https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
You cannot use posix make without a posix shell. That means /dev/null support
too.
https://pubs.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/xbd_chap10.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
--- Comment #3 from Jan Nárovec ---
The commands (mv, touch) are not the main problem, these can be indeed somehow
provided, but redirecion to /dev/null cannot work at all in the windows SHELL
(cmd.exe).
We use gcc for a cross compilation, prim
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2023-07-18
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
In a mingw env, I thought most of the posix simple posix commands are there.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110710
Bug ID: 110710
Summary: LTO linker on Windows creates an invalid Makefile
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Compone
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110709
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to wangwen from comment #3)
> when the global pointer variety has an initialized value which is not NULL,
> then the value should be an address, so the initialized value should be
> recalculated wh
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110709
--- Comment #3 from wangwen at microsoft dot com ---
when the global pointer variety has an initialized value which is not NULL,
then the value should be an address, so the initialized value should be
recalculated when dynamically loaded.
Now th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110709
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
as far as I understand, there will be a relocation section which is there for
runtime relocations and they basically "instructions" on how the relocation
should happen including the location of where the rel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110709
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I don't understand your question since if we look at the output of GCC we get:
.LC0:
.ascii "const char *text\000"
.section.data.rel.local,"aw"
.align 2
.type user
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110709
Bug ID: 110709
Summary: how to handle the initialization of global struct data
for position independent executable application.
Product: gcc
Version: 12.1.0
Status: UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #17 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Rin Okuyama from comment #16)
> The fix has been cherry-picked for NetBSD:
> https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/07/18/msg146078.html
>
> Let me thank you again, Oleg!
Sure, you're
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=101469
--- Comment #16 from Rin Okuyama ---
The fix has been cherry-picked for NetBSD:
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/07/18/msg146078.html
Let me thank you again, Oleg!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110438
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c3f1768b21e9d994c4f090405e863feb06a54002
commit r14-2596-gc3f1768b21e9d994c4f090405e863feb06a54002
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110591
--- Comment #5 from Hongtao.liu ---
Fixed in GCC14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110591
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:06cc38c1c350b34cbd6dde23aefca32442c07a73
commit r14-2595-g06cc38c1c350b34cbd6dde23aefca32442c07a73
Author: liuhongt
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110522
Roman Lebedev changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||dmalcolm at redhat dot com,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110628
--- Comment #4 from seurer at gcc dot gnu.org ---
Created attachment 55563
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55563&action=edit
All the intermediate files in a .tar.gz
Here are all the files zipped up.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110708
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110708
Bug ID: 110708
Summary: std::format("{:%EEC %OOd}",
std::chrono::system_clock::now()) should be rejected
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109557
--- Comment #8 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
with the following slightly modified testing case, the same issue:
#include
#include
struct P {
int k;
int x[10];
} *p;
void store(int a, int b)
{
p = (struct P *)malloc (sizeof (struc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108022
--- Comment #6 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Martin Liška from comment #5)
> Yes, -ggdb3 seems to me like a reasonable solution. Note you can always
> strip the debuginfo into a separate file.
This doesn't really work for us, as building with
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110707
Bug ID: 110707
Summary: unused-but-set-variable in static lambda with deduced
parameter
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110703
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110705
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Summary|IC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=95947
--- Comment #7 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95ddd2659849a904509067ec3a2770135149a722
commit r14-2586-g95ddd2659849a904509067ec3a2770135149a722
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: Su
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110658
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:95ddd2659849a904509067ec3a2770135149a722
commit r14-2586-g95ddd2659849a904509067ec3a2770135149a722
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Component|c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110702
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Wrong code at -O1 on|[12/13/14 Regression] Wrong
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |trivial
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55561|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
What GCC 13 did was
Trying 16 -> 17:
16: {r94:HI=r92:DI#0^0x3;clobber flags:CC;}
REG_DEAD r92:DI
REG_UNUSED flags:CC
17: r95:SI=sign_extend(r94:HI)
REG_DEAD r94:HI
Failed to match thi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87142
Bug 87142 depends on bug 110618, which changed state.
Bug 110618 Summary: Dependency between arguments when one is allocatable array
whose dummy is intent(out)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110706
Bug ID: 110706
Summary: [OpenMP] C++ class mapping fails to map reference-type
members
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp, wrong-c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110705
Bug ID: 110705
Summary: ICE at -O2 and above: in gimplify_modify_expr, at
gimplify.cc:6255 (on GCC-12.x)
Product: gcc
Version: 12.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80578
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||marc.mutz at hotmail dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110704
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |roger at
nextmovesoftware dot com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110610
avieira at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|AS
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110610
--- Comment #10 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Andre Simoes Dias Vieira
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:caabf0973a4e9a26421c94d540e3e20051e93e77
commit r14-2585-gcaabf0973a4e9a26421c94d540e3e20051e93e77
Author: Andre Vieira
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110704
--- Comment #1 from Marc Mutz ---
GCC self-compiled, line numbers should be as at 275820c09e5:
$ g++ --version
g++ (GCC) 13.0.1 20230124 (experimental)
$ (cd ~/C++/gcc; git log -1 --oneline)
275820c09e5 (HEAD, origin/trunk, origin/master, origi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110704
Bug ID: 110704
Summary: When ubsan reports an error, asan reports a leak in
cp-demangle.c
Product: gcc
Version: 13.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110697
--- Comment #3 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm this fixed the bootstrap for me. Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82205
Stijn Schildermans changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||stijn.schildermans@kuleuven
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110703
Bug ID: 110703
Summary: Incorrect "-Wfloat-conversion" diagnostic with
_Generic
Product: gcc
Version: 12.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110696
Kito Cheng changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110524
--- Comment #6 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:04e8808841c33d94529b144b15af5d11671dde1b
commit r13-7570-g04e8808841c33d94529b144b15af5d11671dde1b
Author: Patrick Palka
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110702
Bug ID: 110702
Summary: Wrong code at -O1 on x86_64-linux-gnu (regression
since GCC-12.2)
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Bégou ---
Just tested today as many new improvements have been added to gcc compilers.
$ gfortran --version
GNU Fortran (GCC) 14.0.0 20230717 (experimental)
...
Nvidia HPC is nvhpc/23.5
The problem still occur.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|c |rtl-optimization
--- Comment #1 from Xi Ruo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110697
Tobias Burnus changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
--- Comment #4 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e21e13e2525a042a0aabfbcb4ebf4f08609078c7
commit r14-2580-ge21e13e2525a042a0aabfbcb4ebf4f08609078c7
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110618
--- Comment #3 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1a46400e5ac0f21eead74b10752f69ebc7a8be27
commit r14-2579-g1a46400e5ac0f21eead74b10752f69ebc7a8be27
Author: Mikael Morin
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97100
Konstantin Kharlamov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Hi-Angel at yandex dot ru
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110684
--- Comment #6 from AlexK ---
I don't know, I copied it from somewhere
I want to compile gcc on x86_64 Linux Mint
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110696
--- Comment #1 from CVS Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Lehua Ding :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:70742d08832eb7db4d90f52465966111a19ce3a5
commit r14-2564-g70742d08832eb7db4d90f52465966111a19ce3a5
Author: Lehua Ding
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
I wonder what the following does anyway. We delete the noop move
only when either the reg isn't used for return or it isn't in
use in later insns between 'insn' and the next set of it.
That seems to detec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107424
--- Comment #14 from Tobias Burnus ---
(In reply to Tobias Burnus from comment #12)
> Handle loop steps other than ±1.
Fortran (here F2023) has under "11.1.7.4.3 The execution cycle" (for "DO"):
"... consists of the following steps ..."
"(1) Th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vmakarov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sayle at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110649
Roger Sayle changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot
com
--- Co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
--- Comment #10 from Sergei Trofimovich ---
I confirm the change fixed build for me (it also needed unrelated workaround
for https://gcc.gnu.org/PR110697). Thank you!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105522
--- Comment #9 from Sergey Fedorov ---
Just to update, GCC 12.3.0 exhibits the same error:
/opt/local/var/macports/build/_opt_PPCSnowLeopardPorts_devel_libsdl2-snowleopard/libsdl2-snowleopard/work/SDL2-2.0.22/src/hidapi/mac/hid.c:
In function '
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110701
Bug ID: 110701
Summary: Wrong code at -O1/2/3/s on x86_64-linux-gnu
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #55545|0 |1
is obsolete|
hread model: posix
// Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
// gcc version 13.1.1 20230717 (GCC)
//
// during IPA pass: analyzer
// CWE/cwe-369.c: In function 'divide':
// CWE/cwe-369.c:3:9: internal compiler error: in wide_int_to_tree_1, at
tree.cc:1755
//
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110586
--- Comment #3 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Jan Hubicka from comment #2)
> Do we have other PRs reducing to this change?
>
I thought the recent sphinx regression was also becaus of this? But if I am
wrong, there may be none.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110204
--- Comment #5 from Richard Biener ---
Yeah, the issue is that PRE figures out a new value here but we've already done
value-numbering so we can't alter the "old" solution here. So what we do
is add a '0' with value '_42' (instead of value '0')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110689
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
Status|UNCO
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110688
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||rejects-valid
--- Comment #2 from Jon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110699
Bug ID: 110699
Summary: internal compiler error: tree check: expected
array_type, have error_mark in array_ref_low_bound, at
tree.cc:12754
Product: gcc
Version:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110687
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Fixed for 12.1 and 11.4 by:
c++: template-id with current inst qualifier [PR102300]
The patch for PR41723 properly changed one place to look into the current
instantiation; now we need to fix
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110686
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to actri_lxlong3 from comment #0)
> Test template name resolution, such as:
>
> template struct N {
> template struct S23{
> typedef long X;
> void g(void) { try {} catch (typename ::N::S:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110586
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110587
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comment #3)
> I can't find pr28071.c in GCC testsuite, but find an attached source file in
> the PR #c1, is that pr28071.c you means?
Yes.
(In reply to Hongtao.liu from comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110652
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:081c623ca88dc53abe34b5f5661e79fcde800cef
commit r14-2560-g081c623ca88dc53abe34b5f5661e79fcde800cef
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul 1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110673
Bug 110673 depends on bug 110669, which changed state.
Bug 110669 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr105132.c since
r14-2515-gb77161e60bce7b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110671
Bug 110671 depends on bug 110669, which changed state.
Bug 110669 Summary: [14 regression] ICE in gcc.dg/torture/pr105132.c since
r14-2515-gb77161e60bce7b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29256
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
--- Comment #9 from CVS Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Richard Biener
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b8a1531371309698ad5cd4f000152ce74a52
commit r13-7569-gb8a1531371309698ad5cd4f000152ce74a52
Author: Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110669
--- Comment #8 from CVS Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3228e5c078ed2b505e4ad238b09c1817b38f9cfb
commit r14-2559-g3228e5c078ed2b505e4ad238b09c1817b38f9cfb
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110697
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110692
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org
K
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110697
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juergen.reuter at desy dot de
--- Comme
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110698
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110698
Bug ID: 110698
Summary: Bootstrap fails with [-Werror=unused-but-set-variable]
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110688
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110687
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||11.4.0
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110686
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 103 matches
Mail list logo
