rea, like comp.std.c++ or comp.lang.c++.moderated, thanks.
--
Giovanni Bajo
u online compiler, etc.) so to report issues which are more likely real
GCC bugs.
Thanks anyway for taking the time of reporting this issue!
--
Giovanni Bajo
w_bug.cgi?id=21230
Giovanni Bajo
.
With GCC 3.4.3, I get this error trying to compile bug.cc:
bug.cc: In function `int _()':
bug.cc:1: error: expected `(' before numeric constant
--
Giovanni Bajo
CE
> HACKING (thats because I write to gcc-BUGS mailing list)) to generate
> C++ code with this tipical errors FIXED? I ask just because I see,
> gcc does collect all SUFFICIENT (enough) INFO to FIX that tipical
> erros.
GCC is not able to reproduce the C++ source code it compiles on the output, let
alone modified. Just fix the bugs in your code like everyone else does :)
Giovanni Bajo
warns for expressions like "(cast*)&decl", but
"(cast*)array_decl" is also something to warn about.
This is a possible enhancement. Would you please file a bug report in Bugzilla
about this?
Thanks,
Giovanni Bajo
Lee-Thorp, Andrew wrote:
> GCC 3.4.2 selects an 'unavailable' function overload.
> Platform is Cygwin on Windows 2000.
Please, submit a bug report through our Bugzilla interface
(http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla).
Thanks.
Giovanni Bajo
