[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

2025-06-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #20 from Richard Biener --- As 78% of the time is spent in var-tracking I'd suggest to try -g1 or even -g0. Alternatively -g -fno-var-tracking. var-tracking has the issue that once the function gets comparatively big the and the wo

[Bug middle-end/120564] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed during IPA pass: *free_lang_data

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120564 --- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #2) > openmp expansion introduces this, not sure why we don't verify after that. I noticed that execute_one_ipa_transform_pass had a comment about verifying the IR b

[Bug middle-end/120564] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed during IPA pass: *free_lang_data

2025-06-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120564 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 CC|

[Bug target/120562] powerpc: Complex and uncomplete loop unroll

2025-06-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120562 --- Comment #1 from Richard Biener --- This is a powerpc backend speciality, they fiddle with unroll parameters, esp. they seem to cause the loop to be unrolled on the RTL level (which doesn't know about complete peeling). No idea why we can't

[Bug tree-optimization/120560] [14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with -fno-tree-ccp on x86_64-linux-gnu

2025-06-05 Thread rguenth at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120560 Richard Biener changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|P3 |P2 --- Comment #3 from Richard Biener

[Bug middle-end/120564] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE: verify_gimple failed during IPA pass: *free_lang_data

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120564 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needs-bisection Status|UNCO

[Bug tree-optimization/97490] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] false-positive -Wstringop-overflow= with address sanitizer since r10-5451-gef29b12cfbb4979a

2025-06-05 Thread kees at outflux dot net via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97490 Kees Cook changed: What|Removed |Added CC||kees at outflux dot net --- Comment #6 from

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

2025-06-05 Thread andi-gcc at firstfloor dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 --- Comment #19 from Andi Kleen --- Can you do perf record/report and add the output? But if its any different than ladybird its unlikely to be fixable without a test case, except perhaps if you can bisect it

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #27 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Mateusz Guzik from comment #26) > 4 stores per loop is best Do you have data to show it? > it is libcalls after 256, which is fine

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #19 from Greg Chandler --- Mostly because I was in the mode of, well let me fix this one thing first, then one after another for that. It likely would have saved me a ton of time if I had just removed it in the first place. I woul

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread mjguzik at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #26 from Mateusz Guzik --- 4 stores per loop is best it is libcalls after 256, which is fine

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #25 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Mateusz Guzik from comment #24) > I got the thing compiled against top of git. > > with this as a testcase: > void zero(char *buf) > { > __builtin_memset(buf, 0, SIZE); > } > > compiled lik

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread mjguzik at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #24 from Mateusz Guzik --- I got the thing compiled against top of git. with this as a testcase: void zero(char *buf) { __builtin_memset(buf, 0, SIZE); } compiled like so: ./xgcc -O2 -DSIZE=128 -mno-sse -c ~/zero.c && objdu

[Bug tree-optimization/120533] GCN: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phiprop-2.c scan-tree-dump-times phiopt2 "MIN_EXPR " 1

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120533 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill

[Bug target/120530] nvptx offloading: FAIL: libgomp.c/target-map-zero-sized-3.c execution test

2025-06-05 Thread tschwinge at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120530 Thomas Schwinge changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Target Milestone|---

[Bug middle-end/119482] slow compilation on ladybird interpreter

2025-06-05 Thread moncef.mechri at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119482 Moncef Mechri changed: What|Removed |Added CC||moncef.mechri at gmail dot com --- Comm

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #23 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #22) > (In reply to Mateusz Guzik from comment #21) > > I presume H.J. Lu can readily compile gcc or even has one with the patch > > around. I don't. On the other hand I provided

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #22 from H.J. Lu --- (In reply to Mateusz Guzik from comment #21) > I presume H.J. Lu can readily compile gcc or even has one with the patch > around. I don't. On the other hand I provided a trivial testcase not > requiring any setup

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread mjguzik at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #21 from Mateusz Guzik --- I presume H.J. Lu can readily compile gcc or even has one with the patch around. I don't. On the other hand I provided a trivial testcase not requiring any setup.

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #18 from Sam James --- As I said, I don't see that at all on my alpha crosses. But why not just patch out that warning for now instead?

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #17 from Greg Chandler --- So it turns out the libiberty code in gdb is identical to gcc, so the configure patch was needed there as well, and did not have to be modified. I did however have to modify 10 more configure scripts to st

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #20 from Sam James --- If you're that keen on the issue, why not build a kernel with the patch and compare the trees (or build a GCC yourself with that)?

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread mjguzik at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #19 from Mateusz Guzik --- can you show me what this disassembles to? note that kernel builds disable simd see https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119596#c3 for a sample code

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread hjl.tools at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 H.J. Lu changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-05 Ever confirmed|0

[Bug target/102294] memset expansion is sometimes slow for small sizes

2025-06-05 Thread mjguzik at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102294 --- Comment #17 from Mateusz Guzik --- any plans to push this forward? this is affecting the linux kernel, see 119596

[Bug target/120553] Improve code to select between -1 and various values

2025-06-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553 Uroš Bizjak changed: What|Removed |Added Last reconfirmed||2025-06-05 Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Bug target/120553] Improve code to select between -1 and various values

2025-06-05 Thread ubizjak at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553 --- Comment #8 from Uroš Bizjak --- (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #1) > might be also interesting on x86-64 when using bts can use a smaller > immediate than the now used orq and thus improve instruction size (but it > clobbers flags)

[Bug lto/120559] local variable stack store eliminated while its stack location is kept as passed argument (only with LTO, rv64gc)

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120559 --- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski --- >1. Does it affect the caller due to LTO being used? LTO just exposes the issue as now the compiler has aliasing info from the functions of all Translational units. GCC 12 (or was it 13) added IPA based a

[Bug target/120553] Improve code to select between -1 and various values

2025-06-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120553 --- Comment #7 from GCC Commits --- The master branch has been updated by Uros Bizjak : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:ed57e5de634eda91f32e0e61724d8f103ef648dd commit r16-1196-ged57e5de634eda91f32e0e61724d8f103ef648dd Author: Uros Bizjak Date: Thu J

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #16 from Greg Chandler --- It's entirely possible I spent days chasing down the wrong thing, but I wanted to make sure I'm not missing something much farther up stream... I don't think the configure stuff is a distro patch problem,

[Bug lto/120559] local variable stack store eliminated while its stack location is kept as passed argument (only with LTO, rv64gc)

2025-06-05 Thread lucian.silistru at gmail dot com via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120559 --- Comment #6 from Lucian Raul Silistru --- (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #5) > struct tx_buffer_entry *entry; > > uint32_t * ptr = (void *)(&entry); > > uint32_t value = (*ptr | (channel & 3)); > // alias violation here, reading a

[Bug target/108415] ICE in emit_library_call_value_1 at gcc/calls.cc:4181

2025-06-05 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108415 --- Comment #9 from Segher Boessenkool --- What is the current state here? We should simply not allow -mmodulo at all if we do not generate such insns (we do not have a -mcpu= that allows those). We do not want multiple ways to do thing, certa

[Bug tree-optimization/120533] GCN: FAIL: gcc.dg/tree-ssa/phiprop-2.c scan-tree-dump-times phiopt2 "MIN_EXPR " 1

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120533 --- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski --- Actually this one is odd. Re-reading the phi-opt code cselim should handle this always . I guess I need to look into this further. Though we should do a limited form of cselim as part of phiopt anyways.

[Bug tree-optimization/120560] [14/15/16 regression] wrong code at -O{s,2,3} with -fno-tree-ccp on x86_64-linux-gnu

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120560 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org --- Comment

[Bug rtl-optimization/108273] Inconsistent dfa state between debug and non-debug

2025-06-05 Thread segher at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108273 --- Comment #10 from Segher Boessenkool --- The problem seems to be in generic scheduling code, not in the Power backend. Can someone confirm this, or point out where the problem is, is show the problem no longer exists? Whatever way we can re

[Bug libstdc++/81122] [DR 2381] parsing f stopped after '0' when reading std::hexfloat >> f;

2025-06-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81122 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.5|---

[Bug lto/120559] local variable stack store eliminated while its stack location is kept as passed argument (only with LTO, rv64gc)

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120559 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|---

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread sjames at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #15 from Sam James --- I think that may be barking up the wrong tree. We had issues like that on HPPA and we ended up removing the warning, but I've also never seen anyone report that on alpha/hppa before confusing configure tests (t

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #14 from Greg Chandler --- Created attachment 61591 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61591&action=edit This patch is likely to be superceeded by another, but fixes grep for errors when warnings are transposed to e

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #13 from Greg Chandler --- Created attachment 61590 --> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=61590&action=edit Ignores warnings that are routed to stderr, causing normal checks to fail This removes any false positives du

[Bug target/120513] Possible arch or configure issue

2025-06-05 Thread chandleg at wizardsworks dot org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120513 --- Comment #12 from Greg Chandler --- Well Patching a couple of the configure scripts fixed a long standing issue of needing to patch code to find the headers and yeilds a clean compile. However, the resultant native, on the native platfor

[Bug libstdc++/119496] _Temporary_buffer::requested_size is not a reserved name

2025-06-05 Thread peppe at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119496 Giuseppe D'Angelo changed: What|Removed |Added CC||peppe at gcc dot gnu.org --- Commen

[Bug middle-end/110459] Trivial on stack variable was not optimized away

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110459 --- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski --- I should mention this shows up more after PR 87901 too.

[Bug middle-end/110459] Trivial on stack variable was not optimized away

2025-06-05 Thread pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110459 Andrew Pinski changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #61586|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug libstdc++/120561] std::weak_ptr cannot be converted to std::weak_ptr or std::weak_ptr, and std::weak_ptr cannot be converted to std::weak_ptr

2025-06-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120561 --- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely --- Backported as r14-11828-gd0c4f654354a7e for 14.4 and r13-9742-g6e8dcc0aa0ba5d for 13.5

[Bug libstdc++/120561] std::weak_ptr cannot be converted to std::weak_ptr or std::weak_ptr, and std::weak_ptr cannot be converted to std::weak_ptr

2025-06-05 Thread redi at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120561 Jonathan Wakely changed: What|Removed |Added Known to work||13.4.1, 14.3.1 Target Milestone|15.

[Bug analyzer/106634] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE in get_region_for_local with nested function extension since r13-2029-g7e3b45befdbbf1a1

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106634 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug testsuite/115827] [13/14/15/16 Regression] uninit-17.c no longer emits expected warning on arm soft-float

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115827 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/115331] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE-on-invalid passing a typoed lambda to a list-initializer

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115331 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/114826] [13 Regression] Bogus -Warray-bounds warning for 32-byte array with certain march flags

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114826 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/108422] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE: base pointer cycle detected since r13-2661-gb57abd072dd319a7

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108422 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/119029] [13/14/15/16 regression] abi_check FAILs on Solaris with gld

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119029 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #14 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/117245] [13 Regression] ICE: verify_ssa failed (error: definition in block 2 follows the use) with VLA types in struct with a vector type rebuild and nested functions since r13-6128-g47821ba07a

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117245 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/119515] [13/14/15/16 Regression] subsumption fails with concept-id that uses a function parameter of an abbreviated function template

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119515 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/116917] [13/14 Regression] raised TYPES.UNRECOVERABLE_ERROR : comperr.adb:414 during RTL pass: dwarf2, in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.cc:3079 on s390x-linux-gnu

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116917 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/114869] [13/14 Regression] GCC says nullptr_t is a C built in but it should be in

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/114788] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE on valid code at -O{2,3} on x86_64-linux-gnu (during RTL pass: sched2): in move_exprs_to_boundary, at sel-sched.cc:5236

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114788 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/117817] [13 Regression] Compile error when taking address of temporary array in sizeof operator since r13-6716-g31cdfdef04701e

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117817 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/67491] [meta-bug] concepts issues

2025-06-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=67491 Bug 67491 depends on bug 120123, which changed state. Bug 120123 Summary: [13 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 What|Removed

[Bug c++/106756] [CWG1699] Overbroad friendship for nested classes

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106756 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug bootstrap/106472] No rule to make target '../libbacktrace/libbacktrace.la', needed by 'libgo.la'.

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106472 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #44 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/106511] [13/14/15/16 Regression] New -Werror=maybe-uninitialized since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106511 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #11 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120123] [13 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

2025-06-05 Thread cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 --- Comment #13 from GCC Commits --- The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by Jason Merrill : https://gcc.gnu.org/g:561607ff94a9c602de3cb6c09518a72c7ad6160f commit r13-9743-g561607ff94a9c602de3cb6c09518a72c7ad6160f Author: Jason Merrill

[Bug tree-optimization/115869] [13/14/15/16 Regression] Wrong constant evaluation with vector of struct due to loop interchange since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c502e55c425897fb3884ba8f05882

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115869 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ada/120546] Array aggregate inside record aggregate inside generic package instantiation breaks Dimension_System

2025-06-05 Thread ebotcazou at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120546 Eric Botcazou changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|--- |15.0 CC|

[Bug ipa/106816] noreturn/pure attributes are not set correctly on multiversioned functions

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106816 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120123] [13 Regression] Implicit this is not used in a requires clause in nested lambdas

2025-06-05 Thread jason at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120123 Jason Merrill changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|ASSIGNED

[Bug analyzer/114677] [13/14/15/16 Regression] -Wanalyzer-fd-leak false positive writing to int * param

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114677 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug bootstrap/115416] [13/14/15/16 regression] Setting --includedir to a nonexistent directory causes a build error since r13-5490-g59e4c98173a79f

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115416 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/114578] [13/14 Regression] memory hog, virtual memory exhausted, building a c++ file on arm-linux-gnueabihf

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114578 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/106438] [13/14/15/16 regression] powerpc: ICE when building libgfortran with -flto: in insert_value_copy_on_edge, at tree-outof-ssa.cc:334 since r13-1324-g133d0d422ebd18

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106438 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug fortran/114373] [12/13 Regression] BLOCK construct not correctly analyzed with -fopenmp

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114373 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/117236] [13/14/15/16 regression] -Wnull-dereference false positive in GNU tar (regression from GCC 12) since r13-3596-ge7310e24b1c0ca

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117236 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/108355] [13/14/15/16 Regression] Dead Code Elimination Regression at -O2 since r13-2772-g9baee6181b4e42

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108355 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #16 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/115880] [13/14/15/16 regression] GCC 14+ fails to parse CoreFoundation header

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115880 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/118160] Dangling reference in std::ranges::is_permutation may cause a crash

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118160 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/116884] [13/14/15/16 Regression] Bogus strcpy -Warray-bounds warning following memset of destination after r13-455

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116884 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug libstdc++/114865] [13/14/15/16 Regression] std::atomic::compare_exchange_strong seems to hang under GCC 13 for C++11

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114865 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #27 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/118012] [avr][13/14/15/16 Regression] Expensive code (bit extract + extend + neg + and) instead of bit test

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118012 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #18 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/117271] [13/14/15/16 regression] GCC trunk emits larger code at -Os than 12.4.0 since r14-3084-gaadc5c07feb0ab

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117271 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/114432] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE in connect_traces, at dwarf2cfi.cc:3079 on s390x-linux-gnu

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114432 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/120270] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE with -O1 in expand_debug_locations, at cfgexpand.cc:5668

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120270 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

gcc-bugs@gcc.gnu.org

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119997 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/119847] [13/14/15/16 Regression] RISC-V:GCC fail to optimize repeated patterns in volatile operations

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119847 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120272] [13/14/15/16 Regression] ICE in get_local_decls, at cp/name-lookup.c:4594 since 13.3 (r14-5514)

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120272 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/116645] [13/14/15/16 regression] Huge performance loss after 13.2.0 compiler upgrade; reload CSE regs has scalability issues

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116645 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c++/120142] [13/14/15/16 regression] internal compiler error: in tsubst, at cp/pt.cc:16670 since r13-6971-ga5de246535db1b

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120142 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/120052] [13/14/15/16 Regression] VLA with OpenMP vs -fsanitize=undefined since r13-6375-gc7728805a71074

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120052 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #6 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/119683] [13/14/15/16 Regression] recalculating the return value which was already in the register right before function return

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119683 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug c/119651] [13/14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: tree check: expected class 'type', have 'exceptional' (error_mark) in tree_nonzero_bits, at fold-const.cc:16702

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119651 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug ipa/116296] [12/13/14/15/16 Regression] internal compiler error: in merge, at ipa-modref-tree.cc:176 at -O3 since r12-4227-g44b61586d8640b

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116296 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/119033] [13/14/15/16 regression] Unsafe FRE of pointer assignment since r13-469-g9a53101caadae1

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119033 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/113048] [13 Regression] ICE: in lra_split_hard_reg_for, at lra-assigns.cc:1862 (unable to find a register to spill) {*andndi3_doubleword_bmi} with -march=cascadelake since r13-17

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113048 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #12 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/116560] [13/14/15/16 Regression] RISC-V : rv32 code optimization , big code difference between 8/9.x and 10.x

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116560 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #3 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug tree-optimization/116426] [13/14/15/16 Regression] bogus -Wnull-dereference warning since r13-1268-g8c99e307b20c50

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116426 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug middle-end/116216] [13/14/15/16 regression] -Wstringop-overread in attribs.cc since r13-754-ga1c9f779f75283

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=116216 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug rtl-optimization/113662] [13/14/15/16 Regression] Wrong code for std::sort with fancy pointer since r13-6945-g429a7a88438cc8

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113662 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #35 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113641] [13/14/15/16 regression] 510.parest_r with PGO at O2 slower than GCC 12 (7% on Zen 3&2, 4% on CascadeLake) since r13-4272-g8caf155a3d6e23

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113641 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #2 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/113690] [13 Regression] ICE: in as_a, at machmode.h:381 with -O2 -fno-dce -fno-forward-propagate -fno-split-wide-types -funroll-loops

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=113690 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #9 from Jakub Jelinek

[Bug target/110001] [13/14/15/16 regression] Suboptimal code generation for branchless binary search

2025-06-05 Thread jakub at gcc dot gnu.org via Gcc-bugs
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110001 Jakub Jelinek changed: What|Removed |Added Target Milestone|13.4|13.5 --- Comment #8 from Jakub Jelinek

  1   2   3   >