[Bug c++/105652] New: ICE: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.cc:13400

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105652 Bug ID: 105652 Summary: ICE: in is_base_type, at dwarf2out.cc:13400 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug tree-optimization/105650] [13 Regression] Possibly wrong code on fontforge -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105650 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug tree-optimization/105643] [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 --- Comment #3 from Levy Hsu --- I forgot to mention, that the build time also increased by 128% on the Intel platform above, but no performance improvement was spotted. I'll check the objdump and see what happens.

[Bug fortran/105473] semicolon allowed when list-directed read integer with decimal='point'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105473 --- Comment #19 from harper at msor dot vuw.ac.nz --- Thank you. To make the outputs from my test program testdecimal.f90 easier to compare when using different compilers, and to clarify where a reading error happened, I have revised the

[Bug tree-optimization/105651] bogus "may overlap" memcpy warning with std::string

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c++ |tree-optimization Known to fail|

[Bug c++/105651] Failure compiling constexpr/__builtin_memcpy on Cygwin with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- Created attachment 52991 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52991=edit save-temps

[Bug c++/105651] New: Failure compiling constexpr/__builtin_memcpy on Cygwin with -std=c++20

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105651 Bug ID: 105651 Summary: Failure compiling constexpr/__builtin_memcpy on Cygwin with -std=c++20 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/87403] [Meta-bug] Issues that suggest a new warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87403 Bug 87403 depends on bug 105131, which changed state. Bug 105131 Summary: Warning for mismatched declaration/definition with enum https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 What|Removed |Added

[Bug c/105131] Warning for mismatched declaration/definition with enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/105131] Warning for mismatched declaration/definition with enum

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105131 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7da9a089608b0ca09683332ce014fb6184842724 commit r13-627-g7da9a089608b0ca09683332ce014fb6184842724 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/102774] Stop showing "error: variable or field ‘f’ declared void" after an earlier error in a declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102774 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/102774] Stop showing "error: variable or field ‘f’ declared void" after an earlier error in a declarator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102774 Barry Revzin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||barry.revzin at gmail dot com ---

[Bug tree-optimization/105650] New: [13 Regression] Possibly wrong code on fontforge -fvect-cost-model=unlimited

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105650 Bug ID: 105650 Summary: [13 Regression] Possibly wrong code on fontforge -fvect-cost-model=unlimited Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507 --- Comment #6 from Eric Botcazou --- > So the rule of thumb is to never use -static-libgcc if you have a > GCC-compiled DLL in the link, that's guaranteed to break otherwise. So this could happen to the compiler if it is linked with the

[Bug ipa/105600] [12/13 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble since r12-5696-g53caa4723d8de73f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #10 from Sam James --- Thanks Andrew. I spent a while trying to minimise it using that but I've got a bit stuck. I'm used to reducing normal ICEs but link-time/LTO ones seem to be harder to me. I was going to upload the full lot

[Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507 --- Comment #5 from Eric Botcazou --- > We do have some open bugs re broken exception handling with mingw32, like > https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/9289#issuecomment-945306860 > > Sadly no one stepped up to look into that. Do

[Bug testsuite/105620] [13 regression] g++.dg/tsan/pr88018.C fails after r13-456-geccbd7fcee5bbf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620 pc at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-18 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507 --- Comment #4 from Christoph Reiter --- I see, thanks for having a look :) We do have some open bugs re broken exception handling with mingw32, like https://github.com/msys2/MINGW-packages/issues/9289#issuecomment-945306860 Sadly no one

[Bug fortran/104096] ICE with parameterized derived type (PDT)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104096 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug testsuite/105620] [13 regression] g++.dg/tsan/pr88018.C fails after r13-456-geccbd7fcee5bbf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105620 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Clarke : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1875214cd1ca3e8bd0121f703537eb98edd84027 commit r13-626-g1875214cd1ca3e8bd0121f703537eb98edd84027 Author: Paul A. Clarke Date:

[Bug fortran/82173] [meta-bug] [PDT] Parameterized derived type errors

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82173 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Remove PR 82243 from "Depends On" as it isn't a PDT bug.

[Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||100486 Last reconfirmed|

[Bug target/105649] New: Wrong .localentry address on powerpc64le with -fpatchable-function-entry=1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105649 Bug ID: 105649 Summary: Wrong .localentry address on powerpc64le with -fpatchable-function-entry=1 Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ada/105507] Ada build fails for 32bit Windows

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105507 --- Comment #2 from Christoph Reiter --- Stack trace (I rebuilt the host gcc 11.3.0 with debug symbols and re-ran the failing command with "-wrapper gdb,--args"): Thread 1 received signal SIGSEGV, Segmentation fault. 0x7563bd90 in strlen ()

[Bug c++/41091] Using section attribute in c and c++ function causes section type conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41091 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- I really doubt there is a good solution for this because of what c++ calls vague linkage. Clang's solution is broken too.

[Bug c++/41091] Using section attribute in c and c++ function causes section type conflict

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41091 Bobby Reynolds changed: What|Removed |Added CC||boreynol at microsoft dot com ---

[Bug target/105587] [13 Regression] ICE in extract_insn, at recog.cc:2791 (error: unrecognizable insn) since r13-210-gfcda0efccad41eba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105587 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug middle-end/105648] New: .cfi_startproc in wrong position when -fpatchable-function-entry= is enabled on ppc64le

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105648 Bug ID: 105648 Summary: .cfi_startproc in wrong position when -fpatchable-function-entry= is enabled on ppc64le Product: gcc Version: 11.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/105647] New test g++.dg/modules/pr105169 from r13-566-g7a3f38a966a528 fails with assembler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647 --- Comment #1 from Giuliano Belinassi --- Confirmed. powerpc64le-suse-linux-gcc-11 -fpatchable-function-entry=1 -O2 -c -o /tmp/a.o pr105169_a.C /tmp/ccjfumfv.s: Assembler messages: /tmp/ccjfumfv.s:64: Error: .localentry expression for

[Bug middle-end/98865] Missed transform of (a >> 63) * b

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98865 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4a9be8d51182076222d707d9d68f6eda78e8ee2c commit r13-624-g4a9be8d51182076222d707d9d68f6eda78e8ee2c Author: Roger Sayle Date: Wed

[Bug debug/105627] -fcompare-debug failure at -Og for powerpc64le-unknown-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105627 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-18

[Bug target/105556] RA assigns an MMA vector input operand to vs0-vs31 causing an MMA accumulator to be spilled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105556 Peter Bergner changed: What|Removed |Added Version|13.0|12.1.0 --- Comment #4 from Peter

[Bug c++/105634] [9/10/11/12 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in maybe_warn_class_memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/105497] -Wswitch ignores [[maybe_unused]] for an enumerator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105497 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/105497] -Wswitch ignores [[maybe_unused]] for an enumerator

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105497 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:60fdce11dc9e5ddf671b07a3fc6ed70476860b22 commit r13-622-g60fdce11dc9e5ddf671b07a3fc6ed70476860b22 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug c++/105634] [9/10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Floating point exception in maybe_warn_class_memaccess

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105634 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dfe38b8d5dbfe3dd5209aece4ce2f7a6b303a2f9 commit r13-621-gdfe38b8d5dbfe3dd5209aece4ce2f7a6b303a2f9 Author: Marek Polacek Date:

[Bug other/105647] New: New test g++.dg/modules/pr105169 from r13-566-g7a3f38a966a528 fails with assembler error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105647 Bug ID: 105647 Summary: New test g++.dg/modules/pr105169 from r13-566-g7a3f38a966a528 fails with assembler error Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/105645] Template specializations are not hidden with fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105645 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- There might be a dup of this one already.

[Bug c++/105646] g++ does not raise xxx is used uninitialized warning under some conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105646 --- Comment #1 from cfy1990 at gmail dot com --- When compile without -O2, g++ will generate "'v3' may be used uninitialized" warning. code link: https://godbolt.org/z/r3sY4srx9

[Bug tree-optimization/105458] [12/13 Regression] ICE in set_relation, at value-relation.cc:609 since r12-4790-g4b3a325f07acebf4

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105458 --- Comment #5 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9c8125b98cdd406fbad09995529a5c6acffdd928 commit r12-8393-g9c8125b98cdd406fbad09995529a5c6acffdd928 Author: Andrew

[Bug c++/105646] New: g++ does not raise xxx is used uninitialized warning under some conditions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105646 Bug ID: 105646 Summary: g++ does not raise xxx is used uninitialized warning under some conditions Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/105645] New: Template specializations are not hidden with fvisibility=hidden

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105645 Bug ID: 105645 Summary: Template specializations are not hidden with fvisibility=hidden Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/105644] ICE in a fold expression with a requires expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/105643] [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-05-18 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/105643] [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org Target

[Bug lto/41526] gimple bytecode streams are not portable between different hosts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=41526 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||richard at weickelt dot de --- Comment

[Bug lto/105641] Floating point constants are 0 in LTO objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105641 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug libstdc++/96710] __int128 vs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #0) > Our definitions of is_scalar depends on is_arithmetic, so > is_scalar<__int128> is false, and therefore is_object<__int128> is false. > This is clearly

[Bug ipa/105639] [12/13 Regression] ICE in propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.cc:4195 since r12-7936-gf6d65e803623c7ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105639 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.2 Priority|P3

[Bug middle-end/105638] Redundant stores aren't removed by DSE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105638 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c++/105637] [12/13 Regression] Wrong overload selected in base class

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105637 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2

[Bug c/105635] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimple_parm_array_size, at pointer-query.cc:592 since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 Target Milestone|---

[Bug debug/105630] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.4

[Bug middle-end/105629] [13 Regression] g++.dg/opt/pr94589-2.C for cris, m68k, s390x

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105629 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug ipa/105600] [12/13 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble since r12-5696-g53caa4723d8de73f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #9 from Martin Liška --- So what happens in WPA: 1) we read IPA ICF summary and the variable has definition: (gdb) p vnode->debug() _ZN8nlohmann6detail12static_constINS0_10to_json_fnEE5valueE/10 (value) @0x77fb3200 Type:

[Bug debug/105630] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O1 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105630 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug ipa/105600] [12/13 Regression] ICE with LTO when building Mumble since r12-5696-g53caa4723d8de73f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|ICE with LTO when building |[12/13 Regression] ICE with

[Bug ipa/105600] ICE with LTO when building Mumble from git on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug lto/105641] Floating point constants are 0 in LTO objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105641 --- Comment #3 from Richard Weickelt --- Aha, according to bug 41526, GIMPLE bytecode streams are not portable across different hosts. That's unfortunate.

[Bug c/105635] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimple_parm_array_size, at pointer-query.cc:592 since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug lto/105641] Floating point constants are 0 in LTO objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105641 Richard Weickelt changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Floating point constants|Floating point constants

[Bug lto/105641] Floating point constants are 0 in C LTO objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105641 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Yes we don't support still different host compiling lto code.

[Bug tree-optimization/105643] [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- >From what I know, that might be the loop versioning for alias or otherwise kicking in more since the vectorizer can not vectorize more loops.

[Bug target/105640] [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 --- Comment #5 from Tobias Burnus --- Regarding LLVM, I have no idea, but doing some searching, I do see: * clang/test/OpenMP/declare_variant_clauses_ast_print.cpp: //PRINT: #pragma omp declare variant(foo_v2) match(construct={dispatch},

[Bug ipa/105600] ICE with LTO when building Mumble from git on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #6 from Alex Coplan --- Note the original bug also triggers on GCC 11 but the attached reduced testcase doesn't, I'm attempting to reduce a testcase that crashes all versions.

[Bug ipa/105600] ICE with LTO when building Mumble from git on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 Alex Coplan changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/105600] ICE with LTO when building Mumble from git on arm64

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105600 --- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan --- Created attachment 52988 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=52988=edit reduced testcase I managed to reproduce the environment and reduce a testcase (see the attached tarball): $ cat

[Bug c++/105644] New: ICE in a fold expression with a requires expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105644 Bug ID: 105644 Summary: ICE in a fold expression with a requires expression: in iterative_hash_template_arg, at cp/pt.cc:1805 Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status:

[Bug tree-optimization/105643] New: [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105643 Bug ID: 105643 Summary: [13 Regression] Code-Size regression for specrate 538.imagick_r Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/105073] [meta bug]Patch pending for GCC13.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug target/105073] [meta bug]Patch pending for GCC13.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105073 Bug 105073 depends on bug 103462, which changed state. Bug 103462 Summary: GCC failed to reduce bit clear in loop. https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462 What|Removed |Added

[Bug tree-optimization/103462] GCC failed to reduce bit clear in loop.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/105642] [12/13 Regression] error: call to ‘__write_overflow_field’ declared with attribute warning: [-Werror=attribute-warning] since r12-2270-gdddb6ffdc5c25264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105642 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- That seems completely correct. Try: int foo (struct ceph_inode_info *n) { int *i = >vfs_inode; return __builtin_object_size(i, 1); } This returns 4, even GCC 4.6 returned that. So,

[Bug tree-optimization/105642] [12/13 Regression] error: call to ‘__write_overflow_field’ declared with attribute warning: [-Werror=attribute-warning] since r12-2270-gdddb6ffdc5c25264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105642 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/103462] GCC failed to reduce bit clear in loop.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103462 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9d1336d977cf0cab75679d4b4170e7c9a86cd1f4 commit r13-583-g9d1336d977cf0cab75679d4b4170e7c9a86cd1f4 Author: liuhongt Date: Tue Dec

[Bug debug/105636] -gctf causes an ICE on some invalid code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105636 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ibhagat at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug c/105635] [12/13 Regression] ICE in gimple_parm_array_size, at pointer-query.cc:592 since r12-6606-g9d6a0f388eb048f8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105635 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org,

[Bug tree-optimization/105642] New: [12/13 Regression] error: call to ‘__write_overflow_field’ declared with attribute warning: [-Werror=attribute-warning] sincer12-2270-gdddb6ffdc5c25264

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105642 Bug ID: 105642 Summary: [12/13 Regression] error: call to ‘__write_overflow_field’ declared with attribute warning: [-Werror=attribute-warning]

[Bug ipa/105639] [12/13 Regression] ICE in propagate_controlled_uses, at ipa-prop.cc:4195 since r12-7936-gf6d65e803623c7ba

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105639 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 Summary|[13 Regression]

[Bug target/105640] [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek --- What does LLVM implement? Either I'm looking at a wrong place, or at least their testsuite coverage for this is non-existing. I see no sse nor avx substrings in clang/test/OpenMP/* (except for sse2020 which

[Bug lto/105641] New: Floating point constants are 0 in C LTO objects

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105641 Bug ID: 105641 Summary: Floating point constants are 0 in C LTO objects Product: gcc Version: 10.3.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/105640] [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek --- I'll also cite my response in https://mailman.openmp.org/mailman/private/omp-lang/2020/016879.html "The rationale for not using sm_XX for arch is that at least users of compilers that target more than one

[Bug target/105640] [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- And no, t-omp-device isn't needed, that one is solely for targets that can be used for offloading. i386 has it because of the intelmic offloading.

[Bug target/105640] [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek --- It isn't implemented on anything but x86, nvptx and gcn. https://gcc.gnu.org/legacy-ml/gcc-patches/2019-10/threads.html#02066 has some more details. aarch64 would be another HPC related target.

[Bug middle-end/105640] New: [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105640 Bug ID: 105640 Summary: [OpenMP] Context selectors missing for PowerPC Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: openmp Severity: normal