https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |WAITING
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121821
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|bootstrap |target
Keywords|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121823
Alexander Monakov changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||amonakov at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121826
Bug ID: 121826
Summary: ICE on less constrainted partial specialization
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component:
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121808
Nathaniel Shead changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-06
Status|UNCONFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121825
Bug ID: 121825
Summary: ICE on coroutine return in lambda
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121824
Bug ID: 121824
Summary: side effects of expressions not done
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121823
Bug ID: 121823
Summary: float expressions not honor rounding
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121822
Bug ID: 121822
Summary: ICE in dependent_type_p with concept
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121821
Bug ID: 121821
Summary: [16 regression] profiledbootstrap fails to build on
armv8l since r16-496-gcc74e2f2b39b6d
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121820
Bug ID: 121820
Summary: [regression 16] gcc.dg/vect/vect-early-break_39.c
fails on aarch64 since r16-1001-g0291f53f8d2343
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121820
--- Comment #2 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 62327
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62327&action=edit
vect file for parent commit r16-1000-g225622398a9631
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121820
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||testsuite-fail
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121820
--- Comment #3 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 62328
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62328&action=edit
.s file for parent commit r16-1000-g225622398a9631
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121820
--- Comment #1 from Thiago Jung Bauermann
---
Created attachment 62326
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62326&action=edit
.s file for r16-1001-g0291f53f8d2343
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108355
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Known to work||16.0
Target Milestone|13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=96710
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||romain.geissler at amadeus dot
com
---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121819
--- Comment #2 from Andrew Pinski ---
r16-2190-g4faa42ac0dee2c26ed68f0df002837e7e1c95687 was the main change to do it
always rather than just strict mode.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121819
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121818
--- Comment #4 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62324
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62324&action=edit
arraytest.xnvptx-none.ii
here is the i file for that second version with where omp atomic gets different
res
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121818
--- Comment #3 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62323
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62323&action=edit
mathfunctions_mpi.h
mathfunctions_mpi.h with omp atomics on shared variables of teams distribute
parallel f
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121819
Bug ID: 121819
Summary: Shall std::is_integral/make_signed/make_unsigned
always be defined for int128 ?
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severi
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121818
--- Comment #2 from Benjamin Schulz ---
hi, no it turned out that when i remove the reduction, i just get large
numerical errors but it is still not correct.
When I, however, remove the reduction clauses and use shared for the reduction
variabl
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56456
Bug 56456 depends on bug 102690, which changed state.
Bug 102690 Summary: [13/14/15 regression] g++.dg/warn/Warray-bounds-16.C fails
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
What|Removed |Added
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=102690
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Target Milestone|13.5
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #13 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #12)
> >* GCC + libc++: fails, because it uses the failing C header
>
> This sounds like a bug in libc++ for not providing a C++26 header.
They may argue otherwis
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=108466
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
Created attachment 62322
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62322&action=edit
Patch which I am testing
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121818
--- Comment #1 from Benjamin Schulz ---
Created attachment 62321
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62321&action=edit
arraylibrary.tar.gz
sourcecode of the arraylibrary. again, if you remove
the reduction(+:tmp)
in line 1610
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121818
Bug ID: 121818
Summary: miscompilation of parallel for reduction on nvptx
target in a cholesky decomposition
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
S
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121817
Bug ID: 121817
Summary: iseqsig( 0.DD, 1.DD ) will not compile
Product: gcc
Version: 15.2.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121817
--- Comment #3 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #2)
> Yes this is libdfp bug which does not provide a version of iseqsig which
> works. iseqsig is new in C23.
Report it to them via https://github.com/libdfp/libdfp/
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121817
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121817
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
Using __builtin_iseqsig works. So this might be a libdfp bug.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=14708
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |15.0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=94852
--- Comment #8 from Andrew Pinski ---
The documentation has been improved slightly:
https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Optimize-Options.html#index-ffloat-store
To mention that -fexcess-precision=standard should be used instead:
Do not store flo
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121816
Bug ID: 121816
Summary: Disappointments has an old reference to ffloat-store
still
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: documentation
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|WAITING
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121809
--- Comment #2 from Fred J. Tydeman ---
Bug 121807 has the output of gcc -v and the command line flags.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121815
Bug ID: 121815
Summary: memcmp should expand inline when the len is [0,1]
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: missed-optimization
Severity: enhancem
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #12 from Andrew Pinski ---
>* GCC + libc++: fails, because it uses the failing C header
This sounds like a bug in libc++ for not providing a C++26 header.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #15 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:070e691dc0a926bade74e21940bd90ab41462a36
commit r16-3609-g070e691dc0a926bade74e21940bd90ab41462a36
Author: Sam James
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #11 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #7)
> Use a configure time test instead of a compile time one.
Configure-time tests aren't good for libraries, when the idea is to use the
content in our own heade
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121806
Sam James changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121806
--- Comment #4 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Sam James :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:6b008944e7bc3a342a734c4fcf1001d63fd0a6f8
commit r16-3608-g6b008944e7bc3a342a734c4fcf1001d63fd0a6f8
Author: Andre Vehreschild
Date: T
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121801
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Last reconfirmed|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121809
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Last reconfirmed||2025-09-05
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
--- Comment #8 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to Mikael Morin from comment #6)
> (In reply to kargls from comment #3)
> >idx = [(i,i=1,8)]
> >e%data = idx
> >dd=>e%data
> >array_sum = sum(idx(dd))
> ...
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121806
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Ever confirmed|0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #11 from Andrew Pinski ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> Also read
> https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3292r0.html . This
> area is a mess that writing out a pointer to some string and then rea
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121807
Vincent Lefèvre changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||vincent-gcc at vinc17 dot net
--- Com
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||wrong-code
--- Comment #6 from Andrew P
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #8 from liwei ---
Created attachment 62319
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62319&action=edit
New version with some bug fixed, but exception still throw
Thanks for the comments from @Jonathan Wakely. I have updat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #1 from Jonathan Wakely ---
=
==204691==ERROR: AddressSanitizer: stack-buffer-overflow on address
0x7b3d11a00058 at pc 0x7f3d14a4b2cf bp 0x7ffe75781ae0 sp 0x7ffe757812b0
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #12 from liwei ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #11)
> (In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #6)
> > Also read
> > https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3292r0.html . This
> > area is a mess that writ
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #10 from liwei ---
@Andrew Pinski : Thanks for the comments. In fact the code I present is just a
mimic of one gcc test:
https://github.com/gcc-mirror/gcc/blob/41ea9305466ce54027324258aeae9893101941db/libstdc%2B%2B-v3/testsuite/27_
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
liwei changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |---
Status|RESOLVED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #7 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> And __s += *c not __s += c;
>
> Don't you want to append single characters, not a char* that isn't even
> null-terminated?
of course the whole loop could b
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #6 from Andrew Pinski ---
Also read https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3292r0.html
. This area is a mess that writing out a pointer to some string and then
reading it back might actually not work.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #5 from liwei ---
Comment on attachment 62318
--> https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=62318
The file that can re-pro the issue
>#include
>#include
>#include
>#include
>
>void put(std::string& __s, const void* __vv)
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #4 from Jonathan Wakely ---
(In reply to Jonathan Wakely from comment #3)
> Also, stop using names like _UIntPtrType and __s, those are reserved names.
See https://stackoverflow.com/q/228783/981959
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
Status|UNCONFIRME
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
--- Comment #2 from Jonathan Wakely ---
for (auto c = __cs; c < __cs + __ilen; ++c)
__s += c;
Shouldn't that be __len not __ilen?
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121510
--- Comment #6 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Robin Dapp :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:a6bf07653cd272add46a2218ec141c95d7f02427
commit r16-3607-ga6bf07653cd272add46a2218ec141c95d7f02427
Author: Robin Dapp
Date: Fri Sep
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121814
Bug ID: 121814
Summary: Optimization has changed the code behavior
Product: gcc
Version: 13.3.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
--- Comment #7 from Mikael Morin ---
(In reply to federico from comment #5)
>
> from my limited understanding the array version does not have a `dd.offset +
> ` term that was set as `dd.offset = -1;`,
This is expected.
offset is used for user i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
Mikael Morin changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||mikael at gcc dot gnu.org
--- Comment #6
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121813
Bug ID: 121813
Summary: [OpenMP] omp_target_is_accessible too simplistic -
false positive and false negative
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Key
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121757
--- Comment #14 from GCC Commits ---
The trunk branch has been updated by Richard Sandiford :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:168cdfd137abacb2a227c4242d7a8c87270f22d4
commit r16-3605-g168cdfd137abacb2a227c4242d7a8c87270f22d4
Author: Richard Sandiford
D
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121812
Bug ID: 121812
Summary: [OpenMP] 'Contruct' context selector handling with
'declare variant'
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: openmp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
--- Comment #5 from federico ---
Thanks a lot for checking this Steve. I re-enabled the loop version to see what
it does in the tree dump and I see
```
loop_sum = idx[(integer(kind=8)) *(integer(kind=4) *) (dd.data + (sizetype)
((dd.offset + (
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #10 from Jonathan Wakely ---
On the other hand, if I'm going to go to all the trouble of adding a new header
then I might as well just backport r15-8036-gd4c7de7dc925e7 and add the working
header to gcc-14.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=118485
Matthias Klose changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Jonathan Wakely changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |redi at gcc dot gnu.org
Last
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121804
--- Comment #3 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Patrick Palka :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:8e971d665a9922a73de3a37ec8e04aea975e0993
commit r16-3604-g8e971d665a9922a73de3a37ec8e04aea975e0993
Author: Patrick Palka
Date: F
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121804
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Target Milestone|--- |16.0
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|WONTFIX |FIXED
Target Milestone|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121772
--- Comment #5 from Alex Coplan ---
Here's a fully-preprocessed reduced testcase; not for the testsuite, but just
to enable debugging with a cc1 cross:
typedef __Int16x4_t int16x4_t;
typedef __Int16x8_t int16x8_t;
short f(int16x4_t va) {
int1
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #7 from Andrew Pinski ---
Use a configure time test instead of a compile time one.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WONTFIX
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #4 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Andrew Pinski from comment #1)
> It is a c only header ...
>
> C++ does not define it yet.
No, it is C++26 with
https://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2024/p3161r2.html, which i
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
--- Comment #4 from kargls at comcast dot net ---
(In reply to kargls from comment #3)
>
> program pointer_array_to_struct
>
>implicit none
>
>type str
> integer data
> integer(1) a
>end type
>
>type(str), target
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #5 from Thiago Macieira ---
(In reply to Thiago Macieira from comment #4)
> If you're not going to fix the C header, can you please add an empty
> libstdc++ header so that __STDC_VERSION_STDCKDINT_H__ won't get #define'd?
Or wrap th
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Thiago Macieira changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFI
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Andrew Pinski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121805
kargls at comcast dot net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||kargls at comcast dot net
--
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
--- Comment #1 from Andrew Pinski ---
It is a c only header ...
C++ does not define it yet.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121811
Bug ID: 121811
Summary: stdckdint.h fails to compile in C++26 mode in GCC 14
Product: gcc
Version: 14.3.1
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Comp
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=34678
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzill
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121807
Xi Ruoyao changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
CC|
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121810
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121810
Richard Earnshaw changed:
What|Removed |Added
Assignee|unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org |rearnsha at gcc dot
gnu.org
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121804
Patrick Palka changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |ASSIGNED
Assignee|unassigned
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121810
Bug ID: 121810
Summary: Out-of-range literal pool entry for MVE const vector
Product: gcc
Version: 16.0
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Keywords: assemble-failure
Severity: normal
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121652
--- Comment #17 from Aurelien Jarno ---
(In reply to Jeffrey A. Law from comment #16)
> WRT c#13, yes, it's worth it, the performance gains were huge. Of course if
> we look out Zfa should become ubiquitious and that other path won't matter.
>
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121290
--- Comment #22 from Tamar Christina ---
(In reply to Ramana Radhakrishnan from comment #17)
>
>
> (In reply to Tamar Christina from comment #16)
> > (In reply to Soumya AR from comment #13)
> > > Hi Tamar,
> > >
> > > Thanks for the fix.
> >
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121807
--- Comment #2 from Fred J. Tydeman ---
Using built-in specs.
COLLECT_GCC=gcc
COLLECT_LTO_WRAPPER=/usr/libexec/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/15/lto-wrapper
OFFLOAD_TARGET_NAMES=
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121652
--- Comment #16 from Jeffrey A. Law ---
WRT c#13, yes, it's worth it, the performance gains were huge. Of course if we
look out Zfa should become ubiquitious and that other path won't matter. But
we're not at that point yet IMHO.
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=121695
--- Comment #8 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:052c1d8284b1eb16474473b341fd83f99e8664c8
commit r16-3601-g052c1d8284b1eb16474473b341fd83f99e8664c8
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=52641
--- Comment #38 from GCC Commits ---
The master branch has been updated by Georg-Johann Lay :
https://gcc.gnu.org/g:052c1d8284b1eb16474473b341fd83f99e8664c8
commit r16-3601-g052c1d8284b1eb16474473b341fd83f99e8664c8
Author: Georg-Johann Lay
Dat
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
