https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114125
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #26 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Hongtao Liu from comment #25)
> (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> > Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the intrinsic
> > for MOVLPD?
> >
> From Intel intrins
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #25 from Hongtao Liu ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the intrinsic
> for MOVLPD?
>
>From Intel intrinsic guide[1], there's explict "mem_addr does not need
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 112325, which changed state.
Bug 112325 Summary: Missed vectorization of reduction after unrolling
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
What|Removed |Added
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112325
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by hongtao Liu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ef27b91b62c3aa8841c02665dffa8914c742fd37
commit r15-919-gef27b91b62c3aa8841c02665dffa8914c742fd37
Author: liuhongt
Date: Tue Feb
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115287
--- Comment #2 from XChy ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Dup.
>
> *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 113105 ***
Sorry for reporting it again. But I transfer it to rtl-optimization because the
developer told me
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115287
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113105
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 115287 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115287
Bug ID: 115287
Summary: Missed optimzation: fold `div(v, a) * b + rem(v, a)`
to `div(v, a) * (b - a) + v`
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113072
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 113072 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115022
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #21 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-11 branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1bc4a777b21ae36b116e1842b7c482340ec929ef
commit r11-11457-g1bc4a777b21ae36b116e1842b7c482340ec929ef
Author: YunQiang Su
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #20 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3be8fa7b19d218ca5812d71801e3e83ee2260ea0
commit r13-8809-g3be8fa7b19d218ca5812d71801e3e83ee2260ea0
Author: YunQiang Su
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-12 branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e26f16424f6279662efb210bc87c77148e956fed
commit r12-10480-ge26f16424f6279662efb210bc87c77148e956fed
Author: YunQiang Su
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115286
Bug ID: 115286
Summary: MIPS: mips16_rdhwr_one_only_stub::output_body clobber
$3
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prio
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-05-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
Target Milestone|13.4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58312
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58312&action=edit
Testcase which fails for GCC 12+ (rather than 13+)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Though I think the standard says only one is entered rather than both ... But
not which one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:201cfa725587d13867b4dc25955434ebe90aff7b
commit r14-10260-g201cfa725587d13867b4dc25955434ebe90aff7b
Author: YunQiang Su
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Looks to be a defect:
https://cplusplus.github.io/LWG/issue2844
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.4
Summary|std::unordered_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Phil changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||bugs at phlexo dot com
--- Comment #1 from Phil
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #6 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
BTW, I see the target list says sparc*-sun-solaris2.11 which seems a cutnpasto
from some ancient template: that particular version is installed on cfarm211
and a build log for a recent gcc checkout says
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115285
Bug ID: 115285
Summary: std::unordered_set can have duplicate values
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: lib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #5 from Hans-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115283
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115283
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58311
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58311&action=edit
Reduced
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #4 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
(In reply to r...@cebitec.uni-bielefeld.de from comment #2)
> You should use cfarm216 instead: it's way faster than the others and
> runs Solaris 11.4, which is the only OS release supported on trunk.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #3 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE Uni-Bielefeld.DE> ---
[...]
> Aldy, when investigating PR ipa/114985, got along with just
>
> configure && make -j128 && make ch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115283
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Summary|[14 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
--- Comment #2 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #1 from Hans-Peter Nilsson ---
> Sorry. I bet something in reorg actually uses a barrier insn as a reference.
> I'll revert those three patches unless I can fix the probl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
Hans-Peter Nilsson changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115283
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115284
Rainer Orth changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Build: sparc*-sun-solaris2.11
Between 20240528 (c08b0d3f7b3539b26031de31d88dea6b94474577) and 20240529
(18f477980c8597fe3dca2c2e8bd533c0c2b17aa6),
Solaris/SPARC bootstrap (both 32 and 64-bit-default) got broken. In stage 3,
cc1plus SEGVs:
/vol/gcc/src/hg/master/local/gcc/analyzer/supergraph.cc: In
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115283
Bug ID: 115283
Summary: [14 Regression] "used but never defined" with extern
templates
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104130
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.3.1, 13.3.0
Known to
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103139
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||11.4.1, 12.3.1, 13.3.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #24 from Peter Cordes ---
(In reply to Jeffrey Walton from comment #23)
> (In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> > [...]
> > That instruction is useless and should never be used in asm except for
> > code-alignment reasons (1 b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #23 from Jeffrey Walton ---
(In reply to Peter Cordes from comment #22)
> [...]
> That instruction is useless and should never be used in asm except for
> code-alignment reasons (1 byte longer than MOVLPS, same length as MOVSD, all
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84508
--- Comment #22 from Peter Cordes ---
Why are we adding an alignment requirement to _mm_storel_pd, the intrinsic for
MOVLPD?
It was defined in terms of _mm_store_sd (which this patch correctly changes to
remove the alignment requirement), so we'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115282
Bug ID: 115282
Summary: 15 regression]
gcc.dg/vect/costmodel/ppc/costmodel-slp-12.c fails
after r15-812-gc71886f2ca2e46
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
St
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115268
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106136
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||syq at gcc dot gnu.org
Resolution
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102619
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #8
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100760
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245
--- Comment #4 from YunQiang Su ---
It has been fixed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89245
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=82051
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
--- Comment #3 from Eric Gallager ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> (In reply to Eric Gallager from comment #1)
> > I think there's another bug for this, but I can't seem to remember which one
> > at the moment...
>
> PR 88002
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #17 from Matthias Schiffer ---
I have now verified replacing Felix's patch with your new patch in the OpenWrt
toolchain (currently based on GCC 13.3) results in correct compilation, while a
GCC 13.3 without these patches applied exhib
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115212
Eric Gallager changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||egallager at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Commen
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115214
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
YunQiang Su changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84790
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by YunQiang Su :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:915440eed21de367cb41857afb5273aff5bcb737
commit r15-911-g915440eed21de367cb41857afb5273aff5bcb737
Author: YunQiang Su
Date: Wed Ma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|-ftree-vectorize optimizes |[13/14/15 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.2
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115281
Bug ID: 115281
Summary: [14/15 Regression] aarch64 ICE in go_through_subreg
after r14-5129
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: ice-on-vali
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115266
Marek Polacek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mpolacek at gcc dot gnu.org
Last reco
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115280
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||accepts-invalid
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115280
Bug ID: 115280
Summary: Concept can access private alias in a classs
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect r14-1951-g7b34cacc573538 exposes the missed optimization here.
You can see the same missed optimization with:
```
template
T min(T a, T b)
{
return a < b ? a : b;
}
template
T max(T a, T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d1a1f7e9f0bedea55c558ab95127679bc3e9ff72
commit r15-909-gd1a1f7e9f0bedea55c558ab95127679bc3e9ff72
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Wed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115224
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb
commit r15-908-g547143df5aa0960fb149a26933dad7ca1c363afb
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15 Regression] register |[14 Regression] register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115258
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:39263ed2d39ac1cebde59bc5e72ddcad5dc7a1ec
commit r15-906-g39263ed2d39ac1cebde59bc5e72ddcad5dc7a1ec
Author: Richard Sandiford
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to Natalie Perlin from comment #17)
> Brief note on the errors is below. Does it need to be submitted as a
> separate ticket/different bug?
Yes.
> I'd prepare a preprocessed file where the error
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
--- Comment #2 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58310
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58310&action=edit
Proposed fix
Here is a proposed fix - currently bootstrapping and testing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115107
--- Comment #17 from Natalie Perlin ---
anl...@gcc.gnu.org - Thank you for you comment on the new compiler version/new
bug (to file a separate report for gnu/14.1.0)
It turns out, however, that other packages from the software stack collection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115279
Bug ID: 115279
Summary: [OpenMP] Fix USM/unified-shared memory handling of
'declare target enter(global_var)'
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Ke
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115278
Bug ID: 115278
Summary: -ftree-vectorize optimizes away volatile write on
x86_64
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Jan Hubicka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICF needs to match loop |[13/14/15 regression] ICF
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115277
Bug ID: 115277
Summary: ICF needs to match loop bound estimates
Product: gcc
Version: 14.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: middle-e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114529
--- Comment #4 from Gaius Mulley ---
Created attachment 58307
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58307&action=edit
Work in progress patch
This is only partially complete and it is being saved here to show the
direction of the
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15 Regression] |[13/14 Regression] pragma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109753
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Jason Merrill :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:eff00046409a7289bfdc1861e68b532895f91c0e
commit r15-902-geff00046409a7289bfdc1861e68b532895f91c0e
Author: Jason Merrill
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115276
Bug ID: 115276
Summary: libgm2 wraptime.InitTM returns NIL
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||13.3.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106852
--- Comment #5 from Jonathan Wakely ---
Bug 114600 comment 10 has a std module implementation attached.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #10 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Peter Bergner from comment #9)
> (In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8)
> > Should be fixed on trunk, it's not a regression, but we probably want
> > backporting this?
>
> For code correctness bu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #4 from Boris Kolpackov ---
> Please try compress it.
I did try with xz -9e and it was still 1.5M (the limit is 1M). I doubt any
compression method will be able to shave those 50% off.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93988
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
(In reply to Tom Tromey from comment #2)
> Also, I see the "__unknown__" there now -- better IMO to let gdb synthesize
> a name instead.
Attempt to synthesize the name in gcc:
...
commit d2b7f315ad976ff18c71e
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93988
Tom de Vries changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vries at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #3 f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114846
--- Comment #9 from Peter Bergner ---
(In reply to Kewen Lin from comment #8)
> Should be fixed on trunk, it's not a regression, but we probably want
> backporting this?
For code correctness bugs, yes, we want them backported.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115275
Bug ID: 115275
Summary: [14/15 Regression] Missed optimization for Dead Code
Elimination
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111641
--- Comment #13 from ro at CeBiTec dot Uni-Bielefeld.DE ---
> --- Comment #12 from dave.anglin at bell dot net ---
> It will be a few days before I can test. I've had three hard drives fail on
> my
> main hppa
> system in the past few weeks.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #2 from Boris Kolpackov ---
Ok, I couldn't attach the source file due to size limits, but you can get it
from https://sqlite.org/download.html . I get this warning with the latest
version, which is 3.46.0 at the time of this writing.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115272
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries ---
With this patch:
...
diff --git a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
index 8ec3856873e..ea3318396e0 100644
--- a/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
+++ b/gcc/dwarf2out.cc
@@ -13247,6 +13247,7 @@ base_type_die (tree type, bool
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115274
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
>Compiled attached sqlite3.c
Looks like it didn't attach. Can you try again? Maybe compress it?
1 - 100 of 152 matches
Mail list logo
