[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

2014-04-22 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jobst.Ziebell

[Bug libstdc++/55817] [C++11] void return value in std::vectorT::insert() c++11 should be an iterator

2014-04-22 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817 Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED

[Bug libstdc++/56019] max_align_t should be in std namespace

2014-04-22 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019 --- Comment #5 from Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de --- I would propose adding something like #ifdef _GCC_MAX_ALIGN_T ... #endif around the 'using' declaration. (Though I really have no idea whatsoever off gcc internals...)

[Bug c++/43407] Specifying visibility attribute of C++0x enum class emits warning

2014-02-02 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43407 Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed: What|Removed |Added CC||Jobst.Ziebell

[Bug libstdc++/55817] New: void return value in std::vectorT::insert() c++11 should be an iterator

2012-12-27 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817 Bug #: 55817 Summary: void return value in std::vectorT::insert() c++11 should be an iterator Classification: Unclassified Product: gcc Version: 4.7.1 Status:

[Bug libstdc++/55817] void return value in std::vectorT::insert() c++11 should be an iterator

2012-12-27 Thread Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817 --- Comment #1 from Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de 2012-12-27 16:32:32 UTC --- Created attachment 29055 -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29055 The testcase