https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103353
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9367e3a65f874dffc8f8a3b6760e77fd9ed67117
commit r13-2062-g9367e3a65f874dffc8f8a3b6760e77fd9ed67117
Author: Kewen.Lin
Date: Tue Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322
--- Comment #46 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5239e2bd48fb1e6a1d1b06a1bac49bee0a742e98
commit r13-2061-g5239e2bd48fb1e6a1d1b06a1bac49bee0a742e98
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Tue Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106634
Bug ID: 106634
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in get_region_for_local, at
analyzer/region.cc:874
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106533
--- Comment #7 from Vineet Gupta ---
Can this be back-ported to gcc 12 please ?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620
--- Comment #3 from nrk at disroot dot org ---
> Feel free to reopen it if you're able to reproduce it with gcc 12 or later
Huh, I linked to godbolt specifically because I wanted to test gcc 12 and see
if the bug still persists or not since my
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106633
Mike Hommey changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106633
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't think this is a gcc bug but rather gcc 12 fixed a bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106633
Bug ID: 106633
Summary: Hidden visibility on forward declarations impacts
visibility of default-visibility class methods
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106586
--- Comment #13 from Andrew Pinski ---
All patches I have pushed to refs/users/pinskia/heads/riscvbit this includes
all cleanups I did to the backend. I will finish up the patches (add testcases
and run the testsuite) in the next few days.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106632
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106632
Bug ID: 106632
Summary: undefined code causes assembler failure
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: assemble-failure
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106586
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53463
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53463=edit
Patch (which might depend on other patches)
I have a full fix now. The problem I mentioned is a few different
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106586
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
There was a few issues dealing with not doing trunc_int_for_mode in some cases.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
--- Comment #5 from Aldy Hernandez ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> > It looks like DOM2, as a side-effect of using the ranger to do cprop, is
> > exporting a global range for a_9
> > Where a_9 has a global range of [0,0].
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
> It looks like DOM2, as a side-effect of using the ranger to do cprop, is
> exporting a global range for a_9
> Where a_9 has a global range of [0,0].
Why didn't DOM do a constant prop here since the only
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106586
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
There is still some missing sign extend of the const_int.
(insn 17 16 18 4 (set (reg:SI 77)
(mem/u/c:SI (lo_sum:SI (reg/f:SI 78)
(symbol_ref/u:SI ("*.LC0") [flags 0x82])) [0 S4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106631
Bug ID: 106631
Summary: Unhelpful diagnostic on variable template
specialization with unknown name
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
--- Comment #6 from Martin Liška ---
> Which makes some sense as I locally run GNU make with --shuffle enabled by
> default: https://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/index.php?62100
Do you have a special patch on top of that? Which exact revision of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106623
Iain Buclaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106623
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:dc230a0c690794cd45cc4065fa13303fd6cdfc40
commit r12-8688-gdc230a0c690794cd45cc4065fa13303fd6cdfc40
Author: Iain Buclaw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
--- Comment #4 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Bisected locally down to:
53e3b2bf16a486c15c20991c6095f7be09012b55 is the first bad commit
commit 53e3b2bf16a486c15c20991c6095f7be09012b55
Author: Martin Liska
Date: Tue Aug 9 13:59:36 2022 +0200
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106623
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain Buclaw :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e206fecaac29f559f4990312b875604eb1ce3ef3
commit r13-2057-ge206fecaac29f559f4990312b875604eb1ce3ef3
Author: Iain Buclaw
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
--- Comment #2 from Aldy Hernandez ---
Works with -fno-thread-jumps or with -fdisable-tree-dom3.
I haven't investigated whether the threading done in DOM2 is generating invalid
IL, but it looks like this match.pd pattern is going around in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106586
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is a testcase which shows a similar issue where bseti is not used (ignore
the 1<<31 being undefined/unspecified issue):
int f(int a, int b)
{
b = 31;
int tt = sizeof(b)*8 - 1;
return a |
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:23e8c0b0d99f585499baddda70af6a8b26f49bea
commit r13-2054-g23e8c0b0d99f585499baddda70af6a8b26f49bea
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106573
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ca123e019bb92fd1d6909e8da7f53a4f45922526
commit r13-2053-gca123e019bb92fd1d6909e8da7f53a4f45922526
Author: David Malcolm
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106621
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-15
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106630
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106621
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:265cdd067afd56293137ecb3057c5ba28a7c9480
commit r13-2052-g265cdd067afd56293137ecb3057c5ba28a7c9480
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
plus
gcc version 13.0.0 20220815 (6624ad73064de241e937e97a28b65c50fe14c78e)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106551
--- Comment #7 from Immad Mir ---
(In reply to CVS Commits from comment #6)
The patch was lightly tested on x86_64 Linux.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106551
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Immad Mir :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed7e7620188dc0e653815bdd40d8802bd5446638
commit r13-2051-ged7e7620188dc0e653815bdd40d8802bd5446638
Author: Immad Mir
Date: Mon Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106629
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Marek Polacek from comment #3)
> Not a bug, this is
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/cwg_active.html#2450 I
> implemented in GCC.
Oh I see, I should have looked into the active
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98954
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
commit r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98956
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
commit r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64992
--- Comment #12 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
commit r13-2048-g418b71c0d535bf91df78bad2e198c57934682eaa
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106629
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71343
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Roger Sayle :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:03acd8b6429e22068330dce5abf129291d3f26de
commit r13-2047-g03acd8b6429e22068330dce5abf129291d3f26de
Author: Roger Sayle
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106629
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106629
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 53462
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53462=edit
full testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106629
Bug ID: 106629
Summary: GCC accepts invalid program involving {1,2,3,4} as
template argument
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106628
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-15
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-15
Summary|[docs]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|rtl-optimization|target
--- Comment #3 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(In reply to David Malcolm from comment #1)
> I've made lots of implementation changes to -fanalyzer in gcc 12 in beyond
"and beyond", I meant to say
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106627
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-08-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106276
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106276
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Marek Polacek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ae3459cd5956fcd29e8aa5408efb707cb7d9b14f
commit r13-2045-gae3459cd5956fcd29e8aa5408efb707cb7d9b14f
Author: Marek Polacek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101839
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liška ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #11)
> Fixed on mainline with r:0f2c7ccd14a29a8af8318f50b8296098fb0ab218
g:0f2c7ccd14a29a8af8318f50b8296098fb0ab218
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106628
Bug ID: 106628
Summary: Missed folding with COMPOUND_EXPR due to C frontend
bugs
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106591
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
Martin Liška changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
--- Comment #2 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Used configure options:
configure flags:
--prefix=/nix/store/fx45rjgwi61c5xx6xyxz9lih1bkyv374-gfortran-13.0.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
--- Comment #4 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
The problem is with sibling call optimization where parameters with BLKmode are
not handled correctly. I will prepare a patch and submit it shortly.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106627
Bug ID: 106627
Summary: Exception from multiversion function cannot be caught
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106626
Bug ID: 106626
Summary: Improvements to wording of -Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106355
Dan Horák changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106625
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tlange at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106625
Bug ID: 106625
Summary: RFE: support some symbolic values in
-Wanalyzer-out-of-bounds
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81708
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Alexandre Oliva :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4ad200addc3eaf55fba6cc91db3d3b66eabaf3d0
commit r13-2043-g4ad200addc3eaf55fba6cc91db3d3b66eabaf3d0
Author: Alexandre Oliva
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 53461
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53461=edit
good.log.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106624
Bug ID: 106624
Summary: [13 Regression] LTO plugin fails to build in parallel
builds: xgcc: fatal error: cannot execute
'/build/build/./prev-gcc/collect2': execv: Bad address
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106623
Bug ID: 106623
Summary: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault at
gimple-expr.cc:88
Product: gcc
Version: 12.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106590
--- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Fixed on the trunk so far, 12.2 is frozen now and I think the fix needs some
time on the trunk before backporting, so probably only will be fixed for 12.3.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106590
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3a74a7bf62f47ed0d19866576378724be932ee17
commit r13-2042-g3a74a7bf62f47ed0d19866576378724be932ee17
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106621
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106622
Bug ID: 106622
Summary: Bug report
Product: gcc
Version: rust/master
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: demangler
Assignee:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106558
--- Comment #10 from Yury Gribov ---
Created attachment 53458
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53458=edit
Very draft patch
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #7)
> Perhaps either a quick check that for base ptrs that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106621
Bug ID: 106621
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in irange_set, at
value-range.cc:619
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-valid-code
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609
--- Comment #2 from Sébastien Michelland ---
Yes there are delay slots for all branches except bt and bf, so here bt.s, jsr
and rts all have one. (-fno-delayed-branches avoids them but that doesn't
affect the bad optimization in this case.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
We don't fold because
case COMPOUND_EXPR:
/* When pedantic, a compound expression can be neither an lvalue
nor an integer constant expression. */
if (TREE_SIDE_EFFECTS (arg0) ||
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106620
Bug ID: 106620
Summary: Incorrectly thinks execution can continue after a
return statement
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106551
--- Comment #5 from Immad Mir ---
Thanks for reporting the ICE, Tim.
Dave: I have sent a patch via gcc-patches.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106609
--- Comment #1 from Richard Biener ---
.L3:bt.s.L2
dt r1
are there any delay slots in SH? Does -fno-schedule-insns -fno-schedule-insns2
help?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106608
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[12 Regression] |[12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106619
Bug ID: 106619
Summary: Inconsistent __PRETTY_FUNCTION__ output
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106618
Bug ID: 106618
Summary: [docs] Option Summary shows `-fargs-in-order` instead
of `-fstrong-eval-order`
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #6 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 53455
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=53455=edit
ring_buffer.c.gz
ring_buffer.c.gz is a preprocessed file from linux-4.19.
$ time gcc-12.1.0 -O2 -c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106617
--- Comment #5 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
--enable-checking=release did not help much. Attached example still compiles
3.5 s. verify parts disappeared from profile, but generic_simplify are still
there:
11.20% cc1 cc1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106322
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #45 from Kewen Lin
86 matches
Mail list logo
