[Bug preprocessor/45696] New: Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: preprocessor AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug preprocessor/45696] Continuation character gets lost or not taken into account

--- Comment #2 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-09-17 00:04 --- I don't understand why the continuation character should be removed. For the C parser that character is not special (only for the C preprocessor it is), nor it confuses its line number accountancy. Or am I

[Bug target/45029] New: Buffer overflow in *push_multi pattern

org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-riscos http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45029

[Bug target/45029] Buffer overflow in *push_multi pattern

--- Comment #1 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-22 12:53 --- Created an attachment (id=21282) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21282action=view) Proposed patch to fix the buffer overflow. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=45029

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

--- Comment #3 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-18 17:11 --- I'm updating my port for 4.6trunk and this gcc problem is still there. My suggested patch in comment #1 is still applicable and attached it after having brought up-to-date for trunk. ChangeLog: John Tytgat

[Bug middle-end/31980] ICE in cancel_option() for Negative marked options

--- Comment #4 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-18 17:13 --- Created an attachment (id=21241) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=21241action=view) Fix ICE in cancel_option() by repreventing a recursive call for Negative marked option -- http

[Bug libstdc++/44902] eh_arm.cc:42:23: error: declaration of '__cxxabiv1::__cxa_type_match_result __cxa_type_match(_Unwind_Control_Block*, const std::type_info*, bool, void**)' with C language linkage

--- Comment #5 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-17 21:24 --- Patch attachment 21195 fixes reported problem as well (4.6 cross with target arm-unknown-eabi). Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44902

[Bug c/44974] New: Function with attribute noreturn omits a call to another function with noreturn

Version: 4.6.0 Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown

[Bug libstdc++/44902] eh_arm.cc:42:23: error: declaration of '__cxxabiv1::__cxa_type_match_result __cxa_type_match(_Unwind_Control_Block*, const std::type_info*, bool, void**)' with C language linkage

--- Comment #3 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2010-07-13 20:32 --- I can confirm that it is because of the use of --enable-maintainer-mode we get an error instead of a warning. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=44902

[Bug libstdc++/44902] New: eh_arm.cc:42:23: error: declaration of '__cxxabiv1::__cxa_type_match_result __cxa_type_match(_Unwind_Control_Block*, const std::type_info*, bool, void**)' with C language l

Priority: P3 Component: libstdc++ AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net GCC build triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC host triplet: x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-eabi http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug target/30192] [arm] Wrong sp value on exit after calling __floatdidf or __floatundidf

--- Comment #7 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2007-12-16 13:04 --- Indeed fixed thanks. -- John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net changed: What|Removed |Added

[Bug preprocessor/32564] [libcpp] ICE in print_location() when stat() in remove_duplicates() fails

--- Comment #2 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2007-11-02 10:58 --- My suggested patch breaks warning/error reporting as it no longer outputs the src filename and linenumber where those warnings/errors are happening (something I just now realise). -- http://gcc.gnu.org

[Bug c/32564] New: [libcpp] ICE in print_location() when stat() in remove_duplicates() fails

ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32564

[Bug c/32564] [libcpp] ICE in print_location() when stat() in remove_duplicates() fails

--- Comment #1 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2007-06-30 15:02 --- Created an attachment (id=13807) -- (http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=13807action=view) Suggested fix -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=32564

[Bug c/31980] New: ICE in cancel_option()

Priority: P3 Component: c AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=31980

[Bug target/30192] [arm] Wrong sp value on exit after calling __floatdidf or __floatundidf

--- Comment #3 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2006-12-13 22:01 --- Proposed patch works fine. Interworking safeness isn't important for my target so that's why didn't consider your approach. Thanks. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30192

[Bug target/30192] [arm] Wrong sp value on exit after calling __floatdidf or __floatundidf

--- Comment #4 from John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net 2006-12-13 22:03 --- Just to avoid confusion, in comment #3 I was talking about patch with id 12793, not mine. I've tested it and works equally well. -- http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30192

[Bug target/30192] New: [arm] Wrong sp value on exit after calling __floatdidf or __floatundidf

AssignedTo: unassigned at gcc dot gnu dot org ReportedBy: John dot Tytgat at aaug dot net GCC target triplet: arm-unknown-riscos http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30192