https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=81950
Judy Ward changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|_GLIBCXX17 macro not used |_GLIBCXX17_INLINEmacro not
++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Judy.Ward at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
The macro _GLIBCXX17_INLINE is used in most places in the headers to represent
the need for the c++17 inline variable feature. This makes it useful to
compilers (like the Intel
https://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=71035
--- Comment #2 from Judy Ward ---
Yes I have a beta copy of EDG
4.11 which has relaxed constexpr and they give an error. Unfortunately some
Boost code (I think inadvertently) relies on not giving a diagnostic.
Yes I see your point that this is
Severity: normal
Priority: P3
Component: c++
Assignee: unassigned at gcc dot gnu.org
Reporter: Judy.Ward at intel dot com
Target Milestone: ---
Both EDG and Clang give an error on the code below.
GNU only gives an error if call() is not a template function (see
