[Bug tree-optimization/111432] New: `bool & (a|1)` is not optimized to just `bool`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111432 Bug ID: 111432 Summary: `bool & (a|1)` is not optimized to just `bool` Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization Severity:

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 --- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55907 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55907=edit Patch which I am testing I should note that LLVM does NOT do this simple pattern matching either.

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- Note I found this while looking into the patch that was originally posted for PR 57755 which removed the xfail for binop-notand1a.c/binop-notand4a.c but found this was a better way of fixing this rather

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Note this is an extension of the pattern: /* X & !X -> 0. */ (simplify (bit_and:c @0 (logical_inverted_value @0)) Which was moved to match via r5-4683-g5609420fbab5ca .

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- The pattern should be: (simplify (bit_and:c (convert@2 (eq @0 INTEGER_CST@1)) (convert? @0)) (if ((wi::to_wide (@1) & 1) != 0) @2 { build_zero_cst (type); })) Since 0/1 of the eq, the convert on the

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-16

[Bug tree-optimization/111431] New: a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111431 Bug ID: 111431 Summary: a & (a == 0) is not optimized to 0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: missed-optimization, xfail Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/57755] Improve fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57755 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Severity|normal

[Bug c++/90670] const& template parameter in a header trips -Wsubobject-linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90670 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug c++/90670] const& template parameter in a header trips -Wsubobject-linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90670 --- Comment #3 from Adam Byrd --- Hmm, I reckon that makes sense. Though the wording is confusing. Why is it "uses the anonymous namespace" instead of something like "has internal linkage". I'm not aware of an anonymous namespace being involved

[Bug ipa/111430] IPA read only variable analysis should handle the case where the storing was the same as the initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111430 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- Note LLVM does this optimization ...

[Bug ipa/111430] IPA read only variable analysis should handle the case where the storing was the same as the initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111430 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement

[Bug ipa/111430] New: IPA read only variable analysis should handle the case where the storing was the same as the initialization

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111430 Bug ID: 111430 Summary: IPA read only variable analysis should handle the case where the storing was the same as the initialization Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status:

[Bug middle-end/111429] New: NO_COLOR env should disable color

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111429 Bug ID: 111429 Summary: NO_COLOR env should disable color Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: diagnostic Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/110992] [13/14 Regression] missed VRP optimization due to transformation of `a & -zero_one_valued_p` into `a * zero_one_valued_p`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110992 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- This is what I came up with in the end: /* (a * b@[0,1]) == CST -> CST == 0 ? (a == CST | b == 0) : (a == CST & b != 0) (a * b@[0,1]) != CST -> CST != 0 ? (a != CST | b == 0) :

[Bug analyzer/111312] Should the analyzer run earlier?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111312 --- Comment #3 from David Malcolm --- Another example can be seen here: https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-August/628759.html in: gcc/testsuite/c-c++-common/analyzer/overlapping-buffers.c where -Wanalyzer-overlapping-buffers

[Bug target/111259] [14 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'subreg' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934 during riscv64 build

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111259 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Patrick O'Neill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d7b6020276a843e97f6135259b4ab3b53a5850e2 commit r14-4044-gd7b6020276a843e97f6135259b4ab3b53a5850e2 Author: Fei Gao Date: Fri

[Bug tree-optimization/57755] Improve fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=57755 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > I think we should optimize this testcases slightly different from > "improving" fold_binary_op_with_conditional_arg (I think >

[Bug target/111428] New: RISC-V vector: Flaky segfault in {min|max}val_char_{1|2}.f90

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111428 Bug ID: 111428 Summary: RISC-V vector: Flaky segfault in {min|max}val_char_{1|2}.f90 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug other/111427] New: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f fails after r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111427 Bug ID: 111427 Summary: [14 regression] gfortran.dg/vect/pr60510.f fails after r14-3999-g3c834d85f2ec42 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug tree-optimization/110131] [12/13/14 Regression] Missed Dead Code Elimination when using __builtin_unreachable since r12-6924-gc2b610e7c6c

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110131 --- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #8) > With https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-September/629128.html we > get: > _34 = (int) _13; > _30 = (unsigned int) _13; > _22 = _30 ==

[Bug other/111406] libiberty build produces errors with CC=clang, unsupported option '-print-multi-os-directory'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111406 --- Comment #4 from Andreas K. Huettel --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3) > > So I think this isn't an issue unless you try to build libiberty stand-alone > or as part of binutils and also install it? > We have a binutils-libs

[Bug fortran/93485] ICE in gfc_trans_array_ctor_element, at fortran/trans-array.c:1682

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93485 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Known to work|

[Bug driver/86030] specs file processing does not create response files for input directories

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86030 --- Comment #16 from John Soo --- It is actually somewhat likely that ARG_MAX will be hit when running on linux because it is hit when the stack can't contain enough pointers to contain argv and environ (see exec.c in the kernel

[Bug fortran/37802] Improve wording for matmul bound checking

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=37802 Bug 37802 depends on bug 30802, which changed state. Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/27766] [meta-bug] -fbounds-check related bugs

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27766 Bug 27766 depends on bug 30802, which changed state. Bug 30802 Summary: out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added CC||anthony.debeus at gmail dot

[Bug fortran/97039] -fbounds-check misses violation with slice of array but not an element

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97039 anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/51577] dependent name lookup finds operator in global namespace

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=51577 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||schuchart at icl dot utk.edu ---

[Bug c++/87452] decltype ignores namespace in trailing return type

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87452 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug target/110792] [13/14 Regression] GCC 13 x86_32 miscompilation of Whirlpool hash function

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110792 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug c++/98820] Placeholder (auto) non-type template parameter wrongly deduced to 'const' for class type arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98820 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||davveston at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|ASSIGNED Resolution|DUPLICATE

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c++/98820] Placeholder (auto) non-type template parameter wrongly deduced to 'const' for class type arguments

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98820 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||johelegp at gmail dot com --- Comment

[Bug fortran/110996] RISC-V vector Fortran: SEGV ICE during parsing

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110996 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug fortran/106050] ICE in reject_statement, at fortran/parse.cc:2879 since r8-3056-g5bab4c9631c478b7

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106050 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 Mikael Morin changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c/111421] constexpr not working with array subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111421 --- Comment #4 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- The definition of constexpr in C2x is intentionally minimal, with potential for future expansion in subsequent standard revisions. Allowing array element accesses would run into needing

[Bug fortran/30802] out of bounds error array I/O not picked up with -fbounds-check

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30802 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1cbf18978aa384bd0ed2dc29b107fc3423cf8e62 commit r14-4039-g1cbf18978aa384bd0ed2dc29b107fc3423cf8e62 Author: Harald Anlauf Date:

[Bug c/111421] constexpr not working with array subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111421 --- Comment #3 from Abdulmalek Almkainzi --- (In reply to jos...@codesourcery.com from comment #1) > See the definitions of "named constant" and "compound literal constant". > Array element accesses aren't allowed, and the example you have

[Bug c/111421] constexpr not working with array subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111421 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug c/111421] constexpr not working with array subscript

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111421 --- Comment #1 from joseph at codesourcery dot com --- See the definitions of "named constant" and "compound literal constant". Array element accesses aren't allowed, and the example you have with "->" shouldn't be accepted either (although

[Bug c++/90670] const& template parameter in a header trips -Wsubobject-linkage

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=90670 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/111420] relocation truncated to fit: R_RISCV_JAL against `.L12287'

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111420 --- Comment #6 from AK --- To confirm what Andrew mentioned, the release build (-O3) built successfully.

[Bug tree-optimization/110992] [13/14 Regression] missed VRP optimization due to transformation of `a & -zero_one_valued_p` into `a * zero_one_valued_p`

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110992 --- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski --- This is what I have so far: /* Transform (a * { 0 or 1 }) != 0 into {0 or 1} != 0 & (a != 0) */ /* Transform (a * { 0 or 1 }) == 0 into ({0 or 1} == 0) | (a == 0) */ (for cmp (ne eq) bit_op (bit_and

[Bug tree-optimization/111414] [14 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple failed since r14-3719-gb34f3736356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111414 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug tree-optimization/111414] [14 Regression] ICE in verify_gimple failed since r14-3719-gb34f3736356

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111414 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ba4c1f2bfc9ec063188b39d0281fae04c57b1416 commit r14-4037-gba4c1f2bfc9ec063188b39d0281fae04c57b1416 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug c++/70413] Class template names in anonymous namespaces are not globally unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70413 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug c++/70413] Class template names in anonymous namespaces are not globally unique

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70413 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||brunopitrus at hotmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/111423] bogus Wsubobject-linkage when using CRTP with an invisible base, template template parameters, and concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111423 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug other/9346] make uninstall does not remove all files

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=9346 Tom Tromey changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tromey at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #8

[Bug tree-optimization/111407] ICE: SSA corruption due to widening_mul opt on conflict across an abnormal edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111407 --- Comment #10 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6) the fix has been in GCC14, shall we backport the patch to previous releases?

[Bug tree-optimization/111407] ICE: SSA corruption due to widening_mul opt on conflict across an abnormal edge

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111407 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Qing Zhao : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4aca1cfd6235090e48a53dab734437740671bbf3 commit r14-4034-g4aca1cfd6235090e48a53dab734437740671bbf3 Author: Qing Zhao Date: Fri Sep

[Bug c++/111426] [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111426 Marek Polacek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5 Keywords|

[Bug c++/111426] New: [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111426 Bug ID: 111426 Summary: [11/12/13/14 Regression] "error: use of deleted function" printed twice Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug target/111425] ia64: ICE in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1621:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener --- Reduced testcase: enum { REFCOUNT_ADD_NOT_ZERO_OVF } refcount_warn_saturate(); int refcount_inc_not_zero_old, fib_info_num_path___trans_tmp_11, rtnh_ok_remaining, fib_create_info_nexthop_nh_0,

[Bug tree-optimization/111422] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||missed-optimization --- Comment #3

[Bug tree-optimization/111422] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||10.4.0, 12.3.1, 7.5.0 --- Comment #2

[Bug tree-optimization/111422] Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC|

[Bug target/111425] ia64: ICE in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1621:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code

[Bug fortran/108957] Fortran FE memleak with interfaces

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108957 --- Comment #6 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Mikael Morin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6dba708c8627080f4ca776590a191683b38336c commit r14-4021-ge6dba708c8627080f4ca776590a191683b38336c Author: Mikael Morin Date:

[Bug target/111425] ia64: ICE in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1621:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425 --- Comment #1 from Frank Scheiner --- Created attachment 55905 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55905=edit the gzip compressed preprocessed file Added the preprocessed file (gzip compressed due to size of 4.4 MiB).

[Bug target/111425] New: ia64: ICE in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1621:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111425 Bug ID: 111425 Summary: ia64: ICE in net/ipv4/fib_semantics.c:1621:1: internal compiler error: Segmentation fault Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/111424] New: LoongArch: Enable vect test suite

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111424 Bug ID: 111424 Summary: LoongArch: Enable vect test suite Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: P3 Component: target

[Bug middle-end/106811] GENERIC and GIMPLE IL undefined behavior needs documenting

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106811 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||documentation Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/111411] [14 regression] ICE when building opus-1.4, unrecognizable insn with -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411 --- Comment #12 from Martin Jansa --- I can confirm https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d38f45bcca62ca0c7afef4b579f82c5c2a01610 fixes the other reproducer from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111418 as well. Thank you for quick fix.

[Bug target/111411] [14 regression] ICE when building opus-1.4, unrecognizable insn with -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411 --- Comment #11 from Martin Jansa --- I can confirm https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d38f45bcca62ca0c7afef4b579f82c5c2a01610 fixes the other reproducer from https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111418 as well. Thank you for quick fix.

[Bug libstdc++/111172] Dead code in std::get for variant?

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=72 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d19bdf8874059457fdfe50a9e14dad8f8b8cecbb commit r14-4012-gd19bdf8874059457fdfe50a9e14dad8f8b8cecbb Author: Jonathan Wakely

[Bug target/111411] [14 regression] ICE when building opus-1.4, unrecognizable insn with -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411 --- Comment #10 from Richard Sandiford --- Fixed on trunk. The patch applies cleanly to GCC 12 and 13, so I'll backport there next week.

[Bug target/111411] [14 regression] ICE when building opus-1.4, unrecognizable insn with -fstack-protector-strong

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111411 --- Comment #9 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2d38f45bcca62ca0c7afef4b579f82c5c2a01610 commit r14-4010-g2d38f45bcca62ca0c7afef4b579f82c5c2a01610 Author: Richard Sandiford

[Bug c++/111423] New: bogus Wsubobject-linkage when using CRTP with an invisible base, template template parameters, and concepts

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111423 Bug ID: 111423 Summary: bogus Wsubobject-linkage when using CRTP with an invisible base, template template parameters, and concepts Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug target/111231] armhf: Miscompilation with -O2/-fno-exceptions level (-O2 is working)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111231 --- Comment #7 from Mathieu Malaterre --- new cvise setup started today: % cvise check.sh widen_mul_test.cc 00:01:16 INFO ===< 1427429 >=== 00:01:16 INFO running 4 interestingness tests in parallel 00:01:16 INFO INITIAL PASSES 00:01:16 INFO

[Bug target/111367] Error: operand out of range (0x1391c is not between 0xffffffffffff8000 and 0x7fff)

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111367 Kewen Lin changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #5 from Kewen Lin

[Bug tree-optimization/111422] New: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111422 Bug ID: 111422 Summary: Wrong code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/111393] ICE: Segmentation fault src/gcc/toplev.cc:314

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111393 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #11

[Bug middle-end/111401] Middle-end: Missed optimization of MASK_LEN_FOLD_LEFT_PLUS

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111401 --- Comment #7 from Richard Biener --- (In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #6) > Created attachment 55902 [details] > Tentative > > You're referring to the case where we have init = -0.0, the condition is > false and we end up wrongly doing

[Bug target/111366] error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'hwy::PreventElision(int&)void': target specific option mismatch

https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111366 --- Comment #18 from Jan Wassenberg --- Ah, got it. We'll change the pragma to ",htm" as you suggest. Thank you :)