http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019
Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Jobst.Ziebell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=56019
--- Comment #5 from Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de ---
I would propose adding something like
#ifdef _GCC_MAX_ALIGN_T
...
#endif
around the 'using' declaration.
(Though I really have no idea whatsoever off gcc internals...)
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=43407
Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||Jobst.Ziebell
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
Bug #: 55817
Summary: void return value in std::vectorT::insert() c++11
should be an iterator
Classification: Unclassified
Product: gcc
Version: 4.7.1
Status:
http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=55817
--- Comment #1 from Jobst.Ziebell at mailbox dot tu-dresden.de 2012-12-27
16:32:32 UTC ---
Created attachment 29055
-- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=29055
The testcase