https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121526
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|preprocessor|target
Target|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121522
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |14.4
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121520
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Paul Thomas :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e6f4543f63366433493b3870845b555fd00be7e6
commit r16-3178-ge6f4543f63366433493b3870845b555fd00be7e6
Author: Paul Thomas
Date: Wed Au
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121526
Bug ID: 121526
Summary: EBCDIC is incompatible with signed 8 bit char
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121520
--- Comment #2 from Kishan Parmar ---
FAIL: g++.dg/DRs/dr2576.C -std=gnu++26 (test for excess errors)
Excess errors:
: error: keyword 'bool' defined as macro [-Wkeyword-macro]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121136
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121525
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Severity|normal |enhancement
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121525
Michael Meissner changed:
What|Removed |Added
Host||powerpc64le-linux
CC
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121525
Bug ID: 121525
Summary: Add _Float16 support to PowerPC starting with power9
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120476
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-14 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:00c19ad6da2339add251579fef3d97b3f8a57c2f
commit r14-11951-g00c19ad6da2339add251579fef3d97b3f8a57c2f
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120476
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by LuluCheng
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c4e96a094636b3c15b5e3bfde8673ec3b8172993
commit r15-10223-gc4e96a094636b3c15b5e3bfde8673ec3b8172993
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121234
Jerry DeLisle changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120476
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d94178d9b3fb1cb869b90d6f061990eae75c770e
commit r16-3177-gd94178d9b3fb1cb869b90d6f061990eae75c770e
Author: Lulu Cheng
Date: Wed Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121234
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The releases/gcc-15 branch has been updated by Jerry DeLisle
:
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b078015d94152e0e6d19de67717371e79f05b18d
commit r15-10222-gb078015d94152e0e6d19de67717371e79f05b18d
Author: Jerry DeLisle
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117599
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by LuluCheng :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8079e96eb767851e8e061a13ecfb21aa1a2362de
commit r16-3176-g8079e96eb767851e8e061a13ecfb21aa1a2362de
Author: Yang Yujie
Date: Sat Aug
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 90% sure it was caused by r15-6334.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118934
liu mirko changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lw297073896 at gmail dot com
--- Comment #5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect this will start happening when there is a pedantic message that shows
up which exposed this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
-pedantic-errors also rejects this:
```
:8:29: error: 'alignas' on a type other than class [-Wattributes]
8 | UT foo[8] alignas(32);
| ^
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
clang rejects this:
```
:8:12: error: 'alignas' attribute cannot be applied to types
8 | UT foo[8] alignas(32);
| ^
```
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62107
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62107&action=edit
more portable testcase
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120763
Bug 120763 depends on bug 121113, which changed state.
Bug 121113 Summary: ICE: in riscv_sched_variable_issue, at
config/riscv/riscv.cc:10243 with -mcpu=xiangshan-kunminghu and _Float16
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121113
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121113
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121113
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2e2589616ac18a0473e4f1e05dec6903d8131740
commit r16-3174-g2e2589616ac18a0473e4f1e05dec6903d8131740
Author: Jeff Law
Date: Tue Aug 12
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121524
Bug ID: 121524
Summary: [15 Regression] Trailing alignas leaks into subsequent
types, sometimes
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: norm
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121498
--- Comment #7 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
Note that GCC considers RA a fixed register because of its hidden uses. RA is
not available to the regsiter allocator. There is special code to save/restore
RA if the function is not a leaf function OR if
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121516
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119783
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119783
--- Comment #5 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:f622df9af2e7c1da35cf0c9b895dacc1fa75107a
commit r16-3172-gf622df9af2e7c1da35cf0c9b895dacc1fa75107a
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121516
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by David Malcolm :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:d6d1fa0039e68e52c3d787d90b545842cbb24d32
commit r16-3171-gd6d1fa0039e68e52c3d787d90b545842cbb24d32
Author: David Malcolm
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121498
--- Comment #6 from liu mirko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #4)
> Note shrink wrapping is not the only time this could cause an issue, it can
> cause an issue with leaf function where ra is not normally saved either.
Yes. Because
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121498
--- Comment #5 from liu mirko ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #3)
> Confirmed. Though the code is not enough to reproduce the issue.
>
> ```
> (define_insn "*branch"
> [(set (pc)
> (if_then_else
> (match_operator
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121497
H.J. Lu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121497
--- Comment #2 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by H.J. Lu :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:9e30860f8c77309c9f74742fe8866d2ca0d0fe7a
commit r16-3170-g9e30860f8c77309c9f74742fe8866d2ca0d0fe7a
Author: H.J. Lu
Date: Tue Aug 12 05
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
--- Comment #7 from Shreya Munnangi ---
Sure, I'll go ahead with this.
On Tue, Aug 12, 2025 at 2:07 PM law at gcc dot gnu.org <
gcc-bugzi...@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
>
> --- Comment #6 from Jeff
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121523
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc_checking_assert (num >= 0 && den > 0);
profile_probability scale_prob
= (count_in * (iteration_bound + 1)).probability_in (loop->header->count);
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=119783
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |dmalcolm at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121523
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121523
Bug ID: 121523
Summary: [16 Regression] RISC-V: ICE in apply_scale, at
profile-count.h:1187 since r16-3065-geee51f9a4b6
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121516
David Malcolm changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121498
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note shrink wrapping is not the only time this could cause an issue, it can
cause an issue with leaf function where ra is not normally saved either.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120621
--- Comment #21 from James K. Lowden ---
On Fri, 01 Aug 2025 13:02:50 +
"ro at gcc dot gnu.org" wrote:
> I think so, yes. However, COBOL has been so much trouble that I've
> decided to stop testing on my platforms.
Hi Rainer, [off list]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121334
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121518
--- Comment #2 from Nedim Šehić ---
I am working on a fix for this.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121334
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:980e1fc195325cd4637ce52d0e2b0e7fcc763f60
commit r16-3166-g980e1fc195325cd4637ce52d0e2b0e7fcc763f60
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Mon Aug 4
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120811
--- Comment #6 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
It does look viable to fix this problem using Shreya's work. But there's one
notable caveat.
So I created an expander "addptr3" which is the magic expander that gets
used by LRA when it needs to reload ad
-bootstrap
--enable-checking=yes --prefix=/local/suz-local/software/local/gcc-trunk
--enable-sanitizers --enable-languages=c,c++ --disable-werror --enable-multilib
Thread model: posix
Supported LTO compression algorithms: zlib
gcc version 16.0.0 20250812 (experimental) (GCC)
[538] %
[538] % gcctk -O2
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120935
pietro changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.2.0
--- Comment #10 from pietro ---
Since
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121507
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121113
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121507
uecker at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-checking
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=89092
Paul Thomas changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pault at gcc dot gnu.org
Assigne
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117784
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||cooky.ykooc922 at gmail dot com
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121521
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121521
Bug ID: 121521
Summary: elements of std::array in constexpr structured binding
is not a constant expression
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Seve
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121521
--- Comment #1 from Desmond Gold ---
Edited testcase:
#include
#include
struct Point {
int x, y, z;
};
int main() {
constexpr int arr[] {1, 2, 3};
constexpr auto [a, b, c] = arr;
static constexpr std::array std_arr {4, 5, 6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121268
Palmer Dabbelt changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121268
Vineet Gupta changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vineetg at gcc dot gnu.org
Ass
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110812
--- Comment #18 from Kito Cheng ---
Just another smaller testcase to reproduce, and seem we hit a GC issue which
need to fix first...:
empty.c
---
void foo();
int main(){
foo();
}
---
vector.c
---
#include
uint8_t *x;
void foo () {
in
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121520
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jakub at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121520
Bug ID: 121520
Summary: [16 regression] g++.dg/DRs/dr2575.C FAIL
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: testsuite-fail
Severity: normal
Prior
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121519
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121511
--- Comment #3 from Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus
---
Ah that makes sense. Thanks for sharing!
I created a patch adding option -marm:
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-August/692421.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121519
Bug ID: 121519
Summary: ICE on valid code at -O3 on x86_64-linux-gnu: in
upper_bound, at value-range.h:1186
Product: gcc
Version: unknown
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121509
--- Comment #11 from David Binderman ---
(In reply to Richard Biener from comment #8)
> Of course it requires a high level of obfuscation to get
> this past unrolling, VRP and other opts that would do this.
I find csmith very good indeed at fin
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121253
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:e82c8413eda498163ae2e0ecc458ea0428708c30
commit r16-3163-ge82c8413eda498163ae2e0ecc458ea0428708c30
Author: Richard Sandiford
Da
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121509
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c5dab6fb402c93a92f6aa808c43956dfb9328190
commit r16-3162-gc5dab6fb402c93a92f6aa808c43956dfb9328190
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121511
--- Comment #2 from Christophe Lyon ---
(In reply to Stefan Schulze Frielinghaus from comment #1)
> (In reply to Christophe Lyon from comment #0)
> > Given the dg-do line:
> > /* { dg-do compile { target { { aarch64*-*-* powerpc64*-*-* riscv64-*
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121514
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a440b382e43203857de9195eb526c4a16f21ceb1
commit r16-3161-ga440b382e43203857de9195eb526c4a16f21ceb1
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121514
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-reduction |missed-optimization
--- Comment #8 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121494
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121494
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Andrew Pinski :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2fe432175ef135037dea210002881a093f328779
commit r16-3160-g2fe432175ef135037dea210002881a093f328779
Author: Andrew Pinski
Date: Mo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121514
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Here is another testcase:
```
void ar(int*);
void av() {
int b[4], d[4];
for (int c = 0; c < 2; ++c)
b[c] = 0;
unsigned e[4];
__builtin_memcpy(e, b, sizeof(b));
for (int c = 0; c < 4; ++c)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100446
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |MOVED
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=100446
--- Comment #15 from R. Diez ---
I just tested -g3 with a bigger, non-LTO firmware, and I am not seeing
excessive CPU load and memory usage with GDB anymore. Debugging seems right.
The versions are: cross-compiler GCC 15.2, Binutils 2.45 and GD
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121518
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Blocks|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121509
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121518
Bug ID: 121518
Summary: Deducing member array type from string literal
Product: gcc
Version: 15.1.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121493
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Target Milestone|---
84 matches
Mail list logo
