[Bug fortran/107968] New: array slicing gives wrong result for an array pointer defined in a subroutine

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107968 Bug ID: 107968 Summary: array slicing gives wrong result for an array pointer defined in a subroutine Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/107412] Miss to fold LEN_{LOAD,STORE} when the specified length equal to vector length

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107412 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:380d62c14c99d8df13b7a86660e7ee67d01ad827 commit r13-4488-g380d62c14c99d8df13b7a86660e7ee67d01ad827 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Sun Dec

[Bug analyzer/107943] [11/12/13 Regression] gcc -fanalyzer hangs in openssl curve25519.c since r11-3840-gaf66094d03779377

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107943 --- Comment #6 from Bernd Edlinger --- I don't know if that is relevant or not, but I was using a slighthly different criterion in bisection. I used .../configure --prefix=... --enable-languages=all and defined the bad criterion using the

[Bug c/107967] New: The gcc commit 2f7f9edd28d caused the glibc make check fails.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107967 Bug ID: 107967 Summary: The gcc commit 2f7f9edd28d caused the glibc make check fails. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #3) > GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory. > In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is > like

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 --- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song --- GCC doesn't implement -fsanitize=memory. In the absence of it, __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation)) is like __attribute__((no_sanitize("all"))). When -fsanitize=memory is implemented, the two

[Bug sanitizer/78204] ‘no_sanitize’ attribute directive ignored [-Wattributes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78204 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #8) > Note: Clang supports > __attribute__((no_sanitize("address","undefined"))) > but not > __attribute__((no_sanitize("address,undefined"))) > > Possibly reject

[Bug sanitizer/78204] ‘no_sanitize’ attribute directive ignored [-Wattributes]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78204 Fangrui Song changed: What|Removed |Added CC||i at maskray dot me --- Comment #8 from

[Bug sanitizer/107963] Support __attribute__((disable_sanitizer_instrumentation))

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107963 Sam James changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sam at gentoo dot org --- Comment #2 from

[Bug gcov-profile/107537] gcov skips throw/fallthrough annotations for 'never executed' branches

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107537 --- Comment #2 from michael.foerderer at gmx dot de --- Created attachment 54009 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54009=edit Patch for annotation of uncovered branches

[Bug fortran/107144] ICE in gfc_get_symbol_decl, at fortran/trans-decl.cc:1623

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107144 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Last

[Bug middle-end/107966] [10/11/12/13 Regression] option property Var(var) documentation seems cut off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107966 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |10.5

[Bug middle-end/107966] New: [10/11/12/13 Regression] option property Var(var) documentation seems cut off

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107966 Bug ID: 107966 Summary: [10/11/12/13 Regression] option property Var(var) documentation seems cut off Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug libstdc++/107965] libstdc++ Python Pretty-Printers: Many Exceptions From Uninitialized Structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107965 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug fortran/107922] ICE in gfc_simplify_unpack, at fortran/simplify.cc:8473

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107922 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:24b9337d1f1b5197b6498dceb9074319be003449 commit r13-4486-g24b9337d1f1b5197b6498dceb9074319be003449 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/107870] A possible typo in the documentation of 'FLOOR'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107870 --- Comment #5 from Nino Pereira --- and to you for being so courteous not to laugh me out of the room. On Sun, Dec 4, 2022 at 2:43 PM anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org < gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote: >

[Bug libstdc++/107965] New: libstdc++ Python Pretty-Printers: Many Exceptions From Uninitialized Structures

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107965 Bug ID: 107965 Summary: libstdc++ Python Pretty-Printers: Many Exceptions From Uninitialized Structures Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/107899] ICE in resolve_deallocate_expr, at fortran/resolve.cc:7576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107899 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/107870] A possible typo in the documentation of 'FLOOR'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107870 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target

[Bug fortran/107870] A possible typo in the documentation of 'FLOOR'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107870 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:98d6e4b6f1011655da19344bc124a3013b9c0134 commit r13-4485-g98d6e4b6f1011655da19344bc124a3013b9c0134 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug fortran/107899] ICE in resolve_deallocate_expr, at fortran/resolve.cc:7576

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107899 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9123863828b2f86e7a6aafba38738e7204ed19ca commit r13-4484-g9123863828b2f86e7a6aafba38738e7204ed19ca Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug tree-optimization/107956] [12/13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3641) with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftree-slp-vectorize -fexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107956 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- This should fix it: diff --git a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc index f6c34bb3263..d9fdb24ee62 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-vect-patterns.cc @@ -4964,6

[Bug tree-optimization/107956] [12/13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3641) with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftree-slp-vectorize -fexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/107956] [12/13 Regression] ICE: SIGSEGV in contains_struct_check (tree.h:3641) with -fsanitize=float-cast-overflow -ftree-slp-vectorize -fexceptions

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107956 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3

[Bug fortran/106576] Finalization of temporaries from functions not occuring

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106576 --- Comment #6 from Thomas Koenig --- > I hope that you are well and that the lack of time is for a good cause? Hi Paul, yes, I'm well, and the lack of time is indeed for a good cause :-) > I have just returned to my finalizer patch. With

[Bug plugins/107964] New: [13] missing plugin header contracts.h

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107964 Bug ID: 107964 Summary: [13] missing plugin header contracts.h Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: plugins

[Bug c++/107417] g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.3 --- Comment #3 from Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/107417] g++ fails to recognize parameter pack in requires-expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107417 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:079add3ad39d6620d34665dd9c26c21951eb657c commit r13-4483-g079add3ad39d6620d34665dd9c26c21951eb657c Author: Patrick Palka Date:

[Bug libstdc++/51906] thread lock test failures on darwin11 under Xcode 4.2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51906 --- Comment #57 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a044c9d25972b22c6b4c8ec27f2de5fd622573cc commit r13-4482-ga044c9d25972b22c6b4c8ec27f2de5fd622573cc Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/105373] miscompile involving lambda coroutines and an object bitwise copied instead of via the copy constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105373 --- Comment #17 from Avi Kivity --- This was apparently fixed by 58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f. At least, I no longer observe copying of __old4 in gimple. Instead, I see addresses taken, and if I squint I can see that object properly

[Bug libstdc++/107801] Building cross compiler for H8 family fails in libstdc++ (c++17/memory_resource.cc)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107801 --- Comment #17 from Jan Dubiec --- Thanks Jonathan. I have also applied g:7b79fa930917da735f02b4f6911dfbb0a91f9714 and finally successfully built libstdc++, however there is a bunch of warnings for review. There are no assembler errors for

[Bug c++/99576] [coroutines] destructor of a temporary called too early within co_await expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99576 --- Comment #16 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f commit r13-4479-g58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/101976] When constructing object, calling function and performing co_await in same statement, temporary is erroneously moved trivially

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101976 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f commit r13-4479-g58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/100611] coroutines: destructor called too many times for coroutine lambda stored object

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100611 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f commit r13-4479-g58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f Author: Iain Sandoe Date:

[Bug c++/101367] [coroutines] destructor for capture in lambda temporary operand to co_yield expression called twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101367 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f commit r13-4479-g58a7b1e354530d8dfe7d8fb859c8b8b5a9140f1f Author: Iain Sandoe Date: