https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115526
--- Comment #12 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Andreas K. Huettel from comment #11)
> > Can someone please regression test the attached patch?
>
> More in a bit, but:
Any progress with testing?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115688
Kewen Lin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115847
--- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Yeah, the Intel ABI for this only handles scalar
integral/pointer/enum/bool/floating point types and _Complex, and our variant
thereof doesn't even handle _Complex.
Returning arrays is returning pointers,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115252
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115847
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||openmp
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115842
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
Version|14.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115835
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=104688
--- Comment #35 from Uroš Bizjak ---
(In reply to Mayshao-oc from comment #34)
> Can we extend this patch to Zhaoxin processors as well?
Just post the enablement patch to gcc-patches@ mailing list.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110456
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||26163
--- Comment #3 from Richard
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110456
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
*** Bug 115845 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115845
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
101 - 111 of 111 matches
Mail list logo