[Bug c/106133] New: ICE: SIGSEGV in diagnostic_output_format_init_json_file() with -fdiagnostics-format=json-file -E

x-gnu --with-ld=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-ld --with-as=/usr/bin/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu-as --disable-libstdcxx-pch --prefix=/repo/gcc-trunk//binary-trunk-r13-1327-20220628144301-g243b5396106-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-amd64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc

[Bug sanitizer/106132] New: ICE: in report_conflicting_sanitizer_options, at opts.cc:1011 with -fsanitize=thread,address,kernel-hwaddress

ion 13.0.0 20220628 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug c++/106131] -fstrict-aliasing breaks normal program that does not use any pointer or reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106131 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Here is a slightly reduced (still has std::vector in it): #include template struct Pair1 { constexpr Pair1(const Pair1&) = default; constexpr Pair1(Pair1&&) = default; constexpr Pair1(co

[Bug c++/106131] -fstrict-aliasing breaks normal program that does not use any pointer or reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106131 --- Comment #1 from 18307130172 at fudan dot edu.cn --- Created attachment 53221 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53221&action=edit output of g++ -v -O2 main.cpp

[Bug c++/106131] New: -fstrict-aliasing breaks normal program that does not use any pointer or reference

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106131 Bug ID: 106131 Summary: -fstrict-aliasing breaks normal program that does not use any pointer or reference Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug tree-optimization/105903] Missed optimization for __synth3way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/105903] Missed optimization for __synth3way

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105903 --- Comment #2 from luoxhu at gcc dot gnu.org --- diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd index 4a570894b2e..f6b5415a351 100644 --- a/gcc/match.pd +++ b/gcc/match.pd @@ -5718,6 +5718,22 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT) (bit_xor (con

[Bug middle-end/106130] internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106130 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING Last reconfirmed|

[Bug c/106130] New: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106130 Bug ID: 106130 Summary: internal compiler error: Illegal instruction Product: gcc Version: 11.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug other/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 Hans-Peter Nilsson changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/106117] Use of option -fexcess-precision for operation-by-operation emulation for _Float16 arithmetics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106117 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- we're using -fexcess-precision=16 to force operation-by-operation translation when AVX512-FP16 is not available. https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2021-August/576493.html

[Bug lto/106129] New: [12/13 Regression] LTO option merging broken

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106129 Bug ID: 106129 Summary: [12/13 Regression] LTO option merging broken Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: lto

[Bug c++/106128] Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106128 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/106128] Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106128 --- Comment #1 from James McKelvey --- I guess I should say recent Windows 10 with Cygwin.

[Bug c++/106128] New: Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106128 Bug ID: 106128 Summary: Bogus Warning on static_cast double to bool with -Wfloat-equal Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/106126] tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 --- Comment #5 from David Binderman --- Seems good. Current range appears to be [607118dfa47a1865, f1fcd6e3ad911945].

[Bug c/106117] Use of option -fexcess-precision for operation-by-operation emulation for _Float16 arithmetics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106117 --- Comment #2 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- "none" was something I mentioned as a possible future argument when originally posting -fexcess-precision . I still think

[Bug libstdc++/106127] experimental::filesystem::path("//") should be a root-directory not a root-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- This patch: --- a/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc +++ b/libstdc++-v3/src/filesystem/path.cc @@ -377,7 +377,7 @@ path::_M_split_cmpts() if (len == 2) { // entire pat

[Bug tree-optimization/106126] tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #3) > I am trying a git bisect. Trying git f1fcd6e3ad911945. Goes wrong with that. Trying 607118dfa47a1865.

[Bug libstdc++/106127] New: experimental::filesystem::path("//") should be a root-directory not a root-name

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106127 Bug ID: 106127 Summary: experimental::filesystem::path("//") should be a root-directory not a root-name Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Sever

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |anlauf at gcc dot gnu

[Bug tree-optimization/106126] tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- I am trying a git bisect. Trying git f1fcd6e3ad911945.

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 --- Comment #4 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 07:43:39PM +, anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > (In reply to kargl from comment #2) > > Infamous NULL pointer dereference. > > Yes. > > Shorter fix: > > diff --git a/gcc/fortran

[Bug fortran/103942] [9 Regression] invalid memory reference with allocatable string and class(*)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103942 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-28 CC

[Bug ipa/106124] [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_abstract_function, at dwarf2out.cc:23254

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug other/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 --- Comment #2 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org --- I am not sure. This only happens for 32 bit runs on power. 64 bit ones work fine.

[Bug tree-optimization/106126] tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- Reduced C code seems to be char *var_1; void pool_conda_matchspec() { for (; var_1 && *var_1 && *var_1 != '<' && *var_1 != '>' && *var_1 != '!' && *var_1 != '~';) if (*var_1 >= 'A'

[Bug tree-optimization/106126] tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- Problem first seems to occur sometime between git hash 713f2fd923442b1b and 98b6e62cf5e7d477, a couple of days later. cvise reduction running in other window.

[Bug c/106126] New: tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106126 Bug ID: 106126 Summary: tree check fail in useless_type_conversion_p, at gimple-expr.cc:87 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/95291] ICE in resolve_args at gcc/cp/call.c:4482

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95291 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mameluc at gmail dot com --- Comment #12

[Bug c++/106125] [c++2a] Segmentation fault in constexpr initialization of static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106125 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/106125] [c++2a] Segmentation fault in constexpr initialization of static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106125 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug other/106120] [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 --- Comment #1 from Aldy Hernandez --- I wonder if this is the same problem we see on x86-64 on line 198.

[Bug c++/106125] [c++2a] Segmentation fault in constexpr initialization of static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106125 --- Comment #1 from Marcos Campos --- Command line: g++-10 -save-temps -std=c++2a test_segfault.cpp

[Bug c++/106125] New: [c++2a] Segmentation fault in constexpr initialization of static variable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106125 Bug ID: 106125 Summary: [c++2a] Segmentation fault in constexpr initialization of static variable Product: gcc Version: 10.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: no

[Bug c++/106124] New: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_abstract_function, at dwarf2out.cc:23254

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106124 Bug ID: 106124 Summary: [11/12/13 Regression] ICE in dwarf2out_abstract_function, at dwarf2out.cc:23254 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity

[Bug c++/106123] New: ICE in walk_tree_1, at tree.cc:11243

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106123 Bug ID: 106123 Summary: ICE in walk_tree_1, at tree.cc:11243 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c/106122] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in fixup_args_size_notes, at expr.cc:4493

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106122 Bug ID: 106122 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in fixup_args_size_notes, at expr.cc:4493 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/106121] ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 G. Steinmetz changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-invalid-code --- Comment #1 from

[Bug fortran/106121] New: ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106121 Bug ID: 106121 Summary: ICE in gfc_simplify_extends_type_of, at fortran/simplify.cc:3109 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/106101] [12/13 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101 --- Comment #6 from Segher Boessenkool --- It looks like quite a few more backends use strict_low_part on random RTL, which is completely meaningless :-(

[Bug c++/65328] GCC perf issue when compiling templates - 120x slower than Clang

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65328 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug ipa/106116] Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106116 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- What I am saying is the cost for doing this optimization is higher than the gain you would get.

[Bug ipa/106116] Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106116 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- On most recent out of order cores, a unconditional jump is basically free except for space. So I really doubt you would see a performance improvement in most code on x86 cores; even on high performance armv8

[Bug ipa/106116] Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106116 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug other/106120] New: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106120 Bug ID: 106120 Summary: [13 regression] g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C fails since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug middle-end/106030] [13 Regression] ice in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/106032] [10/11 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|[10/11/12/13 Regression]|[10/11 Regression] wrong

[Bug rtl-optimization/106032] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e72a522dd9f835dd159fe3aff493eee001be0d4 commit r12-8523-g9e72a522dd9f835dd159fe3aff493eee001be0d4 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/106030] [13 Regression] ice in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4026

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106030 --- Comment #8 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d068623e5b109e635e2ec2acfcf15e7c50c7f15c commit r12-8522-gd068623e5b109e635e2ec2acfcf15e7c50c7f15c Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/106119] Bogus use-after-free warning triggered by optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119 --- Comment #1 from Tom Cosgrove --- Note that the command lines just need -Wall, i.e. gcc-12 $ gcc -O2 -Wall -o foo -c foo.c

[Bug libgomp/106045] Incorrect testcase in libgomp.c/target-31.c at -O0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106045 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d67dfc5f80e537460ebf809758a0e673028ebad7 commit r12-8521-gd67dfc5f80e537460ebf809758a0e673028ebad7 Author: Jakub Jelinek

[Bug preprocessor/103902] GCC requires a space between string-literal and identifier in a literal-operator-id where the identifier is not in basic character set

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103902 --- Comment #4 from Lewis Hyatt --- (In reply to Lewis Hyatt from comment #3) > I can look into that. Patch waiting for review here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2022-June/596660.html

[Bug c/106117] Use of option -fexcess-precision for operation-by-operation emulation for _Float16 arithmetics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106117 John McCall changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rjmccall at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug fortran/103506] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:4039 since r10-2798-ge68a35ae4a65d2b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506 --- Comment #4 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- A patch to address this issue was submitted 7 months ago.

[Bug fortran/104313] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE verify_gimple failed with -ff2c since r10-2279-ge0af8f52b10385d8

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 --- Comment #6 from Steve Kargl --- On Tue, Jun 28, 2022 at 10:47:54AM +, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104313 > > Jakub Jelinek changed: > >What|Removed

[Bug target/106101] [12/13 Regression] ICE in reg_bitfield_target_p

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106101 --- Comment #5 from Segher Boessenkool --- Thanks for tracking this down! Interesting it survived so long. We could use some RTL checking on this :-)

[Bug fortran/103414] [10/11/12/13 Regression] [PDT] ICE in gfc_free_actual_arglist, at fortran/expr.c:547 since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103414 --- Comment #8 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7) > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. That's a shame. The patches in comments in 2 and 4 where submitted over 8 months ago.

[Bug fortran/103413] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE: Invalid expression in gfc_element_size since r10-2083-g8dc63166e0b85954

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103413 --- Comment #5 from kargl at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #4) > GCC 10.4 is being released, retargeting bugs to GCC 10.5. That's a shame. The patch in comment 1 and the correction noted in comment 2 where submitte

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 Aldy Hernandez changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P1 CC|

[Bug lto/106118] lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c: -pthread not passed to AM_LDFLAGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106118 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-06-28 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 --- Comment #6 from rguenther at suse dot de --- > Am 28.06.2022 um 14:53 schrieb david at westcontrol dot com > : > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 > > --- Comment #5 from David Brown --- > (In reply to Richard Biener

[Bug c++/106072] Bogus -Wnonnull warning breaks rust bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072 --- Comment #2 from Rainer Orth --- Created attachment 53215 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53215&action=edit Original preprocessed testcase.

[Bug c++/106111] -Wc++20-compat doesn't warn about using `requires` as an identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/106111] -Wc++20-compat doesn't warn about using `requires` as an identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111 --- Comment #4 from Marek Polacek --- And for consteval the problem is likely that enum rid has: 273 RID_FIRST_CXX20 = RID_CONSTINIT, 274 RID_LAST_CXX20 = RID_CONSTINIT, Oops.

[Bug c/106119] New: Bogus use-after-free warning triggered by optimizer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106119 Bug ID: 106119 Summary: Bogus use-after-free warning triggered by optimizer Product: gcc Version: 12.1.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Compo

[Bug target/106091] [11/12/13 Regression] during RTL pass: swaps ICE: verify_flow_info failed: missing REG_EH_REGION note at the end of bb 69 with -fnon-call-exceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106091 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||linkw at gcc dot gnu.org Status

[Bug target/106113] wrong codegen for _mm_[u]comineq_{ss,sd} and need to return PF result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106113 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Note, for -ffast-math we certainly should keep generating what we have been as NaN as operand is not valid in that case.

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 --- Comment #7 from David Brown --- (In reply to rguent...@suse.de from comment #6) > > Am 28.06.2022 um 14:53 schrieb david at westcontrol dot com > > : > > > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 > > > > --- Comment #5 from

[Bug lto/106118] New: lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c: -pthread not passed to AM_LDFLAGS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106118 Bug ID: 106118 Summary: lto-plugin/lto-plugin.c: -pthread not passed to AM_LDFLAGS Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Pr

[Bug c++/106072] Bogus -Wnonnull warning breaks rust bootstrap

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072 --- Comment #1 from Rainer Orth --- While creduce produced a 198-byte file from the original 3.5 MB source which still shows the warning/error, it is correct in that case. I'm attaching the original preprocessed source instead. It shows the er

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/106117] New: Use of option -fexcess-precision for operation-by-operation emulation for _Float16 arithmetics.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106117 Bug ID: 106117 Summary: Use of option -fexcess-precision for operation-by-operation emulation for _Float16 arithmetics. Product: gcc Version: unknown

[Bug tree-optimization/106115] wrong code at -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106115 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE CC|

[Bug target/106096] [13 regression] ICE building stage 2 libgcc on loongarch64-linux-gnu because stage 2 gcc is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106096 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/106116] Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106116 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Com

[Bug c++/106111] -Wc++20-compat doesn't warn about using `requires` as an identifier

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106111 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org Last reco

[Bug target/106096] [13 regression] ICE building stage 2 libgcc on loongarch64-linux-gnu because stage 2 gcc is miscompiled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106096 --- Comment #11 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:020b7d98589bbc928b5a66b1ed56b42af8791355 commit r13-1319-g020b7d98589bbc928b5a66b1ed56b42af8791355 Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Tue Jun

[Bug rtl-optimization/106032] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106032 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/105996] [10/11/12/13 Regression] reinterpret_cast in constexpr failure creating a pair with a function pointer of class parent

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105996 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Version|unknown |13.0 CC|

[Bug rtl-optimization/105988] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in linemap_ordinary_map_lookup, at libcpp/line-map.cc:1064 since r6-4873-gebedc9a3414d8422

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105988 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/106116] New: Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106116 Bug ID: 106116 Summary: Missed optimization: in no_reorder-attributed functions, tail calls to the subsequent function could just be function-to-function fallthrough Produc

[Bug target/106113] wrong codegen for _mm_[u]comineq_{ss,sd} and need to return PF result.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106113 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/105809] [10/11/12/13 Regression] __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ in constexpr in function vs NSDMI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105809 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 --- Comment #3 from Marek Polacek --- *** Bug 106115 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug c++/105737] [10/11 only] Incorrect evaluation order in new expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105737 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 --- Comment #5 from David Brown --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #4) > (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #3) > > There is a more specific instance here: can_inline_edge_by_limits_p in > > ipa-inline.cc treats flags and "optimize"

[Bug debug/105653] [10/11/12/13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105653 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #1 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/105604] [10/11 Regression] ICE: in tree_to_shwi with vla in struct and sprintf

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105604 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug debug/105415] [10/11/12 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure w/ -O2 -ftree-parallelize-loops=2 since r7-4900-g59ec925b1199f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105415 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #10 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 --- Comment #4 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to frankhb1989 from comment #3) > There is a more specific instance here: can_inline_edge_by_limits_p in > ipa-inline.cc treats flags and "optimize" attributes differently. A bit up there's a bla

[Bug middle-end/105263] [10 Regression] ICE: gimple check: expected gimple_assign(error_mark), have gimple_nop() in gimple_assign_rhs1, at gimple.h:2655 with _Decimal64 -ffast-math since r7-950-g8a85c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105263 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/101279] Function attributes often block inlining

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101279 frankhb1989 at gmail dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||frankhb1989 at gmail dot c

[Bug tree-optimization/106112] [10/11/12/13 Regression] wrong code at -Os and above on x86_64-linux-gnu since r10-2711-g3ed01d5408045d80

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106112 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/105228] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE tree check: expected tree that contains 'decl minimal' structure, have 'error_mark' in decl_anon_ns_mem_p, at cp/tree.cc:3826 since r7-755-g23cb72663051cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105228 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.4|10.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/103501] associative containers left invalid after allocator-extended move construction

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103501 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|10.5|10.4

[Bug tree-optimization/106114] [13 Regression] wrong code at -O1, -O2 and -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106114 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org,

  1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   >