[Bug debug/108573] [13 Regression] '-fcompare-debug' failure (length) at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108573 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/108595] New: -fcall-saved-a1 with -O2 leads to incorrect RISC-V code-gen around inline assembly

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108595 Bug ID: 108595 Summary: -fcall-saved-a1 with -O2 leads to incorrect RISC-V code-gen around inline assembly Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Sev

[Bug c++/108594] New: GCC ignores deleted movement constructor is not used on return

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108594 Bug ID: 108594 Summary: GCC ignores deleted movement constructor is not used on return Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/108552] Linux i386 kernel 5.14 memory corruption for pre_compound_page() when gcov is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552 --- Comment #42 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #40) > (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #39) > > I was wonering if we should not provide flag to turn all counts > > volatile. That way we will still have rac

[Bug tree-optimization/108552] Linux i386 kernel 5.14 memory corruption for pre_compound_page() when gcov is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552 --- Comment #41 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Linus Torvalds from comment #31) > (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #26) > > > > Now, in principle we should have applied store-motion and not only PRE which > > would have avoided th

[Bug tree-optimization/108306] [12 Regression] false-positive -Warray-bounds warning emitted with -fsanitize=shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108306 --- Comment #17 from rguenther at suse dot de --- On Fri, 27 Jan 2023, amacleod at redhat dot com wrote: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108306 > > --- Comment #16 from Andrew Macleod --- > (In reply to Richard Biener from comm

[Bug target/108589] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 with -mtune=ampere1a -fno-split-wide-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108589 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-30 Status|UNCONFIRM

[Bug target/108583] [13 Regression] wrong code with vector division by uint16 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tnfchris at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/108583] [13 Regression] wrong code with vector division by uint16 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108583 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-30 Component|rtl-optim

[Bug fortran/107721] Lost typespec with constant expressions using array constructors and parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107721 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --

[Bug fortran/107721] Lost typespec with constant expressions using array constructors and parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107721 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||gs...@t-online.de --- Comment #1 from J

[Bug fortran/107820] ICE in match_mult_operand, at fortran/matchexp.cc:296

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107820 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/107721] Lost typespec with constant expressions using array constructors and parentheses

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107721 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug fortran/107820] ICE in match_mult_operand, at fortran/matchexp.cc:296

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107820 Jerry DeLisle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jvdelisle at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug c++/107360] ICE on sizeof(*f(x)) when f's (deduced) return type is a pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107360 --- Comment #5 from Martin Uecker --- Yes. After reconsidering this, this is not related to the other bugs mentioned above. I think your first example needs to be invalid, because the derived return type then depends on a variable inside the ne

[Bug c++/107360] ICE on sizeof(*f(x)) when f's (deduced) return type is a pointer to VLA

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107360 --- Comment #4 from Alexey Izbyshev --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #3) > I think there there are cases were variably modified > return types are allowed in ISO C: > > void f(int n, double (*(bar(void)))[n]) > { > double (*p)[n]

[Bug fortran/108450] [12/13 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.cc:4380 since r12-5793-g689407ef916503b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108450 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e32a12c04c72f692a7bd119fd3e4e5b74392c9d commit r13-5486-g2e32a12c04c72f692a7bd119fd3e4e5b74392c9d Author: Mikael Morin Date: Sun

[Bug fortran/108592] In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-01-29 Ever confirme

[Bug c++/16922] gcc inlines functions with attribute noinline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16922 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note noipa attribute has been added for a while now if you want not IPA based optimizations for this function.

[Bug c++/16922] gcc inlines functions with attribute noinline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16922 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||hp at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #2 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/56099] Empty static noinline functions aren't called from optimized code

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56099 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #8 from Andrew Pin

[Bug c++/16922] gcc inlines functions with attribute noinline

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=16922 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||yuri at tsoft dot com --- Comment #3 fro

[Bug tree-optimization/34563] noinline function call being removed

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34563 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #13 from Andrew Pi

[Bug ipa/108593] No inlining after function cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108593 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/108450] [12/13 Regression] ICE in sort_actual, at fortran/intrinsic.cc:4380 since r12-5793-g689407ef916503b2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108450 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |mikael at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/108593] New: No inlining after function cloning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108593 Bug ID: 108593 Summary: No inlining after function cloning Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c A

[Bug fortran/103506] [10/11/12/13 Regression] ICE in gfc_free_namespace, at fortran/symbol.c:4039 since r10-2798-ge68a35ae4a65d2b3

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103506 --- Comment #15 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8011fbba7baa46947341ca8069b5a327163a68d5 commit r13-5485-g8011fbba7baa46947341ca8069b5a327163a68d5 Author: Jerry DeLisle Date:

[Bug fortran/108592] New: In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108592 Bug ID: 108592 Summary: In IF statements -Winteger-division is repeated 4 times Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Prior

[Bug c/95130] GCC ignoring attribute(format(gnu_printf)) on printf in mingw

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95130 Alvin Wong changed: What|Removed |Added CC||alvinhochun at gmail dot com --- Comment #1

[Bug c++/108590] - 1_short_consteval is not being promoted to int before doing the unary operator negative

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|- 1_short_consteval is not |- 1_short_consteval is not

[Bug c++/108590] Wrong integer promotion for consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/102820] [DR2351] Failure to compile void{}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |12.0

[Bug c++/108591] void{} does not error out in 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108591 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/102820] [DR2351] Failure to compile void{}

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102820 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Mark_B53 at yahoo dot com --- Comment #

[Bug c++/108591] New: void{} does not error out in 12.1

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108591 Bug ID: 108591 Summary: void{} does not error out in 12.1 Product: gcc Version: 12.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/105593] avx512 math function raises uninitialized variable warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105593 --- Comment #16 from James Addison --- Does it make sense to update some of the other variable declarations (like this[1] one) within optimized blocks to use self-initialization as part of this bug, or should I create a separate bug for that? (o

[Bug analyzer/108492] __analyzer_eval has effect on the analysis result of gcc static analyzer

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108492 ming mengli changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c++/108590] New: Wrong integer promotoion for consteval

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108590 Bug ID: 108590 Summary: Wrong integer promotoion for consteval Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c++

[Bug c++/108579] [13 Regression] Requires-expression that checks constructor on non-template constructor of template class got rejected

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108579 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org Ke

[Bug tree-optimization/108552] Linux i386 kernel 5.14 memory corruption for pre_compound_page() when gcov is enabled

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108552 --- Comment #40 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #39) > I was wonering if we should not provide flag to turn all counts > volatile. That way we will still have race conditions on their updates > (and it would be che

[Bug c/64619] No -Wsign-conversion warning

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=64619 Roman Žilka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roman.zilka at gmail dot com --- Comment #

[Bug target/108589] New: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 with -mtune=ampere1a -fno-split-wide-types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108589 Bug ID: 108589 Summary: ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1932 with -mtune=ampere1a -fno-split-wide-types Product: gcc Ve

[Bug c++/108588] New: __is_constructible returns wrong value for invalid (but non deleted) default constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108588 Bug ID: 108588 Summary: __is_constructible returns wrong value for invalid (but non deleted) default constructor Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED