https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
Iain Sandoe changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-14
Target|sparc*-sun-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d3fee43fb3873b00de913e0501fbf28b56d2ce64
commit r13-4694-gd3fee43fb3873b00de913e0501fbf28b56d2ce64
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|WAITING |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108092
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|libstdc++ |bootstrap
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108092
Bug ID: 108092
Summary: libstdc++ and all other gcc libraries installed
incorrectly installed $PREFIX/lib32 for crossback
compilation
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100866
HaoChen Gui changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104959
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108078
Antoni changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108078
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Antoni Boucher :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:512098a3316f07d4b8bf0e035ab128ed2a50cb5e
commit r13-4693-g512098a3316f07d4b8bf0e035ab128ed2a50cb5e
Author: Antoni Boucher
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106559
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cjamcl at gmail dot com
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85741
Bug 85741 depends on bug 108091, which changed state.
Bug 108091 Summary: '-Wformat-overflow' determines incorrect size when printing
strings from an array of structs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108091
What|Remove
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108091
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2022-12-14
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108091
Bug ID: 108091
Summary: '-Wformat-overflow' determines incorrect size when
printing strings from an array of structs
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108090
Bug ID: 108090
Summary: pack expansion of using declarations doesn't properly
handle dependent conversion function names
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103585
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:10478270fe0c39c59eb0f35d19356a63bdf3a2ad
commit r13-4687-g10478270fe0c39c59eb0f35d19356a63bdf3a2ad
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103227
--- Comment #16 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4834e9360f7bf42fbeabaa20de5619e67c9fee4e
commit r13-4685-g4834e9360f7bf42fbeabaa20de5619e67c9fee4e
Author: Martin Jambor
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107640
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Martin Jambor :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4834e9360f7bf42fbeabaa20de5619e67c9fee4e
commit r13-4685-g4834e9360f7bf42fbeabaa20de5619e67c9fee4e
Author: Martin Jambor
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108028
--- Comment #2 from David Malcolm ---
(D) Also, the
(3) dereference of NULL '0'
is poorly worded; ideally we'd say:
(3) dereference of NULL 'q'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108028
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|--Wanalyzer-null-dereferenc |Misleading -fanalyzer
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79426
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |WAITING
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108044
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108044
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37c2d99f3f569350ebc0de43c10374b90086b832
commit r13-4683-g37c2d99f3f569350ebc0de43c10374b90086b832
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107423
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108088
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
*** Bug 108089 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108089
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108088
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
-O2 -std=c++17 -Wall -Werror=free-nonheap-object
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108089
Fabio Alemagna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.3.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108089
Bug ID: 108089
Summary: False positive for -Wfree-nonheap-object when using
std::variant
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108088
Bug ID: 108088
Summary: False positive for -Wfree-nonheap-object when using
std::variant
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Sorry, output got mangled slightly by ansifiltering:
```
/var/tmp/portage/sys-devel/gcc-13.0./work/gcc-13.0./gcc/rust/rust-lang.cc:67:17:
warning: type ‘struct lang_type’ violates the C++ One Definition
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108087
Bug ID: 108087
Summary: -Wodr warnings in rust/rust-lang.cc (lang_type)
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
--- Comment #3 from Jonas Keller ---
Created attachment 54081
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54081&action=edit
source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
--- Comment #2 from Jonas Keller ---
Created attachment 54080
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54080&action=edit
preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
--- Comment #1 from Jonas Keller ---
Created attachment 54079
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54079&action=edit
The file generated by -freport-bug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108086
Bug ID: 108086
Summary: internal compiler error: in set_accesses, at
rtl-ssa/internals.inl:449
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107423
--- Comment #2 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:531ca06c007d4c4d156637083dcad7f25ac8713d
commit r13-4681-g531ca06c007d4c4d156637083dcad7f25ac8713d
Author: Steve Kargl
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
The code definitely has a check for nullptr on pattern:
```
// parse pattern (which is required)
std::unique_ptr pattern = parse_pattern ();
if (pattern == nullptr)
{
// not necessarily an e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c++ |ipa
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
The aarch64-linux-gnu preprocessed source is attached to PR 108084 too.
The same preprocessed source does not show the issue on x86_64-linux-gnu either
.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||build
Summary|Bogus -Wnonnul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
I built cc1plus on x86_64 at r13-4678-g8f4634fb82d and still not able to
reproduce it. This is a bit interesting.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|12.0|13.0
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106072
--- Comment #4 from Rainer Orth ---
With rust merged into trunk, the warning resurfaced and broke SPARC bootstrap.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
The command line which is able to reproduce on aarch64:
../prev-gcc/cc1plus -fpreprocessed t.ii -quiet -dumpdir rust/ -dumpbase
rust-ast-full-test.cc -dumpbase-ext .cc -g -g -gtoggle -O2 -O2 -Wextra -Wall
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 54078
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54078&action=edit
Preprocessed source
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #3)
> Can you please attach preprocessed source?
I will in a few minutes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I can reproduce the failure.
It is happening in stage 2
Command line:
/home/ubuntu/src/upstream-gcc-aarch64/gcc/objdir/./prev-gcc/xg++
-B/home/ubuntu/src/upstream-gcc-aarch64/gcc/objdir/./prev-gcc/
-B/home/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083
--- Comment #3 from stefanos ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #2)
> (In reply to stefanos from comment #0)
> > With my Makefile, I generate an executable with the following steps:
> >
> > ccache g++ -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wpedantic
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108085
Bug ID: 108085
Summary: gcc trunk's ASAN at -O3 missed a stack-use-after-scope
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108064
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:33be3ee36a7e2c0be383ec01b5fbc9aef39568fd
commit r13-4679-g33be3ee36a7e2c0be383ec01b5fbc9aef39568fd
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||diagnostic
Component|rust
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to stefanos from comment #0)
> With my Makefile, I generate an executable with the following steps:
>
> ccache g++ -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wpedantic -std=c++20 -g -Og
> -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -I src -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85668
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87844
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107617
--- Comment #7 from rdapp at linux dot ibm.com ---
The patch fixes the problem for me. I did a full bootstrap with enabled
len_load support. No new regressions with -march=arch14. Thanks again!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108084
Bug ID: 108084
Summary: AArch64 Linux bootstrap failure in rust
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: build
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97837
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99961
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||gccbugbjorn at fahller dot se
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105801
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105801
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8f4634fb82d5670183d0ee42de9dae3b55ab5087
commit r13-4678-g8f4634fb82d5670183d0ee42de9dae3b55ab5087
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083
--- Comment #1 from stefanos ---
I forgot to mention that if I try *directly* the following command
g++ -Wall -Wextra -Werror -Wpedantic -std=c++20 -g -g0
-fsanitize=address,undefined -D_GLIBCXX_DEBUG -fno-strict-aliasing -fwrapv -lm
-o tmp src
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90706
Vladimir Makarov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108083
Bug ID: 108083
Summary: Code with memory leak does not get triggered when I
run the executable
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106514
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #10)
> Re-confirmed. =15 vs =30 goes from
>
> backwards jump threading : 0.58 ( 13%)
>
> to
>
> backwards jump threading : 7.00 ( 65%)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106514
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Re-confirmed. =15 vs =30 goes from
backwards jump threading : 0.58 ( 13%)
to
backwards jump threading : 7.00 ( 65%)
so it still shows exponential behavior for CFGs like
if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108082
--- Comment #2 from Risto Alasaarela ---
Could you please point the duplicate report?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108082
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |tree-optimization
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108079
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-Wunused-variable gives |[10/11/12/13 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108082
Bug ID: 108082
Summary: False Warray-bounds warning
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assign
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107568
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Except sprintf is 100% when used correctly. And snprintf requires just as much
audit as sprintf does really. Many people have written about this before where
using snprint just gives a false sense of securit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P2
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108076
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b4fddbe9592e9feb37ce567d90af822b75995531
commit r13-4630-gb4fddbe9592e9feb37ce567d90af822b75995531
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107568
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
since this effects upstream *-*-darwin21+ the bug is now tracked here (I've
closed the arm64 duvet branch dup)
I am considering amending the darwin host module to add
-Wno-error=deprecated-declarations to the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107828
Feng Xue changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108072
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0a43f7b1a73c8e3b9cefffe430274d0a3d6d3291
commit r13-4629-g0a43f7b1a73c8e3b9cefffe430274d0a3d6d3291
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108077
Romain Geissler changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108081
--- Comment #3 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
> 11956#c6
> [...]
> -mxgot might help,
Pay attention that my bug report is about `R_MIPS_TLS_GD` and not
`R_MIPS_CALL16` which indeed can be fixed by `-mxgot`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108081
Mathieu Malaterre changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108081
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108081
Bug ID: 108081
Summary: -O0 leads to R_MIPS_TLS_GD error
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
86 matches
Mail list logo
