https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113229
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
--- Comment #9 from Andr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109636
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #9)
> The following testcases now fail due to this ICE when compiled with
> -march=armv9-a+sve2 (something which I have been testing recently too):
> gcc.dg/torture/p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304
Bug ID: 113304
Summary: zero-length array and bound checking error
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: san
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113115
--- Comment #7 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #5)
> I really dislike the -mpower{8,9}-vector options, but maybe it's too late to
> remove them for this release? I'm not sure how involved/invasive that patch
> would b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113205
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109987
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||documentation
--- Comment #1 from Andre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113304
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283
--- Comment #9 from Arsen Arsenović ---
(In reply to cqwrteur from comment #6)
> if someone writes an operating system or libc，he can ensure the abi being
> the same.
that's a job of theirs. they can and should add OS defines for their OS.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113255
--- Comment #10 from Richard Biener ---
Hmm, trying to fix find_base_term isn't enough, init_alias_analysis
find_base_value needs to be adjusted as well. One "obvious" mistake there
is a missing
diff --git a/gcc/alias.cc b/gcc/alias.cc
index b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301
--- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Started with r12-6924-gc2b610e7c6c89fd422c5c31f01023bcddf3cf4a5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112958
--- Comment #5 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #4 from Eric Botcazou ---
> Someone motivated enough should add a specific libgnat/s-dorepr__freebsd.adb
> unit where Rep64 is an array of two Interfaces.Unsigned_64 and t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #11 from Richard Biener ---
IMHO REG_UNUSED notes should stay correct or be removed. Instead of a full
solution can we just wipe them in postreload-cse as we know that pass will
break them? Any user then should recompute the notes.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156
--- Comment #8 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
Is there as comprehensible explanation when option property "Save" is needed?
The internals just state
> Build the cl_target_option structure to hold a copy of the option,
> add the functions cl_target_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #11)
> IMHO REG_UNUSED notes should stay correct or be removed. Instead of a full
> solution can we just wipe them in postreload-cse as we know that pass will
> bre
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Maybe the case is mdouble=64 is not being set correctly after the __optimize__
attribute. If I get some more time, I will look into what other targets do for
these kind of options.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
--- Comment #13 from rguenther at suse dot de ---
On Wed, 10 Jan 2024, jakub at gcc dot gnu.org wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113059
>
> --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek ---
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077
--- Comment #10 from Alex Coplan ---
Testing a v2 patch that addresses the review feedback.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
--- Comment #7 from JuzheZhong ---
Hi, Robin.
I sent a patch switching cost model into generic cost model:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2024-January/642428.html
But I tweak the cost back to default cost.
Since current generic co
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=87281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P4
--- Comment #16 from Richard Biener
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Thinking about if 1/x or (x+1u) <= 2 ? x : 0 is more conconial for gimple. I
suspect 1/x is . Which case this should be move to late gimple. I will look at
that tomorrow.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111682
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
Version|unknown
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110603
Aldy Hernandez changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amacleod at redhat dot com
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111960
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512
--- Comment #8 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> = std::__or_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305
Bug ID: 113305
Summary: ICE with do concurrent and ivdep
Product: gcc
Version: 13.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: fortran
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110512
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113156
--- Comment #10 from Georg-Johann Lay ---
-mdouble and -mlong-double are more complicated than other options because they
depend on each other in way that (to my knowledge) cannot be described by
option properties. For example, in
-mdouble=64 -
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113306
Bug ID: 113306
Summary: constexpr cast from void* fails with typeid result
target
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112817
--- Comment #12 from JuzheZhong ---
Hi, Vineet.
Are you going to support VLS compile option and attributes?
If not, I can ask other RISC-V folks to do that.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113307
Bug ID: 113307
Summary: fails to diagnose an explicit object parameter to be a
function parameter pack
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112651
--- Comment #5 from JuzheZhong ---
I guess it's more reasonable to have -mrvv-vector-lmul like we will have
-mrvv-vector-bits.
the option can be m1/m2/m4/m8/dynamic.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113120
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2611cdc329e0229330b228e441934f386d6d5ff7
commit r14-7095-g2611cdc329e0229330b228e441934f386d6d5ff7
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113305
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-01-10
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113297
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113192
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fb3ee3ee82874e160309344bc3e52afeed8f26a
commit r14-7099-g2fb3ee3ee82874e160309344bc3e52afeed8f26a
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113297
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d790565afa219a2b38cd74f419b3e56d9ed6f5a4
commit r14-7100-gd790565afa219a2b38cd74f419b3e56d9ed6f5a4
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
Li Pan changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pan2.li at intel dot com
--- Comment #8 from L
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287
--- Comment #5 from Tamar Christina ---
Created attachment 57023
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=57023&action=edit
branch_check.patch
Patch undergoing testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308
Bug ID: 113308
Summary: derived class doesn't currently allow inherited
explicit object member function post increment
operator
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113145
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
commit r14-7101-g9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
commit r14-7101-g9e7c77c7933b1bb0dd07214333e52a9a896fa349
Author: Tamar Christina
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113144
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113291
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113309
Bug ID: 113309
Summary: [C++23] Implement P2165R4, Compatibility between tuple
and tuple-like objects
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severit
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113281
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113178
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113172
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113310
Bug ID: 113310
Summary: [C++26] Implement P2819R2 Add tuple protocol to
complex
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113308
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nathanieloshead at gmail dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971
--- Comment #21 from JuzheZhong ---
Hi, Robin.
Will you continue on this issue ?
I have seen a benchmark has the same ICE.
Thanks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112971
--- Comment #22 from Robin Dapp ---
Yes, going to the thread soon.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113283
--- Comment #10 from cqwrteur ---
also. how do deal with other headers. like cstdlib which C++26 requires qsort
to be freestanding.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-11-30 00:00:00 |2024-1-10
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113247
--- Comment #9 from Robin Dapp ---
I also noticed this (likely unwanted) vector snippet and wondered where it is
being created. First I thought it's a vec_extract but doesn't look like it.
I'm going to check why we create this.
Pan, the test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113197
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14 regression] ICE |ICE verify_gimple failed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112632
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|P3 |P1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112740
--- Comment #13 from Richard Biener ---
The issue is the code expects 1-bit masks but doesn't check for it. Of course
it would also work for multi-bit masks, not sure if that would ever trigger -
maybe for vector lowering code.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113182
--- Comment #11 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
On 2024-01-09 3:03 p.m., dave.anglin at bell dot net wrote:
> The new code in process_pending_assemble_externals() doesn't strip the name
> encoding
> from XSTR (symbol, 0). Maybe that's the p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110841
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cac9d2d2346bf06b29b34e12cf0a005c37eacdc9
commit r14-7108-gcac9d2d2346bf06b29b34e12cf0a005c37eacdc9
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 113078, which changed state.
Bug 113078 Summary: [14 regression] reduction of cond_sub is not vectorized.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113078
What|Removed |Added
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111291
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|mjambor at suse dot cz |mikael at gcc dot
gnu.org
--- C
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Tamar Christina :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:91fd5c94965b4077490c6bfcc9aa4b0e4146b38a
commit r14-7109-g91fd5c94965b4077490c6bfcc9aa4b0e4146b38a
Author: Tamar Christina
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113287
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111012
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111003
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rsandifo at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110942
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110941
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
--- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek ---
BTW, the registration alternates on
svmla_za32_vg2x1
svmla_za32_f16_vg2x1
svmla_za32_vg2x1
svmla_za32_f16_vg2x1
etc.
So, that is one thing that should be fixed, this being registered just once,
and another
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110842
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
--- Comment #5 from Martin Jambor ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112989
--- Comment #12 from Richard Sandiford ---
> another is try
> #pragma GCC aarch64 "arm_sve.h"
> after a couple of intentional declarations of the SVE builtins with
> non-standard return/argument types and make sure that while it emits some
> err
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311
Bug ID: 113311
Summary: [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110768
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110705
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Assignee|ppalka at g
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106749
Bug 106749 depends on bug 113311, which changed state.
Bug 113311 Summary: [C++23] Implement P2445R1, std::forward_like
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113311
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110450
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113083
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jason at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110294
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110091
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
This doesn't ICE any more since
r14-6051-gb1fe98dee21773b9d908469effe2580567b903fb
aka PR112770 fix.
So guess I should include the testcase into testsuite and close.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110065
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jamborm at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jakub Jelinek :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ac6bcce1d0a364129c7e9f6cf7f75233bdd5c5f1
commit r14-7111-gac6bcce1d0a364129c7e9f6cf7f75233bdd5c5f1
Author: Jakub Jelinek
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112734
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113312
Bug ID: 113312
Summary: Update __attribute__((interrupt)) for Intel FRED
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113077
--- Comment #11 from Alex Coplan ---
Testing a v3 patch.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110001
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:113475d03b0ab1ab18a509e8e5844c1a43983b24
commit r14-7114-g113475d03b0ab1ab18a509e8e5844c1a43983b24
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112581
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113301
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||aldyh at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109918
Martin Jambor changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
1 - 100 of 212 matches
Mail list logo
