[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #3) > If at all possible, cc Jin Ma in this since it's his change, I just reviewed > and committed the bits on Jin's behalf. I've replied the gcc-patch thread. It

[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

2023-11-12 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 Jeffrey A. Law changed: What|Removed |Added CC||law at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 --- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao --- FWIW, GCC configured with: --with-system-zlib --disable-fixincludes --enable-default-ssp --enable-default-pie --disable-werror --disable-multilib

[Bug bootstrap/112497] [14 Regression] Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12 Summary|Bootstrap

[Bug tree-optimization/112493] [11/12/13/14 Regression] ICE in verify_sra_access_forest with scalar_storage_order

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112493 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |tree-optimization Keywords|

[Bug tree-optimization/112495] [11/12/13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed with named address space (__seg_gs )

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2023-11-12 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug bootstrap/112492] Add LLVM BOLT support to the GCC build scripts

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112492 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|other |bootstrap Severity|normal

[Bug tree-optimization/112496] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, at tree-vect-loop.cc with bit fields

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Bug tree-optimization/112496] [13/14 Regression] ICE: in vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, at tree-vect-loop.cc with bit fields

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112496 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Known to fail||13.1.0, 13.2.0 Target Milestone|---

[Bug tree-optimization/112495] [11/12/13/14 Regression] internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed with named address space (__seg_gs )

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |11.5

[Bug target/112413] Wrong switch jump table offset

2023-11-12 Thread vincent.riviere at freesbee dot fr via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112413 --- Comment #6 from Vincent Riviere --- (In reply to Mikael Pettersson from comment #4) > Does the `.balignw` filler disappear if you drop `-malign-int`? No, it stays, but its value becomes 2, so it doesn't cause trouble.

[Bug bootstrap/112497] New: Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112497 Bug ID: 112497 Summary: Bootstrap comparison failure: gcc/analyzer/constraint-manager.o differs on loongarch64-linux-gnu Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug rtl-optimization/112415] [14 regression] Python 3.11 miscompiled on HPPA with new RTL fold mem offset pass, since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

2023-11-12 Thread law at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415 --- Comment #41 from Jeffrey A. Law --- I would agree. In fact,the whole point of the f-m-o pass is to bring those immediates into the memory reference. It'd be really useful to know why that isn't happening. The only thing I can think of

[Bug target/110551] [11/12/13 Regression] an extra mov when doing 128bit multiply

2023-11-12 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110551 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|11.5|14.0 Resolution|---

[Bug rtl-optimization/91865] Combine misses opportunity to remove (sign_extend (zero_extend)) before searching for insn patterns

2023-11-12 Thread roger at nextmovesoftware dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=91865 Roger Sayle changed: What|Removed |Added CC||roger at nextmovesoftware dot com

[Bug rtl-optimization/112415] [14 regression] Python 3.11 miscompiled on HPPA with new RTL fold mem offset pass, since r14-4664-g04c9cf5c786b94

2023-11-12 Thread danglin at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112415 --- Comment #40 from John David Anglin --- Jeff, I don't think these split instructions make a lot of sense on PA-RISC. (insn 280 277 281 30 (set (reg/f:SI 20 %r20 [480]) (plus:SI (reg/f:SI 19 %r19 [orig:127 prephitmp_37 ] [127])

[Bug c/112496] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9573

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112496 Bug ID: 112496 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in vectorizable_nonlinear_induction, at tree-vect-loop.cc:9573 Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c/112495] GCC: 14: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495 --- Comment #1 from wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> --- Correction: It should be -O3.

[Bug c/112495] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112495 Bug ID: 112495 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: verify_gimple failed Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug c/112494] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in ix86_cc_mode, at config/i386/i386.cc:16477

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112494 Bug ID: 112494 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in ix86_cc_mode, at config/i386/i386.cc:16477 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug c/112493] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.cc:2421

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112493 Bug ID: 112493 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in verify_sra_access_forest, at tree-sra.cc:2421 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug rtl-optimization/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Component|target |rtl-optimization --- Comment #5 from Xi

[Bug other/112492] New: Add LLVM BOLT support to the GCC build scripts

2023-11-12 Thread zamazan4ik at tut dot by via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112492 Bug ID: 112492 Summary: Add LLVM BOLT support to the GCC build scripts Product: gcc Version: unknown Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3

[Bug target/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483 --- Comment #4 from Xi Ruoyao --- In 268r.cse1: (insn 26 25 27 2 (set (reg:SF 93) (mem/u/c:SF (reg/f:DI 94) [0 S4 A32])) "ieee_2.f90":13:6 discrim 4 146 {*movsf_hardfloat} (expr_list:REG_EQUAL (const_double:SF -1.0e+0

[Bug target/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483 --- Comment #3 from Xi Ruoyao --- Minimized test case: ! { dg-do run } use, intrinsic :: ieee_arithmetic implicit none real :: sx1, sx2, sx3 double precision :: dx1, dx2, dx3 type(ieee_round_type) :: mode ! Test IEEE_COPY_SIGN

[Bug target/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483 --- Comment #2 from Xi Ruoyao --- (In reply to Xi Ruoyao from comment #1) > gcc/ChangeLog: > > PR tree-optimization/109154 > * match.pd: Add new neg+abs rule, remove inverse copysign rule. I guess the inverse

[Bug target/112483] [14 Regression] gfortran.dg/ieee/ieee_2.f90 fails on loongarch64-linux-gnu at -O1 or above

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112483 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tamar.christina at arm dot com Last

[Bug libstdc++/112491] New: std::deque::size xmethod output is wrong

2023-11-12 Thread ks1322 at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112491 Bug ID: 112491 Summary: std::deque::size xmethod output is wrong Product: gcc Version: 13.2.1 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component:

[Bug rtl-optimization/110390] ICE on valid code on x86_64-linux-gnu with sel-scheduling: in av_set_could_be_blocked_by_bookkeeping_p, at sel-sched.cc:3609

2023-11-12 Thread tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110390 Thomas Koenig changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tkoenig at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug c++/112490] New: infinite meta error in reverse_iterator::iterator>>

2023-11-12 Thread hewillk at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112490 Bug ID: 112490 Summary: infinite meta error in reverse_iterator::ite rator>> Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity:

[Bug ipa/112487] [14 Regression] internal compiler error: in setup_one_parameter, at tree-inline.cc:3565

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112487 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |14.0

[Bug ipa/112486] GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline

2023-11-12 Thread xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486 Xi Ruoyao changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment #3

[Bug c/112489] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112489 Bug ID: 112489 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in check_loop_closed_ssa_def, at tree-ssa-loop-manip.cc:647 Product: gcc Version: 14.0

[Bug c/112488] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:354

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112488 Bug ID: 112488 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in make_ssa_name_fn, at tree-ssanames.cc:354 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/112486] GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486 wierton <141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn> changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Bug c/112487] New: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in setup_one_parameter, at tree-inline.cc:3565

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112487 Bug ID: 112487 Summary: GCC: 14: internal compiler error: in setup_one_parameter, at tree-inline.cc:3565 Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED

[Bug ipa/112486] GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline

2023-11-12 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Component|c |ipa CC|

[Bug c/112486] New: GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline

2023-11-12 Thread 141242068 at smail dot nju.edu.cn via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112486 Bug ID: 112486 Summary: GCC: 14: hangs with always_inline Product: gcc Version: 14.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c

[Bug other/112485] datestamp on -v recently broken ?

2023-11-12 Thread dcb314 at hotmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
2023.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc gcc version 14.0.0 20231109 (experimental) (391f9798b35ec75c) results.20231112.asan.ubsan/bin/gcc gcc version 14.0.0 20231109 (experimental) (e0787da263322fc1) gcc $ So it looks ok with g:e01c2eeb2b654abc and wrong with g:5dbaf4851bbf56b6

<    1   2