https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rguenth at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110268
--- Comment #4 from Richard Biener ---
tree
arm_builtin_decl (unsigned code, bool initialize_p ATTRIBUTE_UNUSED)
{
unsigned subcode = code >> ARM_BUILTIN_SHIFT;
switch (code & ARM_BUILTIN_CLASS)
{
case ARM_BUILTIN_GENERAL:
ret
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110268
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
--- Comment #3 from Richard Biene
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109856
--- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert ---
Created attachment 55337
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55337&action=edit
Another illustration of the bug, taken from GNU tar
Here is another example of the bug, taken from GNU tar. Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110276
Bug ID: 110276
Summary: [13 Regression] ICE building efibootguard on
x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110275
--- Comment #1 from Matthias Klose ---
... and built with make profiledbootstrap-lean
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110275
Bug ID: 110275
Summary: [14 Regression] trunk fails to build with binutils
trunk on riscv64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
kargl at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargl at gcc dot gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110264
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jeffreyalaw at gmail dot com
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107583
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107583
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:57446d1bc9757ee1fb030600d38fa9487231f2a4
commit r14-1876-g57446d1bc9757ee1fb030600d38fa9487231f2a4
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110274
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note it is _mm256_packus_epi32 which is being miscompiled.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110274
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110235
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110274
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 55336
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55336&action=edit
shift_test.cc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110274
Bug ID: 110274
Summary: [14 Regression] Wrong AVX2 code on highway-1.0.4 on
-O1 and above
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
The difference is the inlining of memcpy if I used -minline-all-stringops, the
realignment comes back.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
--- Comment #11 from Zebediah Figura ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #10)
> Right, those are different issues. Any chance of a standalone testcase
> extracted from Wine? If you already see a function where stack realignment
> is
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
--- Comment #1 from Zebediah Figura ---
Created attachment 55335
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55335&action=edit
gcc -v output, from godbolt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110273
Bug ID: 110273
Summary: i686-w64-mingw32 with -march=znver4 generates AVX
instructions without stack alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
The problem is that I thought match_arith_overflow returns true if it replaced
something, but that is not the case, it only returns true for the BIT_NOT_EXPR
case when it removed the stmt.
So, I think the ri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
--- Comment #10 from Alexander Monakov ---
Right, those are different issues. Any chance of a standalone testcase
extracted from Wine? If you already see a function where stack realignment is
missing, just give us preprocessed containing source,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Component|middle-end
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110272
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110117
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97058
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92178
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109442
--- Comment #17 from AK ---
With recent changes in libc++ (https://reviews.llvm.org/D147741) clang
optimizes away the new-delete pair. https://godbolt.org/z/a6PG54Pvb
$ clang++ -O3 -stdlib=libc++ -fno-exceptions
vat1(std::__1::vector >): #
@va
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110272
--- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> ---
Created attachment 55332
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55332&action=edit
The compiler output
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110272
Bug ID: 110272
Summary: ICE in as_a, at machmode.h:381
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
Assig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
--- Comment #1 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
Created attachment 55330
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55330&action=edit
mont.c.c.orig.xz
In case I reduced it too much mont.c.c.orig.xz is the original preprocessed
file. ICEs w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110271
Bug ID: 110271
Summary: [14 Regression] UICE on pycryptodome-3.17.0 during
GIMPLE pass: widening_mul: in gsi_replace, at
gimple-iterator.cc:437
Product: gcc
Vers
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
Zebediah Figura changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||zfigura at codeweavers dot com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109443
--- Comment #17 from AK ---
Even after vector::size() is hoisted, the codegen is sub-optimal compared to
iterator version.
```
void use_idx_const_size(std::vector v) {
auto s = v.size();
for (std::vector::size_type i = 0; i < s; i++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55327|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91fb8bdb3944b78bca4f739583ff490c83a92fe7
commit r14-1872-g91fb8bdb3944b78bca4f739583ff490c83a92fe7
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
Andrew Macleod changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andrew Macleod :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6c121a2c687c56b09ecc11ef6ae1893ec5006325
commit r14-1871-g6c121a2c687c56b09ecc11ef6ae1893ec5006325
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110270
Bug ID: 110270
Summary: [OpenMP] OpenMP 5.2 – firstprivate of pointer shall
retain the value if pointee is not mapped
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe gimple_fold_stmt_to_constant_1 should handle GIMPLE_COND ...
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110268
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
This regression appeared after the patch that re-implements vdupq, but the
issue is likely more generic.
velo r
I tried to update arm_init_mve_builtins() with:
+ if (in_lto_p)
+ {
+ arm_mve::handle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110269
Bug ID: 110269
Summary: 13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when
using __builtin_unreachable since
r13-4607-g2dc5d6b1e7e
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110268
Alex Coplan changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-06-15
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110268
Bug ID: 110268
Summary: arm MVE intrinsics support broken with LTO
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: targe
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.0
Summary|ice in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90556
Bug 90556 depends on bug 105868, which changed state.
Bug 105868 Summary: false positive return-local-addr with goto statement and
optimization O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105868
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dixyes at gmail dot com
--- Comment #25
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105868
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90556
Bug 90556 depends on bug 110267, which changed state.
Bug 110267 Summary: Bogus warning "function may return address of local
variable"
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110267
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93644
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nullplanwichmann at web dot de
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110267
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110267
Bug ID: 110267
Summary: Bogus warning "function may return address of local
variable"
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110189
--- Comment #5 from Thorsten Otto ---
Many thanks for fixing it. But just found, that same thing seems to happen when
using other builtin functions like ORD(). Should i open a new report for this?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109798
Eric Botcazou changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.2
URL|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107583
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107583
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106895
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80753
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:37f373e974ac0a272b0e2b24e27c08833ad43470
commit r14-1870-g37f373e974ac0a272b0e2b24e27c08833ad43470
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55240|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
--- Comment #8 from Jimi Huotari ---
Looks like with '-mno-avx512f' the issues go away for me.
As a sidey-note, this seems to also possibly affect KWin desktop effects
(animated ones at least), which don't seem to be doing their thing (haven't
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107535
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1)
> kind-of a pilot error,
Yes, this seems to be exactly what the code asks for. If you compile the class
with hidden visibility, its static member isn't shared
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #5 from David Binderman ---
Second test case:
# include
int Hann_i, PsyBufferUpdate_psyInfo_0, PsyBufferUpdate_i;
double *mdct_data;
double PsyBufferUpdate_sfreq;
void PsyBufferUpdate() {
if (PsyBufferUpdate_psyInfo_0 == 4)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104024
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #4 from David Binderman ---
$ git bisect bad 07767389fb390814
07767389fb390814d9b6142e9d0341b7b9fd1cc2 is the first bad commit
commit 07767389fb390814d9b6142e9d0341b7b9fd1cc2
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Date: Fri Jun 9 12:58:57 2023 -0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #34 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b2d29f2622c215201cb415565ab4f18b738ca35c
commit r12-9700-gb2d29f2622c215201cb415565ab4f18b738ca35c
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #35 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5a21f78294624dd7166e1a25a57c805a759dc0d2
commit r12-9701-g5a21f78294624dd7166e1a25a57c805a759dc0d2
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
David Binderman changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #33 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by Xi Ruoyao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e8ee5a0b00dc7a7c25dd3264e9007f440457a791
commit r12-9699-ge8ee5a0b00dc7a7c25dd3264e9007f440457a791
Author: Xi Ruoyao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106895
Nicholas Piggin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #2 from David Binderman ---
After a couple of steps of bisect, I have this list of Authors in the git
range:
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Author: Andrew MacLeod
Author: GCC Administrator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
--- Comment #32 from rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
---
(In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #31)
> Richard: is it allowed to backport them (or the entire
> https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-March/613093.html series) for
> gcc-12?
Yeah,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
Jimi Huotari changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Multiple applications |Multiple applications
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
--- Comment #1 from David Binderman ---
Reduced code is:
typedef struct {
int sizeS
} PsyInfo;
Hann_i;
*mdct_data;
PsyInfo PsyBufferUpdate_psyInfo;
mdct(N) {
double tempr, s, sfreq, xr_0 = cos(N);
int i;
sfreq = sin(N);
for (; N; i++)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110266
Bug ID: 110266
Summary: ice in gimple_range_adjustment
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
As
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110136
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |12.4
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110235
--- Comment #4 from ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> (In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #2)
> > FAIL: gcc.target/i386/avx2-vpackssdw-2.c execution test
> >
> > This one is about sign saturation which
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110136
chenglulu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110136
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f829733b5c92877247727347246d9f927372f0c1
commit r13-7448-gf829733b5c92877247727347246d9f927372f0c1
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110136
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ddec24e5abe99033c8d6bbe544b4c2b35a0232f2
commit r12-9698-gddec24e5abe99033c8d6bbe544b4c2b35a0232f2
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110136
--- Comment #5 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:5430c86e71927492399129f3df80824c6c334ddf
commit r14-1866-g5430c86e71927492399129f3df80824c6c334ddf
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date: Wed Jun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110265
--- Comment #1 from JuzheZhong ---
This issue is caused by incorrect redcution instructions:
(define_insn "@pred_reduc_"
[(set (match_operand: 0 "register_operand""=vr, vr")
(unspec:
[(unspec:
[(ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||krebbel at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70150
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #31
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110265
Bug ID: 110265
Summary: RISC-V: ICE when build RVV intrinsic with
"-march=rv32gc_zve64d -mabi=ilp32d"
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110264
--- Comment #1 from Mathieu Malaterre ---
This is not a duplicate of PR/109535 since I can compile the previously
mentionned TU transform_test.cc just fine.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110264
Bug ID: 110264
Summary: internal compiler error: src/gcc/toplev.cc:314
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110104
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98160
--- Comment #13 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df071fbd467f0cb379ef41d74792fc5e6c8c
commit r14-1838-gdf071fbd467f0cb379ef41d74792fc5e6c8c
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57111
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Thomas Schwinge :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df071fbd467f0cb379ef41d74792fc5e6c8c
commit r14-1838-gdf071fbd467f0cb379ef41d74792fc5e6c8c
Author: Thomas Schwinge
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173
--- Comment #20 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:43a3252c42af12ad90082e4088ea58eecd0bf582
commit r14-1837-g43a3252c42af12ad90082e4088ea58eecd0bf582
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173
--- Comment #19 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ec52d228d6db7f77188ad099a8c0ff65dead3241
commit r14-1836-gec52d228d6db7f77188ad099a8c0ff65dead3241
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
--- Comment #6 from Alexander Monakov ---
(In reply to Jimi Huotari from comment #0)
> (By the by, is ADCX a typo of ADX? I see -madx as an option but only one
> use of it otherwise, and no -adcx as an option and lots of mentions of it...
> but
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79173
--- Comment #18 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b6ca11407d4f5d16ccfb580ea2d3d9aa08d7cd11
commit r14-1835-gb6ca11407d4f5d16ccfb580ea2d3d9aa08d7cd11
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #4)
> Um, sched1 is not enabled on x86 so -fno-schedule-insns does nothing — you
> probably meant -fno-schedule-insns2?
Yes, of course - thanks for correcting me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110260
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
99 matches
Mail list logo
