https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=112728
--- Comment #11 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Iain D Sandoe :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6ce76052aeaa3370243909b62c87bfdcb243b885
commit r16-3557-g6ce76052aeaa3370243909b62c87bfdcb243b885
Author: Iain Sandoe
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121213
--- Comment #9 from Vincenzo Romano ---
I confirm trunk now produces expected code also for case no.2 .
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xxs_chy at outlook dot com
Target Milestone: ---
GCC version: gcc version 16.0.0 20250903 (experimental) (gbda76b479)
Testcase:
#include
#include
typedef int16_t a;
typedef uint16_t b;
typedef b c __attribute__
: target
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: xxs_chy at outlook dot com
Target Milestone: ---
GCC version: gcc version 16.0.0 20250903 (experimental) (gbda76b479)
Testcase:
#include
#include
typedef uint8_t a;
typedef a b __attribute__((vector_size(4)));
typedef a c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65266
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93921
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=86023
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
I suspect we could optimize this at the gimple level too:
```
[local count: 4971102460]:
# __last_57 = PHI <_47(9), _45(7)>
_47 = __last_57 + 18446744073709551608;
_50 = MEM[(int *)_47];
MEM[(int *
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=117838
cuilili changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121765
--- Comment #4 from Shuangcheng Ni ---
A possible fix:
```cpp
namespace std {
namespace __format {
template <__char _CharT>
struct _Iter_for<_CharT> {
using type = _Sink_iter<_CharT>;
};
} // namespace __format
} // namespace std
```
Test
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
--- Comment #6 from Basil Milanich ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> >However, the gcc-15.2 ICE seemingly depends on the environment
>
> No it depends on how you configure gcc. In your case you have
> `--enable-checking=yes,extr
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=93556
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||easyhack
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Basil Milanich from comment #6)
>
> What about Godbolt's trunk, is this the same bug - Godbolt does not report
> --enable-checking in its config but this could be forced in the source?
The dev
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=47186
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||4.9.0
Known to work|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=70079
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski ---
The trunk just calls memcpy now.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=78713
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Note std::optional produces the best code already. I am not sure if we
care about code generation of std::experimental::optional.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=50382
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-04
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121779
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||15.1.0
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121779
Bug ID: 121779
Summary: ICE when building ladybird browser: internal compiler
error: tree check: expected call_expr, have lt_expr in
build_min_non_dep_op_overload, at cp/tree.cc:3733
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121779
--- Comment #1 from Christopher Fore ---
Created attachment 62298
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62298&action=edit
compressed preprocessed file
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65266
--- Comment #2 from Oleg Endo ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #1)
> So I took at peek at this as it looked like it might be an interesting
> missed optimization case for one my interns.
Sure, always welcome :)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needs-bisection |
CC|
in Godbolt, using gcc-trunk, I get an ICE:
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-snapshot/bin/g++
Target: x86_64-linux-gnu
Configured with: ../gcc-trunk-20250903/configure
--prefix=/opt/compiler-explorer/gcc-build/staging
--enable-libstdcxx-backtrace=yes --build=x86_64-linux
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
--- Comment #4 from Andrew Pinski ---
I am 99% sure it was caused by r15-6709-g325189c675017b .
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
gcc_checking_assert (!TYPE_REF_P (TREE_TYPE (expr)));
Yes that shows it explictly an assert which is only enabled with checking.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||14.3.0
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121776
Bug ID: 121776
Summary: [13/14/15 Regression] memcmp expansion in strlen uses
the wrong alignment
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wron
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121778
Bug ID: 121778
Summary: Improve rotation detection for RISC-V
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121777
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||ice-on-valid-code
--- Comment #1 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121776
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |pinskia at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121773
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needs-bisection
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121773
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most likely r12-11174-gaffa145910b676 or r12-10976-g77172598dcb07b caused it.
Those 2 combine patches are the ones on all 3 release branches when it seems
like it started to go wrong.
Based on the anlaysis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121773
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
Known to fail|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #9 from Andrew Pinski ---
If i get some time tonight, I will figure out if it is reproducible without
LTO. I tried a few testcases trying to do that but I have not been able to get
one that failed without LTO just yet. Plus goldbolt'
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassig
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Richard Sandiford changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|rsandifo at gcc dot gnu.org|unassigned at gcc dot
gnu.or
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
--- Comment #7 from Danijel Zlaus ---
(In reply to Danijel Zlaus from comment #3)
> Just hit this bug when bumping up GCC from 15.1 to 15.2.
>
> https://godbolt.org/z/fdsc69PzY
>
> The issue appears to be the same. That is, await_suspend of th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #62295|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121763
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||patch
--- Comment #7 from Sam James ---
ht
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=65266
--- Comment #1 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
So I took at peek at this as it looked like it might be an interesting missed
optimization case for one my interns.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||lto
--- Comment #5 from Andrew Pinski
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
anlauf at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression] ICE
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121263
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Harald Anlauf :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:692281a38773a70ae795b3b594f0c0f8fd83e5ef
commit r16-3551-g692281a38773a70ae795b3b594f0c0f8fd83e5ef
Author: Harald Anlauf
Date: W
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
--- Comment #6 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Iain Sandoe from comment #5)
> (In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> > Started with r16-1548 / r15-10103-ga169a4718b5b62
>
> interesting ...
>
> https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.await#3.7
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
--- Comment #5 from Iain Sandoe ---
(In reply to Patrick Palka from comment #4)
> Started with r16-1548 / r15-10103-ga169a4718b5b62
interesting ...
https://eel.is/c++draft/expr.await#3.7
does not appear to give the option for additional param
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121643
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||iains at gcc dot gnu.org,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #4 from Sam James ---
Created attachment 62295
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62295&action=edit
unity_0_cxx.cxx.ii
```
$ g++ -O2 unity_0_cxx.cxx.ii -shared -flto
during RTL pass: late_combine
unity_0_cxx.cxx.ii
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121775
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rearnsha at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121775
Bug ID: 121775
Summary: arm: wrong code in vset_lane*
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121766
--- Comment #3 from Tamar Christina ---
Ok, have a patch that teaches the cost model about truncating stores.
We now get the SVE code again, but this makes me wonder about the widening
loads code.
We also pick a ridiculous unroll factor for th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121157
--- Comment #24 from Tom Kacvinsky ---
I wonder what support will be like for VLAs in Visual Studio 2025 will be like.
My understanding is that that version will be released in November of this
year. Supposing the 2025 release supports VLAs, w
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121213
Jeffrey A. Law changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|ASSIGNED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121213
--- Comment #7 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jeff Law :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:b790606e492d33e0cdb8159e38cb148d3526071b
commit r16-3549-gb790606e492d33e0cdb8159e38cb148d3526071b
Author: Austin Law
Date: Wed Sep 3
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121655
--- Comment #4 from Jakub Jelinek ---
template void foo ();
struct A { char a; };
#ifndef SB
char &bar ();
char &x = bar ();
#else
A &bar ();
auto &[x] = bar ();
#endif
void
baz ()
{
foo ();
}
shows that without structured binding we rej
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
--- Comment #4 from Alex Coplan ---
Simplified testcase:
#include
int16_t f(int16x4_t b) {
return vaddvq_s16(vcombine_s16(b, vdup_n_s16 (0)));
}
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=98163
Johannes Larsen changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mail at johslarsen dot net
--- Comment
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Most like needs `types_match (@0, type)` added to the match pattern.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|target |tree-optimization
--- Comment #2 from A
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121749
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:2b8256d0ce18ed4d00868c78f5128d32884ccfa1
commit r16-3546-g2b8256d0ce18ed4d00868c78f5128d32884ccfa1
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121774
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121774
Bug ID: 121774
Summary: [14 Regression] expensive-optimizations produces wrong
results
Product: gcc
Version: 14.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
Alice Carlotti changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-03
Status|UNCONFIR
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121770
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pinskia at gcc dot gnu.org
Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121749
ktkachov at gcc dot gnu.org changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[14/15/16 Regression] |[14/15 Regression] aarch64:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121749
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Kyrylo Tkachov :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:cb508e54140687a50790059fac548d87515df6be
commit r16-3544-gcb508e54140687a50790059fac548d87515df6be
Author: Kyrylo Tkachov
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121768
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|ICE on valid code at|[16 Regression] ICE on
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121496
--- Comment #12 from Ted Lyngmo ---
Brilliant! Thanks!
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121655
Jakub Jelinek changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15/16 Regression]
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |13.5
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121773
Bug ID: 121773
Summary: Combine over-simplifies a subreg write
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: wrong-code
Severity: normal
Priority: P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=10
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 109576, which changed state.
Bug 109576 Summary: access checking done on constexpr even if the access was
done in the class itself when used inside a template
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109576
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=109576
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=9
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
Bug ID: 121772
Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression] aarch64: ICE (invalid gimple)
with vcombine since r13-1836-g8a1e05b7618fed
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55004
Bug 55004 depends on bug 96716, which changed state.
Bug 96716 Summary: GCC reports "object is private" when it's accessed through
proper accessor
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
What|Removed
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill |
|a/show_bug.cgi?id=96
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96716
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
See Also|https://gcc.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression] Weird
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
--- Comment #9 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:3e2077d8c7a0acba2d54bd0666ae578fe114cd72
commit r16-3543-g3e2077d8c7a0acba2d54bd0666ae578fe114cd72
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: We
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=106658
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2025-August/693665.html
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121768
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-03
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=110853
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|[13/14/15/16 Regression]|[13/14/15 Regression] Bad
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121771
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to fail||12.2.0, 13.1.0, 14.3.0,
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121771
Bug ID: 121771
Summary: [13/14/15/16 Regression] std::tuple CTAD fails for
lvalue reference to function type
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121770
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=114449
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rockeet at gmail dot com
--- Comment #6 fro
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121769
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121756
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Richard Biener :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:df64893e7082d7fae5d6863fd02371b37c78557f
commit r16-3542-gdf64893e7082d7fae5d6863fd02371b37c78557f
Author: Richard Biener
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121756
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120747
--- Comment #22 from Filip Kastl ---
Hmm, but the patch makes a few testsuite tests fail. So that would have to be
sorted out.
+FAIL: gcc.dg/optimize-bswapdi-3.c scan-tree-dump-times bswap "64 bit bswap
implementation found at" 3
+FAIL: gcc.dg
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121770
Bug ID: 121770
Summary: [16 Regression] 5% slowdown of 503.bwaves_r on Aarch64
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization, needs-bisection
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120775
--- Comment #5 from Jakub Jelinek ---
Created attachment 62293
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62293&action=edit
gcc16-p3394r4-wip.patch
Untested partial implementation of P3394R4, in particular the one which doesn't
depend
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121765
Tomasz Kamiński changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |tkaminsk at gcc dot
gnu.org
-
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=120747
--- Comment #21 from Filip Kastl ---
Created attachment 62292
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62292&action=edit
Patch removing stabilization "hacks" from sort_operands_by_rank()
So I gave this some more time.
I confirmed t
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121745
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Jonathan Wakely :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:c8a24f60b6874fca4fb3adb153f8d5f1dd72b951
commit r16-3541-gc8a24f60b6874fca4fb3adb153f8d5f1dd72b951
Author: Jonathan Wakely
Date:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=97740
Jason Merrill changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned a
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121769
Bug ID: 121769
Summary: gcc does not optimize manual bswap
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121758
Richard Biener changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
1 - 100 of 133 matches
Mail list logo
