https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115823
Bug ID: 115823
Summary: Wrong expansion of isnormal optab
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: modula2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=92006
Bug 92006 depends on bug 84006, which changed state.
Bug 84006 Summary: [11/12 Regression] ICE in storage_size() with CLASS entity
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006
What|Removed |Added
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=103368
--- Comment #10 from Paul Thomas ---
Created attachment 58605
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58605&action=edit
"Fix" for this PR
This "fix" turns out to have restricted utility because of other changes in
14-branch and mai
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115713
--- Comment #6 from Kewen Lin ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #5)
> The docs are at least imprecise. Surely command-line -maltivec with
> target ("no-vsx") shouldn't revert to whatever is default with the target
> opts.
Thanks for
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98534
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
commit r13-8897-gb1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
Author: Paul Thomas
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006
--- Comment #19 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
commit r13-8897-gb1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
commit r13-8897-gb1429ddd7f20a5c88b65d8de38d64c98c4820782
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100027
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
commit r14-10390-gc36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
Author: Paul Thomas
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98534
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
commit r14-10390-gc36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
Author: Paul Thomas
Date
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=84006
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
commit r14-10390-gc36acfea1aea17ff8df8994657c8bf9e3ccde6ca
Author: Paul Thomas
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115822
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
--- Comment #1 from Andrew
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115822
Bug ID: 115822
Summary: -Wmisleading-indentation should warn for inconsistent
use of tabs vs spaces
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889
--- Comment #8 from Paul Thomas ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #7)
> (In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> > Created attachment 58586 [details]
> > Fix for this PR
> >
> > This does the job but it is still a bit clunky.
> >
> > Hav
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115821
Bug ID: 115821
Summary: -Wc++-compat should warn about anonymous struct
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: diagnostic, documentation
Severity: enha
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115659
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f379596e0ba99df249d6e8b3f2e66edfcea916fe
commit r15-1890-gf379596e0ba99df249d6e8b3f2e66edfcea916fe
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115659
--- Comment #13 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6425dae07aa4be58abade03455c2d9744f73d4e1
commit r15-1891-g6425dae07aa4be58abade03455c2d9744f73d4e1
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Mon Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||3.4.6
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115820
--- Comment #1 from Halalaluyafail3 ---
The Clang error only occurs with -pedantic-errors to make it clear, GCC does
not diagnose the error even with -pedantic-errors.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115820
Bug ID: 115820
Summary: Qualified anonymous union is not diagnosed
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115688
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kewen Lin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f90ca62566c1d20da585d95ced99f6a1903fc2cc
commit r15-1889-gf90ca62566c1d20da585d95ced99f6a1903fc2cc
Author: Kewen Lin
Date: Sun Jul 7
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115819, which changed state.
Bug 115819 Summary: RISC-V: Failed to hoist vrsub.vx to the header of the loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763
--- Comment #9 from Li Pan ---
(In reply to Monk Chiang from comment #8)
> Li Pan, I tested it without any errors, I think this issue has been fixed
Thank you! Looks this bug is still in UNCONFIRMED status, will close it once
confirmed.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
--- Comment #4 from JuzheZhong ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> This might be a cost issue.
No. I don't it's cost issue.
It's because we suppress the hoist by incorrect POLY INT handling codes.
I have a patch to fix it:
https
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61338
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Just the simple:
```
void foo (int *__restrict A, int n) {
for (int i = n; i > 0; --i) {
A[i] += 1;
}
}
```
Produces the double PERM here.
>From PR 115819 .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 115819, which changed state.
Bug 115819 Summary: RISC-V: Failed to hoist vrsub.vx to the header of the loop
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=61338
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-07-07
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||missed-optimization
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115819
Bug ID: 115819
Summary: RISC-V: Failed to hoist vrsub.vx to the header of the
loop
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115104
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115795
JuzheZhong changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||juzhe.zhong at rivai dot ai
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Gaius Mulley :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:4594d555aa551a9998fc921363c5f6ea50630d5c
commit r15-1886-g4594d555aa551a9998fc921363c5f6ea50630d5c
Author: Gaius Mulley
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58596|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107256
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||10.1.0
Summary|Contradictory
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=107256
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 115818 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115818
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115818
Bug ID: 115818
Summary: Infinite recursive in noexcept operator is not
detected
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Pri
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |11.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
Gaius Mulley changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
--- Comment #7 from Gaius Mulle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[11/12/13/14 regression]|[11/12/13 regression] Bogus
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115700
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:36ca07f0a95c00cc985fc06e46df4028e6f2b77e
commit r14-10387-g36ca07f0a95c00cc985fc06e46df4028e6f2b77e
Author: Harald Anlauf
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115810
--- Comment #11 from linuxnyasha at tutanota dot com ---
If I just compile manually in docker, it works the same way.(In reply to Andrew
Pinski from comment #10)
> Can you provide the exact version of gcc you are using? The trunk works
> correctl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108889
--- Comment #7 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Paul Thomas from comment #6)
> Created attachment 58586 [details]
> Fix for this PR
>
> This does the job but it is still a bit clunky.
>
> Having recently used the location field o
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115799
--- Comment #8 from 康桓瑋 ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #7)
> Fixed now, thanks for the reports.
Thanks for the quick fix. There may be another potential issue that I don't
know if it is worth mentioning.
When the difference_typ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115763
--- Comment #8 from Monk Chiang ---
Li Pan, I tested it without any errors, I think this issue has been fixed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115799
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115807
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115799
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ce34fcc572a0dceebcffef76e98064546feebb38
commit r15-1880-gce34fcc572a0dceebcffef76e98064546feebb38
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115799
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:762ee55d369a3257997092ef7853cf9dd4d5cc4f
commit r15-1879-g762ee55d369a3257997092ef7853cf9dd4d5cc4f
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115817
Bug ID: 115817
Summary: [AVR] Suboptimal code for zeroing SRAM byte from ISR
Product: gcc
Version: 14.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115816
Bug ID: 115816
Summary: ICE: in emit_move_insn, at expr.cc:4611 with
target("sse4.1,arch=core2") attribute and -mavx512f
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115804
--- Comment #5 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
I did a quick test and with
diff --git a/gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/m2builtins.cc b/gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/m2builtins.cc
index cfb4751e15a..4263a4e297f 100644
--- a/gcc/m2/gm2-gcc/m2builtins.cc
+++ b/gcc/m2/gm2-
58 matches
Mail list logo
