[Bug middle-end/106081] missed vectorization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106081 Hongtao.liu changed: What|Removed |Added CC||crazylht at gmail dot com --- Comment #2

[Bug c/106087] New: Segmentation fault in GIMPLE pass: ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 Bug ID: 106087 Summary: Segmentation fault in GIMPLE pass: ccp Product: gcc Version: 9.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug c/106087] Segmentation fault in GIMPLE pass: ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 --- Comment #1 from Nadav Har'El --- Created attachment 53199 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53199&action=edit preprocessed source file which gcc saved for reporting the crash (compressed because of bugzilla's attachment le

[Bug tree-optimization/106087] Segmentation fault in GIMPLE pass: ccp

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106087 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Version|9.1.1 |12.1.0 Component|c

[Bug target/106088] New: ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106088 Bug ID: 106088 Summary: ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pri

[Bug target/106088] ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106088 --- Comment #1 from William Tang --- The mentioned libraries did exist in the cross compile environment. Compiling with command "arm-linux-gnueabihf-gcc main.c -Wl,-rpath-link,/usr/arm-linux-gnueabihf/usr/lib -larchive" works just fine.

[Bug target/106088] ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106088 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at mengyan1223 dot wang --- Comment

[Bug fortran/106089] New: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 Bug ID: 106089 Summary: false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/106089] false positives with -Wuninitialized for allocation on assignment

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106089 --- Comment #1 from beliavsky at aol dot com --- I see that the report is a duplicate of some reports listed at https://fortran-lang.discourse.group/t/gfortran-uninitialized-warnings/3838/4 56670 – Allocatable-length character var causes bogus w

[Bug target/106088] ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106088 --- Comment #3 from William Tang --- Thanks, you are right, somehow, the ld of binutils has the wrong default SEARCH_DIR: [william@NoteBook ~]$ arm-linux-gnueabihf-ld --verbose | grep SEARCH SEARCH_DIR("/usr/lib/binutils/arm-linux-gnueabihf");

[Bug gcov-profile/106090] New: [GCOV] Wrong coverage for loop statements

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106090 Bug ID: 106090 Summary: [GCOV] Wrong coverage for loop statements Product: gcc Version: 10.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: gcov

[Bug target/106088] ld cannot find dependent libraries when cross compiling

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106088 --- Comment #4 from William Tang --- Okay, the '=' before search dir denotes sysroot replacement (https://sourceware.org/binutils/docs/ld/Options.html), so the configuration of ld should be correct. Anyway, it should be a binutils issue.

[Bug fortran/106071] single where run error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106071 --- Comment #2 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to han.wu from comment #0) > two layer where work ok, why single where work error? > > example one: > > program test > real :: x(3) = 1, y(3) = 2 > logical :: m(3) = .true., m2(3)

[Bug fortran/106071] single where run error

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106071 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P4

[Bug rtl-optimization/106091] New: [11/12/13 Regression] during RTL pass: swaps ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 69 with -fnon-call-exceptions

0626001633-g87509781849-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-powerpc64le Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 13.0.0 20220626 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug target/106091] [11/12/13 Regression] during RTL pass: swaps ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 69 with -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|rtl-optimization|target --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinsk

[Bug fortran/105954] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.cc:132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a312407bd715647f7c11b67e0a52effc94d0f15d commit r13-1276-ga312407bd715647f7c11b67e0a52effc94d0f15d Author: Harald Anlauf Date: M

[Bug fortran/105691] Incorrect calculation of INDEX(str1,str2) at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ff35dbc02092fbcd3d814fcd9fe8e871c3f741fd commit r13-1277-gff35dbc02092fbcd3d814fcd9fe8e871c3f741fd Author: Harald Anlauf Date: T

[Bug fortran/105954] ICE in gfc_element_size, at fortran/target-memory.cc:132

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105954 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug fortran/105691] Incorrect calculation of INDEX(str1,str2) at compile time

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105691 --- Comment #8 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Fixed on mainline so far.

[Bug c++/106092] New: Bogus -Wfree-nonheap-object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106092 Bug ID: 106092 Summary: Bogus -Wfree-nonheap-object Product: gcc Version: 11.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++ Assi

[Bug middle-end/106092] Bogus -Wfree-nonheap-object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106092 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||diagnostic Component|c++

[Bug fortran/105813] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8490

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105813 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|

[Bug middle-end/106092] Bogus -Wfree-nonheap-object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106092 --- Comment #2 from lavr at ncbi dot nlm.nih.gov --- Created attachment 53201 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53201&action=edit preprocessed source Attached! It's rather big

[Bug fortran/103707] Stray "Array operands are incommensurate"

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103707 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-26 C

[Bug c++/106093] New: [Regression] False positive -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 when resizing std::vector

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106093 Bug ID: 106093 Summary: [Regression] False positive -Wstringop-overflow with -O3 when resizing std::vector Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/106094] New: Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106094 Bug ID: 106094 Summary: Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary] Product: gcc Version: 12.1.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug c++/106094] Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/106094] Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106094 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 53203 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53203&action=edit testcase

[Bug c++/106094] Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106094 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Also please attach the testcase next time rather than just a link to godbolt. I attached it this time.

[Bug c++/106094] Lifetime extension of temporary do not obey some rules of [class.temporary]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106094 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||53288 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski

[Bug tree-optimization/106063] [12/13 Regression] ICE: in gimple_expand_vec_cond_expr, at gimple-isel.cc:281 with -O2 -fno-tree-forwprop --param=evrp-mode=legacy-first

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106063 --- Comment #4 from Tamar Christina --- Ah, there's optimize_vectors_before_lowering_p, would you prefer I check the operation or just gate the pattern on the above Richi?

[Bug target/106095] New: Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106095 Bug ID: 106095 Summary: Some AVX builtins produce invalid asm with -masm=intel Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Comp

[Bug target/106096] New: [13 regression] ICE building stage 2 libgcc on loongarch64-linux-gnu since r13-911

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106096 Bug ID: 106096 Summary: [13 regression] ICE building stage 2 libgcc on loongarch64-linux-gnu since r13-911 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug target/106097] New: undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 Bug ID: 106097 Summary: undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/106098] New: error message that uses ANSI codes that can cause characters to disappear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106098 Bug ID: 106098 Summary: error message that uses ANSI codes that can cause characters to disappear Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/106098] error message that uses ANSI codes that can cause characters to disappear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106098 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- What terminal are you using?

[Bug c++/106098] error message that uses ANSI codes that can cause characters to disappear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106098 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug other/90411] Colored diagnostics can omit characters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90411 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jonathan.poelen at gmail dot com --- Co

[Bug c++/106098] error message that uses ANSI codes that can cause characters to disappear

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106098 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > What terminal are you using? Basically some terminals implement this differently and maybe even incorrectly. See the other (still open) bug report for more deta

[Bug target/106097] undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 --- Comment #1 from chenglulu --- How can I reproduce the problem? Thanks! Lulu Cheng

[Bug target/106097] undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- by using the --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan option at configure time or BUILD_CONFIG variable to build time. See https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html

[Bug target/106097] undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 --- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2) > by using the --with-build-config=bootstrap-ubsan option at configure time or > BUILD_CONFIG variable to build time. > > See https://gcc.gnu.org/install/build.html

[Bug target/106097] undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 --- Comment #5 from Xi Ruoyao --- And it actually does not need a reproducer: "x << 32 >> 32" for sign-extension is undefined by C++ standard if x is negative: > The value of E1 << E2 is E1 left-shifted E2 bit positions; vacated bits are > zer

[Bug target/106097] undefined behaviors regarding integer shifts in loongarch_build_integer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106097 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- BTW I found this issue trying to triage PR106096, but I think it's not related to this one.

[Bug tree-optimization/106099] New: ICE in execute_todo, at passes.cc:2134

Priority: P3 Component: tree-optimization Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org Reporter: asolokha at gmx dot com Target Milestone: --- gfortran 13.0.0 20220626 snapshot (g:ff35dbc02092fbcd3d814fcd9fe8e871c3f741fd) ICEs when compiling libgomp/testsuite/libgomp.oacc

[Bug rtl-optimization/7061] Access of bytes in struct parameters

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=7061 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:64d4f27a0ce47e97867512bda7fa5683acf8a134 commit r13-1282-g64d4f27a0ce47e97867512bda7fa5683acf8a134 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon Ju

[Bug tree-optimization/94026] combine missed opportunity to simplify comparisons with zero

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94026 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f3f73e86ec8613f176db3e52bbfbfbb9636cb714 commit r13-1281-gf3f73e86ec8613f176db3e52bbfbfbb9636cb714 Author: Roger Sayle Date: Mon J