https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121329
Bug ID: 121329
Summary: There are some errors about std::nullopt
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121327
--- Comment #1 from Borislav Stanimirov ---
So, the problem is that `std::equality_comparable_with` is bidirectional.
It checks lhs==rhs and rhs==lhs. Using it with two id types will lead to an
infinite recursion of checking `rhs==X`. The reaso
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121312
--- Comment #2 from liu xu ---
(In reply to GCC Commits from comment #1)
> The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
>
> https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da88f9bd9e30eb743132734d71c62ebb9c42b11e
>
> commit r16-2656-gda88f9bd9e30eb743132734d71c62
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102775
--- Comment #5 from Sam James ---
No, I was mistaken and misread. (There is another bug for the namespace issue
though.)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102775
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #4 fr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102775
Harald van Dijk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||harald at gigawatt dot nl
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #19 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #18)
> Created attachment 62018 [details]
> a-except.adb
>
> (In reply to Sam James from comment #17)
> Well, I say that, but at least it should be reproducible in terms of
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #18 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62018
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62018&action=edit
a-except.adb
(In reply to Sam James from comment #17)
Well, I say that, but at least it should be reproducible in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #17 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62017
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62017&action=edit
build-gnat.sh
With the attached script, I can toggle the breakage by changing the cmdline for
a-except.o.
It ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #16 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #7)
> (In reply to Richard Biener from comment #3)
> > likewise whether -fno-tree-vectorize helps.
>
> This didn't make a difference. I'll do the rest soon.
I must have mad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #15 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #13)
> Created attachment 62016 [details]
> 120440.tar.xz
The diff between the objects is really small.
--- 120440/a-except.o-good
+++ 120440/a.except.o-bad
...
Disassembl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #14 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Sam James from comment #12)
> Maybe obvious in hindsight but the miscompiled object is a-except.o.
.. specifically ada.exceptions'Elab_Spec
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #13 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62016
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62016&action=edit
120440.tar.xz
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120440
--- Comment #12 from Sam James ---
Maybe obvious in hindsight but the miscompiled object is a-except.o.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121328
Bug ID: 121328
Summary: ICE: Segmentation fault on local lambda constraints
with pack expression
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: nor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115242
--- Comment #9 from Florian Weimer ---
(In reply to Segher Boessenkool from comment #8)
> Can we have a testcase please?
The test case in glibc: https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=26566
> It sounds like the glibc you used was misc
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=53947
Bug 53947 depends on bug 121190, which changed state.
Bug 121190 Summary: [15 regression] Segmentation fault when executing
vectorized loops with -O3 -march=znver2 since r15-6807-g68326d5d1a593d
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121190
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121190
Tamar Christina changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121190
--- Comment #7 from Tamar Christina ---
Backported to GCC 15 to make RC1.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121190
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Tamar Christina
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1869281ba69da0d98481ecef72da69362101f1ac
commit r15-10165-g1869281ba69da0d98481ecef72da69362101f1ac
Author: Pengfei Li
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
--- Comment #18 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-13 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:1afe5101b179339cf0021f26786bb77f272dc1a2
commit r13-9817-g1afe5101b179339cf0021f26786bb77f272dc1a2
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
--- Comment #17 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8b959ca27ee95ba32e5a587e0490f6cb49ef9760
commit r14-11924-g8b959ca27ee95ba32e5a587e0490f6cb49ef9760
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121327
Bug ID: 121327
Summary: Not-matching concept fails to compile with error
"depends on itself"
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121259
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121301
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.4
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121301
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alessandro Vergani from comment #3)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> > Works for me with the trunk.
>
> I tested with trunk on compiler explorer and it doesn't even finish the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121325
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-31
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121312
--- Comment #1 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kito Cheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:da88f9bd9e30eb743132734d71c62ebb9c42b11e
commit r16-2656-gda88f9bd9e30eb743132734d71c62ebb9c42b11e
Author: Kito Cheng
Date: Thu Jul
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121323
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62014
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62014&action=edit
cribbage.i.xz
(In reply to Sam James from comment #0)
> No testcase here as it needs LTO, I can spend time on that
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121321
--- Comment #3 from Sam James ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> This code seems undefined at this point though.
Fixed in MySQL's
commit 96ccd8dc9f9795ff4a671ef0cbf952732461b8a7
Author: Jakub Łopuszański
AuthorDate: Thu Apr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
Bug 63426 depends on bug 121326, which changed state.
Bug 121326 Summary: UBSAN error in use_related_value (signed integer overflow:
4707129865599665876 - -7070675565921424023 cannot be represented in type 'long
int')
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121326
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=85608
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||sjames at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #7 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121326
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62013
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62013&action=edit
spdy_utils.ii.xz
ix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250730 (experimental)
7aa9565a62ea2ce04e2ddf61e1932bc123374988 (Gentoo 16.0. p, commit
8cda62318174b911a7cba57fcf70efd38f265f0e)
```
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
[Bug 63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120427
--- Comment #16 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:94ca071cba4078aa783e6c134277515a4e46709e
commit r15-10164-g94ca071cba4078aa783e6c134277515a4e46709e
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121274
Hongtao Liu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121274
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:82cc62b51dcbc74298424c2e9540dd479ca5f26f
commit r15-10163-g82cc62b51dcbc74298424c2e9540dd479ca5f26f
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121274
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by hongtao Liu
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8eb4fcd40c2faef5dadbaa83abfcc6e058ee9f6
commit r14-11923-gc8eb4fcd40c2faef5dadbaa83abfcc6e058ee9f6
Author: liuhongt
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121325
Bug ID: 121325
Summary: ICE on pack index in noexcept specifier of generic
lambda in requires clause
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: n
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=39878
--- Comment #2 from Fred J. Tydeman ---
With gcc 15.1.1, the same problem still exists.
/*
* Compiler converts some decimal FP constants wrong.
CFLAGS="-H -std=gnu23 -O0 -march=native -mhard-float -mfpmath=387 -mieee-fp \
-enable-decimal-flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121306
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
*** Bug 121324 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121324
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121324
Bug ID: 121324
Summary: [16 Regression] FAIL: gcc.target/i386/pr82524.c caused
by r16-2649-g0340177d54d08b
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Sever
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121323
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121323
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62012
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62012&action=edit
build.log.xz
--disable-libvtv --with-zstd --without-isl
--enable-default-pie --enable-host-pie --enable-host-bind-now
--enable-default-ssp --disable-fixincludes
--with-gxx-libcxx-include-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1
--with-build-config='bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap-cet'
Thread mod
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121322
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
tmp_n = tmp_n >> count | tmp_n << (range - count);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121322
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62010
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62010&action=edit
ELFObjectFile.cpp.ii.xz
de/c++/v1
--with-build-config='bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap-cet'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250730 (experimental)
7aa9565a62ea2ce04e2ddf61e1932bc123374988 (Gentoo 16.0. p, commit
8cda62318174b911a7cba57fcf70efd38f265f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121321
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|tree-optimization |middle-end
--- Comment #2 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121321
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62009
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62009&action=edit
lock0lock.cc.ii.xz
ude-dir=/usr/include/c++/v1
--with-build-config='bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap-cet'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250730 (experimental)
7aa9565a62ea2ce04e2ddf61e1932bc123374988 (Gentoo 16.0. p, commit
8cda62318174b911a7cba57fcf70efd38f265f0e)
```
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
[Bug 63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121320
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
The fix in r14-9353-ge1bd0f293d8407d4e8149fbafd470612323dc938 was an
improvement over the code after r14-8929-g938a419182f8c4 but it should have
used it in poly_offset_int .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409
--- Comment #14 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #13)
> (In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> > (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> > > well .. the visible difference in gimple, but this is code outside of the
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121159
--- Comment #19 from Lukas Grätz ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #18)
> Guess we need then an effective target for whether target can do indirect
> musttail calls and add dg-error there guarded on the new effective target.
According
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=105608
Lewis Hyatt changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL|https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma |https://gcc.gnu.org/piperma
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121320
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-30
Status|UNCONFIRM
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409
--- Comment #13 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to H.J. Lu from comment #12)
> (In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> > well .. the visible difference in gimple, but this is code outside of the
> > coroutines changes (i.e. just a bit of regu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121320
--- Comment #1 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62008
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62008&action=edit
DTest.cpp.ii
clude/c++/v1
--with-build-config='bootstrap-ubsan bootstrap-cet'
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib zstd
gcc version 16.0.0 20250730 (experimental)
7aa9565a62ea2ce04e2ddf61e1932bc123374988 (Gentoo 16.0. p, commit
8cda62318174b911a7cba57fcf70efd38f265f0e)
```
Referenced Bugs:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=63426
[Bug 63426] [meta-bug] Issues found with -fsanitize=undefined
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
--- Comment #12 from H.J. Lu ---
(In re
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121319
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2020-October/557652.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121319
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121319
Bug ID: 121319
Summary: Why is global_options.x_flag_pcc_struct_return
cleared?
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120409
--- Comment #11 from H.J. Lu ---
typeck.cc has
/* We can't initialize a register from a AGGR_INIT_EXPR. */
else if (! cfun->returns_struct
&& TREE_CODE (retval) == TARGET_EXPR
&& TREE_CODE (TARGET_EXPR_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121291
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121291
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Nathaniel Shead :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:bfb8615031a8c23df814d011567735093e3c1ac6
commit r16-2652-gbfb8615031a8c23df814d011567735093e3c1ac6
Author: Nathaniel Shead
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #7 from Jakub Jelinek ---
(In reply to qinzhao from comment #6)
> (In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> > Why has this been backported to 15 branch?
> > Generally accepts-invalid bugs aren't backported to release branches, or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #6 from qinzhao at gcc dot gnu.org ---
(In reply to Jakub Jelinek from comment #5)
> Why has this been backported to 15 branch?
> Generally accepts-invalid bugs aren't backported to release branches, or
> similar changes which cause r
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=115242
--- Comment #8 from Segher Boessenkool ---
Can we have a testcase please?
It sounds like the glibc you used was misconfigured. Of course VSX registers
are not restored by the GCC unwinder stuff if you configured GCC to not support
VSX register
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Alexander Monakov from comment #3)
> When necessary to upgrade global-dynamic to initial-exec (in libraries)
> without downgrading local-exec to initial-exec (in executables), the code
> can att
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
--- Comment #5 from H.J. Lu ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> I am not so sure, the documentation of attribute say it should override the
> default.
Linker can override the TLS mode attribute. Why can't compiler perform TLS
opt
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
--- Comment #4 from H.J. Lu ---
Created attachment 62007
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62007&action=edit
A patch
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am not so sure, the documentation of attribute say it should override the
default.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-15.1.0/gcc/Common-Variable-Attributes.html#index-tls_005fmodel-variable-attribute
The tls_model attribute sets thread-local storage model (see Thread-Local
Storage) of a p
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121318
Bug ID: 121318
Summary: handle_tls_model_attribute failed to consider compiler
options
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121317
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
See https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2019-October/530992.html also.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121317
Bug ID: 121317
Summary: Incorrect info about variables possibly modified by
longjmp/vfork
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120354
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:722aa418df94d85eecb7500ec9c38384c557338d
commit r15-10159-g722aa418df94d85eecb7500ec9c38384c557338d
Author: Qing Zhao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120353
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Qing Zhao :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:12796e6938a6390512e714f635d2c4fdef7023ba
commit r15-10158-g12796e6938a6390512e714f635d2c4fdef7023ba
Author: Qing Zhao
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119100
--- Comment #15 from Paul-Antoine Arras ---
https://godbolt.org/z/dczr15Eo4
Reduced from 538.imagick
We get the following assembly:
fld fa5,0(a4)
vfmv.v.fv2,fa5
vfmacc.vv v1,v3,v2
But since r16-1659-g92e1893e0155b6 we should
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121234
--- Comment #2 from Jerry DeLisle ---
The original test case is rather clever. With this slightly modified, placing
quotes around the 'string' in the buffer.
character(80) buffer,a
buffer="'33;44'"
print *, buffer
read(b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120778
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 62006
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62006&action=edit
gcc16-pr120778-keyword-macro.patch
WIP on -Wkeyword-macro warning (still need to do C, allow #define likely()
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121315
--- Comment #2 from Richard Biener ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> Confirmed.
>
> At .optimization GCC produces:
> ```
> vect__5.13_42 = MEM [(int *)src_3(D) + ivtmp.34_19 * 1];
> _4 = src_3(D) + 16;
> vect__5.14_44 = M
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118480
Segher Boessenkool changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-07-30
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121315
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Confirmed.
At .optimization GCC produces:
```
vect__5.13_42 = MEM [(int *)src_3(D) + ivtmp.34_19 * 1];
_4 = src_3(D) + 16;
vect__5.14_44 = MEM [(int *)_4 + ivtmp.34_19 * 1];
```
Which I think is a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121316
Bug ID: 121316
Summary: Representation clauses silently cause iterator filters
to be ignored
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121315
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Se
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121295
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121295
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aebbc90d8c7c703c787ce402b9c55fdf2ecbbcd8
commit r16-2648-gaebbc90d8c7c703c787ce402b9c55fdf2ecbbcd8
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121308
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121236
--- Comment #12 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:aebbc90d8c7c703c787ce402b9c55fdf2ecbbcd8
commit r16-2648-gaebbc90d8c7c703c787ce402b9c55fdf2ecbbcd8
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121308
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:0340177d54d08b6375391ba164a878e6a596275e
commit r16-2649-g0340177d54d08b6375391ba164a878e6a596275e
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Tu
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121225
--- Comment #2 from Dusan Stojkovic ---
Created attachment 62005
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62005&action=edit
Defer POINTER_PLUS_EXPR bswap implementations
> The bswap pass in this case should not insert another load
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121315
Bug ID: 121315
Summary: Missed LDP/STP fusion opportunity
Product: gcc
Version: 15.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: normal
Priorit
1 - 100 of 156 matches
Mail list logo
