https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=83324
--- Comment #31 from lucier at math dot purdue.edu ---
Are there plans to support the __attribute__((musttail)) notation for C code?
It appears that with
heine:~/programs/gambit/gambit> clang -v
Ubuntu clang version 14.0.0-1ubuntu1.1
one needs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116478
Bug ID: 116478
Summary: x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -flto should support and not
warn about __attribute__ ((visibility("default")))
Product: gcc
Version: 13.1.0
Status: UNCON
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=111736
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109410
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed|2023-04-11 00:00:00 |2024-8-24
--- Comment #20 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110635
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c442a9b78bdbebdbcb4a8f91bc36961eb732fbdf
commit r15-3155-gc442a9b78bdbebdbcb4a8f91bc36961eb732fbdf
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Mon
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102051
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f0315f7a325ffccb446fe378fcdfccda6eead8ba
commit r15-3154-gf0315f7a325ffccb446fe378fcdfccda6eead8ba
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115908
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:68ee624bc52ba1154040a904db56dd2f9c3af1f6
commit r15-3153-g68ee624bc52ba1154040a904db56dd2f9c3af1f6
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sun
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109682
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f4915e6c4cd42e7d6f397dc36fab507cc47dad05
commit r15-3152-gf4915e6c4cd42e7d6f397dc36fab507cc47dad05
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100476
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a0b431033c307982123abbff752045cfe7eda47f
commit r15-3151-ga0b431033c307982123abbff752045cfe7eda47f
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113773
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:efc99ab2d5fdb7f2a942199b0e5b16e1e2bb8c27
commit r15-3150-gefc99ab2d5fdb7f2a942199b0e5b16e1e2bb8c27
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: Sat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113746
Simon Martin changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|14.3|15.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113746
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Martin :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1d09ccc4a5fe7c9a3dd37fcef34c1523a5c95819
commit r15-3145-g1d09ccc4a5fe7c9a3dd37fcef34c1523a5c95819
Author: Simon Martin
Date: Fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116472
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xry111 at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116477
Bug ID: 116477
Summary: ICE in instantiate_decl, instead of "cannot use
concept as function"
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116472
--- Comment #3 from 8dcc.git at gmail dot com ---
> Are you sure you don't have some patch which breaks this?
I haven't manually patched GCC, it was installed it from the Arch repository,
which is apparently configured with `--enable-default-pie`
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116476
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116476
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116476
Bug ID: 116476
Summary: error: binding reference of type 'int&&' to 'const
int' discards qualifiers for std::vector>
f{2}; (OK under Clang and GCC<=13)
Product: gcc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116438
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
It also makes triage a lot easier and makes the FEs more consistent too.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=80060
--- Comment #2 from Eric Gallager ---
Another example: off_t is sometimes defined as long long, and sometimes as just
long, but in each case sizeof(off_t) == 8, so it shouldn't really matter
whether you use "ll" or just "l" as the modifier for it
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116449
--- Comment #5 from Franz Sirl ---
This small change fixes the bug and passes bootstrap and regtests on x86_64.
--- a/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/typeck.cc
@@ -4195,7 +4195,7 @@ get_member_function_from_ptrfunc (tree *instance_ptrptr,
tree fu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2024-08-24
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #58992|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116458
--- Comment #12 from Alexander Monakov ---
Thanks. It's probably nicer to deduplicate computation of required padding to a
common header (libcpp/internal.h), I'll send a patch to that effect.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116458
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
I confirm that the fix works for me.
On a more subtle note, if two functions are strongly related,
would it be wise to have them in the same file with some comments
and maybe even some asserts to ensure
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
--- Comment #10 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58992
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58992&action=edit
much more reduced testcase
Now this testcase also ICEs on x86_64-linux-gnu with `-O3 -g`.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116470
--- Comment #11 from Bernd Edlinger ---
Created attachment 58991
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58991&action=edit
proposed patch
I would appreciate when you could check if this patch fixes the problem.
Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116460
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 58990
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=58990&action=edit
single file testcase
Reduced down to single file testcase; `-g -O3` is enough, no LTO needed now.
28 matches
Mail list logo