[Bug ipa/106783] New: [12/13 Regression] ICE in ipa-modref.cc:analyze_function

2022-08-31 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106783 Bug ID: 106783 Summary: [12/13 Regression] ICE in ipa-modref.cc:analyze_function Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: ice-on-valid-code

[Bug other/106782] New: dump_printf_loc has incorrect format attribute

2022-08-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106782 Bug ID: 106782 Summary: dump_printf_loc has incorrect format attribute Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: o

[Bug preprocessor/106778] libcpp/makeuname2c.cc:454: sanity check in wrong place ?

2022-08-31 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106778 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b3048b6ffb126a4624f66bad713fe6d1dc6dc13d commit r13-2301-gb3048b6ffb126a4624f66bad713fe6d1dc6dc13d Author: Jakub Jelinek Date: W

[Bug tree-optimization/106781] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2) since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca95

2022-08-31 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781 --- Comment #3 from Martin Liška --- (In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #1) > Thanks. > > Also ICEs in ipa-modref when 'noclone' added to 'noinline', a 12/13 > regression (different cause, needs a separate PR). Can't reproduce Alexand

[Bug tree-optimization/106781] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2) since r13-1754-g7a158a5776f5ca95

2022-08-31 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added CC||marxin at gcc dot gnu.org Ever confi

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread marxin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2022-08-31 CC|

[Bug tree-optimization/106781] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2)

2022-08-31 Thread amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781 Alexander Monakov changed: What|Removed |Added CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org --- Com

[Bug bootstrap/106779] GCC 12.2 fails to compile in libiberty - uknown symbol PTR - requires later patch

2022-08-31 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106779 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/106781] New: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2)

2022-08-31 Thread asolokha at gmx dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106781 Bug ID: 106781 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE: verify_flow_info failed (error: returns_twice call is not first in basic block 2) Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFI

[Bug libstdc++/106780] gcc maybe-uninitialized warning on std_function.h

2022-08-31 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106780 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- > cat t.C #include > /space/rguenther/install/gcc-12.1/bin/g++ -S t.C -Wall -Wextra > -pedantic-errors I can't reproduce. So can you provide a testcase?

<    1   2