 105622
Summary: ICE in cxx_eval_store_expression with
[[no_unique_address]] and empty data members
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
quot;, (int)d);
if (d != 1)
__builtin_abort();
}
Error:
>$ g++ -O2 driver.cpp && ./a.out
1
>$ g++ -O3 driver.cpp && ./a.out
0
Aborted (core dumped)
GCC version 13.0.0 20220516 (69c4b5c519f0df37e4903992644cc29682721bc1)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620
Bug ID: 105620
Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/tsan/pr88018.C fails after
r13-456-geccbd7fcee5bbf
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105619
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105553
--- Comment #2 from Jason Merrill ---
I implemented P0929R2 in r11-5036.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105553
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13 Regression] |[11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105619
Bug ID: 105619
Summary: Wrong "used in its own initializer" with class prvalue
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
Sebastian Pop changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5251647c84489af05baa38e4dd103cf359f77b75
commit r12-8389-g5251647c84489af05baa38e4dd103cf359f77b75
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9ef808fb4373c8d8479539cb19ae00b1bcec87ea
commit r11-10005-g9ef808fb4373c8d8479539cb19ae00b1bcec87ea
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #11 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-10 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:90a0a5315375fd53baf677e60f0fc996fe2d70b2
commit r10-10745-g90a0a5315375fd53baf677e60f0fc996fe2d70b2
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100662
Piotr Kubaj changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pkubaj at anongoth dot pl
--- Comment #16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104069
Rolf Eike Beer changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||e...@sf-mail.de
--- Comment #23 from R
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #6 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Michael_S from comment #5)
>
> Even scalar-to-scalar or vector-to-vector moves that are hoisted at renamer
> does not have a zero cost, because quite often renamer itself constitutes
> the narrowes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
If b was not static and this was not main, there could be undefined behavior.
Gcc does not take into account the function being main though.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105162
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-9 branch has been updated by Sebastian Pop :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:407adcb310df7c85387a02f9b0d5f1df770258e9
commit r9-10184-g407adcb310df7c85387a02f9b0d5f1df770258e9
Author: Sebastian Pop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105618
Bug ID: 105618
Summary: Missed loop body simplification by -O3 (trunk v.s.
10.3)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #5 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> We are vectorizing the store it dst[] now at -O2 since that appears
> profitable:
>
> t.c:10:10: note: Cost model analysis:
> r0.0_12 1 times scalar_store costs 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #4 from Michael_S ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This is just the vectorizer still being too aggressive right before a return.
> It is a cost model issue and it might not really be an issue in the final
> code just
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biener ---
We are vectorizing the store it dst[] now at -O2 since that appears profitable:
t.c:10:10: note: Cost model analysis:
r0.0_12 1 times scalar_store costs 12 in body
r1.1_13 1 times scalar_store costs 12 in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.2
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Regression in code |[12/13 regressi] Slp is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105617
Bug ID: 105617
Summary: Regression in code generation for _addcarry_u64()
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105616
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105616
Bug ID: 105616
Summary: Using regex_replace throws "maybe-uninitialized"
warnings
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=2022
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef7b8976b9143aa78dd9cf5cfdaa02552d6e18a0
commit r13-506-gef7b8976b9143aa78dd9cf5cfdaa02552d6e18a0
Author: Richard Biener
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105577
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef7b8976b9143aa78dd9cf5cfdaa02552d6e18a0
commit r13-506-gef7b8976b9143aa78dd9cf5cfdaa02552d6e18a0
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105610
--- Comment #2 from fsb4000 at yandex dot ru ---
>Has anybody ever been confused about the semantics, and expected the
>cv-qualifiers to have an effect?
Yes. I saw a question on one forum why constness is not taken into account when
inheriting
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #4 from Martin Liška ---
Please make the review request to upstream first:
https://reviews.llvm.org/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105615
Bug ID: 105615
Summary: Partial ordering of constraints with empty parameter
mapping
Product: gcc
Version: 10.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #3 from Chris Packham ---
It looks like upstream has moved to FIRST_32_SECOND_64(160, 216) somewhere
along the line. According to my reading of the linux source code this is wrong
for both bitnesses now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
--- Comment #2 from Chris Packham ---
Created attachment 52984
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52984&action=edit
Set struct_kernel_stat_sz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105598
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105613
--- Comment #5 from Roger Sayle ---
Firstly sorry for the inconvenience. Yep, Jakub's analysis is correct we/I
need iorv4si for NE. My thinko, X==Y is X.h==Y.h && X.l==Y.l, but X!=Y is
X.h!=Y.h || X.l!=Y.l, sorry. Many thanks to Jakub for ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105598
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
With -O2 -fdisable-tree-fre1 it started with the same revision, but went away
with r12-5104-gb406bb901f7e98f7c6d66a240c2eb64b7cd7e615 instead.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105614
Bug ID: 105614
Summary: mips64: sanitizer_platform_limits_linux.cpp:75:38:
error: static assertion failed
Product: gcc
Version: 11.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105613
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 52983
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52983&action=edit
gcc13-pr105613.patch
Untested fix.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105598
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
r12-3918-g5b8b1522e04adc20980f396571be1929a32d148a is an optimization
improvement. When backporting the change the failure goes away but it
re-appears with -fdisable-tree-fre1 and can be mitigated with -fn
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105491
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11/12 Regression] Usage
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104652
--- Comment #2 from Vorfeed Canal ---
Thanks for showing a workaround:
class Foo {
public:
explicit Foo(int f) : x(f) {}
[[gnu::target("default")]] friend inline Foo bar(Foo& foo) {
return Foo(foo.x);
}
[[gnu::target("
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105610
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
I don't see any benefit to this warning. What harm does the example code do?
Has anybody ever been confused about the semantics, and expected the
cv-qualifiers to have an effect?
If this language feature
1 - 100 of 110 matches
Mail list logo
