[Bug target/111366] error: inlining failed in call to 'always_inline' 'hwy::PreventElision(int&)void': target specific option mismatch

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111366 --- Comment #19 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a65b38e361320e0aa45adbc969c704385ab1f45b commit r14-4247-ga65b38e361320e0aa45adbc969c704385ab1f45b Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Sep

[Bug target/111380] Inconsistent behaviors between non-LTO and LTO

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111380 --- Comment #1 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:266dfed68b881702e9660889f63408054b7fa9c0 commit r14-4246-g266dfed68b881702e9660889f63408054b7fa9c0 Author: Kewen Lin Date: Mon Sep

[Bug target/111581] New: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization /

2023-09-24 Thread cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111581 Bug ID: 111581 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/111580] New: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / b.n to bx lr

2023-09-24 Thread cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111580 Bug ID: 111580 Summary: [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization / b.n to bx lr Product: gcc Version: 9.3.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug target/111500] [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization

2023-09-24 Thread cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500 --- Comment #4 from Luke --- the a.i file for example #1a is: # 1 "a.c" # 1 "/tmp//" # 1 "" # 1 "" # 1 "a.c" void artiSUBS() { for (int i=100; i>0; i--) *(volatile int*)0xE000E014 = i; } the command-line was: > arm-none-eabi-gcc -save-temps

[Bug target/111500] [arm-none-eabi-gcc] / suboptimal optimization

2023-09-24 Thread cptarse-luke at yahoo dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111500 --- Comment #3 from Luke --- maybe i should also say the "-v" output? > arm-none-eabi-gcc -v Using built-in specs. COLLECT_GCC=arm-none-eabi-gcc COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/lib/gcc/arm-none-eabi/9.3.0/lto-wrapper Target: arm-none-eabi Configured

[Bug ada/111579] New: gnatpp error at start

2023-09-24 Thread thiebauddick2 at aol dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111579 Bug ID: 111579 Summary: gnatpp error at start Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: ada Assignee:

[Bug ada/111578] New: GNAT ada.textio.setline gives incorrect result

2023-09-24 Thread thiebauddick2 at aol dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111578 Bug ID: 111578 Summary: GNAT ada.textio.setline gives incorrect result Product: gcc Version: 11.4.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/111533] [14 Regression] ICE: RTL check: expected code 'reg', have 'const_int' in rhs_regno, at rtl.h:1934

2023-09-24 Thread xuli1 at eswincomputing dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111533 xuli1 at eswincomputing dot com changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xuli1 at

[Bug middle-end/111576] gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 --- Comment #5 from Paul Eggert --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4) > >111715 > > That is not a valid bug # either. Sorry, I meant Bug 111575.

[Bug middle-end/111577] -Os gives significantly bigger code than -O0

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- I suspect you forgot to count the other functions which get emitted here. And you are just counting the size of main but that is wrong really. Anyways the overall size of the executable's text section is

[Bug middle-end/111577] -Os gives significantly bigger code than -O0

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/111577] New: -Os gives significantly bigger code than -O0

2023-09-24 Thread socketpair at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111577 Bug ID: 111577 Summary: -Os gives significantly bigger code than -O0 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug tree-optimization/111285] vector ABSU is lowered incorrectly

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111285 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Created attachment 55985 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55985=edit Patch which fixes the issue I am not sure this is the best patch but we don't pass down 2 inner types into do_unop

[Bug tree-optimization/110386] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE with ABSU in backprop

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110386 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||patch URL|

[Bug middle-end/111576] gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 --- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski --- >111715 That is not a valid bug # either.

[Bug middle-end/79045] bool expanded as 2 jumps

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=79045 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eggert at cs dot ucla.edu --- Comment

[Bug middle-end/111576] gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/111576] gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|tree-optimization |middle-end Target|

[Bug ada/111434] [13/14 regression] infinite loop with limited with clauses

2023-09-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111434 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|unassigned

[Bug tree-optimization/111576] gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 --- Comment #1 from Paul Eggert --- Created attachment 55984 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55984=edit Generated assembly language for the program

[Bug tree-optimization/111576] New: gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&"

2023-09-24 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111576 Bug ID: 111576 Summary: gcc generates conditional branch for bitwise "&" Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug ada/111434] [13/14 regression] infinite loop with limited with clauses

2023-09-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111434 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24 Summary|Infinite

[Bug ada/111433] bogus error about null exclusion with mix of anonymous and named access types

2023-09-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111433 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org Ever

[Bug target/111528] aarch64: Test gfortran.dg/pr80494.f90 fails with -fstack-protector-strong with gcc-13 since r13-7813-gb96e66fd4ef3e3

2023-09-24 Thread rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111528 --- Comment #3 from Richard Sandiford --- This was the problem that g:10d59b802a7db9ae908291fb20627c1493cfa26c fixed. I wasn't sure it was worth backporting because it only triggers for out-of-bounds array accesses, or uninitialised Fortran

[Bug c/111575] New: -Wbool-operation mistakenly warns about an int operation

2023-09-24 Thread eggert at cs dot ucla.edu via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111575 Bug ID: 111575 Summary: -Wbool-operation mistakenly warns about an int operation Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug c++/111569] Problem finding in Library functions with parametres: 32, 8 , 32 Bits

2023-09-24 Thread hjherbert at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569 Hans-Jürgen Herbert changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED --- Comment #3 from

[Bug target/111556] OMP_* environment variables not read if libgomp is loaded via dlopen([..], [..]|RTLD_DEEPBIND) and the process executable access the environ global variable

2023-09-24 Thread silvio at traversaro dot it via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111556 --- Comment #3 from Silvio Traversaro --- Thanks for the quick reply! I imagined something like that, but I preferred anyhow to have a clear bug on the libgomp so that I can refer to it and for other people that could encounter this behavior.

[Bug middle-end/111574] [14 Regression] Illegal instruction with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dce"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- What is happening is: ``` if (_1 != 0) goto ; [INV] else goto ; [INV] : _28 = (uint8_t) _1; // predicted unlikely by early return (on trees) predictor. goto ; [INV] : _7 =

[Bug tree-optimization/111469] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -Os on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-573-g69f1a8af45

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111469 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn ---

[Bug middle-end/111574] [14 Regression] Illegal instruction with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dce"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE

[Bug middle-end/111574] [14 Regression] Illegal instruction with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dce"

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

2023-09-24 Thread danakj at orodu dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 --- Comment #14 from danakj at orodu dot net --- Thank you =)

[Bug ada/88610] ICE with new ACATS test c452003

2023-09-24 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=88610 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Status|SUSPENDED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

2023-09-24 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 108736, which changed state. Bug 108736 Summary: [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside requires with variable template arguments is broken https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108736

[Bug c++/108736] [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside requires with variable template arguments is broken

2023-09-24 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108736 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug c++/111493] [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside requires is broken

2023-09-24 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ldalessandro at gmail dot com ---

[Bug c++/111493] [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside requires is broken

2023-09-24 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |13.3 Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

2023-09-24 Thread ppalka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 Patrick Palka changed: What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Target Milestone|---

[Bug c++/111493] [concepts] multidimensional subscript operator inside requires is broken

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111493 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:40d2dec34b58c3c31b1c731049a914204ec252c3 commit r13-7837-g40d2dec34b58c3c31b1c731049a914204ec252c3 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/111485] [11/12/13/14 Regression] Constraint mismatch on template template parameter

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111485 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:59f5786c20a42be13ac6fec567ffe840045012ad commit r13-7836-g59f5786c20a42be13ac6fec567ffe840045012ad Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c++/99631] decltype of non-type template-parameter shouldn't be const

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=99631 --- Comment #12 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Patrick Palka : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b9e02590f7d35f1f8e8e95ab1f2e30f24113f551 commit r13-7835-gb9e02590f7d35f1f8e8e95ab1f2e30f24113f551 Author: Patrick Palka

[Bug c/111574] Illegal instruction with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dce"

2023-09-24 Thread 19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 --- Comment #3 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- Created attachment 55982 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55982=edit The compiler output

[Bug c/111574] Illegal instruction with "-O3 -fno-toplevel-reorder -fno-tree-bit-ccp -fno-tree-dce"

2023-09-24 Thread 19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 --- Comment #2 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- Created attachment 55981 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=55981=edit The preprocessed file

[Bug c/111574] Illegal instruction with

2023-09-24 Thread 19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 --- Comment #1 from CTC <19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn> --- *** OS and Platform: Ubuntu 20.04.4 LTS

[Bug c/111574] New: Illegal instruction with

2023-09-24 Thread 19373742 at buaa dot edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111574 Bug ID: 111574 Summary: Illegal instruction with Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c Assignee:

[Bug c++/111569] Problem finding in Library functions with parametres: 32, 8 , 32 Bits

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- You would have caught the bad code if in your compile.sh script you added: ``` set -e ``` As that would error out if one of the programs exit with a non-zero return code which gcc does on an error.

[Bug ipa/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||ice-on-valid-code Target

[Bug tree-optimization/111572] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- Self contained testcase: ``` void gg(void) { static int t = 0; if (t != 0) __builtin_abort(); t++; } int a, b = -8, e, f, h; char c, d, g; static int i(long k) { e = 8; for (;

[Bug tree-optimization/111572] [14 Regression] Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/111572] Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572 --- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski --- __builtin_printf ("%u\n", _79); __builtin_unreachable ();

[Bug tree-optimization/111563] Missed optimization of LICM

2023-09-24 Thread 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563 --- Comment #4 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3) > (In reply to Yi from comment #2) > > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > > _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D); > > >

[Bug tree-optimization/111563] Missed optimization of LICM

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Yi from comment #2) > (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > > _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D); > > invariant up to level 1, cost 1. > > > > Basically because the cost is not high

[Bug tree-optimization/111563] Missed optimization of LICM

2023-09-24 Thread 652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111563 --- Comment #2 from Yi <652023330028 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1) > _5 = var_0_16(D) + var_6_18(D); > invariant up to level 1, cost 1. > > Basically because the cost is not high enough ... > > If

[Bug fortran/80757] Internal compiler error when omitting upper subscript of a character substring in a module subroutine

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80757 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 92586, which changed state. Bug 92586 Summary: ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested allocatable derived types https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586 What|Removed

[Bug fortran/92586] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested allocatable derived types

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW

[Bug fortran/92586] ICE in gimplify_expr, at gimplify.c:13479 with nested allocatable derived types

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92586 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9eb2f102d38697011d3069fac759b7c6e149bed4 commit r13-7834-g9eb2f102d38697011d3069fac759b7c6e149bed4 Author: Paul Thomas

[Bug fortran/68155] ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <> len_rhs)

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/19276] [meta-bug] CHARACTER related bugs in gfortran

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19276 Bug 19276 depends on bug 68155, which changed state. Bug 68155 Summary: ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <> len_rhs) https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155 What|Removed |Added

[Bug fortran/68155] ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <> len_rhs)

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155 --- Comment #14 from CVS Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8c1925ece0193058120e94614e99360e9600777e commit r13-7833-g8c1925ece0193058120e94614e99360e9600777e Author: Paul Thomas

[Bug target/108575] Bug in gcc arm non eabi

2023-09-24 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108575 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug middle-end/111573] New: lambda functions often not inlined and optimized out

2023-09-24 Thread hubicka at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111573 Bug ID: 111573 Summary: lambda functions often not inlined and optimized out Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug tree-optimization/111572] New: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d

2023-09-24 Thread shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111572 Bug ID: 111572 Summary: Wrong code at -O2 on x86_64-linux-gnu since r14-301-gf2d6beb7a4d Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug tree-optimization/111571] [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2023-09-24 Thread jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571 Martin Jambor changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-09-24

[Bug analyzer/104940] RFE: integrate analyzer with an SMT solver

2023-09-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104940 --- Comment #6 from David Malcolm --- https://github.com/kristerw/pysmtgcc

[Bug tree-optimization/111571] New: [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656

2023-09-24 Thread shaohua.li at inf dot ethz.ch via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111571 Bug ID: 111571 Summary: [13/14 Regression] ICE in modify_call, at ipa-param-manipulation.cc:656 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug analyzer/104940] RFE: integrate analyzer with an SMT solver

2023-09-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104940 --- Comment #5 from David Malcolm --- See also: https://kristerw.github.io/2022/11/01/verifying-optimizations/

[Bug target/108575] Bug in gcc arm non eabi

2023-09-24 Thread ergasies.uni at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108575 --- Comment #8 from Nikos Tosis --- We found the problem, the bug was in Embedded Ecoder from Mathworks. So the Coder has generated wrong C Code. Thank you all.

[Bug c++/111569] Problem finding in Library functions with parametres: 32, 8 , 32 Bits

2023-09-24 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |INVALID Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug demangler/111570] New: -march=generic prints error

2023-09-24 Thread brjd_epdjq36 at kygur dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111570 Bug ID: 111570 Summary: -march=generic prints error Product: gcc Version: 13.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: demangler

[Bug c++/111569] New: Problem finding in Library functions with parametres: 32, 8 , 32 Bits

2023-09-24 Thread hjherbert at web dot de via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111569 Bug ID: 111569 Summary: Problem finding in Library functions with parametres: 32, 8 , 32 Bits Product: gcc Version: 12.2.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug libstdc++/111550] The range adaptor closure object generated by adaptor(args...) is not a perfect forwarding call wrapper

2023-09-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550 --- Comment #3 from 康桓瑋 --- Let me report another issue I observed on this PR. According to [range.adaptor.object], adaptor(args...) uses std​::​forward(args).. . to forward arguments into the call wrapper's decayed member, whereas libstdc++

[Bug libstdc++/111568] New: std::not_fn can accept non-movable function

2023-09-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111568 Bug ID: 111568 Summary: std::not_fn can accept non-movable function Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

2023-09-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 --- Comment #13 from Jonathan Wakely --- But the code is "ill-formed, no diagnostic required" and GCC is now being more helpful by diagnosing it.

[Bug c++/111544] [14 regression] assignment of read-only location after r14-4111-g6e92a6a2a72d3b

2023-09-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111544 --- Comment #12 from Jonathan Wakely --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #10) > So clang most likely thinks b.t and c->t are still type depedent even though > they don't need to be ... Which is fine. It's QoI whether non-dependent

[Bug libstdc++/111550] The range adaptor closure object generated by adaptor(args...) is not a perfect forwarding call wrapper

2023-09-24 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550 --- Comment #2 from 康桓瑋 --- (In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #1) > I think all four bugs related to adaptor closures are very similar and could > be a single bug report. Perhaps. Maybe I should collect them all. Sorry for bringing up

[Bug libstdc++/111550] The range adaptor closure object generated by adaptor(args...) is not a perfect forwarding call wrapper

2023-09-24 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111550 --- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely --- I think all four bugs related to adaptor closures are very similar and could be a single bug report.

[Bug analyzer/111567] RFE: support __attribute__((counted_by)) in -fanalyzer

2023-09-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111567 --- Comment #1 from David Malcolm --- This PR tracks adding support for the attribute to -fanalyzer (which I can take a look at). Adding the attribute itself is tracked by PR 108896.

[Bug gcov-profile/111559] [14 regression] ICE when building Python with PGO

2023-09-24 Thread sirl at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111559 Franz Sirl changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sirl at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug analyzer/111567] New: RFE: support counted_by in analyzer

2023-09-24 Thread dmalcolm at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111567 Bug ID: 111567 Summary: RFE: support counted_by in analyzer Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: analyzer

[Bug target/111546] [14 Regression] ICE: gfortran.dg/overload_5.f90:53:2: internal compiler error: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4219 since r14-4163-gbea89f78f2f

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111546 --- Comment #2 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Pan Li : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:deb844c67f1e2b116518f9742a6acbe6f19ea28f commit r14-4243-gdeb844c67f1e2b116518f9742a6acbe6f19ea28f Author: Pan Li Date: Sun Sep 24

[Bug tree-optimization/102032] missed optimization on 2 equivalent expressions when -fwrapv is not used

2023-09-24 Thread vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102032 --- Comment #4 from Vincent Lefèvre --- Note that as said in PR111560 comment 6, re-association may break CSE, e.g. if there are also a + b + d and a + c + e with my example. So, re-association for global optimal CSE, in addition to being

[Bug gcov-profile/111559] [14 regression] ICE when building Python with PGO

2023-09-24 Thread slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111559 Sergei Trofimovich changed: What|Removed |Added CC||slyfox at gcc dot gnu.org ---

[Bug target/111566] RISC-V Vector Fortran: ICE in final_scan_insn_1 (final RTL pass)

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|middle-end |target Keywords|

[Bug middle-end/111566] New: RISC-V Vector Fortran: ICE in final_scan_insn_1 (final RTL pass)

2023-09-24 Thread jeremy.bennett at embecosm dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111566 Bug ID: 111566 Summary: RISC-V Vector Fortran: ICE in final_scan_insn_1 (final RTL pass) Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal

[Bug fortran/111271] gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:1134:8: warning: duplicated ‘if’ condition [-Wduplicated-cond]

2023-09-24 Thread pault at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111271 Paul Thomas changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug fortran/68155] ICE on initializing character array in type (len_lhs <> len_rhs)

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=68155 --- Comment #13 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c23ce23e9ce162c49bca8900c8a20079b49501c9 commit r14-4242-gc23ce23e9ce162c49bca8900c8a20079b49501c9 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sun

[Bug fortran/111271] gcc/fortran/trans-expr.cc:1134:8: warning: duplicated ‘if’ condition [-Wduplicated-cond]

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111271 --- Comment #3 from CVS Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c23ce23e9ce162c49bca8900c8a20079b49501c9 commit r14-4242-gc23ce23e9ce162c49bca8900c8a20079b49501c9 Author: Paul Thomas Date: Sun

[Bug target/111565] New: ICE: in riscv_expand_strcmp_scalar, at config/riscv/riscv-string.cc:382 with -mcpu=thead-c906 -minline-strncmp

2023-09-24 Thread zsojka at seznam dot cz via Gcc-bugs
-checking-yes-rtl-df-extra-riscv64 Thread model: posix Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd gcc version 14.0.0 20230924 (experimental) (GCC)

[Bug tree-optimization/111564] Missed optimization of Loop Unswitch

2023-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111560] Missed optimization of available expression

2023-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111560 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org

[Bug tree-optimization/111543] `(a & b) & ~a` could be optimized before reassociation

2023-09-24 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111543 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/111543] `(a & b) & ~a` could be optimized before reassociation

2023-09-24 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111543 --- Comment #4 from CVS Commits --- The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bf0cd05cb30889cae4b6cf06e80b7f3a13c40c1 commit r14-4241-g1bf0cd05cb30889cae4b6cf06e80b7f3a13c40c1 Author: Andrew Pinski Date:

[Bug middle-end/111551] Fix for PR106081 is not working with profile feedback on imagemagick

2023-09-24 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111551 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org