https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104391
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114842
--- Comment #1 from Kewen Lin ---
We can extend powerpc_vsx to consider current_compiler_flags, it means that if
a test case has an explicit -mvsx, even if users specify -mno-vsx it's still
able to be tested if powerpc_vsx checking concludes VSX
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104717
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #14
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114751
--- Comment #8 from Richard Biener ---
I don't know of any difference compared to older compilers but gcov isn't my
main expertise. I fear you have to dig into the gcov code to see where and how
we exactly invent the stamp to see where it goes
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102620
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #9 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
Bug ID: 114843
Summary: AArch64: Wrong Register Reload in
_Unwind_RaiseException causes corrupt return value on
_URC_END_OF_STACK
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114734
--- Comment #7 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Robin Dapp from comment #6)
> This one is really a bit tricky.
>
> We have the following situation:
>
> loop:
>
> # vectp_g.178_1078 = PHI
> _911 = &MEM... vectp_g.178_1078
> MASK_LEN_LOAD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #1 from Hugo Melder ---
Output:
hmelder@ubuntu:/Users/hmelder/Downloads/gcc_bug_report$
temps/ReproduceUnwindTest
RaiseException returned 0xeb9e72a0
Compiler Output (With Ubuntu GCC 13.2.0) as example:
Using built-in specs.
COLLEC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100815
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89462
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pault at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114844
Bug ID: 114844
Summary: A trivial but noexcept(false) destructor is
incorrectly considered non-throwing
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114845
Bug ID: 114845
Summary: Confusing message when using undeclared identifier of
Const
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58035
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58035&action=edit
Preprocessed source of unwind-dw2.i which shows the issue
cc1 -fpreprocessed unwind-dw2.i -quiet -dumpbase unw
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114843
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
((insn 262 261 263 14 (parallel [
(set (reg:DI 0 x0)
(unspec:DI [
(mem/c:V2x8QI (plus:DI (reg/f:DI 31 sp)
(const_int 16 [0x
101 - 114 of 114 matches
Mail list logo