[Bug sanitizer/108995] Missed signed integer overflow checks in UBsan? since r8-343-g2bf54d93f159210d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108995 --- Comment #2 from Richard Biener --- We already fold this on GENERIC to *c = -229690488(OVF); with optimization and *c = (int) b * 10921; without. It's almost surely through extract_muldiv, we also diagnose t.c: In function ‘main’:

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #29

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #28 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:7e8a3dbbb26f66ce8ea60be48962022b5fb2ef55 commit r13-6518-g7e8a3dbbb26f66ce8ea60be48962022b5fb2ef55 Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Sat Sep

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #27 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a1ccb4583dfaa267648110aa7da7275acc3000f8 commit r13-6517-ga1ccb4583dfaa267648110aa7da7275acc3000f8 Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Sat Sep

[Bug testsuite/70150] Additonal test failures with --enable-default-pie

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150 --- Comment #26 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f30f04b1fbd4b4e13a7535fad8e698c7b24db9b8 commit r13-6516-gf30f04b1fbd4b4e13a7535fad8e698c7b24db9b8 Author: Xi Ruoyao Date: Sat Sep

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #14 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #10) > with a debug build on darwin19: > #2 0x00010249e5a5 in make_ssa_name_fn (fn=0x11104b170, var=0x10771d1f8, > stmt=0x0, version=0) at

[Bug tree-optimization/109048] [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109048 --- Comment #4 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3) > A three-operand phi make ifcvt generate worse code > It saved 1 add for potential 1.f + 0.f/1.f since it's constant, but generates more logic operations for

[Bug c++/107741] Missed member variable name in mangling of externally visible lambdas used in inline initialization of static members

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107741 --- Comment #2 from David Blaikie --- Ping on this? Would love it if someone could check my work/confirm my diagnosis, even if it's not a priority to fix the bug immediately.

[Bug c++/109047] Harmonize __attribute__((target_clones)) requirement in function prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109047 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- More over the idea of this attribute is you only need to say on the definition if there is going to be multiple targets. Otherwise you would get different behavior across targets. And exporting different

[Bug tree-optimization/109048] [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109048 --- Comment #3 from Hongtao.liu --- A three-operand phi make ifcvt generate worse code [local count: 10737414]: # iftmp.1_16 = PHI <2.5e-1(13), 5.0e-1(2)> # iftmp.0_34 = PHI <4.0e+0(13), 2.0e+0(2)> # prephitmp_40 = PHI <-2.5e-1(13),

[Bug libstdc++/109049] New: std::declval gives wrong result for cv void

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109049 Bug ID: 109049 Summary: std::declval gives wrong result for cv void Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/109047] Harmonize __attribute__((target_clones)) requirement in function prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109047 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug tree-optimization/109048] [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109048 --- Comment #2 from Hongtao.liu --- Lots of logic operation for mask in ifcvt [local count: 531502205]: # i_18 = PHI # ivtmp_15 = PHI # DEBUG i => NULL # DEBUG BEGIN_STMT _38 = (long unsigned int) i_18; _37 = _38 * 4; _36 =

[Bug tree-optimization/109048] [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109048 --- Comment #1 from Hongtao.liu --- There's also a backend misoptimization for x86 avx512 mask compare which is same as PR88570.

[Bug tree-optimization/109048] New: [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109048 Bug ID: 109048 Summary: [13 regression] redundant mask compare generated by vectorizer. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/109047] New: Harmonize __attribute__((target_clones)) requirement in function prototype

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109047 Bug ID: 109047 Summary: Harmonize __attribute__((target_clones)) requirement in function prototype Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/109046] New: 13 regresion caused by complex lower.

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109046 Bug ID: 109046 Summary: 13 regresion caused by complex lower. Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/108773] [13 Regression] ICE in gimplify_var_or_parm_decl, at gimplify.cc:3058 compiling ceph since r13-4563-g1e1847612d7f169f

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108773 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/108887] [13 Regression] ICE in process_function_and_variable_attributes since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108887 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug target/108938] Missing bswap detection

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108938 --- Comment #11 from Hongtao.liu --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #9) > Though, if more than one replacement operation is emitted, one needs to be > careful not to emit more expensive replacement than the original sequence >

[Bug c++/108116] [12 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1074 since r12-6897-gdec8d0e5fa00ceb2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108998] [12 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108998 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/108998] [12 Regression] ICE in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16037

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108998 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c0edd2060dbc5aad0bae3ef4d68c8e85f26d0062 commit r12-9231-gc0edd2060dbc5aad0bae3ef4d68c8e85f26d0062 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/107853] [10/11/12 Regression] variadic template with a variadic template friend with a requires of fold expression

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107853 --- Comment #7 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb39089c5a0da1e9b16ad27db557a2c3f930e668 commit r12-9229-gcb39089c5a0da1e9b16ad27db557a2c3f930e668 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/108116] [12 Regression] ICE in check_noexcept_r, at cp/except.cc:1074 since r12-6897-gdec8d0e5fa00ceb2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108116 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:09c5937d8295fbc96f6d05cc12ec3709740a277d commit r12-9230-g09c5937d8295fbc96f6d05cc12ec3709740a277d Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/107864] [10/11/12 Regression] ICE (seg fault) in check_return_expr or instantiate_body with concepts and specialized version

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107864 --- Comment #10 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:18bd59990196462cde8011458e2518118b1b6681 commit r12-9228-g18bd59990196462cde8011458e2518118b1b6681 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/107179] [11/12 Regression] requires-expression gives hard error for inaccessible constructor

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107179 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:668098c2e55c33f97e331c3160174bf12c3d88f7 commit r12-9227-g668098c2e55c33f97e331c3160174bf12c3d88f7 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > Both testcases I tested all exited with a non-zero value even at -O0 ... Ok, I missed you need to pass an argument to the program. Anyways I think this might

[Bug bootstrap/107299] [13 regression] ICE in stage 1 after r13-3307-g8efc38347a7444

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107299 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Michael Meissner : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:306c7b1ac3e4413288e6930b00a3cab2133c4e57 commit r13-6507-g306c7b1ac3e4413288e6930b00a3cab2133c4e57 Author: Michael Meissner

[Bug fortran/58331] [OOP] Bogus rank checking with explicit-/assumed-size arrays and CLASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331 --- Comment #5 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- The previous patch would accept invalid code, as it would miss assumed-shape. Fixed by the additional: @@ -2650,10 +2669,14 @@ compare_parameter (gfc_symbol *formal, gfc_expr *actual, if

[Bug target/108987] [13 Regression] RISC-V: shiftadd cost model bug needlessly preferring syth_multiply

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108987 Vineet Gupta changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/58331] [OOP] Bogus rank checking with explicit-/assumed-size arrays and CLASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=58331 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #13 from simon at pushface dot org --- Not sure that it’ll make any difference, but I managed to slim the reproducer down to a pure set of data declarations, no user code at all. It’s the very last declaration (TIMx_CCMRx_Lower_Half)

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #12 from simon at pushface dot org --- Not sure that it’ll make any difference, but I managed to slim the reproducer down to a pure set of data declarations, no user code at all. It’s the very last declaration (TIMx_CCMRx_Lower_Half)

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #11 from simon at pushface dot org --- Created attachment 54597 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54597=edit Minimal reproducer

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Both testcases I tested all exited with a non-zero value even at -O0 ...

[Bug c++/108706] [13 Regression] Indefinite recursion when compiling gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C w/ -g

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108706 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #4 from David Binderman --- Created attachment 54596 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54596=edit C source code After 3 hours further reduction.

[Bug target/108315] -mcpu=power10 changes ABI

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108315 --- Comment #18 from Alexander Monakov --- It seems you are saying that as long as GCC emits code according to the Holy Scripture that is the ABI spec, everything is fine. I imagine on other architectures maintainers are able to consider how

[Bug c/108896] provide "element_count" attribute to give more context to __builtin_dynamic_object_size() and -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 --- Comment #22 from Siddhesh Poyarekar --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #20) > > I haven't seen comments on Kees's first example, where "malloc" returns an > > "__alloc_size" hint that's lost when "p" is returned from the function

[Bug c++/107897] [13 Regression] mangling conflicts with a previous mangle since r13-3601

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107897 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |jason at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925 --- Comment #5 from Mikael Morin --- This does NOT improve things: diff --git a/gcc/fortran/module.cc b/gcc/fortran/module.cc index 601497e0998..2d6c7b8ef73 100644 --- a/gcc/fortran/module.cc +++ b/gcc/fortran/module.cc @@ -5258,7 +5258,10 @@

[Bug c/108896] provide "element_count" attribute to give more context to __builtin_dynamic_object_size() and -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 --- Comment #21 from Martin Uecker --- (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #19) > (In reply to Bill Wendling from comment #18) > > > This is not the case in C: https://godbolt.org/z/P7M6cdnoa > > > > > Right, it's not legal C syntax. I

[Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925 --- Comment #4 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- Also: MODULE m contains subroutine bar (arg, res) class(*) :: arg character(100) :: res end subroutine END MODULE USE m END

[Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925 --- Comment #3 from Mikael Morin --- (In reply to anlauf from comment #2) > The attachment in pr68800 may serve as a starting point: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=36964 Thanks, reduced: MODULE m TYPE :: a END TYPE

[Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/108896] provide "element_count" attribute to give more context to __builtin_dynamic_object_size() and -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 --- Comment #20 from Martin Uecker --- Am Montag, dem 06.03.2023 um 19:15 + schrieb isanbard at gmail dot com: > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 > > --- Comment #18 from Bill Wendling --- > (In reply to Martin Uecker

[Bug tree-optimization/109045] assume attribute does not always optimize std::optional cases

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109045 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- GCC does optimize much dealing with assume and function calls really so this is not really shocking.

[Bug tree-optimization/109045] assume attribute and std::optional do not mix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109045 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/109045] New: assume attribute and std::optional do not mix

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109045 Bug ID: 109045 Summary: assume attribute and std::optional do not mix Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/108925] memory leak of gfc_get_namespace result

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108925 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c/108896] provide "element_count" attribute to give more context to __builtin_dynamic_object_size() and -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 --- Comment #19 from Jakub Jelinek --- (In reply to Bill Wendling from comment #18) > > This is not the case in C: https://godbolt.org/z/P7M6cdnoa > > > Right, it's not legal C syntax. I wanted to point out that it's not an > impossible

[Bug c/108896] provide "element_count" attribute to give more context to __builtin_dynamic_object_size() and -fsanitize=bounds

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 --- Comment #18 from Bill Wendling --- (In reply to Martin Uecker from comment #17) > Am Freitag, dem 03.03.2023 um 23:18 + schrieb isanbard at gmail dot com: > > https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108896 > > > > --- Comment #16

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 --- Comment #2 from Mikael Morin --- Interestingly, the three lines removed in the previous comment come from a fix for PR41093, whose title is "memory leaks with gfc_namespace".

[Bug c++/109042] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109042 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek --- Created attachment 54595 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=54595=edit gcc13-pr109042.patch Untested fix.

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug tree-optimization/109044] Missed fold for (n - 1) / 2 when n is odd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109044 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization

[Bug tree-optimization/109044] New: Missed fold for (n - 1) / 2 when n is odd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109044 Bug ID: 109044 Summary: Missed fold for (n - 1) / 2 when n is odd Product: gcc Version: 12.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug fortran/109043] New: Warning: Legacy Extension: Duplicate SAVE attribute (also ASYNCHRONOUS, VOLATILE)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109043 Bug ID: 109043 Summary: Warning: Legacy Extension: Duplicate SAVE attribute (also ASYNCHRONOUS, VOLATILE) Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #14 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 52227 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/52227] [OOP] TARGET attribute mishandled in polymorphic types

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52227 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug middle-end/109038] Miss optimization to simplify bit_and + rotate to shift

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109038 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- *** Bug 109037 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug middle-end/109037] miss optimization to simplify bit_and to

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109037 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INVALID |DUPLICATE --- Comment #2 from Andrew

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #3 from David Binderman --- 20220508 is good, so the range is 20220508 to 20220515. In git hash terms, that's g:a1947c92f7cda5f6cf7b8d8a9a44f6dd45352c03 to g:18547874ee205d830acb31f1e3c1c89fc7725c14. I will try to reduce the code

[Bug libstdc++/109022] Low performance of std::map constructor for already sorted data of std::pair

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109022 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Last reconfirmed|

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #13 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 51610 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/51610] [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug fortran/51605] internal compiler error gfc_trans_block_construct, at fortran/trans-stmt.c:984

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51605 Bug 51605 depends on bug 51610, which changed state. Bug 51610 Summary: [OOP] Class container does not properly handle POINTER and TARGET https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51610 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #12 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 101101 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/101101] ICE in gfc_build_array_type, at fortran/trans-types.c:1391

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101101 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #11 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 104229 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/104229] ICE in gfc_build_null_descriptor, at fortran/trans-array.cc:536

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104229 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #10 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 107380 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug fortran/107380] ICE in coarray_check, at fortran/check.cc:694

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107380 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug fortran/53951] [OOP] Later TARGET statement ignored for CLASS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53951 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug fortran/106856] [12/13 Regression][OOP] CLASS attribute handling / ICE in gfc_conv_expr_present, at fortran/trans-expr.cc:1977 since r12-4346-geb92cd57a1ebe7cd

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106856 --- Comment #9 from anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org --- *** Bug 53951 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***

[Bug libstdc++/109024] [C++23][ranges][repeat_view] The default ctor unuseable

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109024 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/109041] Bogus compile time check by __builtin_memset? error: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 4 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109041 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug c++/109042] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109042 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #2 from David Binderman --- (In reply to David Binderman from comment #1) > I will try to bisect this one with snapshots. Trying 20220515 first. This one bad. Trying 20220508.

[Bug c++/109042] [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109042 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-06 Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/109042] New: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109042 Bug ID: 109042 Summary: [13 Regression] ICE in emit_support_tinfo_1, at cp/rtti.cc:1584 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug middle-end/109031] csmith: possible bad code with -O2 -fno-strict-aliasing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109031 --- Comment #1 from David Binderman --- I will try to bisect this one with snapshots. Trying 20220515 first.

[Bug c++/109039] [12/13 Regression] Miscompilation with no_unique_address and bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109039 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug c++/109039] [12/13 Regression] Miscompilation with no_unique_address and bitfields

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109039 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Miscompilation with |[12/13 Regression]

[Bug c++/109030] [13 Regression] checking ICE in cxx_eval_call_expression with aggregate initialization inside noexcept

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109030 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug sanitizer/108995] Missed signed integer overflow checks in UBsan? since r8-343-g2bf54d93f159210d

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108995 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Missed signed integer |Missed signed integer

[Bug target/108994] [13 Regression] LLVM JIT segfaults in libgcc after upgrading from gcc 12.2.1 to 13.0.1 since r13-2706-g6e80a1d164d1f9

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108994 Martin Liška changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-03-06 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug driver/108865] gcc on Windows fails with Unicode path to source file

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108865 Costas Argyris changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #54589|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #10 from Iain Sandoe --- with a debug build on darwin19: #2 0x00010249e5a5 in make_ssa_name_fn (fn=0x11104b170, var=0x10771d1f8, stmt=0x0, version=0) at /src-local/gcc-master/gcc/tree-ssanames.cc:357 357 gcc_assert (VAR_P

[Bug target/109007] building for POWER8 leaks into POWER9 ISA with g++ 11.3 (cross-compiler on x86_64 host)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109007 --- Comment #19 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com --- On the side note, my POWER8 machine can only run Ubuntu 16.04 LTS and Ubuntu 18.04 LTS, later releases simply won't boot. So it's getting outdated anyway.

[Bug c/109041] New: Bogus compile time check by __builtin_memset? error: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 4 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination [-Werror=stringop-overflow=]

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109041 Bug ID: 109041 Summary: Bogus compile time check by __builtin_memset? error: ‘__builtin_memset’ writing 4 bytes into a region of size 0 overflows the destination

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Target|x86_64-apple-darwin |x86_64-apple-darwin, |

[Bug target/109040] New: [13 Regression] wrong code with v16hi compare & mask on riscv64 at -O2

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109040 Bug ID: 109040 Summary: [13 Regression] wrong code with v16hi compare & mask on riscv64 at -O2 Product: gcc Version: 13.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords:

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #8 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- Oh nvm... you did.

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 --- Comment #7 from avieira at gcc dot gnu.org --- I'm still trying to build ADA to reproduce this. Could you try 'p debug_tree (var)' if var is a SSA_NAME debug won't print anything. If it comes back as not 0 could you also do p debug_tree

[Bug rtl-optimization/106594] [13 Regression] sign-extensions no longer merged into addressing mode

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106594 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug target/109007] building for POWER8 leaks into POWER9 ISA with g++ 11.3 (cross-compiler on x86_64 host)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109007 --- Comment #18 from bugreporter66 at gmail dot com --- I noticed that building on newer Linux distros often produces a binary that then cannot run on older ones even with the same CPU, it requires newer libraries at runtime (tried that with

[Bug libgcc/108727] gcc.dg/split-5.c fails on power 9 BE

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108727 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma

[Bug tree-optimization/109005] [13 Regression] ICE during GIMPLE pass: ifcvt

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109005 Iain Sandoe changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

  1   2   >